Separating real from fake: Building news literacy with the Frayer Model

References and suggested readings

• Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211–236. doi: 10.1257/jep.31.2.211
   Google Scholar
• Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., Norman, M. K., & Mayer, R. E. (2010). How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching (1st ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Barthel, M., & Mitchell, A. (2017, May 10). Americans’ attitudes about the news media deeply divided along partisan lines. Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/2017/05/10/americans-attitudes-about-the-news-media-deeply-divided-along-partisan-lines/
   Google Scholar
• Barthel, M., Mitchell, A., & Holcomb, J. (2016, December 15). Many Americans believe fake news is sowing confusion. Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/2016/12/15/many-americans-believe-fake-news-is-sowing-confusion/
   Google Scholar
• Borel, B. (2017, January 4). Fact-checking won’t save us from fake news. Retrieved from https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/fact-checking-wont-save-us-from-fake-news/
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington: National Academy of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Donovan, B. M. (2017). Learned inequality: Racial labels in the biology curriculum can affect the development of racial prejudice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(3), 379–411. doi: 10.1002/tea.21370
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, J. (2014). Media literacy, news literacy, or news appreciation? A case study of the news literacy program at stony brook university. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 69(2), 146–165. doi:10.1177/1077695813517885
   Google Scholar
• Frayer, D. A., Fredrick, W. C., & Klausmeier, H. J. (1969). A schema for testing the level of concept mastery. Wisconsin Univ. Research & Development Center for Cognitive Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, S. C. (2002). Making words matter: Vocabulary study in the content areas. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 75(5), 258–263. doi: 10.1080/00098650209603951
   Google Scholar
• Harada, V. H. (2016). The power of place-based learning: Caring for our island Earth. Teacher Librarian, 44(2), 8–12.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs, R. (2011). News literacy: What not to do. Nieman Reports. Retrieved from http://niemanreports.org/articles/news-literacy-what-not-to-do/
   Google Scholar
• Keeley, P. (2013). Formative assessment probes: Is it a rock? Continuous formative assessment. Science and Children, 50(8), 34–37.
   Google Scholar
• Kibby, M. W. (1995). The organization and teaching of things and the words that signify them. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 39(3), 208–223.
   Google Scholar
• Maksl, A., Craft, S., Ashley, S., & Miller, D. (2017). The usefulness of a news media literacy measure in evaluating a news literacy curriculum. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 72(2), 228–241. doi: 10.1177/1077695816651970
   Google Scholar
• Marchi, R. (2012). With Facebook, blogs, and fake news, teens reject journalistic “objectivity”. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 36(3), 246–262. doi: 10.1177/0196859912458700
   Google Scholar
• Marty, J. (2016). Vocabulary instruction: The effectiveness of the Frayer Model for Level 2 and 3 ELLs in first through third grade. Macomb, IL: Western Illinois University.
   Google Scholar
• Monroe, E. E., & Pendergrass, M. R. (1997). Effects of mathematical vocabulary instruction of fourth grade students. Reading Improvement, 34, 120–132.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, J., Boon, R. T., & Spencer, V. G. (2014). Effects of concept mapping instruction on the vocabulary acquisition skills of seventh-graders with mild disabilities: A replication study. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 30(2), 165–182. doi: 10.1080/10573569.2013.818890
   Google Scholar
• Peters, C. W. (1974). A comparison between the Frayer Model of concept attainment and the textbook approach to concept attainment (abstract). Reading Research Quarterly, 10(2), 252–254. doi: 10.2307/747186
   Google Scholar
• Petranová, D., Hossová, M., & Velický, P. (2017). Current development trends of media literacy in European Union countries. Communication Today, 8(1), 52–65.
   Google Scholar
• RobbGrieco, M., & Hobbs, R. (2013). A field guide to media literacy education in the United States. Harrington School of Communication and Media: University of Rhode Island. Retrieved from http://mediaeducationlab.com/sites/mediaeducationlab.com/files/Field%20Guide%20to%20Media%20Literacy%20.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Shoemaker, P. J., & Reese, S. D. (2014). Mediating the message in the 21st century: A media sociology perspective (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Swift, A. (2016, September 14). Americans’ trust in mass media sinks to new low. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/poll/195542/americans-trust-mass-media-sinks-new-low.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Wineburg, S., & McGrew, S. (2017, October 6). Lateral reading: Reading less and learning more when evaluating digital information. Stanford History Education Group Working Paper No. 2017-A1. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3048994
   Google Scholar