Using the theory of planned behaviour to understand cyberbullying: The importance of beliefs for developing interventions

REFERENCES

• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (2011). Constructing a theory of planned behaviour questionnaire. Retrieved from http://people.umass.edu/aizen/pdf/tpb.measurement.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bartholomew, L. K., Parcel, G. S., Kok, G., Gottlieb, N. H., & Fernandez, M. E. (2011). Planning health promotion programs. An intervention mapping approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Berne, S., Frisén, A., Schultze-Krumbholz, A., Scheithauer, H., Naruskov, K., Luik, P., & …Zukauskiene, R. (2013). Cyberbullying assessment instruments: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18, 320–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conner, M., Sheeran, P., Norman, P., & Armitage, C. J. (2000). Temporal stability as a moderator of relationships in the theory of planned behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 469–493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanti, K. A., Demetriou, A. G., & Hawa, V. V. (2012). A longitudinal study of cyberbullying: Examining risk and protective factors. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 168–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festl, R., Scharkow, M., & Quandt, T. (2013). Peer influence, internet use and cyberbullying: A comparison of different context effects among German adolescents. Journal of Children and Media, 7(4), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2011). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Garson, G. D. (2013). Hierarchical linear modeling. Guide and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gerrard, M., Gibbons, F. X., Houlihan, A. E., Stock, M. L., & Pomery, E. A. (2008). A dual-process approach to health risk decision making: The prototype willingness model. Developmental Review, 28, 29–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heirman, W., & Walrave, M. (2012). Predicting adolescent perpetration in cyberbullying: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Psicothema, 24, 614–620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. (2013). Social influences on cyberbullying behaviors among middle and high school students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 711–722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kindermann, T. A., Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., & Duffy, A. (2010). Capturing the peer context. Common themes and synergies. Journal of Adolescence, 33, 891–895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• König, A., Gollwitzer, M., & Steffgen, G. (2010). Cyberbullying as an act of revenge?Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 20, 210–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalski, R. M., & Limber, S. P. (2007). Electronic bullying among middle school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(6, Supplement 1), S22–S30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, D. M., Shapka, J. D., Domene, J. F., & Gagné, M. H. (2012). Are cyberbullies really bullies? An investigation of reactive and proactive online aggression. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 664–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menesini, E., Nocentini, A., & Camodeca, M. (2013). Morality, values, traditional bullying, and cyberbullying in adolescence. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 31(1), 1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishna, F., Cook, C., Gadalla, T., Daciuk, J., & Solomon, S. (2010). Cyber bullying behaviors among middle and high school students. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 80, 362–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mplus. (6.11) [Computer software]. http://www.statmodel.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Perren, S., & Gutzwiller-Helfenfinger, E. (2012). Cyberbullying and traditional bullying in adolescence: Differential roles of moral disengagement, moral emotions, and moral values. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 195–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pornari, C. D., & Wood, J. (2010). Peer and cyber aggression in secondary school students: The role of moral disengagement, hostile attribution bias, and outcome expectancies. Aggressive Behavior, 36, 81–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raskauskas, J., & Stoltz, A. D. (2007). Involvement in traditional and electronic bullying among adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 43, 564–575.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., & Tippet, N. (2008). Cyberbullying: its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49, 376–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandebosch, H., & Van Cleemput, K. (2009). Cyberbullying among youngsters: Profiles of bullies and victims. New Media & Society, 11, 1349–1371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade, A., & Beran, T. (2011). Cyberbullying: The new era of bullying. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 26, 44–61.
   Google Scholar
• Walrave, M., & Heirman, W. (2010). Towards understanding the potential triggering features of technology. In S.Shariff & A. H.Churchill (Eds.), Truths and myths of cyber-bullying. International perspectives on stakeholder responsibility and children's safety (pp. 28–49). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, K. R., & Guerra, N. G. (2007). Prevalence and predictors of internet bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(6, Supplement 1), S14–S21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, M. F., & Li, Y. (2013). Normative beliefs about aggression and cyber aggression among young adults: A longitudinal investigation. Aggressive Behavior, 39, 161–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yzer, M. (2012). The integrated model of behavioral prediction as a tool for designing health messages. In H.Cho (Ed.), Health Communication Message Design: Theory and Practice (pp. 21–40). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar