Improving Teaching Practice Through Interdisciplinary Dialog

REFERENCES

• Boix Mansilla, V., & Dawes Duraisingh, E. (2007). Targeted assessment of students' interdisciplinary work: An empirically grounded framework proposed. The Journal of Higher Education, 78, 215–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15. https://doi.org/doi:10.3102/0013189X033008003.
   Google Scholar
• Borrego, M., & Cutler, S. (2010). Constructive alignment of interdisciplinary graduate curriculum in engineering and science: An analysis of successful IGERT proposals. Journal of Engineering Education, 99, 355–369. https://doi.org/doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01068.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers' professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38, 181–189. https://doi.org/doi:10.3102/0013189X08331140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost, S., & Jean, P. (2003). Bridging the disciplines: Interdisciplinary discourse and faculty scholarship. The Journal of Higher Education, 74, 119–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, M. L. (2005). Researcher as teacher: Lessons modeled by a well-remembered scholar. Studying Teacher Education, 1, 85–102. https://doi.org/doi:10.1080/17425960500040122.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, M. L., Smith, L., & Worthington, K. (2008). Fitting the methodology with the research: An exploration of narrative, self-study and auto-ethnography. Studying Teacher Education, 4, 17–28. https://doi.org/doi:10.1080.17425960801976321.
   Google Scholar
• Hug, B., & Möller, K. J. (2005). Collaboration and connectedness in two teacher educators' shared self-study. Studying Teacher Education, 1, 123–140. https://doi.org/doi:10.1080/17425960500288309.
   Google Scholar
• Isaacs, W. N. (1993). Dialogue, collective thinking, and organizational learning. Sloan Management Review, 22, 24–39.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchen, J., Ciuffetelli Parker, D., & Gallagher, T. (2008). Authentic conversation as faculty development: Establishing a self-study group in an education college. Studying Teacher Education, 4, 157–171. https://doi.org/doi:10.1080/17425960802433637.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, J. T. (2001). Interdisciplinarity and the prospect of complexity: The tests of theory. Issues in Integrative Studies, 19, 43–57.
   Google Scholar
• LaBoskey, V. K. (2004). The methodology of self-study and its theoretical underpinnings. In J. J.Loughran, M. L.Hamilton, V. K.LaBoskey, & T.Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 817–869). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Loughran, J. (2007). Researching teacher education practices: Responding to the challenges, demands, and expectations of self-study. Journal of Teacher Education, 58, 12–20. https://doi.org/doi:10.1177/002248710629617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolin, I. (2008). Creating collegial relationships: A precondition and product of self-study. Studying Teacher Education, 4, 173–186. https://doi.org/doi:10.1080/17425960802433645.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook: Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, W. H. (2001). A theory of interdisciplinary studies. Issues in Integrative Studies, 19, 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Orgnero, M. C. (2007). Students' perceptions, interpretations, and applications of feedback in a first year English composition course (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
   Google Scholar
• Page, R. N. (2000). The turn inward in qualitative research. In B. M.Brizuela, J. P.Stewart, R. G.Carrillo, & J. B.Berger (Eds.), Acts of inquiry in qualitative research (pp. 3–16). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Educational Review Reprint Series.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, S. E., Hart, J., & Weaver, T. D. (2010). Delusions and qualitative confusions: A dialogic collaborative exploration. Qualitative Health Research, 20, 1008–1018. https://doi.org/doi:10.1177/1049732310363805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulus, T. M., Woodside, M., & Ziegler, M. (2008). Extending the conversation: Qualitative research as dialogic collaborative process. The Qualitative Report, 13, 226–243. Retrieved from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR13-2/paulus.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pólya, G. (1945). How to solve it. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, A. C., Garet, M. S., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Suk Yoon, K. (2000). Does professional development change teaching practice? Results from a three-year study. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Repko, A. F. (2008). Interdisciplinary research: Process and theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Repko, A. F., Newell, W. H., & Szostak, R. (Eds.). (2011). Case studies in interdisciplinary research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rodgers, C. (2002a). Defining reflection: Another look at John Dewey and reflective thinking. Teachers College Record, 104, 842–866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodgers, C. (2002b). Seeing student learning: Teacher change and the role of reflection. Harvard Educational Review, 72, 230–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, T., & Schuck, S. (2004). How critical are critical friends and how critical should they be? In D.Tidwell, L.Fitzgerald, & M.Heston (Eds.), Proceedings of the fifth international conference on self-study of teacher education practices (pp. 213–216). Cedar Falls: University of Northern Iowa.
   Google Scholar
• Sill, D. (2001). Integrative thinking, synthesis, and creativity in interdisciplinary studies. JGE: The Journal of General Education, 50, 288–311.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tobin, K., & Roth, W. M. (2005). Implementing coteaching and cogenerative dialoguing in urban science education. School Science and Mathematics, 105, 313–322. https://doi.org/doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2005.tb18132.x.
   Google Scholar
• Truxaw, M. P., Cardetti, F., & Bushey, C. A. (2010). Expertise3: Outcomes of instructor collaboration on elementary teacher education in mathematics. NERA conference proceedings 2010 (paper 12). Retrieved from http://www.digitalcommons.uconn.edu/nera_2010/12.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, M., & Wray, A. (2011). Scholarly reading as a model for scholarly writing. In T.Rocco & T.Hatcher (Eds.), The handbook of scholarly writing and publishing (pp. 44–61). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar