References

• Bain, R.B. (2012). Using disciplinary literacy to develop coherence in history teacher education: The clinical rounds project. History Teacher, 45(4), 513–532.
   Google Scholar
• Bamberger, J., & diSessa, A.A. (2003). Music as embodied mathematics: A study of a mutually informing affinity. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 8(2), 123–160.
   Google Scholar
• Bowman, C.L., & McCormick, S. (2000). Comparison of peer coaching versus traditional supervision effects. The Journal of Educational Research, 93(4), 256–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray, L. (2009). Going bovine. New York, NY: Delacorte Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruce, C.D., & Ross, J.A. (2008). A model for increasing reform implementation and teacher efficacy: Teacher peer coaching in grades 3 and 6 mathematics. Canadian Journal of Education, 31(2), 346–370.
   Google Scholar
• Buehl, D. (2009). Classroom strategies for interactive learning (3rd ed.). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Cardetti, F.A., & Orgnero, M.C. (2013). Improving teaching practice through interdisciplinary dialog. Studying Teacher Education, 9(3), 251–266.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., & Dudley-Marling, C. (2012). Diversity in teacher education and special education: The issues that divide. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(4), 237–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cockrell, K., Placier, P., Burgoyne, S., Welch, S., & Cockrell, D. (2002). Theater of the oppressed as a self-study process: Understanding ourselves as actors in teacher education classrooms. In C. Kosnik, A. Freese, & A. Samaras (Eds.), Making a difference in teacher education through self-study (Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Self-Study of Teacher Education Practices, pp. 43–47). Toronto, ON: OISE/University of Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• de Bono, E. (1995). Serious creativity. The Journal for Quality and Participation, 18(5), 12–18.
   Google Scholar
• Draper, R.J. (2008). Redefining content-area literacy teacher education: Finding my voice through collaboration. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 60–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Draper, R.J., & Siebert, D. (2004). Different goals, similar practices: Making sense of the mathematics and literacy instruction in a standards-based mathematics classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 41(4), 927–962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Draper, R.J., & Siebert, D. (2010). Rethinking texts, literacies, and literacy across the curriculum. In R.J. Draper, P. Broomhead, A.P. Jensen, J.D. Nokes, & D. Siebert (Eds.), (Re) imagining content-area literacy instruction (pp. 20–39). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gemmell, T., Griffiths, M., & Kibble, B. (2010). What kind of research culture do teacher educators want, and how can we get it? Studying Teacher Education, 6(2), 161–174.
   Google Scholar
• Goker, S.D. (2006). Impact of peer coaching on self-efficacy and instructional skills in TEFL teacher education. System, 34, 239–254.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, L., & McKeen, R.L. (1989). Increased professionalism in the work environment of teachers through peer coaching. Education, 109(3), 310–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, H.S., Vomvoridi-Ivanović, E., Jacobs, J., Karanxha, Z., Lypka, A., Topdemir, C., & Feldman, A. (2014). Culturally responsive pedagogy in higher education: A collaborative self-study. Studying Teacher Education, 10(3), 290–312.
   Google Scholar
• Hardré, P.L., Ling, C., Shehab, R.L., Nanny, M.A., Nollert, M.U., Refai, H., … Wollega, E.D. (2013). Teachers in an interdisciplinary learning community: Engaging, integrating, and strengthening K-12 education. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(5), 409–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller, R., & Greenleaf, C. (2007). Literacy instruction in the content areas: Getting to the core of middle and high school improvement. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education. Retrieved from https://all4ed.org/reports-factsheets/literacy-instruction-in-the-content-areas-getting-to-the-core-of-middle-and-high-school-improvement/
   Google Scholar
• Hug, B., & Möller, K.J. (2005). Collaboration and connectedness in two teacher educators’ shared self-study. Studying Teacher Education, 1(2), 123–140.
   Google Scholar
• Huston, T., & Weaver, C.L. (2008). Peer coaching: Professional development for experienced faculty. Innovative Higher Education, 33, 5–20.
   Google Scholar
• Jewett, P., & MacPhee, D. (2012). Adding collaborative peer coaching to our teaching identities. The Reading Teacher, 66(2), 105–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, H., Watson, P.A., Delahunty, T., McSwiggen, P., & Smith, T. (2011). What it is they do: Differentiating knowledge and literacy practices across content disciplines. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 55(2), 100–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (2002). Student achievement through staff development (3rd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2000). Participatory action research. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 567–606). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kluth, P., & Straut, D. (2003). Do as we say and as we do teaching and modeling collaborative practice in the university classroom. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(3), 228–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, S.L., Lloyd, G.M., Arbaugh, F., Edmondson, J., Nolan, J., Jr., McDonald, S.P., & Whitney, A.E. (2013). Talking across the disciplines. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(5), 376–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohler, F.W., Ezell, H.K., & Paluselli, M. (1999). Promoting changes in teachers’ conduct of student pair activities: An examination of reciprocal peer coaching. The Journal of Special Education, 33(3), 154–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtz, G., (Producer), & Lucas, G., (Producer/Director). (1977). Star wars [Motion Picture]. Los Angeles, CA: Twentieth Century Fox.
   Google Scholar
• LaBoskey, V.K. (2007). The methodology of self-study and its theoretical underpinnings. In J.J. Loughran, M.L. Hamilton, V.K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 817–869). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, B.L.M., Thomas, E.E., Drago, K., & Rex, L.A. (2013). Examining studies of inquiry-based learning in three fields of education: Sparking generative conversation. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(5), 387–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsyte, R. (2006). Raider’s night. New York, NY: HarperTeen.
   Google Scholar
• Louie, B.Y., Drevdahl, D.J., Purdy, J.M., & Stackman, R.W. (2003). Advancing the scholarship of teaching through collaborative self-study. The Journal of Higher Education, 74(2), 150–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louie, B.Y., Stackman, R.W., Drevdahl, D., & Purdy, J.M. (2002). Myths about teaching and the university professor: The power of unexamined beliefs. In J. Loughran & T. Russell (Eds.), Improving teacher education practices through self-study (pp. 193–207). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, S., Ma, X., & Mazur, J. (2008). Effects of peer coaching on teachers’ collaborative interactions and students’ mathematics achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 102(3), 203–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, P. (2010). Capturing the complexity of practice: A self-study in the context of engineering education. Studying Teacher Education, 6(2), 187–200.
   Google Scholar
• Pressick-Kilborn, K., & te Riele, K. (2008). Learning from reciprocal peer observation: A collaborative self-study. Studying Teacher Education, 4(1), 61–75.
   Google Scholar
• Quinlan, K.M. (1998). Promoting faculty learning about collaborative teaching. College Teaching, 46(2), 43–47.
   Google Scholar
• Samaras, A.P., & Freese, A.R. (2009). Looking back and looking forward. In C.A. Lassonde, S. Galman, & C. Kosnik (Eds.), Self-study research methodologies for teacher educators (pp. 3–19). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Samaras, A.P., Kayler, M.A., Rigsby, L.C., Weller, K.L., & Wilcox, D.R. (2006). Self-study of the craft of faculty team teaching in a non-traditional teacher education program. Studying Teacher Education, 2(1), 43–57.
   Google Scholar
• Samaras, A.P., & Reed, R.L. (2000). Transcending traditional boundaries through drama: Interdisciplinary teaching and perspective-taking. In J. Loughran & T. Russell (Eds.), Exploring myths and legends of teacher education (Proceedings of the Third International Conference on the Self-Study of Teacher Education Practices, pp. 218–222). Kingston, Ontario: Queen’s University.
   Google Scholar
• Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2014). The implications of disciplinary literacy. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 57(8), 628–631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Showers, B., & Joyce, B. (1996). The evolution of peer coaching. Educational Leadership, 53(6), 12–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siebert, D., & Draper, R.J. (2008). Why content-area literacy messages do not speak to mathematics teachers: A critical content analysis. Literacy Research and Instruction, 47(4), 229–245.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, M.E., & Welch, F.C. (1996). Peer coaching for better teaching. College Teaching, 44(4), 153–156.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, C.L., & Simmons, D.L. (2001). The design and implementation of a peer coaching program. American Secondary Education, 29(3), 67–76.
   Google Scholar
• Stichter, J.P., Lewis, T.J., Richter, M., Johnson, N.W., & Bradley, L. (2006). Assessing antecedent variables: The effects of instructional variables on student outcomes through in-service and peer coaching professional development models. Education and Treatment of Children, 29(4), 665–692.
   Google Scholar
• Thijs, A., & van den Berg, E. (2002). Peer coaching as part of a professional development program for science teachers in Botswana. International Journal of Educational Development, 22, 55–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobin, K., & Espinet, M. (1990). Teachers as peer coaches in high school mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 90(3), 232–244.
   Google Scholar
• Trautwein, B., & Ammerman, S. (2010). From pedagogy to practice: Mentoring and reciprocal peer coaching for preservice teachers. The Volta Review, 110(2), 191–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urquhart, V. (2009). Using writing in mathematics to deepen student learning. Denver, CO: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, R.A. (2001). Interdisciplinary curriculum: Music educator concerns. Music Educators Journal, 87(5), 40–44.
   Google Scholar
• Wynn, M.J., & Kromrey, J. (1999). Paired peer placement with peer coaching in early field experiences: Results of a four-year study. Teacher Education Quarterly, 26(1), 21–38.
   Google Scholar
• Zwart, R.C., Wubbels, T., Bergen, T., & Bolhuis, S. (2009). Which characteristics of a reciprocal peer coaching context affect teacher learning as perceived by teachers and their students? Journal of Teacher Education, 60(3), 243–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar