Variation among wheat (Triticum easativum L.) genotypes in response to the drought stress: I – selection approaches

References

• Ahmadizadeh M, Valizadeh M, Shahbazi H, Nori A. 2002. Behavior of durum wheat genotypes under normal irrigation and drought stress conditions in the greenhouse. Afr J Biotechnol. 11:1912–1923.
   Google Scholar
• Akcura M, Ceri S. 2011. Evaluation of drought tolerance indices for selection of Turkish oat (Avena sativa L.) landraces under various environmental conditions. Žemdirbystė Agric. 98:157–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asharaf M. 2010. Inducing drought tolerance in plants: recent advances. Biotech Adv. 28:199–238. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandurska H, Stroiński A. 2003. ABA and proline accumulation in leaves and roots of wild (Hordeum spontaneum) and cultivated (Hordeum vulgare Maresi) barley genotypes under water deficit conditions. Acta Physiol Plant. 25:55–61. doi: 10.1007/s11738-003-0036-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrs HD. 1986. Determination of water deficit in plant tissues. In: Kozlowski TT, editor. Water deficit and plant growth. Vol.1. New York: Academic Press; p. 235–368.
   Google Scholar
• Berkowitz GA, Chen C, Gibbs M. 1983. Stromal acidification mediates in vivo water stress inhibition of nonstomatal controlled photosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 72:1123–1126. doi: 10.1104/pp.72.4.1123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blum A. 1988. Plant breeding for stress environments. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blum A. 1996. Crop response to drought and the interpretation of adaptation. Plant Growth Regul. 20:57–70. doi: 10.1007/BF00024010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blum A. 2005. Drought resistance, water use efficiency, and yield potential are they compatible, dissonant, or mutually exclusive? Austr J Agric Res. 56:1159–1168. doi: 10.1071/AR05069
   Google Scholar
• Blum A, Ebercon A. 1981. Cell membrane stability as a measure of drought and heat tolerance in wheat. Crop Sci. 21:43–47. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1981.0011183X002100010013x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouslama M, Schapauch WT. 1984. Stress tolerance in soybean. I. Evaluation of three screening techniques for heat and drought tolerance. Crop Sci. 24:933–937. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1984.0011183X002400050026x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer JS. 1982. Plant productivity and environment. Science. 218:443–448. doi: 10.1126/science.218.4571.443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaves MM, Pereira JS, Maroco J, Rodrigues ML, Ricardo CPP, Osorio LM, Carvalho I, Faria T, Pinheiro C. 2002. How plants cope with water stress in the field? Photosynthesis and growth. Ann Bot. 89:907–916. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcf105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke JM, McCaig TN. 1982. Evaluation of techniques for screening for drought resistance in wheat. Crop Sci. 22:503–506. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1982.0011183X002200030015x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornic G, Massacci A. 1996. Leaf photosynthesis under drought stress. In: Baker N.R., editor. Photosynthesis and the Environment. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic; p. 347–366.
   Google Scholar
• Doorenbos J, Kassam AH. 1986. Yield response to water. FAO irrigation and drainage paper. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Doorenbos J, Pruit WO. 1977. Guidelines for predicting crop water requirements. FAO irrigation and drainage paper. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Drikvand R, Doosty B, Hosseinpour T. 2012. Response of rainfed wheat genotypes to drought stress using drought tolerance indices. J Agric Sci. 4:126–131.
   Google Scholar
• Dubey R. 1997. Photosynthesis in plants under stressful conditions. In: Pessarakli M, editor. Handbook of photosynthesis. Tuscon/New York: University of Arizona/Marcel Dekker; p. 859–875.
   Google Scholar
• Edey SN. 1977. Growing degree days and crop production in Canada. Agriculture Canada Publication 1635, Ottawa.
   Google Scholar
• Ehlers W, Goss M. 2003. Water Dynamics in Plant Production. Wallingford: CABI Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Evans RO, Skagss RW, Sneed RE. 1991. Stress day index models to predict corn and soybean relative yield under high water table conditions. Trans ASAE. 5:1997–2005. doi: 10.13031/2013.31829
   Google Scholar
• Farquhar GD, Wong SC, Evans JR, Hubiek KT. 1993. Photosynthesis and gas exchange. In: Jones HG, Flowers TJ, Jones MB, editor. Plants under stress. New York: Cambridge University Press; p. 47–70.
   Google Scholar
• Finlay KW, Wilkinson GN. 1963. The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme. Aust J Agrie Res. 14:742–754. doi: 10.1071/AR9630742
   Google Scholar
• Fischer RA, Maurer R. 1978. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I. Grain yield response. Aust J Agric Res. 29:897–907. doi: 10.1071/AR9780897
   Google Scholar
• Fleury DS, Kuchel H, Langridge P. 2010. Genetic and genomic tools to improve drought tolerance in wheat. J Exp Bot. 61:3211–3222. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flexas J, Medrano H. 2002. Energy dissipation in C3 plants under drought. Funct Plant Biol. 29:1209–1215. doi: 10.1071/FP02015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geravandi M, Farshadfar E, Kahrizi D. 2011. Evaluation of some physiological traits as indicators of drought tolerance in bread wheat genotypes. Russ J Plant Physiol. 58:69–75. doi: 10.1134/S1021443711010067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerik TJ, Eastin JD. 1985. Temperature effects on dark respiration among diverse sorghum genotypes. Crop Sci. 25:957–961. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1985.0011183X002500060014x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golabadi MA, Arzani SA, Maibodym M. 2006. Assessment of drought tolerance in segregating populations in durum wheat. Afr J Agric Res. 1:162–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golbashy M, Ebrahimi M, Khorasani SK, Choucan R. 2010. Evaluation of drought tolerance of some corn (Zea mays L.) hybrids in Iran. Afr J Agric Res. 5:2714–2719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez F, Oliva MA, Mielke MS, de_Almeida AAF, Leita HG, Aquino LA. 2008. Photosynthetic limitations in leaves of young Brazilian Green Dwarf coconut (Cocos macifera L. ‘‘nana’’ palm under well-watered conditions or recovering from drought stress. Environ Exp Bot. 62:195–204. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grzesiak S. 1990. Reaction to drought of inbreds and hybrids of maize (Zea mays L.) as evaluated in field and greenhouse experiments. Maydica. 35:303–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grzesiak MT, Hura K, Jurczyk B, Hura T, Rut G, Szczyrek P, Grzesiak S. 2017. Physiological markers of stress susceptibility in maize and triticale under different soil compaction and/or soil water contents. J Plant Interaction. 12:355–372. DOI: 10.1080/17429145.2017.1370143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grzesiak MT, Marcińska I, Janowiak F, Rzepka A, Hura T. 2012. The relationship between seedling growth and grain yield under drought conditions in maize and triticale genotypes. Acta Physiol Plant. 34:1757–1764. doi: 10.1007/s11738-012-0973-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson AD, Nelson ChE. 1985. Water adaptation of crop to drought. In: Carlson PS, editor. The biology of crop productivity. New York: Academic Press; p. 79–149.
   Google Scholar
• Haupt-Herting S, Fock HP. 2002. Oxygen exchange in relation to carbon assimilation in water-stressed leaves during photosynthesis. Ann Bot. 89:851–859. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcf023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillel D, van Bavel CHM. 1976. Simulation of profile water storage as related to soil hydraulic properties. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 40:807–815. doi: 10.2136/sssaj1976.03615995004000060009x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hisir Y, Kara R, Dokuyucu T. 2012. Evaluation of oat (Avena sativa L.) genotypes for grain yield and physiological traits. Žemdirbystė Agric. 99:55–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hura T, Hura K, Grzesiak MT, Rzepka A. 2007. Effect of long-term drought stress on leaf gas exchange and fluorescence parameters in C3 and C4 plants. Acta Physiol Plant. 29:103–113. doi: 10.1007/s11738-006-0013-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iezzoni AF, Pritts MP. 1991. Applications of principal component analysis to horticultural research. HortScience. 26:334–338. doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.26.4.334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson MB, Ram PC. 2003. Physiological and molecular basis of susceptibility and tolerance of rice plants to complete submergence. Annals of Botany. 91:227–241. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcf242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalili M, Kazemi M, Moghaddam A, Shakiba M. 2004. Evaluation of drought tolerance indices at different growth stages of late-maturing corn genotypes. Proceedings of the 8th Iranian Congress of Crop Science and Breeding, Rasht. p. 298.
   Google Scholar
• Khayatnezhad M, Hasanuzzaman M, Gholamin R. 2011. Assessment of yield and yield components and drought tolerance at end-of season drought condition on corn hybrids (Zea mays L.). Afr J Crop Sci. 5:493–500.
   Google Scholar
• King J. 2011. Reaching for the sun. How plant work. Part IV Stress, defense, and decline. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; p. 185–244.
   Google Scholar
• Kono Y, Yamauchi A, Kawamura AN, Tatsumi J. 1987. Interspecific differences of the capacities of waterlogging and drought tolerance among summer cereals. Jpn J Crop Sci. 56:115–129. doi: 10.1626/jcs.56.115
   Google Scholar
• Kpoghomou BK, Sapra VT, Beyl CA. 1990. Screening for drought tolerance: soybean germination and its relationship to seedling response. J Agron Crop Sci. 164:153–159. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-037X.1990.tb00801.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson S, Górny AG. 1988. Grain yield and drought resistance indices of oat cultivars in field rain shelter and laboratory experiments. J Agron Crop Sci. 161:277–286. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-037X.1988.tb00668.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawlor DW, Cornic G. 2002. Photosynthetic carbon assimilation and associated metabolism in relation to water deficits in higher plans. Plant Cell Environ. 25:275–294. doi: 10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00814.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt J. 1980. Response of plants to environmental stresses. New York (NY): Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liang Y, Zhang K, Zhao L, Liu B, Meng Q. 2010. Identification of chromosome regions conferring dry matter accumulation and photosynthesis in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Euphytica. 171:145–156. doi: 10.1007/s10681-009-0024-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtenthaler HK, Babani F. 2004. Light adaptation and senescence of the photosynthetic apparatus. Changes in pigment composition, chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and photosynthetic activity. In: Papageorgiou GC, Govindjee G, editor. Chlorophyll a fluorescence, a signature of photosynthesis. Dordrecht: Springer; p. 713–736.
   Google Scholar
• Lichtenthaler HK, Langsdorf G, Lenk S, Buschmann C. 2005. Chlorophyll fluorescence imaging of photosynthetic activity with the flash-lamp fluorescence imaging system. Photosynthetica. 43:355–369. doi: 10.1007/s11099-005-0060-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorens GF, Bennett JM, Loggale LB. 1987. Differences in drought resistance between two corn hybrids. I. Water relations and root length density. Agron J. 79:802–807. doi: 10.2134/agronj1987.00021962007900050009x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcińska I, Czyczyło-Mysza I, Skrzypek E, Grzesiak M, Popielarska-Konieczna M, Warchoł M, Grzesiak S. 2017. Application of photochemical parameters and several indices based on phenotypical traits to assess intraspecific variation of oat (Avena sativa L.) tolerance to drought. Acta Physiol Plant. 39:153. doi: 10.1007/s11738-017-2453-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinielio P, Lorenzoni C. 1985. Response of maize genotypes to drought tolerance tests. Maydica. 30:361–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masle J. 2002. High soil strength: mechanical forces at play on root morphogenesis and in root: shoot signaling. In: Waisel Y, Eshel A, Kafkafi U, editor. Plant roots the hidden half. New York (NY): Marcel Dekker; p. 807–819.
   Google Scholar
• McKersie BD, Leshem YY. 1994. Stress and stress cooping in cultivated plants. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• McMaster GS, Wilhelm WW, Palic DB, Porter JR, Jamieson PD. 2003. Spring wheat leaf appearance and temperature: extending the paradigm? Ann Bot. 91:697–705. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcg074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medrano H, Escalona JM, Bota J, Gulias J, Flexas J. 2002. Regulation of photosynthesis of C3 plants in response to progressive drought: stomatal conductance as a reference parameter. Ann Bot. 89:895–905. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcf079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittler R. 2006. Abiotic stress, the field environment and stress combination. Trends plants science. 11:15–19. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2005.11.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moghaddam A, Hadizadeh MH. 2002. Response of corn hybrids and their parental lines to drought using different stress tolerant indices. Iranian J Seed Seedling. 18:256–272.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammadi R, Armion M, Kahrizi D, Amri A. 2010. Efficiency of screening techniques for evaluating durum wheat genotypes under mild drought conditions. Int J Plant Prod. 4:11–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller JE, Whitsitt MS. 1996. Plant cellular response to water deficit. Plant Growth Regul. 20:41–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nouraein M, Mohammadi SA, Aharizad S, Moghaddam M, Sadeghzadeh B. 2013. Evaluation of drought tolerance indices in wheat recombinant inbred line population. Ann Biol Res. 4:113–122.
   Google Scholar
• Ogawa S, Valencia MO, Ishitani M, Selvaraj MG. 2014. Root system architecture variation in response to different NH4 concentrations and its association with nitrogen-deficient tolerance traits in rice. Acta Physiol Plant. 36:2361–2372. doi: 10.1007/s11738-014-1609-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paknejad F, Nasri M, Moghadam HRT, Zahedi H, Alahmadi MF. 2007. Effects of drought stress on chlorophyll fluorescence. Acta Physiol Plant. 35:549–565.
   Google Scholar
• Palta JP. 1990. Stress interactions at the cellular and membrane level. Hort Sci. 25:1337–1381.
   Google Scholar
• Parihar AK, Godawat SL, Singh D, Parihar CM, Mangi L. 2012. Behavior of quality protein maize (QPM) genotypes under well irrigated and water stress conditions in subtropical climate. Maydica. 57:293–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passioura JB, Condon AG, Richards RA. 1993. Water deficits, the development of leaf area and crop productivity. In: Smith JAC, Griffiths H, editor. Water deficits plant responses from cell to community. Oxford: BIOS Scientific Publishers; p. 253–264.
   Google Scholar
• Rabiei E, Khodambashi M, Pirbalouti GA. 2012. The study of the drought tolerance indices of oat (Avena sativa L.). J Food Agric Environ. 10:646–648.
   Google Scholar
• Rapacz M, Kościelniak J, Jurczyk B, Adamska A, Wójcik M. 2010. Different patterns of physiological and molecular response to drought in seedlings of malt- and feed-type barleys (Hordeum vulgare). J Agron Crop Sci. 196:9–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-037X.2009.00389.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds MP, Singh RP, Ibrahim A, Agech OAA, Larque-Saavedra A, Quick JS. 1998. Evaluation physiological traits to complement empirical selection for wheat in warm environments. Euphytica. 100:84–95. doi: 10.1023/A:1018355906553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards RA. 1978. Variation between and within species of rapeseed (Brassica campestris and B. napus) in response to drought stress. III. Physiological and physicochemical characters. Aust J Agric Res. 29:495–501.
   Google Scholar
• Royo C, Abaza M, Bianco R, del Moral LFG. 2000. Triticale grain growth and morphometry as affected by drought stress, late sowing and simulated drought stress. Aust J Physiol. 27:1051–1059.
   Google Scholar
• Shangguan ZP, Shao MA. 1999. Physiological mechanism for improving crop water use in arid region. J Hydraul Eng. 10:33–37.
   Google Scholar
• Smirnoff N, Colombe SV. 1988. Drought influences the activity of enzymes of the chloroplast hydrogen peroxide scavenging system. J Exp Bot. 39:1097–1108. doi: 10.1093/jxb/39.8.1097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza RP, Machado EC, Silva JAB, Lagoa AMMA, Silveira JAG. 2004. Photosynthetic gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence and some associated metabolic changes in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) during water stress and recovery. Environ Exp Bot. 51:45–56. doi: 10.1016/S0098-8472(03)00059-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley CD. 1990. Proper use and data interpretation for plant- and soil water status measuring instrumentation: introductory remarks. HortScience. 25:1534. doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.25.12.1534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starck Z. 2005. The reactions of plants to abiotic environmental stress-acclimatization and adaptation. Grassland Sci Pol. 8:173–184 (in Polish).
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan CHY, Ross WN. 1979. Selecting for drought and heat resistance in grain sorghum. In: Mussel H, Staples R, editor. Stress physiology in crop plant. New York (NY): Wiley; p. 263–281.
   Google Scholar
• Szechyńska-Hebda M, Czarnocka W, Hebda M, Bernacki MJ, Karpiński S. 2016. PAD4, LSD1 and EDS1 regulate drought tolerance, plant biomass production, and cell wall properties. Plant Cell Rep. 35:527–539. doi: 10.1007/s00299-015-1901-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talebi R, Fayaz F, Naji N. 2009. Effective selection criteria for assessing drought stress tolerance in durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.). Gen App Plant Physiol. 35:64–74.
   Google Scholar
• Tang AC, Kawamitsu Y, Kanechi M, Boyer JS. 2002. Photosynthetic oxygen evolution at low water potential in leaf discs lacking an epidermis. Ann Bot. 89:861–870. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcf081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang W, Vinocur B, Altman A. 2003. Plant response to drought, salinity and extreme temperatures: towards genetic engineering for stress tolerance. Planta. 218:1–14. doi: 10.1007/s00425-003-1105-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weatherley PE. 1950. Studies of water relations of the cotton plant. I. The field measurement of water deficit in leaves. New Phytol. 49:81–87. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1950.tb05146.x
   Google Scholar
• Williams MH, Rosenqvist E, Buchhave M. 1999. Response of potted miniature roses (Rosaxhybrida) to reduced water availability during production. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol. 74:301–308. doi: 10.1080/14620316.1999.11511113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter SR, Musick JT, Porter KB. 1988. Evaluation of screening techniques for breeding drought resistant winter wheat. Crop Sci. 28:512–516. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1988.0011183X002800030018x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright H, De Longa J, Ladab R, Prangea R. 2009. The relationship between water status and chlorophyll a fluorescence in grapes (Vitis spp.). Postharvest Biol Technol. 51:193–199. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2008.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamauchi A. 1993. Significance of root system structure in relation to stress tolerance in cereal crop. In: Low-input sustainable crop production system in Asia, Korean Soc. Crop Sci., Korea; p. 347–360.
   Google Scholar
• Zabet M, Hosseinzadeh AH, Ahmadi A, Khialparast F. 2003. Effect of water stress on different traits and determination of the best water stress index in Mung Bean (Vigna radiate). Iran J Agric Sci. 34:889–898.
   Google Scholar
• Zaheri A, Bahraminejad S. 2012. Assessment of drought tolerance in oat (Avena sativa L.) genotypes. Ann Biol Res. 3(5):2194–2201.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Mi X, Shao HB, Ma K. 2011. Strong plant-soil associations in a heterogeneous subtropical broad-leaved forest. Plant Soil. 347:211–220. doi: 10.1007/s11104-011-0839-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar