Psychic fragments and changing bodies: Theoretical and clinical applications of bodily reverie

References

• Asheri, S. (2009). To touch or not to touch: A relational body psychotherapy perspective. In L. Hartley (Ed.), Contemporary body psychotherapy: The Chiron approach (pp. 106–120). Hove: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bais, H. P., Park, S. W., Weir, T. L., Callaway, R. M., & Vivanco, J. M. (2004). How plants communicate using the underground information superhighway. Trends in Plant Science, 9, 26–32.10.1016/j.tplants.2003.11.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balint, M. (1968). The basic fault. Therapeutic aspects of regression. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature: A necessary unity. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bion, W. R. (1962). Learning from experience. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Bion, W. R. (1967). Second thoughts: Selected papers on psychoanalysis. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bromberg, P. M. (1996). Standing in spaces: The multiplicity of self and the psychoanalytic relationship. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 32, 500–535.
   Google Scholar
• Bucci, W. (2005). The interplay of subsymbolic and symbolic processess in psychoanalytic treatment: Commentary on paper by Steven H. Knoblauch. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 15, 855–873.10.2513/s10481885pd1506_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coltart, N. (1992). Slouching towards Bethlehem: And further psychoanalytic explorations. London: Free Association.
   Google Scholar
• Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York, NY: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Ferenczi, S. (1933). Confusion of tongues between the adult and the child. In M. Balint & J. Rickman (Eds.), Collected papers (Vol. 3, pp. 156–167). New York, NY: Basic Books, 1955.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1914). Remembering, repeating and working-through. S. E., 12: pp. 145–156. London: Hogarth, 1958.
   Google Scholar
• Ghent, E. (1990). Masochism, submission, surrender: Masochism as a perversion of surrender. In S. A. Mitchell & L. Aron (Eds.), Relational psychoanalysis: The emergence of a tradition (pp. 211–242). New York, NY: The Analytic Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Heinrich- Clauer, V. (1999). Bodily phenomena of countertransference. Bioenergetic Analysis, 10, 19–31.
   Google Scholar
• Ingerman, S. (1991). Soul retrieval: Mending the fragmented self. San Francisco, CA: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, C. G. (1934). The archetypes of the collective unconscious. In S. H. Read, M. Fordham, & G. Adler (Eds.), R. F. C. Hull (Trans.). The collected works of C. G. Jung (Vol. 9, Part 1) ( R. F. C. Hull, Trans.) (pp. 3–41). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, C. G., & Douglas, C. (1931–1935). Visions – Notes on the seminar given in 1930–1934. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Keleman, S. (2012). Forming an embodied life: The difference between being bodied and forming an embodied life. International Body Psychotherapy Journal, 11, 51–56.
   Google Scholar
• King, A. (2011). Touch as relational affirmation. Attachment: New Directions in Psychotherapy and Relational Psychoanalysis, 5, 108–124.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, M. (1946). Notes on some schizoid mechanisms. In J. Riviere (Ed.), Developments in psychoanalysis (pp. 292–320). London: Hogarth press.
   Google Scholar
• Kohut, H. (1959). Introspection, empathy, and psychoanalysis an examination of the relationship between mode of observation and theory. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 7, 459–483.10.1177/000306515900700304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mahler, M. S. (1967). On human symbiosis and the vicissitudes of individuation. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 15, 740–763.10.1177/000306516701500401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mavromatis, A. (1987). Hypnagogia: The unique state of conciousness between wakefulness and sleep. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, J. T. (1995). Touching limits in the analytic dyad. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 64, 433–465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). London: Routledge, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). The primacy of perception. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mindell, A. (1982). Dreambody. Henley-on-Thames: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Mindell, A., & Mindell, A. (1992). Riding the horse backwards: Process work in theory and practice: Arkana.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden, T. H. (1994). The analytic third – Working with intersubjective clinical facts. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 75, 3–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden, T. H. (1997). Reverie and interpretation. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 4, 567–595.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden, T. H. (2001). Conversations at the Frontier of Dreaming (pp. 153–174). London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Pelled, E. (2007). Learning from experience: Bion’s concept of reverie and Buddhist meditation: A comparative study. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 88, 1507–1526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinkas-Samet, S., & Rolef Ben-Shahar, A. (2014). Psychosoma – Theory and practice, opening lecture. 1st annual conference of Psychosoma, Tel Aviv, June 18. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pFrbO-bZMiY
   Google Scholar
• Rieck, M. (2014). The therapist’s body as a platform for analytic depth work. Sihot, 28(2), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Rolef Ben-Shahar, A. (2008). Resonance: The gift of connection. Self & Society, A Journal of Humanistic Psychology in Britain, 36, 45–48.
   Google Scholar
• Rolef Ben-Shahar, A. (2012). About touching psychotherapists. Somatic Psychotherapy Today, Winter, 2012, 27–29.
   Google Scholar
• Rolef Ben-Shahar, A. (2013). The self-healing forest: Between self-regulation and dyadic regulation. Body, Movement and Dance in Psychotherapy, 9, 16–28.
   Google Scholar
• Rolef Ben-Shahar, A. (2014). Touching the relational edge – Body psychotherapy. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz, D. M. (1997). The four agreements: A practical guide to personal freedom. San Rafael, CA: Amber-Allen Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sadoff, D. F. (1998). Sciences of the flesh: Representing body and subject in psychoanalysis. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, S. A. (1979). Biological diversity as the foundation for the theory of unique individuality. Presented to New York University Postdoctoral Program in Psychotherapy and Psychoanalysis, April 15.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, S. A. (1989). Psychoanalysis and bodywork. Paper presented at Professional Enrichment Program, Wainrite House.
   Google Scholar
• Soth, M. (2005). Embodied countertransference. In N. Totton (Ed.), New dimensions in body psychotherapy (pp. 40–55). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stanislavski, C. (1937). An actor prepares. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Totton, N. (2006). A body psychotherapist’s approach to touch. In G. Galton (Ed.), Touch Papers (pp. 145–162). London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dusen, W. (1958). Wu Wei, no-mind, and the fertile void. In J. O. Stevens (Ed.), Gestalt is: A collection of articles about Gestalt Therapy and living (pp. 87–93). Moab, UT: Real People Press, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Winnicott, D. W. (1949). Mind and its relation to the psyche-soma. In D. W. Winnicott (Ed.), Collected papers: Through paediatrics to psychoanalysis (pp. 243–254). London: Karnac, 1958.
   Google Scholar
• Winnicott, D. W. (1988). Human nature. New York, NY: Schochen.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. (1980). Throwing like a girl: A phenomenology of feminine body comportment motility and spatiality. Human Studies, 3, 137–156.10.1007/BF02331805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Znamenski, A. A. (2007). The beauty of the primitive. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195172317.001.0001
   Google Scholar