The effect of choice interventions on retention-related, behavioural and mood outcomes: a systematic review with meta-analysis

References

• Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Action control (pp. 11–39). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, S., Qu, H., & Shewchuk, R. M. (2012). Association between adherence to physical activity guidelines and health-related quality of life among individuals with physician-diagnosed arthritis. Quality of Life Research, 21(8), 1347–1357. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-0046-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayre, J., Cvejic, E., Bonner, C., Turner, R. M., Walter, S. D., & McCaffery, K. J. (2020). Effects of health literacy, screening, and participant choice on action plans for reducing unhealthy snacking in Australia: A randomised controlled trial. PLoS Medicine, 17(11), e1003409. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartley, H., Faasse, K., Horne, R., & Petrie, K. J. (2016). You can't always get what you want: The influence of choice on nocebo and placebo responding. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 50(3), 445–451. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-016-9772-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource?. Journal оf Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1252–1265. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1252
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beer, N. J., Dimmock, J. A., Jackson, B., & Guelfi, K. J. (2017). Providing choice in exercise influences food intake at the subsequent meal. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 49(10), 2110–2118. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000001330
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2010). A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods, 1(2), 97–111. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borland, R., Balmford, J., & Benda, P. (2013). Population-level effects of automated smoking cessation help programs: A randomized controlled trial. Addiction, 108(3), 618–628. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.04091.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowling, A., & Rowe, G. (2005). “You decide doctor”. What do patient preference arms in clinical trials really mean? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59(11), 914–915. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2005.035261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, C. (1993). Designing medical and educational intervention studies: A review of some alternatives to conventional randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care, 16(2), 509–518. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.16.2.509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, C. (1997). Psychological issues in clinical trial design. The Irish Journal of Psychology, 18(1), 67–87. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03033910.1997.10558130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenes, G. A., Divers, J., Miller, M. E., Anderson, A., Hargis, G., & Danhauer, S. C. (2020). Comparison of cognitive-behavioral therapy and yoga for the treatment of late-life worry: A randomized preference trial. Depression and Anxiety, 37(12), 1194–1207. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/da.23107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewin, C. R., & Bradley, C. (1989). Patient preferences and randomised clinical trials. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 299(6694), 313. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.299.6694.313
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. A., Fowler, S. L., Rasinski, H. M., Rose, J. P., & Geers, A. L. (2013). Choice as a moderator of placebo expectation effects: Additional support from two experiments. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 35(5), 436–444. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2013.803968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruyneel, S., Dewitte, S., Vohs, K. D., & Warlop, L. (2006). Repeated choosing increases susceptibility to affective product features. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 23(2), 215–225. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2005.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, K. B., DeMartini, K. S., Prince, M. A., Luteran, C., & Carey, M. P. (2013). Effects of choice on intervention outcomes for college students sanctioned for campus alcohol policy violations. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 27(3), 596–603. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030333
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castle, P. E., Silva, V. R., Consolaro, M. E., Kienen, N., Bittencourt, L., Peloso, S. M., Partridge, E. E., Pierz, A., Dartibale, C. B., Uchimura, N. S., & Scarinci, I. C. (2019). Participation in cervical screening by self-collection, Pap, or a choice of either in Brazil. Cancer Prevention Research, 12(3), 159–170. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiviacowsky, S., Wulf, G., Lewthwaite, R., & Campos, T. (2012). Motor learning benefits of self-controlled practice in persons with Parkinson’s disease. Gait & Posture, 35(4), 601–605. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.12.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, N. M., Janz, N. K., Dodge, J. A., Mosca, L., Lin, X., Long, Q., … Liang, J. (2008). The effect of patient choice of intervention on health outcomes. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 29(5), 679–686. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2008.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordova, D. I., & Lepper, M. R. (1996). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(4), 715. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.88.4.715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dan-Cohen, M. (1992). Conceptions of choice and conceptions of autonomy. Ethics, 102(2), 221–243. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/293394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., Connell, J. P., & Ryan, R. M. (1989). Self-determination in a work organization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(4), 580. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.74.4.580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1980). Self-determination theory: When mind mediates behavior. The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 1(1), 33–43.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M.. (2012). Motivation, personality, and development within embedded social contexts: An overview of self-determination theory. In R. M. Ryan (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Human Motivation (pp. 85–107). Oxford: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feine, J. S., Awad, M. A., & Lund, J. P. (1998). The impact of patient preference on the design and interpretation of clinical trials. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 26(1), 70–74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1998.tb02086.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flowerday, T., & Schraw, G. (2003). Effect of choice on cognitive and affective engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 96(4), 207–215. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670309598810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flowerday, T., Schraw, G., & Stevens, J. (2004). The role of choice and interest in reader engagement. The Journal of Experimental Education, 72(2), 93–114. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3200/JEXE.72.2.93-114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fodor, M. C., Grekin, E. R., Beatty, J. R., McGoron, L., & Ondersma, S. J. (2020). Participant Satisfaction with computer-delivered intervention components and its relation to alcohol outcomes. Substance Use & Misuse, 55(14), 2332–2340. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2020.1811343
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedrich, M., Gittler, G., Halberstadt, Y., Cermak, T., & Heiller, I. (1998). Combined exercise and motivation program: Effect on the compliance and level of disability of patients with chronic low back pain: A randomized controlled trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 79(5), 475–487. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90059-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goertz, W., Dominick, K., Heussen, N., & vom Dahl, J. (2011). Music in the cath lab: Who should select it? Clinical Research in Cardiology, 100(5), 395–402. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-010-0256-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gourville, J. T., & Soman, D. (2005). Overchoice and assortment type: When and why variety backfires. Marketing Science, 24(3), 382–395. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1040.0109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grob, A.. (2000). Perceived control and subjective well-being across nations and across the life span. In E. Diener & E. Suh (Eds.), Culture and Subjective Well-Being (pp. 319–339). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guyatt, G., Oxman, A. D., Akl, E. A., Kunz, R., Vist, G., Brozek, J., … Debeer, H. (2011). GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64(4), 383–394. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G. E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P., & Schünemann, H. J. (2008). GRADE: An emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Bmj, 336(7650), 924–926. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hack, T. F., Pickles, T., Bultz, B. D., Ruether, J. D., & Degner, L. F. (2007). Impact of providing audiotapes of primary treatment consultations to men with prostate cancer: A multi-site, randomized, controlled trial. Psycho-Oncology, 16(6), 543–552. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1094
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hack, T. F., Pickles, T., Bultz, B. D., Ruether, J. D., Weir, L. M., Degner, L. F., & Mackey, J. R. (2003). Impact of providing audiotapes of primary adjuvant treatment consultations to women with breast cancer: A multisite, randomized, controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 21(22), 4138–4144. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2003.12.155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handelzalts, J. E., & Keinan, G. (2010). The effect of choice between test anxiety treatment options on treatment outcomes. Psychotherapy Research, 20(1), 100–112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10503300903121106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hariton, E., & Locascio, J. J. (2018). Randomised controlled trials—The gold standard for effectiveness research. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 125(13), 1716. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harkins, K. A., Kullgren, J. T., Bellamy, S. L., Karlawish, J., & Glanz, K. (2017). A trial of financial and social incentives to increase older adults’ walking. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 52(5), e123–e130. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2016.11.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heesch, K., Mâsse, L., Dunn, A., Frankowski, R., & Mullen, P. D. (2003). Does adherence to a lifestyle physical activity intervention predict changes in physical activity? Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 26(4), 333–348. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024205011001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegerl, U., Hautzinger, M., Mergl, R., Kohnen, R., Schutze, M., Scheunemann, W., … Henkel, V. (2010). Effects of pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy in depressed primary-care patients: A randomized, controlled trial including a patients’ choice arm. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, 13(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S1461145709000224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, J., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M., & Welch, V.. (2021). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.2 (updated February 2021). Cochrane, 2021. Available from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook.
   Google Scholar
• Inadomi, J. M., Vijan, S., Janz, N. K., Fagerlin, A., Thomas, J. P., Lin, Y. V., … Hayward, R. A. (2012). Adherence to colorectal cancer screening: A randomized clinical trial of competing strategies. Archives of Internal Medicine, 172(7), 575–582. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2012.332
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 995. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.995
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janevic, M. R., Janz, N. K., Dodge, J. A., Lin, X., Pan, W., Sinco, B. R., & Clark, N. M. (2003). The role of choice in health education intervention trials: A review and case study. Social Science & Medicine, 56(7), 1581–1594. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00158-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, L. D., Wehby, J. H., Symons, F. J., Moore, T. C., Maggin, D. M., & Sutherland, K. S. (2014). An analysis of preference relative to teacher implementation of intervention. The Journal of Special Education, 48(3), 214–224. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466913475872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolly, K., Lewis, A., Beach, J., Denley, J., Adab, P., Deeks, J. J., … Aveyard, P. (2011). Comparison of range of commercial or primary care led weight reduction programmes with minimal intervention control for weight loss in obesity: Lighten up randomised controlled trial. BMJ, 343(nov03 2), d6500. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d6500
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaipainen, K., Payne, C. R., & Wansink, B. (2012). Mindless eating challenge: Retention, weight outcomes, and barriers for changes in a public web-based healthy eating and weight loss program. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 14(6), e168. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, M., Nazareth, I., Lampe, F., Bower, P., Chandler, M., Morou, M., … Lai, R. (2005). Impact of participant and physician intervention preferences on randomized trials: A systematic review. Jama, 293(9), 1089–1099. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.293.9.1089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchener, H. C., Gittins, M., Rivero-Arias, O., Tsiachristas, A., Cruickshank, M., Gray, A., … Roberts, C. (2016). A cluster randomised trial of strategies to increase cervical screening uptake at first invitation (STRATEGIC). Health Technology Assessment (Winchester, England), 20(68), 1–138. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3310/hta20680
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krebs, P., Prochaska, J., & Rossi, J. (2010). A meta-analysis of computer-tailored interventions for health behavior change. Preventive Medicine, 51(3-4), 214–221. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.06.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kypri, K., Bowe, S. J., Karlsson, N., & McCambridge, J. (2020). Enrolment-latency in randomized behavior change trials: Individual participant data meta-analysis showed association with attrition but not effect-size. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 118, 55–59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.09.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le, Q. A., Doctor, J. N., Zoellner, L. A., & Feeny, N. C. (2014). Cost-effectiveness of prolonged exposure therapy versus pharmacotherapy and treatment choice in posttraumatic stress disorder (the optimizing PTSD treatment trial): A doubly randomized preference trial. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 75(3), 222–230. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.13m08719
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, P. S., Wheat, C. L., Abhat, A., Brenner, A. T., Fagerlin, A., Hayward, R. A., … Inadomi, J. M. (2016). Adherence to competing strategies for colorectal cancer screening over 3 years. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 111(1), 105–114. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2015.367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilliecreutz, C., Karlsson, H., & Spetz Holm, A.-C. (2020). Participation in interventions and recommended follow-up for non-attendees in cervical cancer screening-taking the women’s own preferred test method into account—A Swedish randomised controlled trial. Plos One, 15(7), e0235202. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindhiem, O., Bennett, C. B., Trentacosta, C. J., & McLear, C. (2014). Client preferences affect treatment satisfaction, completion, and clinical outcome: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 34(6), 506–517. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2014.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lustria, M. L. A., Noar, S. M., Cortese, J., Van Stee, S. K., Glueckauf, R. L., & Lee, J. (2013). A meta-analysis of web-delivered tailored health behavior change interventions: corrigendum. Journal of Health Communication, 18(11), 1397. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2013.852950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson, K., & Britton, A. (1999). The impact of patient treatment preferences on the interpretation of randomised controlled trials. European Journal of Cancer, 35(11), 1598–1602. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-8049(99)00196-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson, K., Britton, A. R., & Wennberg, J. E. (1997). Are randomized controlled trials controlled? Patient preferences and unblind trials. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 90(12), 652–656. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/014107689709001205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McVay, M. A., Voils, C. I., Coffman, C. J., Geiselman, P. J., Kolotkin, R. L., Mayer, S. B., … Yancy Jr, W. S. (2014). Factors associated with choice of a low-fat or low-carbohydrate diet during a behavioral weight loss intervention. Appetite, 83, 117–124. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2014.08.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McVay, M. A., Voils, C. I., Geiselman, P. J., Smith, V. A., Coffman, C. J., Mayer, S., & Yancy Jr, W. S. (2016). Food preferences and weight change during low-fat and low-carbohydrate diets. Appetite, 103, 336–343. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.04.035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mergl, R., Henkel, V., Allgaier, A. K., Kramer, D., Hautzinger, M., Kohnen, R., … Hegerl, U. (2011). Are treatment preferences relevant in response to serotonergic antidepressants and cognitive-behavioral therapy in depressed primary care patients? Results from a randomized controlled trial including a patients’. choice arm. Psychotherapy & Psychosomatics, 80(1), 39–47. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1159/000318772
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merrick, E. L., Hodgkin, D., Horgan, C. M., Lorenz, L. S., Panas, L., Ritter, G. A., … Nefussy, R. A. (2015). Testing novel patient financial incentives to increase breast cancer screening. American Journal of Managed Care, 21(11), 771–779.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moller, A. C., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2006). Choice and ego-depletion: The moderating role of autonomy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(8), 1024–1036. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206288008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, M., Edwards, P., Doyle, P., & Maconochie, N. (2013). Women in an infertility survey responded more by mail but preferred a choice: Randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 66(2), 226–235. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murawski, M. E., Milsom, V. A., Ross, K. M., Rickel, K. A., DeBraganza, N., Gibbons, L. M., & Perri, M. G. (2009). Problem solving, treatment adherence, and weight-loss outcome among women participating in lifestyle treatment for obesity. Eating Behaviors, 10(3), 146–151. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2009.03.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, E. D., & Branthwaite, A. (1992). Out-patient compliance with antidepressant medication. British Journal of Psychiatry, 160(1), 83–86. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.160.1.83
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Noar, S. M., Benac, C. N., & Harris, M. S. (2007). Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychological Bulletin, 133(4), 673–693. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.673
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noël, P. H., Larme, A. C., Meyer, J., Marsh, G., Correa, A., & Pugh, J. A. (1998). Patient choice in diabetes education curriculum: Nutritional versus standard content for type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care, 21(6), 896–901. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.21.6.896
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, R., Schmidt, S., Winkler, C., & Wipfli, B. (2011). The effects of target behavior choice and self-management skills training on compliance with behavioral self-monitoring. American Journal of Health Promotion, 25(5), 319–324. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4278/ajhp.090421-QUAN-143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patall, E. A., Cooper, H., & Robinson, J. C. (2008). The effects of choice on intrinsic motivation and related outcomes: A meta-analysis of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 270–300. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patall, E. A., & Leach, J. K. (2015). The role of choice provision in academic dishonesty. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 42, 97–110. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patall, E. A., Sylvester, B. J., & Han, C.-w. (2014). The role of competence in the effects of choice on motivation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 27–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, S., Maddern, G. J., & Hewett, P. (2005). Interacting effects of preoperative information and patient choice in adaptation to colonoscopy. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 48(11), 2047–2054. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-005-0172-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peyrot, M., & Rubin, R. R. (2009). How does treatment satisfaction work?: Modeling determinants of treatment satisfaction and preference. Diabetes Care, 32(8), 1411–1417. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2337/dc08-2256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakowski, W., Lipkus, I. M., Clark, M. A., Rimer, B. K., Ehrich, B., Lyna, P. R., & Kornguth, P. J. (2003). Reminder letter, tailored stepped-care, and self-choice comparison for repeat mammography. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 25(4), 308–314. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(03)00215-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raposo, S., Hogan, C. L., Barnes, J. T., Chemudupati, T., & Carstensen, L. L. (2020). Leveraging goals to incentivize healthful behaviors across adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 36(1), 57–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000428
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis, H. T., Sheldon, K. M., Gable, S. L., Roscoe, J., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Daily well-being: The role of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(4), 419–435. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200266002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rokke, P. D., Tomhave, J. A., & Jocic, Z. (1999). The role of client choice and target selection in self-management therapy for depression in older adults. Psychology and Aging, 14(1), 155–169. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.14.1.155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, J. P., Geers, A. L., Fowler, S. L., & Rasinski, H. M. (2014). Choice-making, expectations, and treatment positivity: How and when choosing shapes aversive experiences. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 27(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, J. P., Geers, A. L., Rasinski, H. M., & Fowler, S. L. (2012). Choice and placebo expectation effects in the context of pain analgesia [Erratum appears in J Behav Med. 2012 Dec;35(6):674]. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 35(4), 462–470. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-011-9374-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1), 1. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/h0092976
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rotton, J., & Shats, M. (1996). Effects of state humor, expectancies, and choice on postsurgical mood and self-medication: A field experiment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26(20), 1775–1794. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1996.tb00097.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rücker, G. (1989). A two-stage trial design for testing treatment, self-selection and treatment preference effects. Statistics in Medicine, 8(4), 477–485. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780080411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, B. (2004). The paradox of choice: Why more is less.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, R. G., Edwards, J. T., Fritschi, L., Foster, N. M., Mendelson, R. M., & Forbes, G. M. (2004). Community-based screening by colonoscopy or computed tomographic colonography in asymptomatic average-risk subjects. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 99(6), 1145–1151. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.30253.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segnan, N., Senore, C., Andreoni, B., Arrigoni, A., Bisanti, L., Cardelli, A., … Group-Italy, S. W. (2005). Randomized trial of different screening strategies for colorectal cancer: Patient response and detection rates. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 97(5), 347–357. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/dji050
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seligman, M. E.. (1975). Helplessness: On Depression, Development and Death. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Senore, C., Armaroli, P., Silvani, M., Andreoni, B., Bisanti, L., Marai, L., … Segnan, N. (2010). Comparing different strategies for colorectal cancer screening in Italy: Predictors of patients’ participation. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 105(1), 188–198. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2009.583
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, J. R., Koro, T., Doran, N., Thompson, S., Sallis, J. F., Calfas, K., & Patrick, K. (2012). Text4Diet: A randomized controlled study using text messaging for weight loss behaviors. Preventive Medicine, 55(5), 412–417. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.08.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheldon, K. M., Ryan, R., & Reis, H. T. (1996). What makes for a good day? Competence and autonomy in the day and in the person. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(12), 1270–1279. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672962212007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silberman, J. (2007). Positive intervention self-selection: Developing models of what works for whom. International Coaching Psychology Review, 2(1), 70–77.
   Google Scholar
• Staub, E. (2013). Development and maintenance of prosocial behavior: International perspectives on positive morality (Vol. 31). Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Sterne, J. A., Savović, J., Page, M. J., Elbers, R. G., Blencowe, N. S., Boutron, I., … Eldridge, S. M. (2019). Rob 2: A revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ, 366, l4898. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strömgren, A. S., Sjogren, P., Goldschmidt, D., Petersen, M. A., Pedersen, L., Hoermann, L., & Groenvold, M. (2005). A longitudinal study of palliative care: Patient-evaluated outcome and impact of attrition. Cancer: Interdisciplinary International Journal of the American Cancer Society, 103(8), 1747–1755. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20958
   Google Scholar
• Suhonen, R., Välimäki, M., & Leino-Kilpi, H. (2008). A review of outcomes of individualised nursing interventions on adult patients. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 17(7), 843–860. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01979.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swann Jr, W. B., & Pittman, T. S. (1977). Initiating play activity of children: The moderating influence of verbal cues on intrinsic motivation. Child Development, 48(3), 1128–1132. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1128374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terry, D. J., & O'Leary, J. E. (1995). The theory of planned behaviour: The effects of perceived behavioural control and self-efficacy. British Journal of Social Psychology, 34(2), 199–220. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1995.tb01058.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torgerson, D. J., Klaber-Moffett, J., & Russell, I. T. (1996). Patient preferences in randomised trials: Threat or opportunity? Journal of Health Services & Research Policy, 1(4), 194–197. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/135581969600100403
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Weert, E., Hoekstra-Weebers, J., Grol, B., Otter, R., Arendzen, H. J., Postema, K., … van der Schans, C. (2005). A multidimensional cancer rehabilitation program for cancer survivors: Effectiveness on health-related quality of life. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 58(6), 485–496. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2005.02.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veitch, J. A., & Newsham, G. R. (1998). Experimental investigations of lighting quality, preferences and control effects on task performance and energy efficiency: Experiment 2 primary analyses. Institute for Research in Construction.
   Google Scholar
• Veitch, J. A., & Newsham, G. R. (2000). Exercised control, lighting choices, and energy use: An office simulation experiment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20(3), 219–237. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1999.0169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vohs, K., Baumeister, R., Twenge, J., Schmeichel, B., Tice, D., & Crocker, J. (2004). Decision fatigue: Choices influence self-regulatory resources. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Wallston, K. A., Smith, R. P., King, J. E., Smith, M., Rye, P., & Burish, T. (1991). Desire for control and choice of antiemetic treatment for cancer chemotherapy. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 13(1), 12–29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/019394599101300102
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walters, S. J., dos Anjos Henriques-Cadby, I. B., Bortolami, O., Flight, L., Hind, D., Jacques, R. M., … Surtees, M. (2017). Recruitment and retention of participants in randomised controlled trials: A review of trials funded and published by the United Kingdom health technology assessment programme. BMJ Open, 7(3), e015276. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wennberg, J. E., Barry, M. J., Fowler, F. J., & Mulley, A. (1993). Outcomes research, PORTs, and health care reform. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 703(1), 52–62. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26335.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williams, G. C., Freedman, Z. R., & Deci, E. L. (1998). Supporting autonomy to motivate patients with diabetes for glucose control. Diabetes Care, 21(10), 1644–1651. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.21.10.1644
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yancy, W. S., Mayer, S. B., Coffman, C. J., Smith, V. A., Kolotkin, R. L., Geiselman, P. J., … Voils, C. I. (2015). Effect of allowing choice of diet on weight loss: A randomized trial. [Summary for patients in Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jun 16;162(12):I-22; PMID: 26075773]. Annals of Internal Medicine, 162(12), 805–814. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7326/M14-2358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoellner, L. A., Roy-Byrne, P. P., Mavissakalian, M., & Feeny, N. C. (2019). Doubly randomized preference trial of prolonged exposure versus sertraline for treatment of PTSD. American Journal of Psychiatry, 176(4), 287–296. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.17090995
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar