Cross-sectional predictors of ‘risk’ for school failure

References

• Ahmed, M. 2011. “Defining and Measuring Literacy: Facing the Reality.” International Review of Education/Internationale Zeitschrift Für Erziehungswissenschaft 57 (1/2): 179–195.
   Google Scholar
• Akey, T. M. 2006. School Context, Student Attitudes and Behavior, and Academic Achievement: An Exploratory Analysis. New York: MDRC.
   Google Scholar
• Bollinger, S. M. 2010. “FAME: Families Achieving Mathematical Excellence—The Process of Developing a Family Involvement Program for a Western Rural Middle School Serving American Indian Students.” PhD diss., Montana State University. Accessed November 1, 2015. http://scholarworks.montana.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1/944/BollingerS0510.pdf?sequence=1.
   Google Scholar
• Bryk, A. S., and S. W. Raudenbush. 1988. “Toward a More Appropriate Conceptualisation of Research on School Effects: A Three Level Hierarchical Linear Model.” American Journal of Education 97 (1): 65–108. doi: 10.1086/443913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryk, A. S., and S. W. Raudenbush. 1992. Hierarchical Linear Models in Social and Behavioral Research: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Carasco, J., N. Clair, and L. Kanyike. 2001. “Enhancing Dialogue among Researchers, Policy Makers, and Community Members in Uganda: Complexities, Possibilities, and Persistent Questions.” Comparative Education Review 45 (2): 257–279. doi: 10.1086/447664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catts, H., M. Fey, X. Zhang, and J. B. Tomblin. 2001. “Estimating the Risk of Future Reading Difficulties in Kindergarten Children: A Research-Based Model and its Clinical Implementation.” Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in the Schools 32 (1): 38–50. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2001/004)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creemers, B. P. M., and L. Kyriakides. 2008. The Dynamics of Educational Effectiveness: A Contribution to Policy, Practice and Theory in Contemporary Schools. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Creemers, B.P.M., and L. Kyriakides. 2010. “School Factors Explaining Achievement on Cognitive and Affective Outcomes: Establishing a Dynamic Model of Educational Effectiveness.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 54 (3): 263–294. doi: 10.1080/00313831003764529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creemers B.P.M., and L. Kyriakides. 2012. “Explaining Stability and Changes in School Effectiveness by Looking at Changes in the Functioning of School Factors.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement: An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice 21 (4): 409–427. doi: 10.1080/09243453.2010.512795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creemers B.P.M., and L. Kyriakides. 2015. “Developing, Testing, and Using Theoretical Models for Promoting Quality in Education.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 26 (1): 102–119. doi: 10.1080/09243453.2013.869233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis, P. 2008. “Education: Primary Pupils Without Basic Skills Highlight Labour’s Biggest Failure, Says Schools Minister.” The Guardian, August 21.
   Google Scholar
• Demetriou, D., and L. Kyriakides. 2006. “ Investigating the Generalisability of Models of Educational Effectiveness: A Secondary Analysis of PISA Study.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, April 7–11.
   Google Scholar
• Diez-Roux, A. V. 2000. “Multilevel Analysis in Public Health Research.” Annual Reviews of Public Health 21: 171–192. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.21.1.171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S., and C. Midgley. 1989. “Stage-Environment Fit: Developmentally Appropriate Classrooms for Young Adolescents.” In Research on Motivation in Education, edited by R. Ames and C. Ames, 139–186. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2006. “Key Competences for Lifelong Learning: European Reference Framework.” Accessed December 1, 2015. https://www.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/youth-in-action-keycomp-en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2012. “EU High Level Group of Experts on Literacy”. Accessed April 1, 2015. http://ec.europa.eu/education/policy/school/doc/literacy-report_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fairbrother, M. 2013. “Two Multilevel Modeling Techniques for Analyzing Comparative Longitudinal Survey Datasets.” Accessed January 11, 2016. http://seis.bris.ac.uk/~ggmhf/MHF.MLM-longit.2013.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Faubert, B. 2012. “A Literature Review of School Practices to Overcome School Failure.” OECD Education Working Papers 68, OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R., S. Machin, and M. Viarengo. 2011. “Inequality of Educational Outcomes: International Evidence from PISA.” Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies 11 (3). Accessed January 9, 2016. http://www.usc.es/economet/journals2/eers/eers1131.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. 1970. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: The Seabury Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., and J. Hill. 2006. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, H. 1984. “The Methodology of School Comparisons.” Oxford Review of Education 10 (1): 69–74. doi: 10.1080/0305498840100106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, H. 1987. Multilevel Models in Educational and Social Research. London: Charles Griffin.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, H. 2003. Multilevel Statistical Models. 3rd ed. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Haskins, R., R. Murnane, I. Sawhill, and C. Snow. 2012. “Can Academic Standards Boost Literacy and Close the Achievement Gap?” Future of Children Fall: 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Ho Sui-Chu, E., and J. D. Willms. 1996. “Effects of Parental Involvement on Eighth-Grade Achievement.” Sociology of Education 69: 126–141. doi: 10.2307/2112802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hox, J. 2002. Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Huffman, L. C., S. L. Mehlinger, and A. S. Kerivan. 2000. Risk Factors for Academic and Behavioral Problems at the Beginning of School. Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Mental Health.
   Google Scholar
• Keefe, E. B., and S. R. Copeland. 2011. “What Is Literacy? The Power of a Definition.” Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities 36 (3/4): 92–99. doi: 10.2511/027494811800824507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoblauch, C. H. 1990. “Literacy and the Politics of Education.” In The Right to Literacy, edited by A. A. Lumsford, H. Moglen, and J. Slevin, 74–80. New York: The Modern Language Association of America.
   Google Scholar
• Kyriakides, L. 2005. “Extending the Comprehensive Model of Educational Effectiveness by an Empirical Investigation”. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 16 (2): 103–152. doi: 10.1080/09243450500113936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyriakides, L., and B.P.M. Creemers. 2009. “The Effects of Teacher Factors on Different Outcomes: Two Studies Testing the Validity of the Dynamic Model.” Effective Education 1: 61–85. doi: 10.1080/19415530903043680
   Google Scholar
• Kyriakides, L., and B.P.M. Creemers. 2012a. “Characteristics of Effective Schools in Facing and Reducing Bullying.” School Psychology International 34 (3): 348–368. doi: 10.1177/0143034312467127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyriakides, L., and B.P.M. Creemers. 2012b. “School Policy on Teaching and School Learning Environment: Direct and Indirect Effects Upon Student Outcome Measures.” Educational Research and Evaluation: An International Journal on Theory and Practice 18 (5): 403–424. doi: 10.1080/13803611.2012.689716
   Google Scholar
• Kyriakides, L., and N. Tsangaridou. 2008. “Towards the Development of Generic and Differentiated Models of Educational Effectiveness: A Study on School and Teacher Effectiveness in Physical Education.” British Educational Research Journal 34 (6): 807–838. doi: 10.1080/01411920802041467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linnakyla, P., A. Malin, and K. Taube. 2004. “Factors Behind Low Reading Literacy Achievement.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 48 (3): 231–249. doi: 10.1080/00313830410001695718
   Google Scholar
• Maehr, M. L., and C. Midgley. 1996. Transforming School Cultures. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Michelli, M. 2013. The Relationship between Attitudes and Achievement in Mathematics among Fifth Grade Students. Hattiesburg: The University of Southern Mississippi.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammadpour, E. 2012. “A Multilevel Study on Trends in Malaysian Secondary School Students’ Science Achievement and Associated School and Student Predictors.” Science Education 96 (6): 1013–1046. doi: 10.1002/sce.21028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullis, I., O. Martin, P. Foy, and A. Arora. 2012a. IEA’s TIMSS 2011 International Report on Achievement in the Mathematics Cognitive Domains: Findings from a Developmental Project. United States: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.
   Google Scholar
• Mullis, I., O. Martin, P. Foy, and K.T. Drucker. 2012b. IEA’s PIRLS 2011 International Report on Achievement in Reading Cognitive Domains: Findings from a Developmental Project. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 1999. “Education At a Glance 1998: OECD Indicators.” Accessed March 2, 2015. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/education-at-a-glance-1998_eag-1998-en.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2006. Assessing Scientific, Reading and Mathematical Literacy: A Framework for PISA 2006. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2007. “Education At a Glance 2007: OECD Indicators.” Accessed March 2, 2015. http://www.oecd.org/education/skills-beyond-school/40701218.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2012a. “Equity and Quality in Education: Supporting Disadvantaged Students and Schools.” Accessed February 25, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264130852-en.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2012b. PISA 2009 Technical Report. Pisa: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Pahl, K., and J. Rowsell. 2005. Literacy and Education: Understanding the New Literacy Studies in the Classroom. London: Paul Chapman.
   Google Scholar
• Panayiotou, A., L. Kyriakides, B. P. M Creemers, L. McMahon, G. Vanlaar, M. Pfeifer, and M. Bren. 2013. “Teacher Behavior and Student Outcomes: Results of a European study.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, April 27–May 1.
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., and A.S. Bryk. 1986. “A Hierarchical Model for Studying School Effects.” Sociology of Education 59: 1–17. doi: 10.2307/2112482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S.W., A. S. Bryk, and R. Congdon. 2004. HLM 6 for Windows [Computer software]. Skokie, IL: Scientific Software.
   Google Scholar
• Scribner, S. 1984. “Literacy in Three Metaphors.” American Journal of Education 93: 6–21. doi: 10.1086/443783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, F., K. Malgorzata, and P. Beatriz. 2007. “No More Failures: Ten Steps to Equity in Education.” Accessed June 22, 2015. https://books.google.com.cy/books.
   Google Scholar
• Stipek, D. J. 1996. “Motivation and Instruction.” In Handbook of Educational Psychology, edited by D. Berliner and R. Calfee, 85–113. New York: McMillan.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2005. EFA Global Monitoring Report: Literacy for life 2006. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2012. “At Least 250 Million Children of Primary School-Age Are Failing to Learn the Basics. Education for All Global Monitoring Report.” Accessed March 9, 2016. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0021/002193/219349E.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO Institute for Statistics. 2008. International Literacy Statistics: A Review of Concepts, Methodology, and Current Data. Montreal: UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Van Vechten, D. 2013. “Impact of Home Literacy Environments on Students from Low Socioeconomic Status Backgrounds.” Education Masters 248. Accessed March 9, 2016. http://fisherpub.sjfc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1249&context=education_ETD_masters.
   Google Scholar
• Vanlaar, G., L. Kyriakides, A. Panayiotou, M. Vandecandelaere, L. McMahon, B. De Fraine, and J. Van Damme. 2015. “Do the Teachers and School Factors of the Dynamic Model Affect High- and Low-achieving Student Groups to the Same Extent? A Cross Country Study.” Research Papers in Education. doi:10.1080/02671522.2015.1027724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, A. 2011. “Not Just a ‘Boy Problem’: An Exploration of the Complexities Surrounding Literacy Under-Achievement.” Discourse: Studies In The Cultural Politics Of Education 32 (5): 779–795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., J. T. Guthrie, T. Stephen, and K. Perencevich. 2004. “Children's Motivation for Reading: Domain Specificity and Instructional Influences.” The Journal of Educational Research 97 (6): 299–310. doi:10.3200/JOER.97.6.299-310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. 1984. “A Psychometric Model of Hierarchical Development.” PhD diss., University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. 1989. “Saltus: A Psychometric Model of Discontinuity in Cognitive Development.” Psychological Bulletin 105 (2): 276–289. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.105.2.276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wray, D. 2013. “Principles and Practice in Extending Literacy Skills.” The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas 86 (1): 11–16. doi: 10.1080/00098655.2012.718294
   Google Scholar