Video-based methodologies: the affordances of different viewpoints in understanding teachers’ tacit knowledge of practice that supports young children’s oral language

References

• Alexander, R. J. 2008. Towards Dialogic Teaching: Rethinking Classroom Talk. 4th ed. Cambridge: Dialogos.
   Google Scholar
• Altheide, D., and J. Johnson. 1998. “Criteria for Assessing Interpretive Validity in Qualitative Research.” In Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials, edited by N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln, 283–312. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. C., and P. Freebody. 1981. “Vocabulary Knowledge.” In Comprehension and Teaching: Research Reviews, edited by J. Guthrie, 77–117. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, D. 2008. “Exploratory Talk for Learning.” In Exploring Talk in School: Inspired by the Work of Douglas Barnes, edited by N. Mercer and S. Hodgkinson, 1–16. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Barrow, W., and L. Todd. 2015. “Reflections on the Potential of VERP to Support Agency in Professional Reflection and Development.” In Video Enhanced Reflective Practice: Professional Development Through Attuned Interactions, edited by H. Kennedy, M. Landor, and L. Todd, 282–291. London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Blikstad-Balas, M. 2016. “Key Challenges of Using Video When Investigating Social Practices in Education: Contextualization, Magnification, and Representation.” International Journal of Research and Method in Education 14, 1–13. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2016.1181162.
   Google Scholar
• Borko, H. 2016. “Methodological Contributions to Video-based Studies of Classroom Teaching and Learning: A Commentary.” ZDM 48 (1): 213–218. doi: 10.1007/s11858-016-0776-x
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., and L. Waquant. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Calandra, B., R. Gurvitch, and J. Lund. 2008. “An Exploratory Study of Digital Video Editing as a Tool for Teacher Preparation.” Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 16 (2): 137–153.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, D. J., and H. Hollingsworth. 2000. “Seeing Is Understanding: Examining the Merits of Video and Narrative Cases.” Journal of Staff Development 21 (4): 40–43.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, D., C. Mitchell, and P. Bowman. 2009. “Optimising the Use of Available Technology to Support International Collaborative Research in Mathematics Classrooms.” In The Power of Video Studies in Investigating Teaching and Learning in the Classroom, edited by T. Janik and T. Seidel, 39–60. New York, NY: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., L. Manion, and K. Morrison. 2011. Research Methods in Education. 7th ed. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 1998. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2013. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. 3rd ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cutter-Mackenzie, A., S. Edwards, and H. Widdop Quinton. 2015. “Child-framed Video Research Methodologies: Issues, Possibilities and Challenges for Researching with Children.” Children’s Geographies 13 (3): 343–356. doi: 10.1080/14733285.2013.848598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edward-Groves, C., M. Anstey, and G. Bull. 2014. Classroom Talk: Understanding Dialogue, Pedagogy and Practice. Newtown: PETAA.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, K. 2003. “Demystifying Critical Reflection: Defining Criteria for Assessment.” Higher Education Research and Development 22 (3): 313–325. doi: 10.1080/0729436032000145167
   Google Scholar
• Fleer, M. 2008. “Using Digital Video Observations and Computer Technologies in a Cultural-historical Approach.” In Studying Children: A Cultural-historical Approach, edited by M. Hedegaard and M. Fleer, 111–117. Maidenhead: McGraw Hill/Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gillen, J., C. A. Cameron, S. Tapanya, G. Pinto, R. Hancock, S. Young, and B. Accorti Gamannossi. 2007. “‘A Day in the Life’: Advancing a Methodology for the Cultural Study of Development and Learning in Early Childhood.” Early Child Development and Care 177 (2): 207–218. doi: 10.1080/03004430500393763
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. 2013. Representation. 2nd ed. London: Sage in association with the Open University.
   Google Scholar
• Harford, J., G. MacRuairc, and D. McCartan. 2010. “‘Lights, Camera, Reflection’: Using Peer Video to Promote Reflective Dialogue among Student Teachers.” Teacher Development 14 (1): 57–68. doi: 10.1080/13664531003696592
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A. M. 2016. Video as Method: Understanding Qualitative Research. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hatch, J. A. 2002. Doing Qualitative Research in Education Settings. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hennessy, S., and R. Deaney. 2009. “‘Intermediate Theory’ Building: Integrating Multiple Teacher and Researcher Perspectives Through In-depth Video Analysis of Pedagogic Strategies.” Teachers College Record 111 (7): 1753–1795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrington, J., and R. Oliver. 1999. “Using Situated Learning and Multimedia to Investigate Higher-order Thinking.” Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 8 (4): 401–421.
   Google Scholar
• Holquist, M. 1990. “Introduction: The Architectonics of Answerability.” In Art and Answerability: Early Philosophical Essays by M. M. Bakhtin, edited by M. Holquist and V. Liapunov, ix–lii. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C. 2012. “An Introduction to Using Video for Research.” National Centre for Research Methods, Working Paper 03/12. London: Institute of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Kazan, T. S. 2005. “Dancing Bodies in the Classroom: Moving toward an Embodied Pedagogy.” Pedagogy 5 (3): 379–408. doi: 10.1215/15314200-5-3-379
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, H., M. Landor, and L. Todd. 2010. “Video Interaction Guidance as a Method to Promote Secure Attachment.” Educational and Child Psychology 27 (3): 59–72.
   Google Scholar
• Kenway, J., and J. McLeod. 2004. “Bourdieu’s Reflexive Sociology and ‘Spaces of Points of View’: Whose Reflexivity, Which Perspective?” British Journal of Sociology of Education 25 (4): 525–544. doi: 10.1080/0142569042000236998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingsley, J. 2009. “Visual Methodology in Classroom Inquiry: Enhancing Complementary Qualitative Research Designs.” Alberta Journal of Educational Research 55 (4): 534–548.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorp, K. 2004. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lingard, B., and P. Renshaw. 2010. “Teaching as a Research-informed and Research-informing Profession.” In Connecting Inquiry and Professional Learning in Education: International Perspective and Practical Solutions, edited by A. Campbell and S. Groundwater-Smith, 26–39. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lomax, H., and N. Casey. 1998. “Recording Social Life: Reflexivity and Video Methodology.” Sociological Research Online 3 (2): xiii–xxiv. doi: 10.5153/sro.1372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn, N., and S. J. Lea. 2005. “Through the Looking Glass: Considering the Challenges Visual Methodologies Raise for Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 2 (3): 213–225. doi: 10.1191/1478088705qp039oa
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, N., and S. Knipe. 2006. “Research Dilemmas: Paradigms, Methods and Methodology.” Issues in Educational Research 16 (2): 193–205.
   Google Scholar
• Mertens, D. M. 2005. Research Methods in Education and Psychology: Integrating Diversity with Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Moyles, J., S. Adams, and A. Musgrove. 2002. “Using Reflective Dialogues as a Tool for Engaging with Challenges of Defining Effective Pedagogy.” Early Child Development and Care 172 (5): 463–478. doi: 10.1080/03004430214551
   Google Scholar
• Neuman, Y. 2008. “Transgradience: A Lesson from Bakhtin.” In Studies in Multidisciplinarity, Vol. 6, edited by L. A. McNamara, M. A. Meyer, R. Paton, and Y. Neuman, 239–256. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Pillow, W. 2003. “Confession, Catharsis, or Cure? Rethinking the Uses of Reflexivity as Methodological Power in Qualitative Research.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 16 (2): 175–196. doi: 10.1080/0951839032000060635
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S. 2001. Doing Visual Ethnography. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S. 2007. Doing Visual Ethnography: Images, Media and Representation in Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pordes-Bowers, A., J. Strelitz, J. Allen, and A. Donkin. 2012. An Equal Start: Improving Outcomes in Children’s Centres. London: UCL Institute of Health Equity.
   Google Scholar
• Probst, B., and L. Berenson. 2014. “The Double Arrow: How Qualitative Social Work Researchers Use Reflexivity.” Qualitative Social Work: Research and Practice 13 (6): 813–827. doi: 10.1177/1473325013506248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid, E. C. 2011. “Video-stimulated Reflection as a Professional Development Tool in Interactive Whiteboard Research.” ReCALL 23 (3): 252–270. doi: 10.1017/S0958344011000176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, C. E. 1991. “The Theoretical Basis for Relationships Between Language and Literacy in Development.” Journal of Research in Childhood Education 6 (1): 5–10. doi: 10.1080/02568549109594817
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C. E., P. Tabors, and D. E. Dickinson. 2001. “Language Development in the Pre-school Years.” In Beginning Literacy with Language: Young Children Learning at Home and School, edited by D. E. Dickinson and P. Tabors, 1–26. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, P. 2008. “Children and Young People: Voices in Visual Research.” In Doing Visual Research with Children and Young People, edited by P. Thomson, 1–19. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Waite, S., and M. Gatrell. 2004. “Supporting Critical Self-reflection: Developing the Thinking Teacher.” Paper Presented at the 3rd Carfax International Conference on Reflective Practice, “Reflection as a Catalyst for Change’, Institute of Reflective Practice, Gloucester, June 23–25.
   Google Scholar
• White, E. J. 2011. “Seeing the Toddler: Voices and Voiceless.” In Educational Research with Our Youngest: Voices of Infants and Toddlers, edited by E. Johansson and E. J. White, 63–85. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• White, E. J., B. Redder, and M. Peter. 2015. “The Work of the Eye in Infant Pedagogy: A Dialogic Encounter of ‘Seeing’ in an Education and Care Setting.” International Journal of Early Childhood 47 (2): 283–299. doi: 10.1007/s13158-015-0139-8
   Google Scholar
• Wiles, R., L. Prosser, A. Bagnoli, A. Clark, K. Davies, S. Holland, and E. Renold. 2008. Visual Ethics: Ethical Issues in Visual Research. Southampton: ESRC National Centre for Research Methods.
   Google Scholar