Utilising Bacchi's what's the problem represented to be? (WPR) approach to analyse national school exclusion policy in England and Scotland: a worked example

References

• Alexander, A., and Coveney, J., 2013. A critical discourse analysis of Canadian and Australian public health recommendations promoting physical activity to children. Health sociology review, 22 (4), 353–364. doi:https://doi.org/10.5172/hesr.2013.22.4.353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacchi, C., 2009. Analysing policy: what’s the problem represented to be? Frenchs Forest: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Bacchi, C., 2012. Why study problematisations? Making politics visible. Open journal of political science, 2 (1), 1–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.4236/ojps.2012.21001.
   Google Scholar
• Bacchi, C., and Bonham, S., 2014. Reclaiming discursive practices as an analytic focus: political implications. Foucault studies, 17, 173–192. doi:https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.v0i17.4298.
   Google Scholar
• Bacchi, C., and Goodwin, S., 2016. Poststructural policy analysis: a guide to practice. New York: Palgrave Pivot.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S.J., 1993. What is policy? Texts, trajectories and toolboxes. Discourse: studies in the cultural politics of education, 13 (2), 10–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0159630930130203.
   Google Scholar
• Beutler, D., and Feneca, M., 2018. An analysis of the Australian government’s jobs for families child care package: the utility of Bacchi’s WPR methodology to identify potential influences on parents’ childcare choices. Australasian journal of early childhood, 43 (1), 16–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.23965/ajec.43.1.02.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bills, A., and Howard, N., 2017. Social inclusion education policy in South Australia. what can we learn? Australian journal of education, 6 (1), 54–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944116689165.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, A., 2019. Analyzing problematization as a situated practice in critical policy studies: a case study of ‘customer focus’ policy in urban compliance services. Critical policy studies, 13 (2), 190–210. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2017.1414619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, T., et al., 2019. Factors associated with high and low levels of school exclusions: comparing the English and wider UK experience. Emotional and behavioural difficulties, 24 (4), 374–390. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13632752.2019.1628340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels, H., et al., 2003. Study of young people permanently excluded from school. Nottingham: Department for Education and Skills.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, H., Thompson, I., and Tawell, A., 2019. After warnock: the effects of perverse incentives in policies in england for students with special educational needs. Frontiers in education, 4 (36), 1–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00036.
   Google Scholar
• de Friend, 2019. Challenging school exclusions: a report by JUSTICE. London: JUSTICE.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education (DfE), 2017. Exclusion from maintained schools, academies and pupil referral units in England: statutory guidance for those with legal responsibilities in relation to exclusion. London: DfE.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, Y., 2015. 2.1 using critical discourse analysis to interpret educational policy on school exclusion in England and Wales. In: P. Smeyers, D. Bridges, N.C. Burbules and M. Griffiths, eds. International handbook of interpretation in educational research: part 1. Dordrecht: Springer, 285–314.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, M., 1988. Constructing the political spectacle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N., 2003. Analysing discourse: textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1994. “So is it important to think?” In power: essential works of foucault 1954–1984, vol. 3. translated and edited by R. Hurley and others, and J. D. Faubion. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Gale, T., 1999. Policy trajectories: treading the discursive path of policy analysis. Discourse: studies in cultural politics of education, 20 (3), 393–407. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0159630990200304.
   Google Scholar
• Gazeley, L., et al., 2013. Reducing inequalities in school exclusion: learning from good practice. Sussex: University of Sussex.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, K., Quilter-Pinner, H., and Swift, D., 2017. Making the difference: breaking the link between school exclusion and social exclusion. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Gylling-Jørgensen, M., 2012. Comparing the structure of political discourse in three languages. In: II international conference on communication, cognition and media: political and economic discourse. Lisbon: Universidade Catolica Portuguesa, 96–97.
   Google Scholar
• Lappalainen, S., Nylund, M., and Rosvall, P.-A., 2019. Imagining societies through discourses on educational equality: a cross-cultural analysis of Finnish and Swedish upper secondary curricula from 1970 to the 2010s. European educational research journal, 18 (3), 335–354. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904118814140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lomer, S., 2017. Recruiting international students in higher education: representations and rationales in British policy. London: Palgrave Studies in Global Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Loutzenheiser, L.W., 2015. ‘Who are you calling a problem?’: addressing transphobia and homophobia through school policy. Critical studies in education, 56 (1), 99–115. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2015.990473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macleod, G., 2014. How is behaviour policy in scotland made, and what does this mean for the policy that ensues? International journal of school disaffection, 11 (1), 41–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.18546/IJSD.11.1.03.
   Google Scholar
• Magnússon, G., Göransson, K., and Lindqvist, G., 2019. Contextualizing inclusive education in educational policy: the case of Sweden. Nordic journal of studies in educational policy, 5 (2), 67–77. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2019.1586512.
   Google Scholar
• McCluskey, G., et al., 2019. Exclusion from school in Scotland and across the UK: contrasts and questions. British educational research journal, 45 (6), 1140–1159. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Malley, P., 2009. Responsibilisation. In: A. Wakefield and J. Fleming, eds. The SAGE dictionary of policing. London: Sage, 277–279.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, C., et al., 2015. School exclusion in children with psychiatric disorder or impairing psychopathology: a systematic review. Emotional and behavioural difficulties, 20 (3), 229–251. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13632752.2014.945741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regmi, D.V., 2019. Critical policy sociology: key underlying assumptions and their implications for educational policy research. International journal of research & method in education, 42 (1), 59–75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2017.1398228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riddell, S., and McCluskey, G., 2012. Policy and provision for children with social, emotional and behavioural difficulties in scotland: intersections of gender and deprivation. In: T. Cole, H. Daniels and J. Visser, eds. The routledge international companion to emotional and behavioural difficulties. London: Routledge, 57–67.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government (SG), 2017. Included, engaged and involved part 2: preventing and managing school exclusions. Edinburgh: SG.
   Google Scholar
• Skovhus, R.B., and Thomsen, R., 2017. Popular problems. British journal of guidance & counselling, 45 (1), 112–131. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2015.1121536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temple, A., 2020. Excluded, exploited, forgotten: childhood criminal exploitation and school exclusions. London: Just for Kids Law, including the Children’s Rights Alliance for England.
   Google Scholar
• Timpson, E., 2019. Timpson review of school exclusion. London: Department for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Van Aswegen, J., Hyatt, D., and Goodley, D., 2019. A critical discourse problematization framework for (disability) policy analysis: ‘good cop/bad cop’ strategy. Qualitative research journal, 19 (2), 185–198. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-12-2018-0004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar