Two methods for quantifying similarity between textbooks with respect to content distribution

References

• Alajmi, A.H., 2012. How do elementary textbooks address fractions? A review of mathematics textbooks in the USA, Japan, and Kuwait. Educational studies in mathematics, 79 (2), 239–261. doi:10.1007/s10649-011-9342-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albarracin, L., et al., 2019. Extending modelling activity diagrams as a tool to characterise mathematical modelling processes. The mathematics enthusiast, 16 (1), 211–230. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/tme/vol16/iss1/10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, P., and Sayers, J., 2015. Identifying opportunities for grade one children to acquire foundational number sense: developing a framework for cross cultural classroom analyses. Early childhood education journal, 43 (4), 257–267. doi:10.1007/s10643-014-0653-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baroni-Urbani, C., and Buser, M.W., 1976. Similarity of binary data. Systematic Zoology, 25 (3), 251–259.
   Google Scholar
• Borba, R., and Selva, A., 2013. Analysis of the role of the calculator in Brazilian textbooks. ZDM, 45 (5), 737–750. doi:10.1007/s11858-013-0517-3.
   Google Scholar
• Cheetham, A.H., and Hazel, J.E., 1969. Binary (presence-absence) similarity coefficients. Journal of paleontology, 43 (5), 1130–1136.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, S.-S., Cha, S.-H., and Tappert, C.C., 2010. A survey of binary similarity and distance measures. Journal of systemics, cybernetics and informatics, 8 (1), 43–48.
   Google Scholar
• Ding, M., 2016. Opportunities to learn: inverse relations in U.S. and Chinese Textbooks. Mathematical thinking and learning, 18 (1), 45–68. doi:10.1080/10986065.2016.1107819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, M., and Li, X., 2010. A comparative analysis of the distributive property in US and Chinese Elementary Mathematics Textbooks. Cognition and instruction, 28 (2), 146–180. doi:10.1080/07370001003638553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, L., 2013. Textbook research as Scientific Research: towards a common ground on issues and methods of research on Mathematics Textbooks. ZDM, 45 (5), 765–777. Doi: 10.1007/s11858-013-0530-6.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, J.-E., and Hansen, K.Y., 2018. Changes in the impact of family education on student educational achievement in Sweden 1988–2014. Scandinavian journal of educational research, 62 (5), 719–736. doi: 10.1080/00313831.2017.1306799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, J., and Tzur, R., 2017. Where is difference? Processes of mathematical remediation through a constructivist lens. The journal of mathematical behavior, 48, 62–76. doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.06.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, J., et al., 2016. Levels of participatory conception of fractional quantity along a purposefully sequenced series of equal sharing tasks: Stu's trajectory. The journal of mathematical behavior, 41, 45–67. doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2015.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huntley, M.A., and Terrell, M.S., 2014. One-step and multi-step linear equations: a content analysis of five textbook series. ZDM, 46 (5), 751–766. doi:10.1007/s11858-014-0627-6.
   Google Scholar
• Janson, S., and Vegelius, J., 1981. Measures of ecological association. Oecologia, 49 (3), 371–376. doi:10.1007/BF00347601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, K., and Fujita, T., 2013. Interpretations of national curricula: the case of geometry in textbooks from England and Japan. ZDM, 45 (5), 671–683. doi: 10.1007/s11858-013-0515-5.
   Google Scholar
• Keisar, E., and Peled, I., 2018. Investigating new curricular goals: what develops when first graders solve modelling tasks? Research in mathematics education, 20 (2), 127–145. doi:10.1080/14794802.2018.1473160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozak, M., 2009. What is strong correlation? Teaching statistics, 31 (3), 85–86. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9639.2009.00387.x.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, E., McFarland-Piazza, L., and Harrison, L.J., 2015. Changing patterns of parent–teacher communication and parent involvement from preschool to school. Early child development and care, 185 (7), 1031–1052. doi: 10.1080/03004430.2014.975223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersson, J., et al., 2019. Opportunities for year-one children to acquire foundational number sense: comparing English and Swedish adaptations of the same Singapore Textbook. In: Lorraine Harbison and Aisling Twohill, eds. Proceedings of the Seventh Conference on Research in Mathematics Education in Ireland. Dublin: Institute of Education, Dublin City University, 251–258. doi:10.5281/zenodo.3580947
   Google Scholar
• Petersson, J., et al., 2021. Two novel approaches to the content analysis of school Mathematics Textbooks. International journal of research & method in education, 44 (2), 208–222. doi: 10.1080/1743727X.2020.1766437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersson, J., Sayers, J., Rosenqvist, E., and Andrews, P., 2022. Analysing English year-one mathematics textbooks through the lens of foundational number sense: A cautionary tale for importers of overseas-authored materials. Oxford Review of Education. doi: 10.1080/03054985.2022.2064443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romesburg, C., 2004. Cluster Analysis for Researchers. North Carolina: Lulu. com.
   Google Scholar
• Sayers, J., et al., 2019. Opportunities to learn foundational number sense in three Swedish year one textbooks: implications for the importation of overseas-authored materials. International journal of mathematical education in science and technology, 10–21. doi: 10.1080/0020739X.2019.1688406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A.H., 1985. Mathematical Problem Solving. Orlando: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Törnroos, J., 2005. Mathematics textbooks, opportunity to learn and student achievement. Studies in educational evaluation, 31 (4), 315–327. doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2005.11.005.
   Google Scholar
• Wicherts, J.M., et al., 2016. Degrees of freedom in planning, running, analyzing, and reporting psychological studies: a checklist to avoid p-hacking. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1832. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar