Investigating ‘Presence in teaching’: explicating the transition from qualitative studies to a survey instrument

References

• Alise, M.A., and Teddlie, C., 2010. A continuation of the paradigm wars? Prevalence rates of methodological approaches across the social/behavioral sciences. Journal of mixed methods research, 4 (2), 103–126. doi:10.1177/1558689809360805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelides, P., and Gibbs, P., 2006. Supporting the continued professional development of teachers through the use of vignettes. Teacher education quarterly, 33 (4), 111–121.
   Google Scholar
• Angen, M.J., 2000. Evaluating interpretive inquiry: reviewing the validity debate and opening the dialogue. Qualitative health research, 10 (3), 378–395. doi:10.1177/104973230001000308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atzmüller, C., and Steiner, P.M., 2010. Experimental vignette studies in survey research. Methodology: European journal of research methods for the behavioral and social sciences, 6 (3), 128–138. doi:10.1027/1614-2241/a000014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brancato, G. 2006. Handbook of recommended practices for questionnaire development and testing in the European statistical system. Available from: https://www.istat.it/en/files/2013/12/Handbook_questionnaire_development_2006.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R.C., Simone, G., and Worley, L., 2016. Embodied presence: contemplative teacher education. In: K. A. Schonert-Reichl, and R. W. Roeser, eds. In handbook of mindfulness in education. New York: Springer, 207–219.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J.W., and Plano Clark, V.L., 2011. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dellinger, A.B., and Leech, N.L., 2007. Toward a unified validation framework in mixed methods research. Journal of mixed methods research, 1 (4), 309–332. doi:10.1177/1558689807306147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N.K., 2010. Moments, mixed methods, and paradigm dialogs. Qualitative inquiry, 16 (6), 419–427. doi:10.1177/1077800410364608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drill, K., Miller, S., and Behrstock-Sherratt, E., 2013. Teachers’ perspectives on educational research. Brock education: A journal of educational research and practice, 23 (1): 3–17.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, F., 1986. Qualitative methods in research on teaching.” In: M.C. Wittrock, eds. In handbook of research on teaching, 3rd ed., 119–161. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, S.C., et al., 2015. Vignette methodologies for studying clinicians’ decision-making: validity, utility, and application in ICD-11 field studies. International journal of clinical and health psychology, 15 (2), 160–170. doi:10.1016/j.ijchp.2014.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finlay, L., 2002. “Outing” the researcher: the provenance, process, and practice of reflexivity. Qualitative health research, 12 (4), 531–545. doi:10.1177/104973202129120052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodyear-Smith, F., Jackson, C., and Greenhalgh, T., 2015. Co-design and implementation research: challenges and solutions for ethics committees. BMC medical ethics, 16 (1), 1–5. doi:10.1186/s12910-015-0072-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grant, J.S., and Davis, L.L., 1997. Selection and use of content experts for instrument development. Research in nursing & health, 20 (3), 269–274. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199706)20:3<269::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, J.C., 2008. Is mixed methods social inquiry a distinctive methodology? Journal of mixed methods research, 2 (1), 7–22. doi:10.1177/1558689807309969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, K.R., 2004. A critique of experimentalism. Qualitative inquiry, 10 (1), 42–61. doi:10.1177/1077800403259491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, H., 2017. Validity in mixed methods research in education: the application of Habermas’ critical theory. International journal of research & method in education, 40 (2), 201–213. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2015.1088518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J.A., 2016. Expanding the history and range of mixed methods research. Journal of mixed methods research, 10 (1), 12–27. doi:10.1177/1558689815571132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McChesney, K., and Aldridge, J., 2019. Weaving an interpretivist stance throughout mixed methods research. International journal of research & method in education, 42 (3), 225–238. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2019.1590811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer, P.C., Korthagen, F.A.J., and Vasalos, A., 2009. Supporting presence in teacher education: the connection between the personal and professional aspects of teaching. Teaching and teacher education, 25 (2), 297–308. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2008.09.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer, P.C., Verloop, N., and Beijaard, D., 2001. Similarities and differences in teachers’ practical knowledge about teaching reading comprehension. The journal of educational research, 94 (3), 171–184. doi:10.1080/00220670109599914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M.B., 1990. New methods for qualitative data collection and analysis: vignettes and pre-structured cases. International journal of qualitative studies in education, 3 (1), 37–51. doi:10.1080/0951839900030104
   Google Scholar
• Morse, J., 2010. Procedures and practice of mixed method design: maintaining control, rigor, and complexity. In: A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie, eds. In SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, 339–352.
   Google Scholar
• Nakata, Y., 2015. Insider-outsider perspective: revisiting the conceptual framework of research methodology in language teacher education. International journal of research & method in education, 38 (2), 166–183. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2014.923835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noddings, N., 2013. Caring: a feminine approach to ethics and moral education. 2nd. ed. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Bustamante, R., and Nelson, J., 2010. Mixed research as a tool for developing quantitative instruments. Journal of mixed methods research, 4 (1), 56–78. doi:10.1177/1558689809355805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulou, M., 2001. The role of vignettes in the research of emotional and behavioural difficulties. Emotional and behavioural difficulties, 6 (1), 50–62. doi:10.1080/13632750100507655
   Google Scholar
• Rodgers, C.R., and Raider-Roth, M.B., 2006. Presence in teaching. Teachers and teaching, 12 (3), 265–287. doi:10.1080/13450600500467548
   Google Scholar
• Roefs, E.C.J., et al., 2021a. Secondary school students’ experiences of presence in daily classroom practice. Cambridge journal of education, 51 (4), 411–432. doi:10.1080/0305764X.2020.1853678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roefs, E.C.J., et al., 2021b. Teachers’ experiences of presence in their daily educational practice. Education sciences, 11 (2), 48. doi:10.3390/educsci11020048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharmer, C.O., 2007. Theory U: learning from the future as it emerges. Cambridge, MA: Society for Organizational Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Shannon-Baker, P., 2016. Making paradigms meaningful in mixed methods research. Journal of mixed methods research, 10 (4), 319–334. doi:10.1177/1558689815575861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slattery, P., Alexander, K.S., and Bragge, P., 2020. Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews. Health research policy and systems, 18 (1), 1–13. doi:10.1186/s12961-020-0528-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solloway, S.G., 2000. Contemplative practitioners: presence or the project of thinking gaze differently. Encounter: education for meaning and social justice, 13 (3), 30–42.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, H., 2012. Triangulation, respondent validation, and democratic participation in mixed methods research. Journal of mixed methods research, 6 (2), 111–123. doi:10.1177/1558689812437185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trischler, J., Timo, D., and Rundle-Thiele, S., 2019. Co-design: from expert-to user-driven ideas in public service design. Public management review, 21 (11), 1595–1619. doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1619810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vagle, M.D., 2014. Crafting phenomenological research. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L.S., 1987. Thinking and speech. In: R. Rieber and A. Carton, eds. In The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky. New York: Plenum Press, 39–285.
   Google Scholar
• Wegerif, R., and Major, L., 2019. Buber, educational technology, and the expansion of dialogic space. Ai & society: knowledge, culture and communication, 34 (1), 109–119.
   Google Scholar
• Zamenopoulos, T., and Alexiou, K., 2018. Co-design as collaborative research. Bristol: University of Bristol/AHRC Connected Communities Programme.
   Google Scholar