Composing across modes: a comparative analysis of adolescents’ multimodal composing processes

References

• Alvermann, D. 2008. “Why Bother Theorizing Adolescents’ Online Literacies for Classroom Practice and Research?” Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 52 (1): 8–19. doi: 10.1598/JAAL.52.1.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, D., and M. Hamilton. 1998. Local Literacies: Reading and Writing in One Community. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Black, R. W. 2009. “Online Fanfiction, Global Identities, and Imagination.” Research in the Teaching of English 43 (4): 397–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt, D., and K. Clinton. 2002. “The Limits of the Local: Expanding Perspectives of Literacy as a Social Practice.” Journal of Literacy Research 34 (3): 337–356. doi: 10.1207/s15548430jlr3403_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brass, J. J. 2008. “Local Knowledge and Digital Movie Composing in an After-School Literacy Program.” Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 51 (6): 464–473. doi: 10.1598/JAAL.51.6.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce, D. 2008. “Visualizing Literacy: Building Bridges with Media.” Reading & Writing Quarterly 24 (3): 264–282. doi: 10.1080/10573560802004126
   Google Scholar
• Bruce, D. 2009. “Writing with Visual Images: Examining the Video Composition Processes of High School Students.” Research in the Teaching of English 43 (4): 426–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnett, C. 2015. “Being Together in Classrooms at the Interface of the Physical and Virtual: Implications for Collaboration in on/off-Screen Sites.” Learning, Media and Technology 1–24. doi:10.1080/17439884.2015.1050036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler-Olcott, K., and D. Mahar. 2003. “‘Tech-Savviness’ Meets Multiliteracies: Exploring Adolescent Girls’ Technology-Mediated Literacy Practices.” Reading Research Quarterly 38 (3): 356–385. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.38.3.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. 2000. “Grounded Theory: Objectivist and Constructivist Methods.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, 2nd ed., 509–535. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chavez, V., and E. Soep. 2005. “Youth Radio and the Pedagogy of Collegiality.” Harvard Educational Review 75 (4): 409–434. doi: 10.17763/haer.75.4.827u365446030386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cope, B., and M. Kalantzis. eds. 2000. Multiliteracies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, B. 2013. “Multimodal Composition and the Common Core Standards.” The Reading Teacher 66 (4): 333–339. doi: 10.1002/TRTR.01129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, B., and C. P. Proctor. 2008. “The Changing Landscape of Text and Comprehension in the Age of New Literacies.” In Handbook of Research on New Literacies, edited by J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, and D. Leu, 297–324. Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, B., K. Robinson, J. Lavvorn, B. E. Smith, T. Alvey, E. Mo, P. Uccelli, and C. P. Proctor. 2015. “Fifth-grade Students’ Multimodal Compositions: Modal use and Design Intentionality.” Elementary School Journal 115 (4): 548–569. doi: 10.1086/681969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, B., & Smith, B. E. 2012. “‘It Sounds All Dramatic Like in a Movie’: Two Middle School Males Collaboratively Design a Multimodal Digital Folktale.” Paper presented at the 62nd annual meeting of the Literacy Research Association, San Diego, CA, December.
   Google Scholar
• Domingo, M. 2012. “Linguistic Layering: Social Language Development in the Context of Multimodal Design and Digital Technologies.” Learning, Media & Technology 37 (2): 177–197. doi: 10.1080/17439884.2012.670645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehret, C., and T. Hollett. 2014. “Embodied Composition in Real Virtualities: Adolescents’ Literacy Practices and Felt Experiences Moving with Digital, Mobile Devices in School.” Research in the Teaching of English 48 (4): 428–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erlandson, D. A., E. L. Harris, B. L. Skipper, and S. D. Allen. 1993. Doing Naturalistic Inquiry: A Guide to Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. 2012. Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses. 4th ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gilje, ÿ. 2010. “Multimodal Redesign in Filmmaking Practices: An Inquiry of Young Filmmakers Deployment of Semiotic Tools in Their Filmmaking Practice.” Written Communication 27 (4): 494–522. doi: 10.1177/0741088310377874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilje, ÿ. 2011. “Working in Tandem with Editing Tools: Iterative Meaning-making in Filmmaking Practices.” Visual Communication 10 (1): 45–62. doi: 10.1177/1470357210390441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., and A. L. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, S. 2003. Teaching Youth Media: A Critical Guide to Literacy, Video Production and Social Change. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhow, C., and C. Lewin. 2016. “Social Media and Education: Re-conceptualizing the Boundaries of Formal and Informal Learning.” Learning, Media and Technology 41 (1): 6–30. doi:10.1080/17439884.2015.1064954 doi: 10.1080/17439884.2015.1064954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. 1978. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, J., and L. Flowers. 1980. “Identifying the Organization of Writing Processes.” In Cognitive Processes in Writing, edited by L. W. Gregg and E. R. Steinberg, 3–30. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, S. B. 1983. Ways with Words: Language, Life and Work in Communities and Classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, C. M. L., M. E. Nelson, and W. Mueller-Wittig. 2011. “Design and Implementation of a Student-Generated Virtual Museum in a Language Curriculum to Enhance Collaborative Multimodal Meaning-making.” Computers & Education 57: 1083–1097. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodge, R. I. V., and G. R. Kress. 1988. Social Semiotics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hull, G. A., and M. Katz. 2006. “Crafting an Agentive Self: Case Studies of Digital Storytelling.” Research in the Teaching of English 41 (1): 43–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hull, G., and M. Nelson. 2005. “Locating the Semiotic Power of Multimodality.” Written Communication 22: 224–261. doi: 10.1177/0741088304274170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito, M., H. Horst, M. Bittanti, D. boyd, B. Herr-Stephenson, P. Lange, … L. Robinson. 2010. Hanging Out, Messing Around and Geeking Out: Kids Learning and Living in New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H. 2008. Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. Updated ed. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C. 2008. “Multimodality and Literacy in School Classrooms.” Review of Research in Education 32 (1): 241–267. doi: 10.3102/0091732X07310586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C. 2009. The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jocius, R. 2013. “Exploring Adolescents’ Multimodal Responses to The Kite Runner: Understanding How Students use Digital Media for Academic Purposes.” Journal of Media Literacy Education 5 (1): 310–325.
   Google Scholar
• Jocius, R. 2015. “Collaborative Composing in the Digital Dimension: An Investigation of Young Adolescents’ Multimodal Processes and Products.” Unpublished doctoral diss., Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
   Google Scholar
• Kafai, Y. B., and K. A. Peppler. 2011. “Youth, Technology, and DIY: Developing Participatory Competencies in Creative Media Production.” Review of Research in Education 35: 89–119. doi: 10.3102/0091732X10383211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kist, W., and K. Pytash. 2015. “‘I Love to Flip the Pages’: Pre-service Teachers and New Literacies Within a Field Experience.” English Education 47 (2): 131–167.
   Google Scholar
• Knobel, M., and C. Lankshear. 2008. “Remix: The Art and Craft of Endless Hybridization.” Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 52 (1): 22–33. doi: 10.1598/JAAL.52.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress, G. 2003. Literacy in the New Media Age. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. 2010. Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Landlow, G. P., and P. Delaney. 1991. “Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Literacy Studies: The State of the art.” In Hypermedia and Literacy Studies, edited by P. Delaney and G. P. Landlow, 3–50. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leander, K. M., and G. Boldt. 2013. “Rereading ‘A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies’: Texts, Identities, and Futures.” Journal of Literacy Research 45 (1): 22–46. doi: 10.1177/1086296X12468587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leander, K. M., and J. Lovvorn. 2006. “Literacy Networks: Following the Circulation of Texts, Bodies, and Objects in the Schooling and Online Gaming of One Youth.” Cognition & Instruction 24 (3): 291–340. doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci2403_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leander, K. M., N. C. Phillips, and K. H. Taylor. 2010. “The Changing Social Spaces of Learning: Mapping new Mobilities.” Review of Research in Education 34: 329–394. doi: 10.3102/0091732X09358129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenhart, A. 2015. “Teens, Social Media and Technology Overview.” Accessed December 22, 2015 http://www.pewinternet.org/files/2015/04/PI_TeensandTech_Update2015_0409151.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Leu, D. J., E. Forzani, C. Rhoads, C. Maykel, C. Kennedy, and N. Timbrell. 2014. “The New Literacies of Online Research and Comprehension: Rethinking the Reading Achievement Gap.” Reading Research Quarterly 50 (1): 37–59. doi: 10.1002/rrq.85
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leu, D. J., C. K. Kinzer, J. Coiro, and D. W. Cammack. 2004. “Toward a Theory of New Literacies Emerging from the Internet and Other Information and Communication Technologies.” In Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading, edited by R. B. Ruddell and N. J. Unrau, 5th ed., 1570–1613. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, C., and B. Fabos. 2005. “Instant Messaging, Literacies, and Social Identities.” Reading Research Quarterly 40 (4): 470–501. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.40.4.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. 2008. “Multimedia Literacy.” In Handbook of Research on New Literacies, edited by J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, and D. J. Leu, 359–376. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Merchant, G. 2007. “Writing the Future in the Digital Age.” Literacy 41 (3): 118–128. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9345.2007.00469.x
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of English. 2013. “The NCTE Definition of 21st Century Literacies.” http://www.ncte.org/positions/statements/21stcentdefinition.
   Google Scholar
• New London Group. 1996. “A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Designing Social Features.” Harvard Educational Review 66: 60–93. doi: 10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, T. 1990. The Things They Carried. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Oldaker, A. (2010). “Creating Video Games in Middle School Language Arts Classroom: A Narrative Account. Voices from the Middle 17 (3): 19–26.
   Google Scholar
• Pacheco, M. B., and B. E. Smith. 2015. “Across Languages, Modes, and Identities: Bilingual Adolescents’ Multimodal Codemeshing in the Literacy Classroom.” Bilingual Research Journal 38 (3): 292–312. doi: 10.1080/15235882.2015.1091051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. 1990. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, N. C., and B. E. Smith. 2012. “Multimodality and Aurality: Sound Spaces in Student Digital Book Trailers.” In 61st Yearbook of the Literacy Research Association, edited by P. J. Dunston, S. K. Fullerton, C. C. Bates, K. Headley, and P. M. Stecker, 84–99. Oak Creek, WI: Literacy Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, P. 2006. “A Sociocultural Theory of Writing.” In Handbook of Writing Research, edited by C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, and J. Fitzgerald, 54–66. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Purcell, K., J. Buchanan, and L. Friedrich. 2013. The Impact of Digital Tools on Student Writing and How Writing is Taught in Schools. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project. http://www.pewinternet.org/files/old-media//Files/Reports/2013/PIP_NWP%20Writing%20and%20Tech.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ranker, J. 2008. “Composing Across Multiple Media.” Written Communication 25 (2): 196–234. doi: 10.1177/0741088307313021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rideout, V. J., U. G. Foehr, and D. F. Roberts. 2010. Generation M²: Media in the Lives of 8–18 Year-olds. Washington, DC: Kaiser Family Foundation Study.
   Google Scholar
• Rowsell, J., and K. Pahl. 2007. “Sedimented Identities in Texts: Instances of Practice.” Reading Research Quarterly 42 (3): 388–404. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.42.3.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakr, M. 2011. “‘Writing’ the Self: New Technologies and Textual Subjectivities.” Learning, Media and Technology 37 (1): 119–123. doi: 10.1080/17439884.2012.636366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoen, L., and L. D. Fusarelli. 2008. “Innovation, NCLB, and the Fear Factor.” Educational Policy 22 (1): 181–203. doi: 10.1177/0895904807311291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scollon, R., and S. B. K. Scollon. 1981. Narrative, Literacy, and Face in Interethnic Communication. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Sefton-Green, J. 2006. “Youth, Technology, and Media Cultures.” Review of Research in Education 30: 279–306. doi: 10.3102/0091732X030001279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, B. E. 2013. “Beyond Words: The Landscape of Research on Adolescents and Multimodal Composition.” In Exploring Multimodal Composition and Digital Writing, edited by R. E. Ferdig and K. E. Pytash, 1–19. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B. E., and B. Dalton. 2016. “Seeing it from a ‘Different Light’: Students’ Video Reflections About Their Multimodal Compositions.” Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy. First published online. doi: 10.1002/jaal.503.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B. E., and N. B. Renner. 2015. “Linking Through Literature: Exploring Complex Texts Through Hypertext Literary Analysis.” In Using Technology to Enhance Reading: Innovative Approaches to Literacy Instruction, edited by T. Rasinski, K. E. Pytash, and R. E. Ferdig, 137–143. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
   Google Scholar
• Spradley, J. P. 1980. Participant Observation. New York: Holt, Reinhart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. 2006. Multiple Case Study Analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, P. 2008. “Multimodal Instructional Practices.” In Handbook of Research on New Literacies, edited by J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, and D. Leu, 871–898. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., and J. Corbin. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research. Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Street, B. 1984. Literacy in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Street, B., K. Pahl, and J. Rowsell. 2009. “Multimodality and New Literacy Studies.” In The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis, edited by C. Jewitt, 191–200. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thibaut, P., J. S. Curwood, L. Carvalho, and A. Simpson. 2014. “Moving Across Physical and Online Spaces: A Case Study in a Blended Primary Classroom.” Learning, Media and Technology 40 (4): 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, A. 2011. “Children’s Writing Goes 3D: A Case Study of One Primary School’s Journey into Multimodal Authoring.” Learning, Media and Technology 37 (1): 77–93. doi: 10.1080/17439884.2011.560160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unsworth, L. 2006. “Towards a Metalanguage for Multiliteracies Education: Describing the Meaning-making Resources of Language-Image Interaction.” English Teaching: Practice and Critique 5 (1): 55–76.
   Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, T. 2005. Introducing Social Semiotics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, C. S. 2009. “The Multi-modal Redesign of School Texts.” Journal of Research in Reading 32 (1): 126–136. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2008.01385.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V. 1991. Voices of the Mind: A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V. 1998. Mind as Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar