Children’s digital multimodal composing: implications for learning and teaching

References

• Anderson, Kate. T. 2013. “Contrasting Systemic Functional Linguistic and Situated Literacies Approaches to Multimodality in Literacy and Writing Studies.” Written Communication 30 (3): 276–299. doi:10.1177/0741088313488073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, Angela C., and Edna Tan. 2009. “Funds of Knowledge and Discourses and Hybrid Space.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 46 (1): 50–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bawden, David. 2001. “Information and Digital Literacies; a Review of Concepts.” Journal of Documentation 57 (2): 218–259. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000007083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, Pamela, and Susan Jack. 2008. “Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers.” The Qualitative Report 13 (4): 544–559.
   Google Scholar
• Belshaw, Doug. 2014. “The Essential Elements of Digital Literacies.” Accessed August 8 2019. http://digitalliteraci.es.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, Israel. 2012. “YouTube as a Source of Data.” Psychology Postgraduate Affairs Group Quarterly 83: 9–12.
   Google Scholar
• Beyer, Barry K. 1995. Critical Thinking. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Bhabha, Homi K. 2004. The Location of Culture. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brook, Jennifer. 2011. “The Affordances of YouTube for Language Learning and Teaching.” Hawaii Pacific University TESOL Working Paper Series 9 (1–2): 37–56.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, Jean, and Joshua Green. 2009. YouTube: Online Video and Participatory Culture. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burn, Andrew. 2016. “Making Machinima: Animation, Games, and Multimodal Participation in the Media Arts.” Learning, Media and Technology 41 (2): 310–329. doi:10.1080/17439884.2015.1107096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burn, Andrew, and Gunther Kress. 2018. “Multimodality, Style and the Aesthetic: the Case of the Digital Werewolf.” In Multimodality and Aesthetics, edited by Elise Tønnessen, and Frida Forsgren, 15–36. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Burwell, Catherine. 2013. “The Pedagogical Potential of Video Remix: Critical Conversations About Culture, Creativity, and Copyright.” Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 57 (3): 205–213. doi:10.1002/JAAL.205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campanelli, Vito. 2010. Web Aesthetics: How Digital Media Affect Culture and Society. Rotterdam: NAi Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Campanelli, Vito. 2015. “Toward a Remix Culture: An Existential Perspective.” In The Routledge Companion to Remix Studies, edited by Eduardo Navas, Owen Gallagher, and xtine burrough, 68–82. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Caron, Caroline, Rebecca Raby, Claudia Mitchell, Sophie Théwissen-LeBlanc, and Jessica Prioletta. 2017. “From Concept to Data: Sleuthing Social Change-Oriented Youth Voices on YouTube.” Journal of Youth Studies 20 (1): 47–62. doi:10.1080/13676261.2016.1184242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, Kathy C. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Chih-Ping. 2013. “Exploring Personal Branding on YouTube.” Journal of Internet Commerce 12 (4): 332–347. doi:10.1080/15332861.2013.859041.
   Google Scholar
• Cunliffe, Ann L. 2010. “Retelling Tales of the Field: In Search of Organizational Ethnography 20 Years On.” Organizational Research Methods 13 (2): 224–239. doi:10.1177/1094428109340041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubisar, Abby M., and Jason Palmeri. 2010. “Palin/Pathos/Peter Griffin: Political Video Remix and Composition Pedagogy.” Computers and Composition 27 (2): 77–93. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2010.03.004.
   Google Scholar
• Duncum, Paul. 2011. “Youth on YouTube: Prosumers in a Peer-to-Peer Participatory Culture.” The International Journal of Art Education 9 (2): 24–39.
   Google Scholar
• Duncum, Paul. 2013. “Creativity as Conversation in the Interactive Audience Culture of YouTube.” Visual Inquiry 2 (2): 115–125. doi:10.1386/vi.2.2.115_1.
   Google Scholar
• Erstad, Ola, Øystein Gilje, and Thomas de Lange. 2007. “Re-Mixing Multimodal Resources: Multiliteracies and Digital Production in Norwegian Media Education.” Learning, Media and Technology 32 (2): 183–198. doi:10.1080/17439880701343394.
   Google Scholar
• Flessner, Ryan. 2014. “Revisiting Reflection: Utilizing Third Spaces in Teacher Education.” The Educational Forum 78 (3): 231–247. doi:10.1080/00131725.2014.912711.
   Google Scholar
• Frobenius, Maximiliane. 2014. “Audience Design in Monologues: How Vloggers Involve Their Viewers.” Journal of Pragmatics 72: 59–72. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauntlett, David. 2011. Making is Connecting: The Social Meaning of Creativity, From DIY and Knitting to YouTube and Web 2.0. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, James P. 2017. “Affinity Spaces and 21st Century Learning.” Educational Technology 57 (2): 27–31.
   Google Scholar
• Gilje, Øystein. 2010. “Multimodal Redesign in Filmmaking Practices: An Inquiry of Young Filmmakers’ Deployment of Semiotic Tools in Their Filmmaking Practice.” Written Communication 27: 494–522. doi:10.1177/0741088310377874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilje, Øystein. 2011. “Two Lenses on Texts and Practices: Analysing Remixing Practices Across Timescales.” Designs for Learning 4 (2): 28–41. doi:10.16993/dfl.39.
   Google Scholar
• Gutierrez, K. 2008. “Developing a Sociocultural Literacy in the Third Space.” Reading Research Quarterly 43: 148–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafner, Christoph A., and Jenifer W. Y Ho. 2020. “Assessing Digital Multimodal Composing in Second Language Writing: Towards a Process-Based Model.” Journal of Second Language Writing 47: 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafner, Christoph A., and Lindsay Miller. 2019. English in the Disciplines: A Multidimensional Model for ESP Course Design. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hargrove, Ryan A., and John L. Nietfeld. 2015. “The Impact of Metacognitive Instruction on Creative Problem Solving.” The Journal of Experimental Education 83 (3): 291–318. doi:10.1080/00220973.2013.876604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harley, Dave, and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2009. “Creating a Conversational Context Through Video Blogging: A Case Study of Geriatric1927.” Computers in Human Behavior 25 (3): 679–689. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.08.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattingh, Marie. 2017. “A Preliminary Investigation of the Appropriateness of YouTube as an Informal Learning Platform for Pre-Teens.” In Advances in Web-Based Learning – ICWL 2017, vol 10473, edited by Haoran Xie, Elvira Popescu, Gerhard Hancke, and Baltasar Fernández Manjón, 101–110. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jajnke, Isa, Tobias Haertel, and Johannes Wildt. 2017. “Teachers’ Conceptions of Student Creativity in Higher Education.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 54 (1): 87–95. doi:10.1080/14703297.2015.1088396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewitt, Carey, and Gunther Kress. 2003. Multimodal Literacy. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Eric J., and Angela B. Johnson. 2016. “Enhancing Academic Investment Through Home-School Connections and Building on ELL Students’ Scholastic Funds of Knowledge.” Journal of Language and Literacy Education 12 (1): 104–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, James C., and Ronald A. Beghetto. 2009. “Beyond big and Little: The Four C Model of Creativity.” Review of General Psychology 13 (1): 1–12. doi:10.1037/a0013688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinloch, Valerie, and Timothy San Pedro. 2014. “The Space Between Listening and Storying: Foundations for Projects in Humanisation (PiH).” In Humanising Research: Decolonising Qualitative Inquiry with Youth and Communities, edited by Django Paris, and Maisha T. Winn, 21–42. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Knobel, Michele. 2017. “Remix, Literacy and Creativity: An Analytic Review of the Research Literature.” Estonian Journal of Education 5 (2): 31–53. doi:10.12697/eha.2017.5.2.02b.
   Google Scholar
• Kozinets, Robert V. 2002. “The Field Behind the Screen: Using Netnography for Marketing Research in Online Communities.” Journal of Marketing Research 39 (1): 61–72. doi:10.1509/jmkr.39.1.61.18935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress, Gunther. 1995. Making signs and making subjects: the English curriculum and social futures (an inaugural lecture). Institute of Education: University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, Gunther. 2010. Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. Abingdon, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Laurier, Eric. 2016. “YouTube: Fragments of a Video-Tropic Atlas.” Area 48 (4): 488–495. doi:10.1111/area.12157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, Locky. forthcoming. “Creativity & Multimodality: An Analytical Framework for Creativity in Multimodal Texts.” Linguistics and Human Sciences 14 (1): 60–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, Weijhen Janet, and Fei Victor Lim. 2020. “A Pedagogical Framework for Digital Multimodal Authoring in the English Language Classroom.” Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, Fei V. 2021. Designing Learning with Embodied Teaching. Perspectives from Multimodality. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, Fei V. In press. “Towards Education 4.0: An Agenda for Teaching Multiliteracies in the English Language Classroom.” In Literacies, Culture, and Society Towards Industrial Revolution 4.0: Reviewing Policies, Expanding Research, Enriching Practices in Asia, edited by Faud Abdul Hamied.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Xiao. 2010. “Small Videos, Hu Ge Impact: Parody Videos in Postsocialist China.” Journal of Chinese Cinemas 4 (3): 229–244. doi:10.1386/jcc.4.3.229_1.
   Google Scholar
• Manovich, Lev. 2013. Software Takes Command. New York: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Maybin, Janet. 2015. “Everyday Language Creativity.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Creativity, edited by Rodney H. Jones, 25–39. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, Kathy. A., and Len Unsworth. 2018. “iPad Animations: Powerful Multimodal Practices for Adolescent Literacy and Emotional Language.” Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy 61 (6): 609–620. doi:10.1002/jaal.717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misoch, Sabina. 2014. “Card Stories on YouTube: A new Frame for Online Self-Disclosure.” Media and Communication 2 (1): 2–12. doi:10.17645/mac.v2i1.16.
   Google Scholar
• Moll, Luis, Cathy Amanti, Deborah Neff, and Norma Gonzalez. 1992. “Funds of Knowledge for Teaching: Using a Qualitative Approach to Connect Homes and Classrooms.” Theory Into Practice 31: 132–141. doi:10.1080/00405849209543534.
   Google Scholar
• O’Halloran, Kay L., and Fei V. Lim. 2011. “Dimensions of Multimodal Literacy.” Viden om Læsning (Knowledge About Reading) 10: 14–21.
   Google Scholar
• O’Halloran, Kay L., and Fei V. Lim. 2014. “Systemic Functional Multimodal Discourse Analysis.” In Texts, Images and Interactions: A Reader in Multimodality, edited by S. Norris and C. Maier, 135–154. Berlin: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Owyong, Yuet See M. 2009. “Clothing Semiotics and the Social Construction of Power Relations.” Social Semiotics 19 (2): 191–211. doi:10.1080/10350330902816434.
   Google Scholar
• Pahl, Kate, and Jennifer Rowsell. 2005. Literacy and Education: Understanding the New Literacy Studies in the Classroom. London: Paul Chapman.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, Ashley N. 2018. “YouTube Generated Video Clips as Qualitative Research Data: One Researcher’s Reflections on the Process.” Qualitative Inquiry 24 (10): 759–767. doi:10.1177/1077800418788107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, John. 2018. “Primary Education in a Digital age.” In Learning to Teach in the Primary School, edited by Teresa Cremin, and Cathy Burnett, 470–484. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, John, and Julian McDougall. 2017. Digital Media, Culture and Education: Theorising Third Space Literacies. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, John, and Julian McDougall. 2019. “Digital Media Learning in the Third Space.” Journal of Media Practice and Education 20 (1): 1–11. doi:10.1080/25741136.2018.1511362.
   Google Scholar
• Puccio, Gerard. J., and David W. Gonzalez. 2004. “Nurturing Creative Thinking: Western Approaches and Eastern Issues.” In Creativity When East Meets West, edited by Sing Lau, Anna Na Hui, and Grace Yan Chak Ng, 393–428. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Reilly, Erin B. 2010. “Remix Culture: Digital Music and Video Remix, Opportunities for Creative Production.” In Teaching Tech-Savvy Kids: Bringing Digital Media Into the Classroom, Grades 5-12, edited by Jessica Parker, 143–166. California: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Ritzer, George, and Nathan Jurgenson. 2010. “Production, Consumption, Prosumption: The Nature of Capitalism in the age of the Digital ‘Prosumer’.” Journal of Consumer Culture 10 (1): 13–36. doi:10.1177/1469540509354673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuck, Sandy, Damian Maher, and Rachel Perry. 2016. “Moving Classrooms to Third Space Learning.” Accessed October 22 2019. https://msp2l1160225102310.blob.core.windows.net/ms-p2-l1-160225-1023-13-assets/Moving-Classrooms-en-au.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Skerrett, Allison. January 2010. “Lolita, Facebook, and the Third Space of Literacy Teacher Education.” Education Studies 46 (1): 67–84. doi:10.1080/00131940903480233.
   Google Scholar
• Stedman, Kyle D. 2012. “Remix Literacy and Fan Compositions.” Computers and Compositions 29 (2): 107–123. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2012.02.002.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, Angel. 2012. “Children's Writing Goes 3D: a Case Study of one Primary School's Journey Into Multimodal Authoring.” Learning, Media and Technology 37 (1): 77–93. doi:10.1080/17439884.2011.560160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Towndrow, Philip. A., Mark Evan Nelson, and Wan Fareed Bin Mohamad Yusuf. 2013. “Squaring Literacies Assessment with Multimodal Design: An Analytic Case for Semiotic Awareness.” Journal of Literacy Research 45 (4): 327–355. doi:10.1177/1086296X13504155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Leeuwen, Theo. 2008. Discourse and Practice – New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Leeuwen, Theo. 2017. “Multimodal Literacy.” mETAphor 4: 17–23.
   Google Scholar
• van Leeuwen, Theo, and Emilia Djonov. 2018. “The Power of Semiotic Software: A Critical Multimodal Perspective.” In The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by John Flowerdew, and John E. Richardson, 566–581. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Weninger, Csilla. 2019. From Language Skills to Literacy. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, Ben, John Potter, and Rebecca Eynon. 2019. “New Research Problems and Agendas in Learning, Media and Technology: the Editors’ Wishlist.” Learning, Media and Technology 44 (2): 87–91. doi:10.1080/17439884.2019.1614953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarosh, Svetlana, Elizabeth Bonsignore, Sarah McRoberts, and Tamara Peyton. 2016. “YouthTube: Youth Video Authorship on YouTube and Vine.” CSCW ‘16 Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on computer-Supported Cooperative work & social Computing, edited by Darren Gergle, 1423–1437. San Francisco, California, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Sumin, Emilia Djonov, and Theo van Leeuwen. 2014. “Semiotic Technology and Practice: A Multimodal Social Semiotic Approach to PowerPoint.” Text & Talk 34 (3): 349–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Chunfang, Chen Hongbing, and Luo Lingling. 2014. “Students’ Perceptions of Creativity in Learning Information Technology (IT) in Project Groups.” Computers in Human Behavior 41: 454–463. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar