The invisible made visible through technologies’ agency: a sociomaterial inquiry on emergency remote teaching in higher education

References

• Adams, C., and T. L. Thompson. 2016. Researching a Posthuman World. Interviews with Digital Objects. London: Palgrave Pivot.
   Google Scholar
• Affouneh, S., S. Salha, and Z. N. Khlaif. 2020. “Designing Quality E-Learning Environments for Emergency Remote Teaching in Coronavirus Crisis.” Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences 11 (2): 135–137.
   Google Scholar
• Alirezabeigi, S., J. Masschelein, and M. Decuypere. 2020. “Investigating Digital Doings Through Breakdowns: A Sociomaterial Ethnography of a Bring Your Own Device School.” Learning, Media and Technology 45 (2): 193–207. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1727501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez, A. J. 2020. “The Phenomenon of Learning at a Distance Through Emergency Remote Teaching Amidst the Pandemic Crisis.” Asian Journal of Distance Education 15 (1): 127–143. http://asianjde.org/ojs/index.php/AsianJDE/article/view/453.
   Google Scholar
• Amin, F. M., and H. Sundari. 2020. “EFL Students’ Preferences on Digital Platforms During Emergency Remote Teaching: Video Conference, LMS, or Messenger Application?” Studies in English Language and Education 7 (2): 362–378.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2003. “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28 (3): 801–831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2018. “Troubling Time/s and Ecologies of Nothingness: On the Im/possibilities of Living and Dying in the Void.” In Eco-deconstruction. Derrida and Environmental Philosophy, edited by M. Fritsch, P. Lynes, and D. Wood, 160–186. London: Fordham University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beaunoyer, E., S. Dupéré, and M. J. Guitton. 2020. “COVID-19 and Digital Inequalities: Reciprocal Impacts and Mitigation Strategies.” Computers in Human Behavior 111: 106–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. 2000. Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity: Theory, Research, Critique. Rev. ed. Oxford: Rowman.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. 2010. “Why ‘What Works’ Still Won’t Work: From Evidence-Based Education to Value-Based Education.” Studies in Philosophy and Education 29 (5): 491–503. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-010-9191-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta, G., O. Filippakou, E. Wainwright, and D. Aldridge. 2019. “Why Educational Research Should Not Just Solve Problems, but Should Cause Them as Well.” British Educational Research Journal 45 (1): 1–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. 2016. “Posthuman Critical Theory.” In Critical Posthumanism and Planetary Futures, edited by D. Banerji and M. R. Paranjape, 13–32. New Delhi: Springer India.
   Google Scholar
• Buttler, T., D. George, and K. Bruggemann. 2021. “Student Input on the Effectiveness of the Shift to Emergency Remote Teaching due to the COVID Crisis: Structural Equation Modeling Creates a More Complete Picture.” International Journal of Educational Research Open. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100036.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. 2005. “Why Virtualism Paves the Way to Political Impotence: A Reply to Daniel Miller’s Critique of ‘The Laws of the Market.’” Economic Sociology: European Electronic Newsletter, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne 6 (2): 3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M., and J. Law. 1997. “After the Individual in Society: Lessons on Collectivity from Science, Technology and Society.” Canadian Journal of Sociology 22 (2): 165–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho, L., and P. Yeoman. 2021. “Performativity of Materials in Learning: The Learning-Whole in Action.” Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research 10 (1): 28–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2021.1.627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castañeda, L., and B. Williamson. 2021. “Assembling New Toolboxes of Methods and Theories for Innovative Critical Research on Educational Technology.” Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research 10 (1): 1–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2021.1.703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chagas, E. 2020. “Quase 20 milhões de alunos deixaram de ter aulas durante a pandemia.” Data Senado, 12/aug/2020. https://www12.senado.leg.br/noticias/materias/2020/08/12/datasenado-quase-20-milhoes-de-alunos-deixaram-de-ter-aulas-durante-pandemia.
   Google Scholar
• Cleland, J., E. C. P. Tan, K. Y. Tham, and N. Low-Beer. 2020. “How Covid-19 Opened up Questions of Sociomateriality in Healthcare Education.” Adv in Health Sci Educ 25: 479–482. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-020-09968-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decuypere, M. 2021. “The Topologies of Data Practices: A Methodological Introduction.” Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research 10 (1): 67–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2021.1.650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenwick, T. 2011. “Reading Educational Reform with Actor Network Theory: Fluid Spaces, Otherings, and Ambivalences.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (s1): 114–134. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2009.00609.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenwick, T. 2015. “Sociomateriality and Learning: A Critical Approach.” In The Sage Handbook of Learning, edited by D. Scott and E. Hargreaves, 83–93. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick, T., and R. Edwards. 2014. “Networks of Knowledge, Matters of Learning, and Criticality in Higher Education.” Higher Education 67 (1): 35–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1979. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gourlay, L., A. Littlejohn, M. Oliver, and J. Potter. 2021. “Lockdown Literacies and Semiotic Assemblages: Academic Boundary Work in the Covid-19 Crisis.” Learning, Media and Technology. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2021.1900242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gourlay, L., and M. Oliver. 2015. “Sociomaterial Texts, Spaces and Devices: Questioning ‘Digital Dualism’ in Library and Study Practices.” Higher Education Quarterly 69 (3): 263–278. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Networked Learning Editorial Collective (NLEC), L. Gourlay, J. L. Rodríguez-Illera, E. Barberà, M. Bali, D. Gachago, N. Pallitt, et al. 2021. “Networked Learning in 2021: A Community Definition.” Postdigital Science and Education. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00222-y.
   Google Scholar
• Green, J. K., M. S. Burrow, and L. Carvalho. 2020. “Designing for Transition: Supporting Teachers and Students Cope with Emergency Remote Education.” Postdigit Science and Education 2: 906–922. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00185-6.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1991. “A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century.” In Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, 149–181. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 2000. How Like a Leaf: An Interview with Thyrza Nichols Goodeve. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hasse, C. 2019. “Posthuman Learning: AI from Novice to Expert?” AI & Society 34: 355–364. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-018-0854-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hultin, L. 2019. “On Becoming a Sociomaterial Researcher: Exploring Epistemological Practices Grounded in a Relational, Performative Ontology.” Information and Organization 29: 91–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarke, J., and A. Breiter. 2019. “The Datafication of Education.” Learning, Media and Technology 44 (1): 1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenz Taguchi, H. 2011. “Investigating Learning, Participation and Becoming in Early Childhood Practices with a Relational Materialist Approach.” Global Studies of Childhood 1 (1). doi:https://doi.org/10.2304/gsch.2011.1.1.36.
   Google Scholar
• Lenz Taguchi, H., and A. Palmer. 2013. “A More ‘Livable’ School? A Diffractive Analysis of the Performative Enactments of Girls’ Ill-/Well-Being With(in) School Environments.” Gender and Education 25 (6): 671–687. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2013.829909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzei, L. A., and L. E. Smithers. 2020. “Qualitative Inquiry in the Making: A Minor Pedagogy.” Qualitative Inquiry 26 (1): 99–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miranda, L. V. T., and M. Pischetola. 2020. “Teaching as the emergent event of an ecological process: Complexity and choices in one-to-one programmes.” Explorations in Media Ecology 19 (4): 503–519.
   Google Scholar
• Mohmmed, A. O., B. A. Khidhir, and A. Nazeer. 2020. “Emergency Remote Teaching During Coronavirus Pandemic: The Current Trend and Future Directive at Middle East College Oman.” Innovative Infrastructure Solutions 5: 72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-020-00326-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moorhouse, B. L. 2020. “Adaptations to a Face-to-Face Initial Teacher Education Course ‘Forced’ Online due to the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Journal of Education for Teaching. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1755205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, M. P. A. 2020. “COVID-19 and Emergency eLearning: Consequences of the Securitization of Higher Education for Post-Pandemic Pedagogy.” Contemporary Security Policy 16: 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Nespor, J. 2002. “Networks and Contexts of Reform.” Journal of Educational Change 3: 365–382. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021281913741.
   Google Scholar
• Nespor, J. 2012. “Devices and Educational Change.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (1): 15–37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2009.00611.x.
   Google Scholar
• Pischetola, M. 2020. “Exploring the Relationship Between In-service Teachers’ Beliefs and Technology Adoption in Brazilian Primary Schools.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09610-0.
   Google Scholar
• Pischetola, M., and L. V. T. Miranda. 2019. “Metodologias ativas: uma solução simples para um problema complexo?” Revista Educação e Cultura Contemporânea 16 (43): 30–56. doi:https://doi.org/10.5935/2238-1279.20190003PDF.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, A., and C. Dwork. 2014. “The Algorithmic Foundations of Differential Privacy.” Foundations and Trends in Theoretical Computer Science 9 (3-4): 211–407.
   Google Scholar
• Schubert, C., and T. Röhl. 2017. “Ethnography and Organisations: Materiality and Change as Methodological Challenges.” Qualitative Research 19 (2): 164–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. 2020. “Digital Education in the Aftermath of COVID-19: Critical Concerns and Hopes.” In Digital Education After COVID-19, edited by N. Selwyn, F. Macgilchrist, and B. Williamson. TECHLASH – issue #0.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E. 2007. “STS Goes to School: Spatial Imaginaries of Technology, Knowledge and Presence.” Critical Social Studies 2: 15–27.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E. 2009. The Materiality of Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. 2010. “This Is not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 35 (5): 601–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, E. A. 2017. “Untraining Educational Researchers.” Research in Education 96 (1): 6–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. 2013. "Objects bodies and space: gender and embodied practices of mattering in the classroom." Gender and Education 25 (6): 688–703. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2013.834864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. 2016. “Rethinking the Empirical in Higher Education: Post-Qualitative Inquiry as a Less Comfortable Social Science.” International Journal of Research & Method in Education 40 (3): 311–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. 2019. “Diffracting the Curriculum: Putting “New” Material Feminism to Work to Reconfigure Knowledge-Making Practices in Undergraduate Higher Education.” In Theory and Method in Higher Education Research, edited by Jeroen Huisman and Malcolm Tight. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/S2056-375220190000005004
   Google Scholar
• Toquero, C. M. 2020. “Emergency Remote Education Experiment Amid COVID-19 Pandemic.” International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation 15: 162–176. doi:https://doi.org/10.46661/ijeri.5113.
   Google Scholar
• Trust, T., and J. Whalen. 2020. “Should Teachers Be Trained in Emergency Remote Teaching? Lessons Learned from the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 28 (2): 189–199.
   Google Scholar
• Ugur, N. G. 2020. “Digitalization in Higher Education: A Qualitative Approach.” International Journal of Technology in Education and Science 4 (1): 18–25.
   Google Scholar
• UNICEF. 2021. Enfrentamento da cultura do fracasso escolar. Reprovação, abandono e distorção idade-série. Brasília: Escritório da Representação do Unicef no Brasil.
   Google Scholar
• Viner, R. M., Simon J. Russell, Helen Croker, Jessica Packer, Joseph Ward, Claire Stansfield, Oliver Mytton, Chris Bonell, and Robert Booy. 2020. “School Closure and Management Practices During Coronavirus Outbreaks Including COVID-19: A Rapid Systematic Review.” The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health 4 (5): 397–404.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williamson, B., R. Eynon, and J. Potter. 2020. “Pandemic Politics, Pedagogies and Practices: Digital Technologies and Distance Education During the Coronavirus Emergency.” Learning, Media and Technology 45 (2): 107–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winograd, T., and F. Flores. 1986. Understanding Computers and Cognition. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, J. 2021. “A Dialogic Technology-Mediated Model of Feedback Uptake and Literacy.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1852174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar