1,100
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Advancing data justice in education: some suggestions towards a deontological framework

ORCID Icon
Pages 187-199 | Received 21 Dec 2021, Accepted 30 Nov 2022, Published online: 12 Dec 2022

References

  • Alcoff, Linda Martín. 2007. “Fraser on Redistribution, Recognition, and Identity.” European Journal of Political Theory 6 (3): 255–265.
  • Andreotti, Vanessa, Sharon Stein, Cash Ahenakew, and Dallas Hunt. 2015. “Mapping Interpretations of Decolonization in the Context of Higher Education.” Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society 4 (1): 22–40.
  • Bainbridge, Lisanne. 1983. “Ironies of Automation.” Automatica 19 (6): 775–779. doi:10.1016/0005-1098(83)90046-8.
  • Baker, Ryan Shaun, and Aaron Hawn. 2021. “Algorithmic Bias in Education.” International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, doi:10.1007/s40593-021-00285-9.
  • Barocas, Solon, Kate Crawford, Aaron Shapiro, and Hanna Wallach. 2017. The problem with bias: Allocative versus representational harms in machine learning. Paper presented at the 9th Annual Conference of the Special Interest Group for Computing, Information and Society.
  • Benjamin, Ruha. 2019. “Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the new jim Code.” Social Forces.
  • Birhane, Abeba, and Vinay Uday Prabhu. 2021. Large image datasets: A pyrrhic win for computer vision? Paper presented at the 2021 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV).
  • Blackmore, Jill. 2016. Educational Leadership and Nancy Fraser. London: Routledge.
  • Blodgett, Su Lin, Solon Barocas, Hal Daumé III, and Hanna Wallach. 2020. Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of” bias” in nlp. Paper presented at the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Online.
  • Blumenthal, Richard, Ron Wyden, Chris Van Hollen, Tina Smith, and Elizabeth Warren. 2020 “Open Letter to Examsoft” US Senate, Accessed 12/12/2021. https://www.blumenthal.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2020.12.3%20Letter%20to%20Ed%20Testing%20Software%20Companies%20ExamSoft.pdf.
  • Bozalek, Vivienne, and Chrissie Boughey. 2012. “(Mis)Framing Higher Education in South Africa.” Social Policy & Administration 46 (6): 688–703. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9515.2012.00863.x.
  • Callon, Michel, Pierre Lascoumes, and Yannick Barthe. 2011. Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
  • Cerratto Pargman, Teresa, and Cormac McGrath. 2021. “Mapping the Ethics of Learning Analytics in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review of Empirical Research.” Journal of Learning Analytics 8 (2): 123–139.
  • Costanza-Chock, Sasha. 2020. Design Justice: Community-led Practices to Build the Worlds we Need. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Danks, David, and Alex John London. 2017. Algorithmic Bias in Autonomous Systems. Paper presented at the IJCAI.
  • Dencik, L., A. Hintz, J. Redden, and E. Treré. 2019. “Exploring Data Justice: Conceptions, Applications and Directions.” Information Communication and Society 22 (7): 873–881. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2019.1606268.
  • Dencik, Lina, Fieke Jansen, and Philippa Metcalfe. 2018. “A conceptual framework for approaching social justice in an age of datafication.” DATAJUSTICE project 30.
  • Dixon-Román, Ezekiel, T. Philip Nichols, and Ama Nyame-Mensah. 2019. “The Racializing Forces of/in AI Educational Technologies.” Learning, Media and Technology, 1–15. doi:10.1080/17439884.2020.1667825.
  • Eubanks, Virginia. 2018. Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. New York, NY: St. Martin's Press.
  • EU Commission. 2022. “Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on adapting non-contractual civil liability rules to artificial intelligence (AI Liability Directive).” In, edited by European Commission.
  • Farías, Ignacio. 2016. “Devising Hybrid Forums: Technical Democracy in a Dangerous World.” City 20 (4): 549–562.
  • Fraser, Nancy. 1998. “From Redistribution to Recognition?: Dilemmas of Justice in a ‘Postsocialist’ Age.” In In her Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the “Postsocialist” Condition, 11–40. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Fraser, Nancy. 2001. “Recognition Without Ethics?” Theory, Culture & Society 18 (2-3): 21–42. doi:10.1177/02632760122051760.
  • Fraser, Nancy. 2005. “Reframing Justice.” New Left Review 36 (Nov-Dec): 1–19.
  • Fraser, Nancy. 2007a. “Feminist Politics in the age of Recognition: A two-Dimensional Approach to Gender Justice.” Studies in Social Justice 1 (1): 23–35.
  • Fraser, Nancy. 2007b. “Identity, Exclusion, and Critique: A Response to Four Critics.” European Journal of Political Theory 6 (3): 305–338.
  • Fraser, Nancy. 2013. Fortunes of Feminism: From State-Managed Capitalism to Neoliberal Crisis. Reframing Justice, NY: Verso Books.
  • Gajane, Pratik, and Mykola Pechenizkiy. 2017. “On formalizing fairness in prediction with machine learning.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.03184.
  • Gewirtz, Sharon. 1998. “Conceptualizing Social Justice in Education: Mapping the Territory.” Journal of Education Policy 13 (4): 469–484.
  • Gianfrancesco, Milena A., Suzanne Tamang, Jinoos Yazdany, and Gabriela Schmajuk. 2018. “Potential Biases in Machine Learning Algorithms Using Electronic Health Record Data.” JAMA Internal Medicine 178 (11): 1544–1547. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3763.
  • Gulson, Kalervo, Claire Benn, Kirsty Kitto, Simon Knight, and Teresa Swift. 2021. “Algorithms can decide your marks, your work prospects and your financial security. How do you know they’re fair?” The Conversation.
  • Hoffmann, Anna Lauren. 2019. “Where Fairness Fails: Data, Algorithms, and the Limits of Antidiscrimination Discourse.” Information, Communication & Society 22 (7): 900–915. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2019.1573912.
  • Hummel, Patrik, Matthias Braun, and Peter Dabrock. 2021. “Own data? Ethical Reflections on Data Ownership.” Philosophy and Technology 34 (3): 545–572.
  • Jandrić, Petar, and Derek R. Ford. 2022. “Postdigital Ecopedagogies: Genealogies, Contradictions, and Possible Futures.” Postdigital Science and Education 4 (3): 692–710. doi:10.1007/s42438-020-00207-3.
  • Johnson, Khari. 2020. “ExamSoft’s remote bar exam sparks privacy and facial recognition concerns.” Venturebeat.com, Accessed 10/12/2021. https://venturebeat.com/2020/09/29/examsofts-remote-bar-exam-sparks-privacy-and-facial-recognition-concerns/.
  • Keddie, Amanda. 2012. “Schooling and Social Justice Through the Lenses of Nancy Fraser.” Critical Studies in Education 53 (3): 263–279.
  • Keuning, Hieke, Johan Jeuring, and Bastiaan Heeren. 2018. “A Systematic Literature Review of Automated Feedback Generation for Programming Exercises.” ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) 19 (1): 1–43.
  • Kizilcec, René F, and Hansol Lee. 2020. “Algorithmic fairness in education.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.05443.
  • Kurzweil, Martin, and D. Derek Wu. 2015. “Building a pathway to student success at Georgia State University.”.
  • Le Bui, Matthew, and Safiya Umoja Noble. 2020. “We’re Missing a Moral Framework of Justice in Artificial Intelligence.” In The Oxford Handbook of Ethics of AI, edited by Markus Dirk Dubber, Frank Pasquale, and Sunit Das, 163–180. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Mannell, Kate, Robbie Fordyce, and Suneel Jethani. 2022. “Oaths and the Ethics of Automated Data: Limits to Porting the Hippocratic Oath from Medicine to Data Science.” Cultural Studies, 1–22. doi:10.1080/09502386.2022.2042577.
  • Maslow, Abraham H. 1948. ““Higher” and “Lower” Needs.” The Journal of Psychology 25 (2): 433–436.
  • Mehrabi, Ninareh, Fred Morstatter, Nripsuta Saxena, Kristina Lerman, and Aram Galstyan. 2021. “A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning.” ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 54 (6): 1–35.
  • Mills, Martin, Glenda McGregor, Aspa Baroutsis, Kitty Te Riele, and Debra Hayes. 2016. “Alternative Education and Social Justice: Considering Issues of Affective and Contributive Justice.” Critical Studies in Education 57 (1): 100–115.
  • Mitchell, Shira, Eric Potash, Solon Barocas, Alexander D'Amour, and Kristian Lum. 2021. “Algorithmic Fairness: Choices, Assumptions, and Definitions.” Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application 8 (1): 141–163. doi:10.1146/annurev-statistics-042720-125902.
  • Noble, Safiya Umoja. 2018. Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York, NY: NYU Press.
  • Nyuon, Nyadol. 2021. “Anti-vaxxers hide privilege behind language of oppression.” The Age, Accessed 17/12/2021. https://www.theage.com.au/national/anti-vaxxers-hide-privilege-behind-language-of-oppression-20211013-p58zix.html.
  • Pangrazio, L., and J. Sefton-Green. 2020. “The Social Utility of ‘Data Literacy’.” Learning, Media and Technology 45 (2): 208–220. doi:10.1080/17439884.2020.1707223.
  • Pardo, Abelardo, Jelena Jovanovic, Shane Dawson, Dragan Gašević, and Negin Mirriahi. 2019. “Using Learning Analytics to Scale the Provision of Personalised Feedback.” British Journal of Educational Technology 50 (1): 128–138.
  • Peña Gangadharan, Seeta, and Jędrzej Niklas. 2019. “Decentering Technology in Discourse on Discrimination.” Information, Communication & Society 22 (7): 882–899. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2019.1593484.
  • Power, Sally, and Daniel Frandji. 2010. “Education Markets, the new Politics of Recognition and the Increasing Fatalism Towards Inequality.” Journal of Education Policy 25 (3): 385–396.
  • Sahlgren, Otto. 2021. “The Politics and Reciprocal (re) Configuration of Accountability and Fairness in Data-Driven Education.” Learning, Media and Technology, 1–14. doi:10.1080/17439884.2021.1986065.
  • Savage, Leonard J. 1972. The Foundations of Statistics (Second Edition). New York, NY: Dover.
  • Selbst, Andrew D. 2021. “An Institutional View Of Algorithmic Impact Assessments.” Harvard Journal of Law & Technology (Forthcoming) 35 (UCLA School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 21-25).
  • Selwyn, Neil. 2021. “Ed-Tech Within Limits: Anticipating Educational Technology in Times of Environmental Crisis.” E-Learning and Digital Media 18 (5): 496–510.
  • Skitka, Linda J, Kathleen Mosier, and Mark D Burdick. 2000. “Accountability and Automation Bias.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 52 (4): 701–717.
  • Slade, S., P. Prinsloo, and M. Khalil. 2019. Learning analytics at the intersections of student trust, disclosure and benefit. Paper presented at the ACM International Conference Proceeding Series.
  • Taylor, Linnet. 2017. “What is Data Justice? The Case for Connecting Digital Rights and Freedoms Globally.” Big Data & Society 4 (2): 2053951717736335.
  • Thompson, Greg, Kalervo N. Gulson, Teresa Swist, and Kevin Witzenberger. 2022. “Responding to Sociotechnical Controversies in Education: A Modest Proposal Toward Technical Democracy.” Learning, Media and Technology, 1–13. doi:10.1080/17439884.2022.2126495.
  • US Congress. 2021. “H.R.2231 - Algorithmic Accountability Act of 201.” Accessed 17/12/2021. https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/2231/text.
  • Viljoen, Salomé. 2020. “Democratic data: A relational theory for data governance.” Available at SSRN 3727562.
  • Vincent, Carol. 2020. Nancy Fraser, Social Justice and Education. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Whitman, Madisson. 2020. ““We Called That a Behavior”: The Making of Institutional Data.” Big Data & Society 7 (1): 2053951720932200. doi:10.1177/2053951720932200.
  • Zeide, Elana. 2020. “Robot Teaching, Pedagogy, and Policy.” In The Oxford Handbook of Ethics of AI, edited by Markus D. Dubber, Frank Pasquale, and Sunit Das, 789–803. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Zembylas, Michalinos. 2021. “A Decolonial Approach to AI in Higher Education Teaching and Learning: Strategies for Undoing the Ethics of Digital Neocolonialism.” Learning, Media and Technology, 1–13. doi:10.1080/17439884.2021.2010094.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.