Disentangling the fibrous microenvironment: designer culture models for improved drug discovery

References

• Prasad V, Mailankody S. Research and development spending to bring a single cancer drug to market and revenues after approval. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(11):1569–1575.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takebe T, Imai R, Ono S. The current status of drug discovery and development as originated in United States Academia: the influence of industrial and academic collaboration on drug discovery and development. Clin Transl Sci. 2018;11(6):597–606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beachley VZ, Wolf MT, Sadtler K, et al. Tissue matrix arrays for high-throughput screening and systems analysis of cell function. Nat Methods. 2015;12(12):1197–1204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kojima T, Moraes C, Cavnar SP, et al. Surface-templated hydrogel patterns prompt matrix-dependent migration of breast cancer cells towards chemokine-secreting cells. Acta Biomater. 2015;13:68–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jena MK, Janjanam J. Role of extracellular matrix in breast cancer development: a brief update. F1000Res. 2018;7: 274-274.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muncie JM, Weaver VM. Chapter one - the physical and biochemical properties of the extracellular matrix regulate cell fate. In: editors Litscher ES, Wassarman PM. Current topics in developmental biology. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press; 2018. Vol. 130. 1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Lu P, Weaver VM, Werb Z. The extracellular matrix: A dynamic niche in cancer progression. J Cell Biol. 2012;196(4):395–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theocharis AD, Skandalis SS, Gialeli C, et al. Extracellular matrix structure. Extracell Matrix ECM ECM- Mater Ther Tools Targets Cancer Treat. 2016;97:4–27.
   Google Scholar
• Baker BM, Chen CS. Deconstructing the third dimension – how 3D culture microenvironments alter cellular cues. J Cell Sci. 2012;125:3015–3024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acerbi I, Cassereau L, Dean I, et al. Human breast cancer invasion and aggression correlates with ECM stiffening and immune cell infiltration. Integr Biol Quant Biosci Nano Macro. 2015;7(10):1120–1134.
   Google Scholar
• Rockey DC, Bell PD, Hill JA. Fibrosis — a common pathway to organ injury and failure. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(12):1138–1149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters AE, Akhtar R, Comerford EJ, et al. The effect of ageing and osteoarthritis on the mechanical properties of cartilage and bone in the human knee joint. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):5931.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fong ELS, Harrington DA, Farach-Carson MC, et al. Heralding a new paradigm in 3D tumor modeling. Biomaterials. 2016;108:197–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallica B, Maffei JS, Villa S, et al. Alteration of cellular behavior and response to pi3k pathway inhibition by culture in 3D collagen gels. Plos One. 2012;7(10):e48024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho MR, Lima D, Reis RL, et al. Anti-cancer drug validation: the contribution of tissue engineered models. Stem Cell Rev Rep. Published online 2017;1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12015-017-9720-x.
   Google Scholar
• Lovitt CJ, Shelper TB, Avery VM. Miniaturized three-dimensional cancer model for drug evaluation. ASSAY Drug Dev Technol. 2013;11(7):435–448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovitt CJ, Shelper TB, Avery VM. Evaluation of chemotherapeutics in a three-dimensional breast cancer model. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2015;141(5):951–959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson MD, Burdick JA, Wells RG. Engineered biomaterial platforms to study fibrosis. Adv Healthc Mater. 2020;9(8):1901682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tasdemir N, Bossart EA, Li Z, et al. Comprehensive phenotypic characterization of human invasive lobular carcinoma cell lines in 2D and 3D cultures. Cancer Res. 2018;78(21):6209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miermont A, Lee SWL, Adriani G, et al. Quantitative screening of the effects of hyper-osmotic stress on cancer cells cultured in 2- or 3-dimensional settings. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):13782.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edmondson R, Broglie JJ, Adcock AF, et al. Three-dimensional cell culture systems and their applications in drug discovery and cell-based biosensors. ASSAY Drug Dev Technol. 2014;12(4):207–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bischel LL, Sung KE, Jiménez-Torres JA, et al. The importance of being a lumen. Faseb J. 2014;28(11):4583–4590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Torres JA, Peery SL, Sung KE, et al. LumeNEXT: a practical method to pattern luminal structures in ECM gels. Adv Healthc Mater. 2016;5(2):198–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker BM, Trappmann B, Stapleton SC, et al. Microfluidics embedded within extracellular matrix to define vascular architectures and pattern diffusive gradients. Lab Chip. 2013;13(16):3246–3252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson CM, VanDuijn MM, Inman JL, et al. Tissue geometry determines sites of mammary branching morphogenesis in organotypic cultures. Science. 2006;314(5797):298–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piotrowski-Daspit AS, Nelson CM. Engineering three-dimensional epithelial tissues embedded within extracellular matrix. J Vis Exp. 2016;(113):e54283. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3791/54283.
   Google Scholar
• Pampaloni F, Stelzer E, Masotti A. Three-dimensional tissue models for drug discovery and toxicology. Recent Pat Biotechnol. 2009;3(2):103–117.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peck Y, Wang D-A. Three-dimensionally engineered biomimetic tissue models for in vitro drug evaluation: delivery, efficacy and toxicity. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2013;10(3):369–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim D-H, Lipke EA, Kim P, et al. Nanoscale cues regulate the structure and function of macroscopic cardiac tissue constructs. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2010;107(2):565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brightman AO, Rajwa BP, Sturgis JE, et al. Time-lapse confocal reflection microscopy of collagen fibrillogenesis and extracellular matrix assembly in vitro. Biopolymers. 2000;54(3):222–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillette BM, Jensen JA, Tang B, et al. In situ collagen assembly for integrating microfabricated three-dimensional cell-seeded matrices. Nat Mater. 2008;7(8):636–640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf K, Alexander S, Schacht V, et al. Collagen-based cell migration models in vitro and in vivo. Imaging Cell Dev Biol. 2009;20(8):931–941.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matera DL, Wang WY, Smith MR, et al. Fiber density modulates cell spreading in 3D interstitial matrix mimetics. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. Published online 2019 May 22. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b00141.
   Google Scholar
• Provenzano PP, Inman DR, Eliceiri KW, et al. Collagen density promotes mammary tumor initiation and progression. BMC Med. 2008;6: 11-11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Motte S, Kaufman LJ. Pore size variable type I collagen gels and their interaction with glioma cells. Biomaterials. 2010;31(21):5678–5688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velez DO, Ranamukhaarachchi SK, Kumar A, et al. 3D collagen architecture regulates cell adhesion through degradability, thereby controlling metabolic and oxidative stress. Integr Biol. 2019;11(5):221–234.
   Google Scholar
• Velez DO, Tsui B, Goshia T, et al. 3D collagen architecture induces a conserved migratory and transcriptional response linked to vasculogenic mimicry. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):1651.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ranamukhaarachchi SK, Modi RN, Han A, et al. Macromolecular crowding tunes 3D collagen architecture and cell morphogenesis. Biomater Sci. 2019;7(2):618–633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger AJ, Linsmeier KM, Kreeger PK, et al. Decoupling the effects of stiffness and fiber density on cellular behaviors via an interpenetrating network of gelatin-methacrylate and collagen. Biomaterials. 2017;141:125–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker BM, Trappmann B, Wang WY, et al. Cell-mediated fibre recruitment drives extracellular matrix mechanosensing in engineered fibrillar microenvironments. Nat Mater. 2015;14(12):1262–1268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose JC, Gehlen DB, Haraszti T, et al. Biofunctionalized aligned microgels provide 3D cell guidance to mimic complex tissue matrices. Biomaterials. 2018;163:128–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han W, Chen S, Yuan W, et al. Oriented collagen fibers direct tumor cell intravasation. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2016;113(40):11208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nerger BA, Brun PT, Nelson CM. Marangoni flows drive the alignment of fibrillar cell-laden hydrogels. Sci Adv. 2020;6(24):eaaz7748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng Y-N, Kang Y-L, Rau L-R, et al. Construction of cell-containing, anisotropic, three-dimensional collagen fibril scaffolds using external vibration and their influence on smooth muscle cell phenotype modulation. Biomed Mater. 2017;12(4):045019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unadkat HV, Hulsman M, Cornelissen K, et al. An algorithm-based topographical biomaterials library to instruct cell fate. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011;108(40):16565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray A, Lee O, Win Z, et al. Anisotropic forces from spatially constrained focal adhesions mediate contact guidance directed cell migration. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):14923.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim SJ, Tatman PD, Song DH, et al. Nanotopographic cues and stiffness control of tendon-derived stem cells from diverse conditions. Int J Nanomedicine. 2018;13:7217–7227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle AD, Wang FW, Matsumoto K, et al. One-dimensional topography underlies three-dimensional fibrillar cell migration. J Cell Biol. 2009;184(4):481–490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon AR, Moraes C, Csete ME, et al. One-dimensional patterning of cells in silicone wells via compression-induced fracture. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2014;102(5):1361–1369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu X, Mills KL, Peters PR, et al. Fabrication of reconfigurable protein matrices by cracking. Nat Mater. 2005;4(5):403–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang WY, Pearson AT, Kutys ML, et al. Extracellular matrix alignment dictates the organization of focal adhesions and directs uniaxial cell migration. APL Bioeng. 2018;2(4): 046107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Changede R, Cai H, Wind SJ, et al. Integrin nanoclusters can bridge thin matrix fibres to form cell–matrix adhesions. Nat Mater. 2019;18(12):1366–1375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue N, Li X, Bertulli C, et al. Rapid patterning of 1-D collagenous topography as an ECM protein fibril platform for image cytometry. Plos One. 2014;9(4):e93590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moraes C, Kim BC, Zhu X, et al. Defined topologically-complex protein matrices to manipulate cell shape via three-dimensional fiber-like patterns. Lab Chip. 2014;14(13):2191–2201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen CS, Mrksich M, Huang S, et al. Geometric control of cell life and death. Science. 1997;276(5317):1425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellas E, Chen CS. Forms, forces, and stem cell fate. Cell Cycle Differ Dis. 2014;31:92–97.
   Google Scholar
• Luxenburg C, Zaidel-Bar R. From cell shape to cell fate via the cytoskeleton — insights from the epidermis. Exp Cell Res. 2019;378(2):232–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickinson RB, Guido S, Tranquillo RT. Biased cell migration of fibroblasts exhibiting contact guidance in oriented collagen gels. Ann Biomed Eng. 1994;22(4):342–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver VM, Lelièvre S, Lakins JN, et al. β4 integrin-dependent formation of polarized three-dimensional architecture confers resistance to apoptosis in normal and malignant mammary epithelium. Cancer Cell. 2002;2(3):205–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubashkin M, Cassereau L, Bainer R, et al. Force engages vinculin and promotes tumor progression by enhancing PI3-kinase activation of phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)-triphosphate. Cancer Res. 2014;74(17):4597–4611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J, Abdeen AA, Zhang D, et al. Directing stem cell fate on hydrogel substrates by controlling cell geometry, matrix mechanics and adhesion ligand composition. Biomaterials. 2013;34(33):8140–8148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez EW, Chen QK, Gjorevski N, et al. Tissue geometry patterns epithelial-mesenchymal transition via intercellular mechanotransduction. J Cell Biochem. 2010;110(1):44–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boghaert E, Gleghorn JP, Lee K, et al. Host epithelial geometry regulates breast cancer cell invasiveness. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(48):19632–19637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J, Abdeen AA, Wycislo KL, et al. Interfacial geometry dictates cancer cell tumorigenicity. Nat Mater. 2016;15(8):856–862.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schutgens F, Clevers H. Human organoids: tools for understanding biology and treating diseases. Annu Rev Pathol Mech Dis. 2020;15(1):211–234.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haider S, Meinhardt G, Saleh L, et al. Self-renewing trophoblast organoids recapitulate the developmental program of the early human placenta. Stem Cell Rep. 2018;11(2):537–551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Lang B, Qu Y, et al. Single-cell patterning technology for biological applications. Biomicrofluidics. 2019;13(6):061502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jing P, Wu J, Liu GW, et al. Photonic crystal optical tweezers with high efficiency for live biological samples and viability characterization. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):19924.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jing P, Liu Y, Keeler EG, et al. Optical tweezers system for live stem cell organization at the single-cell level. Biomed Opt Express. 2018;9(2):771–779.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao L, Mok S, Moraes C. Micropocket hydrogel devices for all-in-one formation, assembly, and analysis of aggregate-based tissues. Biofabrication. 2019;11(4):045013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudjonsson T, Rønnov-Jessen L, Villadsen R, et al. Normal and tumor-derived myoepithelial cells differ in their ability to interact with luminal breast epithelial cells for polarity and basement membrane deposition. J Cell Sci. 2002;115(Pt 1):39–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tung Y-C, Hsiao AY, Allen SG, et al. High-throughput 3D spheroid culture and drug testing using a 384 hanging drop array. Analyst. 2011;136(3):473–478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han C, Takayama S, Park J. Formation and manipulation of cell spheroids using a density adjusted PEG/DEX aqueous two phase system. Sci Rep. 2015;5(1):11891.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Horman SR, To J, Orth AP. An HTS-compatible 3D colony formation assay to identify tumor-specific chemotherapeutics. J Biomol Screen. 2013;18(10):1298–1308.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ekert JE, Johnson K, Strake B, et al. Three-dimensional lung tumor microenvironment modulates therapeutic compound responsiveness in vitro – implication for drug development. Plos One. 2014;9(3):e92248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandenberg N, Hoehnel S, Kuttler F, et al. High-throughput automated organoid culture via stem-cell aggregation in microcavity arrays. Nat Biomed Eng. Published online 2020. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-020-0565-2.
   Google Scholar
• Bischel LL, Beebe DJ, Sung KE. Microfluidic model of ductal carcinoma in situ with 3D, organotypic structure. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bischel LL, Lee S-H, Beebe DJ. A Practical Method for patterning lumens through ECM hydrogels via viscous finger patterning. J Lab Autom. 2012;17(2): 96–103.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xie R, Korolj A, Liu C, et al. h-FIBER: microfluidic topographical hollow fiber for studies of glomerular filtration barrier. ACS Cent Sci. 2020;6(6):903–912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayad NME, Kaushik S, Weaver VM. Tissue mechanics, an important regulator of development and disease. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2019;374(1779):20180215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guimarães CF, Gasperini L, Marques AP, et al. The stiffness of living tissues and its implications for tissue engineering. Nat Rev Mater. 2020;5(5):351–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anlaş AA, Nelson CM. Tissue mechanics regulates form, function, and dysfunction. Cell Dyn. 2018;54:98–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang TT, Thakar D, Weaver VM. Force-dependent breaching of the basement membrane. Basement Membr Health Dis. 2017;57-58:178–189.
   Google Scholar
• Engler A, Bacakova L, Newman C, et al. Substrate compliance versus ligand density in cell on gel responses. Biophys J. 2004;86(1):617–628.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, et al. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell. 2006;126(4):677–689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri O. Viscoelastic hydrogels for 3D cell culture. Biomater Sci. 2017;5(8):1480–1490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang D, Huang Y, Xiao Y, et al. Viscoelasticity in natural tissues and engineered scaffolds for tissue reconstruction. Acta Biomater. 2019;97:74–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller S, Sandrin L. Liver stiffness: a novel parameter for the diagnosis of liver disease. Hepatic Med Evid Res. 2010;2:49–67.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reiter R, Freise C, Jöhrens K, et al. Wideband MRE and static mechanical indentation of human liver specimen: sensitivity of viscoelastic constants to the alteration of tissue structure in hepatic fibrosis. J Biomech. 2014;47(7):1665–1674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldmann A, Langlois C, Dewailly M, et al. Shear wave elastography (SWE): an analysis of breast lesion characterization in 83 breast lesions. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015;41(10):2594–2604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobruch-Sobczak K, Nowicki A. Role of shear wave sonoelastography in differentiation between focal breast lesions. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015;41(2):366–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denisin AK, Pruitt BL. Tuning the range of polyacrylamide gel stiffness for mechanobiology applications. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016;8(34):21893–21902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nghe P, Boulineau S, Gude S, et al. Microfabricated polyacrylamide devices for the controlled culture of growing cells and developing organisms. Plos One. 2013;8(9):e75537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandrasekaran A, Kouthouridis S, Lee W, et al. Magnetic microboats for floating, stiffness tunable, air–liquid interface epithelial cultures. Lab Chip. 2019;19(17):2786–2798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beningo KA, Dembo M, Wang Y. Responses of fibroblasts to anchorage of dorsal extracellular matrix receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2004;101(52):18024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballester-Beltrán J, Lebourg M, Rico P, et al. Dorsal and ventral stimuli in cell–material interactions: effect on cell morphology. Biointerphases. 2012;7(1):39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer RS, Myers KA, Gardel ML, et al. Stiffness-controlled three-dimensional extracellular matrices for high-resolution imaging of cell behavior. Nat Protoc. 2012;7(11):2056–2066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrbar M, Sala A, Lienemann P, et al. Elucidating the role of matrix stiffness in 3D cell migration and remodeling. Biophys J. 2011;100(2):284–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bott K, Upton Z, Schrobback K, et al. The effect of matrix characteristics on fibroblast proliferation in 3D gels. Biomaterials. 2010;31(32):8454–8464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosales AM, Rodell CB, Chen MH, et al. Reversible control of network properties in azobenzene-containing hyaluronic acid-based hydrogels. Bioconjug Chem. 2018;29(4):905–913.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu Y-C, Cheng M-H, Engel H, et al. The role of pore size on vascularization and tissue remodeling in PEG hydrogels. Biomaterials. 2011;32(26):6045–6051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill BJ, Gibbons DL, Roudsari LC, et al. A synthetic matrix with independently tunable biochemistry and mechanical properties to study epithelial morphogenesis and EMT in a lung adenocarcinoma model. Cancer Res. 2012;72(22):6013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babaie E, Bhaduri SB. Fabrication aspects of porous biomaterials in orthopedic applications: a review. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2018;4(1):1–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao S, Zhao T, Wang J, et al. Gelatin methacrylate (GelMA)-based hydrogels for cell transplantation: an effective strategy for tissue engineering. Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2019;15(5):664–679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichol JW, Koshy ST, Bae H, et al. Cell-laden microengineered gelatin methacrylate hydrogels. Biomaterials. 2010;31(21):5536–5544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin C-H, Su JJ-M, Lee S-Y, et al. Stiffness modification of photopolymerizable gelatin-methacrylate hydrogels influences endothelial differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2018;12(10):2099–2111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen Y-I, Abaci HE, Krupski Y, et al. Hyaluronic acid hydrogel stiffness and oxygen tension affect cancer cell fate and endothelial sprouting. Biomater Sci. 2014;2(5):655–665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suo A, Xu W, Wang Y, et al. Dual-degradable and injectable hyaluronic acid hydrogel mimicking extracellular matrix for 3D culture of breast cancer MCF-7 cells. Carbohydr Polym. 2019;211:336–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gwon K, Kim E, Tae G. Heparin-hyaluronic acid hydrogel in support of cellular activities of 3D encapsulated adipose derived stem cells. Acta Biomater. 2017;49:284–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri O, Koshy ST, Branco da Cunha C, et al. Extracellular matrix stiffness and composition jointly regulate the induction of malignant phenotypes in mammary epithelium. Nat Mater. 2014;13(10):970–978.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds DS, Bougher KM, Letendre JH, et al. Mechanical confinement via a PEG/Collagen interpenetrating network inhibits behavior characteristic of malignant cells in the triple negative breast cancer cell line MDA.MB.231. Acta Biomater. 2018;77:85–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao H, Lee MKH, Yang H, et al. Mechanoregulation of cancer-associated fibroblast phenotype in three-dimensional interpenetrating hydrogel networks. Langmuir. Published online 2018 Nov 27. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b02649.
   Google Scholar
• Ledo AM, Vining KH, Alonso MJ, et al. Extracellular matrix mechanics regulate transfection and SOX9-directed differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Acta Biomater. 2020;110:153–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich TA, Jain A, Tanner K, et al. Probing cellular mechanobiology in three-dimensional culture with collagen–agarose matrices. Biomaterials. 2010;31(7):1875–1884.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paszek MJ, Zahir N, Johnson KR, et al. Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. Cancer Cell. 2005;8(3):241–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levental KR, Yu H, Kass L, et al. Matrix crosslinking forces tumor progression by enhancing integrin signaling. Cell. 2009;139(5):891–906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee KY, Mooney DJ. Hydrogels for tissue engineering. Chem Rev. 2001;101(7):1869–1880.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trappmann B, Gautrot JE, Connelly JT, et al. Extracellular-matrix tethering regulates stem-cell fate. Nat Mater. 2012;11(7):642–649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen JH, Vincent LG, Fuhrmann A, et al. Interplay of matrix stiffness and protein tethering in stem cell differentiation. Nat Mater. 2014;13(10):979–987.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu J, Wang Y-K, Yang MT, et al. Mechanical regulation of cell function with geometrically modulated elastomeric substrates. Nat Methods. 2010;7(9):733–736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breckenridge MT, Desai RA, Yang MT, et al. Substrates with engineered step changes in rigidity induce traction force polarity and durotaxis. Cell Mol Bioeng. 2014;7(1):26–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson CD, Jayco DKP, Matera DL, et al. Myofibroblast activation in synthetic fibrous matrices composed of dextran vinyl sulfone. Acta Biomater. 2020;105:78–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mabry KM, Lawrence RL, Anseth KS. Dynamic stiffening of poly(ethylene glycol)-based hydrogels to direct valvular interstitial cell phenotype in a three-dimensional environment. Biomaterials. 2015;49:47–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taubenberger AV, Girardo S, Träber N, et al. 3D microenvironment stiffness regulates tumor spheroid growth and mechanics via p21 and ROCK. bioRxiv. Published online 2019 Jan 1;586784. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/586784.
   Google Scholar
• Kostic A, Lynch CD, Sheetz MP. Differential matrix rigidity response in breast cancer cell lines correlates with the tissue tropism. Plos One. 2009;4(7):e6361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilghman RW, Cowan CR, Mih JD, et al. Matrix rigidity regulates cancer cell growth and cellular phenotype. Plos One. 2010;5(9):e12905.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura. Changes in viscoelastic properties of articular cartilage in early stage of osteoarthritis, as determined by optical coherence tomography-based strain rate tomography. Published online 2019. https://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.proxy3.library.mcgill.ca/pmc/articles/PMC6731561/
   Google Scholar
• Fortis A, Kostopoulos V, Panagiotopoulos E, et al. Viscoelastic properties of cartilage-subchondral bone complex in osteoarthritis. J Med Eng Technol. 2004;28(5):223–226.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wong B, Bae W, Gratz K, et al. Shear deformation kinematics during cartilage articulation: effect of lubrication, degeneration, and stress relaxation. Mol Cell Biomech. 2008;5(3):197‐206.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Perepelyuk M, Chin L, Cao X, et al. Normal and fibrotic rat livers demonstrate shear strain softening and compression stiffening: a model for soft tissue mechanics. Plos One. 2016;11(1):e0146588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corr DT, Gallant-Behm CL, Shrive NG, et al. Biomechanical behavior of scar tissue and uninjured skin in a porcine model. Wound Repair Regen. 2009;17(2):250–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asbach P, Klatt D, Hamhaber U, et al. Assessment of liver viscoelasticity using multifrequency MR elastography. Magn Reson Med. 2008;60(2):373–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baghban M, Mojra A. Early relaxation time assessment for characterization of breast tissue and diagnosis of breast tumors. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018;87:325–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar V, Denis M, Gregory A, et al. Viscoelastic parameters as discriminators of breast masses: initial human study results. Plos One. 2018;13(10):e0205717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu Y, Sridhar M, Tsou JK, et al. Ultrasonic viscoelasticity imaging of nonpalpable breast tumors: preliminary results. Acad Radiol. 2008;15(12):1526–1533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinkus R, Tanter M, Catheline S, et al. Imaging anisotropic and viscous properties of breast tissue by magnetic resonance-elastography. Magn Reson Med. 2005;53(2):372–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinkus R, Tanter M, Xydeas T, et al. Viscoelastic shear properties of in vivo breast lesions measured by MR elastography. Proc Seventh Int Conf Recent Adv MR Appl Porous Media. 2005;23(2):159–165.
   Google Scholar
• Balleyguier C, Lakhdar AB, Dunant A, et al. Value of whole breast magnetic resonance elastography added to MRI for lesion characterization. NMR Biomed. 2018;31(1):e3795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabavizadeh A, Bayat M, Kumar V, et al. Viscoelastic biomarker for differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesion in ultra- low frequency range. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):5737.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sinkus R, Siegmann K, Xydeas T, et al. MR elastography of breast lesions: understanding the solid/liquid duality can improve the specificity of contrast-enhanced MR mammography. Magn Reson Med. 2007;58(6):1135–1144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Guo Y, Zhou Y, et al. Fluidity and elasticity form a concise set of viscoelastic biomarkers for breast cancer diagnosis based on Kelvin–Voigt fractional derivative modeling. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. Published online 2020 Apr 25. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-020-01330-7.
   Google Scholar
• Du C, Hill RJ. Linear viscoelasticity of weakly cross-linked hydrogels. J Rheol. 2018;63(1):109–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron AR, Frith JE, Cooper-White J. The influence of substrate creep on mesenchymal stem cell behaviour and phenotype. Biomaterials. 2011;32(26):5979–5993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron AR, Frith JE, Gomez GA, et al. The effect of time-dependent deformation of viscoelastic hydrogels on myogenic induction and Rac1 activity in mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials. 2014;35(6):1857–1868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattei G, Cacopardo L, Ahluwalia A. Micro-mechanical viscoelastic properties of crosslinked hydrogels using the nano-epsilon dot method. Mater Basel Switz. 2017;10(8):889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattei G, Cacopardo L, Ahluwalia AA. Engineering gels with time-evolving viscoelasticity. Mater Basel Switz. 2020;13(2):438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murrell M, Kamm R, Matsudaira P. Substrate viscosity enhances correlation in epithelial sheet movement. Biophys J. 2011;101(2):297–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacopardo L, Guazzelli N, Nossa R, et al. Engineering hydrogel viscoelasticity. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2019;89:162–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charrier EE, Pogoda K, Wells RG, et al. Control of cell morphology and differentiation by substrates with independently tunable elasticity and viscous dissipation. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):449.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Charrier EE, Pogoda K, Li R, et al. A novel method to make viscoelastic polyacrylamide gels for cell culture and traction force microscopy. APL Bioeng. 2020;4(3):036104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marozas IA, Cooper-White JJ, Anseth KS. Photo-induced viscoelasticity in cytocompatible hydrogel substrates. New J Phys. 2019;21(4):045004.
   Google Scholar
• Hui E, Gimeno KI, Guan G, et al. Spatiotemporal control of viscoelasticity in phototunable hyaluronic acid hydrogels. Biomacromolecules. 2019;20(11):4126–4134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li L, Eyckmans J, Chen CS. Designer biomaterials for mechanobiology. Nat Mater. 2017;16(12):1164–1168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer A, Gu L, Kwee B, et al. Hydrogel substrate stress-relaxation regulates the spreading and proliferation of mouse myoblasts. Acta Biomater. 2017;62:82–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri O, Gu L, Darnell M, et al. Substrate stress relaxation regulates cell spreading. Nat Commun. 2015;6(1):6365.
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri O, Gu L, Klumpers D, et al. Hydrogels with tunable stress relaxation regulate stem cell fate and activity. Nat Mater. 2016;15(3):326–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodell CB, MacArthur Jr JW, Dorsey SM, et al. Shear-thinning supramolecular hydrogels with secondary autonomous covalent crosslinking to modulate viscoelastic properties in vivo. Adv Funct Mater. 2015;25(4):636–644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lou J, Stowers R, Nam S, et al. Stress relaxing hyaluronic acid-collagen hydrogels promote cell spreading, fiber remodeling, and focal adhesion formation in 3D cell culture. Biomaterials. 2018;154:213–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinnon DD, Domaille DW, Cha JN, et al. Biophysically defined and cytocompatible covalently adaptable networks as viscoelastic 3D cell culture systems. Adv Mater. 2014;26(6):865–872.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown TE, Carberry BJ, Worrell BT, et al. Photopolymerized dynamic hydrogels with tunable viscoelastic properties through thioester exchange. Biomaterials. 2018;178:496–503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam S, Stowers R, Lou J, et al. Varying PEG density to control stress relaxation in alginate-PEG hydrogels for 3D cell culture studies. Biomaterials. 2019;200:15–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vining KH, Stafford A, Mooney DJ. Sequential modes of crosslinking tune viscoelasticity of cell-instructive hydrogels. Biomaterials. 2019;188:187–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisdom KM, Adebowale K, Chang J, et al. Matrix mechanical plasticity regulates cancer cell migration through confining microenvironments. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1): 4144-4144. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06641-z.
   Google Scholar
• Kim J, Feng J, Jones CAR, et al. Stress-induced plasticity of dynamic collagen networks. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):842.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ban E, Franklin JM, Nam S, et al. Mechanisms of plastic deformation in collagen networks induced by cellular forces. Biophys J. 2018;114(2):450–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu AS, Wang H, Copeland CR, et al. Matrix viscoplasticity and its shielding by active mechanics in microtissue models: experiments and mathematical modeling. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):33919.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wisdom KM, Indana D, Chou P-E, et al. Covalent cross-linking of basement membrane-like matrices physically restricts invasive protrusions in breast cancer cells. Matrix Biology. 2020;85-86:94–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cancer facts & figures. Published online 2020 [cited 2020 Jun 1]. https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/annual-cancer-facts-and-figures/2020/cancer-facts-and-figures-2020.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lin C-H, Pelissier FA, Zhang H, et al. Microenvironment rigidity modulates responses to the HER2 receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor lapatinib via YAP and TAZ transcription factors. Luo K, ed. Mol Biol Cell. 2015;26(22):3946–3953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhiman HK, Ray AR, Panda AK. Three-dimensional chitosan scaffold-based MCF-7 cell culture for the determination of the cytotoxicity of tamoxifen. Biomaterials. 2005;26(9):979–986.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung BM, Moraes C, Cavnar SP, et al. Microscale 3D collagen cell culture assays in conventional flat-bottom 384-well plates. J Lab Autom. 2014;20(2):138–145.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ho WJ, Pham EA, Kim JW, et al. Incorporation of multicellular spheroids into 3-D polymeric scaffolds provides an improved tumor model for screening anticancer drugs. Cancer Sci. 2010;101(12):2637–2643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horning JL, Sahoo SK, Vijayaraghavalu S, et al. 3-D tumor model for in vitro evaluation of anticancer drugs. Mol Pharm. 2008;5(5):849–862.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Mooney DJ. Designing hydrogels for controlled drug delivery. Nat Rev Mater. 2016;1(12):16071.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joyce MH, Lu C, James ER, et al. Phenotypic basis for matrix stiffness-dependent chemoresistance of breast cancer cells to doxorubicin. Front Oncol. 2018;8: 337-337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malandrino A, Trepat X, Kamm RD, et al. Dynamic filopodial forces induce accumulation, damage, and plastic remodeling of 3D extracellular matrices. PLOS Comput Biol. 2019;15(4):e1006684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee W, Kalashnikov N, Mok S, et al. Dispersible hydrogel force sensors reveal patterns of solid mechanical stress in multicellular spheroid cultures. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):144.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Campàs O, Mammoto T, Hasso S, et al. Quantifying cell-generated mechanical forces within living embryonic tissues. Nat Methods. 2014;11(2):183–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mongera A, Rowghanian P, Gustafson HJ, et al. A fluid-to-solid jamming transition underlies vertebrate body axis elongation. Nature. 2018;561(7723):401–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohagheghian E, Luo J, Chen J, et al. Quantifying compressive forces between living cell layers and within tissues using elastic round microgels. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1878.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mok S, Al Habyan S, Ledoux C, et al. Mapping cellular-scale internal stiffness in 3D tissues with smart material hydrogel probes. bioRxiv. Published online 2019 Jan 1;840736. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/840736.
   Google Scholar
• Proestaki M, Ogren A, Burkel B, et al. Modulus of fibrous collagen at the length scale of a cell. Exp Mech. 2019;59(9):1323–1334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serwane F, Mongera A, Rowghanian P, et al. In vivo quantification of spatially varying mechanical properties in developing tissues. Nat Methods. 2017;14(2):181–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Zhang X, Zhao S, et al. Micro-scaffold array chip for upgrading cell-based high-throughput drug testing to 3D using benchtop equipment. Lab Chip. 2014;14(3):471–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan X, Zhou L, Wu Z, et al. High throughput scaffold-based 3D micro-tumor array for efficient drug screening and chemosensitivity testing. Organoids Ex Vivo Tissue -Chip Technol. 2019;198:167–179.
   Google Scholar
• Moraes C, Simon AB, Putnam AJ, et al. Aqueous two-phase printing of cell-containing contractile collagen microgels. Biomaterials. 2013;34(37).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gungor-Ozkerim PS, Inci I, Zhang YS, et al. Bioinks for 3D bioprinting: an overview. Biomater Sci. 2018;6(5):915–946.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azizipour N, Avazpour R, Rosenzweig DH, et al. Evolution of biochip technology: a review from lab-on-a-chip to organ-on-a-chip. Micromachines. 2020;11:6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar