Gesturing more diminishes recall of abstract words when gesture is allowed and concrete words when it is taboo

References

• Barsalou, L. W., Breazeal, C., & Smith, L. B. (2007). Cognition as coordinated non-cognition. Cognitive Processing, 8, 79–91. doi: 10.1007/s10339-007-0163-1
   Google Scholar
• Byrd, C., McNeil, N., D’Mello, S. K., & Cook, S. (2014). Gesturing may not always make learning last. In P. Bellow, M. Guarini, M. McShane, & B. Scassellati (Eds.), Proceedings of the 36th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 1982–1987). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, S. W., Yip, T. K.-Y., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2010). Gesturing makes memories that last. Journal of Memory & Language, 63, 465–475. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2010.07.002
   Google Scholar
• Engelkamp, J., & Krumnacker, H. (1980). Imaginale und motorische Prozesse beim Behalten verbalen Materials. Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie, 27, 511–533.
   Google Scholar
• Frick-Horbury, D., & Guttentag, R. E. (1998). The effects of restricting hand gesture production on lexical retrieval and free recall. American Journal of Psychology, 111, 43–62. doi: 10.2307/1423536
   Google Scholar
• Friston, K., Breakspear, M., & Deco, G. (2012). Perception and self-organized instability. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 6. Article no. 44. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2012.00044
   Google Scholar
• Galantucci, B., Fowler, C. A., & Turvey, M. T. (2006). The motor theory of speech perception reviewed. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 361–377. doi: 10.3758/BF03193857
   Google Scholar
• Goldin-Meadow, S. (2010). When gesture does and does not promote learning. Language & Cognition, 2, 1–19. doi: 10.1515/langcog.2010.001
   Google Scholar
• Ingber, D. E. (2006). Cellular mechanotransduction: Putting all the pieces together again. FASEB Journal, 20, 811–827. doi: 10.1096/fj.05-5424rev
   Google Scholar
• Kelso, J. A. S., Tuller, B., Vatikiotis-Bateson, E., Fowler, C. A. (1984). Functionally specific articulatory cooperation following jaw perturbations during speech: Evidence for coordinative structures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 10, 812–832.
   Google Scholar
• Kelty-Stephen, D. G., & Dixon, J. A. (2014). Interwoven fluctuations in intermodal perception: Fractality in head-sway supports the use of visual feedback in haptic perceptual judgments by manual wielding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 40, 2289–2309.
   Google Scholar
• Nagels, A., Kircher, T., Steines, M., Grosvald, M., & Straube, B. (2015). A brief self-rating scale for the assessment of individual differences in gesture perception and production. Learning & Individual Differences, 39, 73–80. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2015.03.008
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (1998). The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Retrieved from http://www.usf.edu/FreeAssociation/
   Google Scholar
• Rolls, E. T. (2015). Limbic systems for emotion and for memory, but no single limbic system. Cortex, 62, 119–157. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2013.12.005
   Google Scholar
• Russ, M. O., Mack, W., Grama, C. R., Lanfermann, H., & Knopf, M. (2003). Enactment effect in memory: Evidence concerning the function of the supramarginal gyrus. Experimental Brain Research, 149, 497–504. doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1398-4
   Google Scholar
• Stevanoni, E., & Salmon, K. (2005). Giving memory a hand: Instructing children to gesture enhances their event recall. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 29, 217–233. doi: 10.1007/s10919-005-7721-y
   Google Scholar
• Straube, B., Green, A., Bromberger, B., & Kircher, T. (2011). The differentiation of iconic and metaphoric gestures: Common and unique integration processes. Human Brain Mapping, 32, 520–533. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21041
   Google Scholar
• Straube, B., Meyer, L., Green, A., & Kircher, T. (2014). Semantic relation vs. surprise: The differential effects of related and unrelated co-verbal gestures on neural encoding and subsequent recognition. Brain Research, 1567, 42–56. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.04.012
   Google Scholar
• Teng, D. W., Eddy, C. L., & Kelty-Stephen, D. G. (2016). Non-visually-guided distance perception depends on matching torso fluctuations between training and test. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78, 2320–2328. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1213-5
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. M., Saygin, A. P., Sereno, M. I., & Iacoboni, M. (2004). Listening to speech activates motor areas involved in speech production. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 701–702. doi: 10.1038/nn1263
   Google Scholar