American and South Korean Engineering Students’ Communication Motives and Their Student–Instructor Communication Satisfaction

References

• Barraclough, R. A., Christophel, D. M., & McCroskey, J. C. (1988). Willingness to communicate: A cross-cultural investigation. Communication Research Reports, 5, 187–192.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, M. (1987). Chinese values and the search for Culture-Free dimensions of culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18, 143–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canary, D. J., & Stafford, L. (1994). Maintaining relationships through strategic and routine interaction. In D. J. Canary, & L. Stafford (Eds.), Communication and relational maintenance (pp. 3–22). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, G.-M., & Chung, J. (1994). The impact of confucianism on organizational communication. Communication Quarterly, 42, 93–105.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, P. J., Calloway-Thomas, C., & Simonds, C. J. (2007). Intercultural communication: A text with readings. Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Frymier, A. B. (2005). Students’ classroom communication effectiveness. Communication Quarterly, 53, 197–212. doi:10.1080/01463370500089896
   Google Scholar
• Frymier, A. B., & Houser, M. L. (2000). The teacher-student relationship as an interpersonal relationship. Communication Education, 49, 207–219. doi:10.1080/03634520009379209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodboy, A. K., & Bolkan, S. (2009). College teacher misbehaviors: Direct and indirect effects on student communication behaviors and traditional learning outcomes. Western Journal of Communication, 73, 204–219. doi:10.1080/10570310902856089
   Google Scholar
• Goodboy, A. K., Bolkan, S., Myers, S. A., & Zhao, X. (2011). Student use of relational and influence messages in response to perceived instructor power use in American and Chinese college classrooms. Communication Education, 60, 191–209. doi:10.1080/03634523.2010.502970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodboy, A. K., Martin, M. M., & Bolkan, S. (2009). The development and validation of the student communication satisfaction scale. Communication Education, 58, 372–396. doi:10.1080/03634520902755441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodboy, A. K., & Myers, S. A. (2008). The effect of teacher communication and students communication on learning outcomes. Communication Education, 57, 153–179. doi:10.1080/03634520701787777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodboy, A. K., Myers, S. A., & Bolkan, S. (2012). Personalized education and student motives for communicating with instructors: An examination of Chinese and American classrooms. China Media Research, 8, 94–100.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. New York, NY: Anchor Books/Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Hecht, M. L. (1984). Satisfying communication and relational labels: Intimacy and depth of relationship as perceptual frames of naturalistic communication. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 48, 201–216.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. H. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G., & McCrae, R. R. (2004). Personality and culture revisited: Linking traits and dimensions of culture. Cross-Cultural Research, 38, 52–88. doi:10.1177/1069397103259443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, C. F. (2007). A cross-cultural comparison of communication orientations between americans and taiwanese. Communication Quarterly, 55, 359–374.
   Google Scholar
• Immigration Direct (2011). U.S. immigration & citizenship form services: Simplifying immigration. Retrieved from www.immigrationdirect.com
   Google Scholar
• Klopf, D. W. (1997). Cross-cultural apprehension research: Procedures and comparisons.In J. Daly, J. C. McCroskey, J. A. Ayres, T. Hopf & D. M. Ayres (Eds.), Avoiding communication: Shyness, reticence and communication apprehension (2nd ed. pp. 269–284). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kluckhohn, F. R., & Strodtbeck, F. L. (1961). Variations in value orientations. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, Y., & Hsu, C.-F. (2008). Willingness to communicate in intercultural interactions between Chinese and Americans. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 37, 75–88.
   Google Scholar
• Mansson, D. H., & Myers, S. A. (2009). A reexamination of Swedish and American college students’ communicative attributes. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 38, 9–22. doi:10.1080/17475750903381622
   Google Scholar
• Mansson, D. H., & Myers, S. A. (2011). Swedish college students’ academic involvement: Bridging culture, traits, and communicative behaviors. The Texas Speech Communication Journal, 36, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Mansson, D. H., & Myers, S. A. (2012). Using mentoring enactment theory to explore the doctoral Student-Advisor mentoring relationship. Communication Education, 61, 309–334. doi:10.1080/03634523.2012.708424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansson, D. H., Myers, S. A., & Martin, M. M. (2011). Students’ aggressive communication traits and their motives for communicating with their instructors. College Student Journal, 45, 401–406.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, M. M., Byrnes, K., & Myers, S. A. (2009, November). International students’ stress and communication competence and their motives for communicating with their instructors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, M. M., Mottet, T. P., & Myers, S. A. (2000). Students’ motives for communicating with their instructors and affective and cognitive learning. Psychological Reports, 87, 830–834. doi:PMid:
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, M. M., & Myers, S. A. (2006). Students’ communication traits and their out-of-class communication with their instructors. Communication Research Reports, 23, 283–289. doi:10.1080/08824090600962599
   Google Scholar
• Martin, M. M., Myers, S. A., & Mottet, T. P. (1999). Students’ motives for communicating with their instructors. Communication Education, 48, 155–164. doi:10.1080/03634529909379163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, M. M., Myers, S. A., & Mottet, T. P. (2006). Students’ machiavellianism and motives for communicating with instructors. Psychological Reports, 98, 861–864. doi:10.2466/pr0.98.3.861-864
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, M. M., Valencic, K. M., & Heisel, A. D. (2002). The relationship between students’ communication apprehension and their motives for communicating with their instructors. Communication Research Reports, 19, 1–7. doi:10.1080/08824090209384826
   Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C., Burroughs, N. F., Daun, A., Richmond, V., & &, P. (1990). Correlates of quietness: Swedish and American perspectives. Communication Quarterly, 38, 127–137.
   Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1990). Willingness to communicate: Differing cultural perspectives. Southern Communication Journal, 56, 72–77.
   Google Scholar
• Park, H. S., Lee, S. A., Yun, D., & Kim, W. (2009). The impact of instructor decision authority and verbal and nonverbal immediacy on Korean student satisfaction in the US and South Korea. Communication Education, 58, 189–212. doi:10.1080/03634520802450531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, A. M. (2009). Social desirability. In R. R. Rubin, A. M. Rubin, E. E. Graham, E. M. Perse, & D. R. Seibold (Eds.), Communication research measures II: A sourcebook (pp. 488–494). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, R. R., Perse, B. M., & Barbato, C. A. (1988). Conceptualization and measurement of interpersonal communication motives. Human Communication Research, 14, 602–628. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1988.tb00169.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sallinen‐Kuparinen, A., McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1991). Willingness to communicate, communication apprehension, introversion, and self-perceived communication competence: Finnish and American comparison. Communication Research Reports, 8, 55–64.
   Google Scholar
• Schutz, W. (1966). The interpersonal underworld. Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books.
   Google Scholar
• Shimotsu-Dariol, S., Mansson, D. H., & Myers, S. A. (2012). Students’ academic competitiveness and their involvement in the learning process. Communication Research Reports, 29, 310–319. doi:10.1080/08824096.2012.723643
   Google Scholar
• Sidelinger, R. J., & Booth-Butterfield, M. (2010). Co-Constructing student involvement: An examination of teacher confirmation and student-to-student connectedness in the college classroom. Communication Education 59, 165–184. doi:10.1080/03634520903390867
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen, C. W. (1994). Success and education in South Korea. Comparative Education Review, 38, 10–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, K. D., & Frymier, A. B. (2007). The relationship between student educational orientation and motives for out-of-Class communication. Communication Research Reports, 24, 249–256. doi:10.1080/08824090701446625
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q. (2006). Immediacy and out-of-class communication: A cross-cultural comparison. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30, 33–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar