Measuring Communication Styles in the Malaysian Workplace: Instrument Development and Validation

References

• Abdul Rashid, M. Z., & Ho, J. A. (2003). Perceptions of business ethics in a multicultural community: The case of Malaysia. Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 75–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdul Rashid, M. Z., Sambasivan, M., & Abdul Rahman, A. (2004). The influence of organizational culture and attitudes toward organizational change. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 25, 161–179.
   Google Scholar
• Abdullah, A. (2001). Influence of ethnic values at the Malaysian workplace. In A. Abdullah & A. Low (Eds.), Understanding the Malaysian workforce: Guidelines for managers (Rev. ed., pp. 1–25). Kuala Lumpur: Malaysian Institute of Management.
   Google Scholar
• Abdullah, A., & Lim, L. (2001). Cultural dimensions of Anglos, Australians and Malaysians. Malaysian Management Review, 36, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, M., Titsworth, B. S., & Hunt, K. S. (2009). Quantitative research in communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Armenakis, A. A., Bernerth, J. B., Pitts, J. P., & Walker, H. J. (2007). Organizational change recipients’ beliefs scale development of an assessment instrument. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43, 481–505.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, H. J., & Feldman, D. C. (1981). Social desirability response bias in self-report choice situations. Academy of Management Journal, 24, 377–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashcraft, K. L., & Allen, B. J. (2003). The racial foundation of organizational communication. Communication Theory, 13, 5–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashkanasy, N. M. (2002). Leadership in the Asian century: Lessons from GLOBE. International Journal of Organizational Behavior, 5, 150–163.
   Google Scholar
• Bakar, H. A., & Connaughton, S. L. (2010). Relationships between supervisory communication and commitment to workgroup: A multilevel analysis approach. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 4, 39–57.
   Google Scholar
• Bakar, H. A., & Mustaffa, C. S. (2011). Understanding the meaning and embodiment of power distance in Malaysian public organization. In T. Kuhn (Ed.), Matters of communication: Political, cultural, and technological challenges to communication theorizing (pp. 197–215). New York, NY: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakar, H. A., & Mustaffa, C. S. (2013). Organizational communication in Malaysia organizations: Incorporating cultural values in communication scale. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 18, 87–109.
   Google Scholar
• Bakar, H. A., & Sheer, V. C. (2013). The mediating role of perceived cooperative communication in the relationship between interpersonal exchange relationships and perceived group cohesion. Management Communication Quarterly, 27, 443–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakar, H. A., Mustaffa, C. S., & Mohamad, B. (2009). LMX quality, supervisory communication and team-oriented commitment: A multilevel analysis approach. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 14, 11–33.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, M. H. (1988). Finding universal dimensions of individual variation in multicultural studies of values: The Rokeach and Chinese value surveys. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 1009–1015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Central Intelligence Agency. (2013). The world factbook. Retrieved from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/my.html
   Google Scholar
• Chan, C. C. A., & Pearson, C. A. L. (2002). Comparison of managerial work goals among Bruneian, Malaysian and Singaporean managers. Journal of Management Development, 21, 545–556.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, J. C., Silverthorne, C., & Hung, J. Y. (2006). Organization communication, job stress, organizational commitment and job performance of accounting professionals in Taiwan and America. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 27, 242–249.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. A. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–354.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DeVellis, R. F. (2011). Scale development: Theory and applications (Vol. 26). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dilbeck, K. E., McCroskey, J. C., Richmond, V. P., & McCroskey, L. L. (2009). Self-perceived communication competence in the Thai culture. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 38, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, C. W., & Hazen, M. D. (1977). A factor analytic study of communication satisfaction. Journal of Business Communication, 14, 63–73.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrhart, M. G., & Naumann, S. E. (2004). Organizational citizenship behavior in work groups: A group norms approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 960–974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdogan, B., & Liden, R. C. (2006). Collectivist as moderator of responses to organizational justice: Implications for leader-member exchange and ingratiation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fay, M. J., & Kline, S. L. (2011). Coworker relationships and informal communication in high-intensity telecommuting. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 39, 144–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldhaber, G. M., & Rogers, D. P. (1979). Auditing organizational communication systems: The ICA communication audit. Dubuque: Kendall/Hunt.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J., & Laidlaw, H. (2004). Improving the measurement of communication satisfaction. Management Communication Quarterly, 17, 425–448.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, V., Surie, G., Javidan, M., & Chhokar, J. (2002). Southern Asia cluster: Where the old meets the new? Journal of World Business, 37, 16–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate analysis: A global perspective (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hinkin, T. R. (1995). A review of scale development practices in the study of organizations. Journal of Management, 21, 967–988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinkin, T. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1, 104–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (2003). Culture’s consequences, comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G., & Hofstede, G. J. (2004). Culture and organizations: Software of the mind: Intercultural cooperation and its importance of survival. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, C.-F. (2010). Acculturation and communication traits: A study of cross-cultural adaptation among Chinese in America. Communication Monographs, 77, 414–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hui, C. H., & Triandis, H. C. (1985). Measurement in cross-cultural psychology: A review and comparison of strategies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 16, 131–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandlosi, N. S. E., Ali, A. J., & Abdollahi, A. (2010). Organizational citizenship behavior in concern of communication satisfaction. International Journal of Business and Management, 5, 51–61.
   Google Scholar
• Karande, K., Rao, C. P., & Singhapakdi, A. (2002). Moral philosophies of marketing managers: A comparison of American, Australian and Malaysian cultures. European Journal of Marketing, 36, 768–791.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, J. C. (2002). Leadership in Malaysia: Traditional values, international outlook. Academy of Management Executive, 16, 15–26.
   Google Scholar
• Keyton, J. (2010). Communication and organizational culture: A key to understanding work experiences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, M. S. (1994). Cross-cultural comparisons of the perceived importance of conversational constraints. Human Communication Research, 21, 128–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. (2004). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Koning, K. Z., & de Jong, M. (2007). Evaluating the communication satisfaction questionnaires communication audit tool. Management Communication Quarterly, 20, 261–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapinski, M. K., & Rimal, R. N. (2005). An explication of social norms. Communication Theory, 15, 127–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., & Tsui, A. S. (2002). A citation analysis of management and organization research in the Chinese context: 1984–1999. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19, 87–107.
   Google Scholar
• Liden, R. C. (2011). Leadership in Asia: A brief assessment and suggestions for the future. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28, 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liden, R. C., & Maslyn, J. M. (1998). Multidimensionafity of leader-member exchange: An empirical assessment through scale development. Journal of Management, 24, 43–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, K. H. (2003a). Budi as the Malay mind. International Institute of Asian Research Newsletter, 31, 31–31.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, K. H. (2003b). Budi as the Malay mind: A philosophical study of Malay ways of reasoning and emotion in peribahasa. Hamburg: Voss, Markus.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, L. (2001). Work-related values of Malays and Chinese Malaysians. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 1, 209–226.
   Google Scholar
• Limaye, M. R., & Victor, D. A. (1991). Cross-cultural business communication research: State of art and hypotheses for the 1990’s. Journal of Business Communication, 28, 277–299.
   Google Scholar
• Loi, R., & Ngo, H.-Y. (2009). Work outcomes of relational demography in Chinese vertical dyads. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20, 1704–1719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loo, R., & Loewen, P. (2004). Confirmatory factor analyses of scores from full and short versions of the Marlowe–Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 2343–2352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowry, P. B., Roberts, T. L., Romano, N. C., Jr., Cheney, P. D., & Hightower, R. T. (2006). The impact of group size and social presence on small-group communication: Does computer-mediated communication make a difference? Small Group Research, 37, 631–661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumoto, D. (1999). Culture and self: An empirical assessment of Markus and Kitayama’s theory of independent and interdependent self-construals. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 289–310.
   Google Scholar
• McCann, R. M., & Giles, H. (2006). Communication with people of different age in workplace: Thai and American data. Human Communication Research, 32, 74–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C., & McCroskey, L. L. (1988). Self‐report as an approach to measuring communication competence. Communication Research Report, 5, 108–113.
   Google Scholar
• McLaren, M. C., & Rashid, M. Z. A. (2002). Issues and cases in cross-cultural Management: An Asian perspective. Petaling Jaya: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Milliman, J., Taylor, S., & Czaplewski, A. J. (2002). Cross-cultural performance feedback in multinational enterprises: Opportunity for organizational learning. Human Resources Planning Society, 25, 29–43.
   Google Scholar
• Monier-Williams, M. (1956). A Sanskrit-English dictionary: Etymologically and philologically arranged with special reference to cognate Indo-European languages. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, B. H., & Lee, J. (2002). Leader-member exchange and organizational communication satisfaction in multiple contexts. Journal of Business Communication, 39, 220–244.
   Google Scholar
• Nair-Venugopal, S. (2000). English identity and the Malaysian workplace. World Englishes, 19, 205–213.
   Google Scholar
• Nasrudin, A. M., Ramayah, T., & Beng, Y. C. (2006). Organizational structure and organizational climate as potential predictors of job stress: Evidence from Malaysia. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 16, 117–129.
   Google Scholar
• Ota, H., McCann, R. M., & Honeycutt, J. (2012). Inter-Asian variability in intergenerational communication. Human Communication Research, 38, 172–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, H. S., & Levine, T. R. (1999). The theory of reasoned action and self‐construal: Evidence from three cultures. Communications Monographs, 66, 199–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, C. L., & Herbik, P. A. (2004). Citizenship behavior at the team level of analysis: The effects of team leadership, team commitment, perceived team support, and team size. The Journal of Social Psychology, 144, 293–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, C. A. L., & Chong, J. (1997). Contributions of job content and social information on organizational commitment and job satisfaction: An exploration in a Malaysian nursing context. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 70, 357–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, K. H., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1974). Measuring organizational communication. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 321–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, C. J., Diyab, A. A., & Al-Kahtani, A. (2013). A cross-national analysis of perceptions of corporate governance principles. International Business Review, 22, 315–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salleh, M. L. (2005). High/low context communication. In L. E. Gueldenzoph (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2005 Association for Business Communication Annual Convention (pp. 1–11). Irvine, CA: Association for Business Communication.
   Google Scholar
• Sandberg, J. (1997). Are phenomenographic results reliable? Higher Education Research & Development, 16, 203–212.
   Google Scholar
• Selvarajah, C., & Meyer, D. (2006). Archetypes of the Malaysian manager: Exploring ethnicity dimensions that relate to leadership. Journal of Management & Organization, 12, 251–269.
   Google Scholar
• Selvarajah, C., & Meyer, D. (2008). One nation, three cultures: Exploring dimensions that relate to leadership in Malaysia. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 29, 693–712.
   Google Scholar
• Shephard, P. (2001). Expats working with Malaysians. In A. Abdullah & A. Low (Eds.), Understanding the Malaysian workforce: Guidelines for managers (Rev. ed., pp. 179–196). Kuala Lumpur: Malaysian Institute of Management.
   Google Scholar
• Shuter, R. (1990). The centrality of culture. Southern Journal of Communication, 55, 237–249.
   Google Scholar
• Shuter, R. (2008). The centrality of culture. In M. K. Asante, Y. Milke, & J. Yin (Eds.), The global intercultural communication reader (pp. 37–43). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. C., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 653–663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storz, M. L. (1999). Malay and Chinese values underlying the Malaysian business culture. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 23, 117–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, J. S. (1998). Malaysia and Singapore. Business Communication Quarterly, 61, 106–110.
   Google Scholar
• The Chinese Culture Connection. (1987). Chinese values and the search for culture-free dimensions of culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18, 134–143.
   Google Scholar
• Ting-Toomey, S. (2012). Communicating across cultures. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsui, A. S. (2004). Contributing to global management knowledge: A case for high quality indigenous research. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21, 419–513.
   Google Scholar
• Tsui, A. S. (2007). From homogenization to pluralism: International management research in the academy and beyond. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1353–1364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varona, F. (1996). Relationship between communication satisfaction and organizational commitment in three Guatemalan organizations. Journal of Business Communication, 33, 111–140.
   Google Scholar
• Wan Husin, W. N. (2011). Budi-Islam; Its roles in the construction of Malay identity in Malaysia. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1, 132–142.
   Google Scholar
• Wefald, A. J., & Downey, R. G. (2009). Construct dimensionality of engagement and its relation with satisfaction. The Journal of Psychology, 143, 91–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiio, O. A., & Helsila, M. (1974). Auditing communication in organizations: A standard survey, LTT communication audits. Finnish Journal of Business Economics, 4, 303–315.
   Google Scholar
• Zarrinabadi, N. (2012). Self-perceived communication competence in Iranian culture. Communication Research Report, 29, 292–298.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q., & Oetzel, J. G. (2006). A cross-cultural test of immediacy–learning models in Chinese classrooms. Communication Education, 55, 313–330.
   Google Scholar