Modeling Serial Argument Goals, Tactics, and Their Effects on Arguers’ Satisfaction in the Case of Three Ethnic Groups in the United States

References

• Berger, C. (1997). Planning strategic interaction: Attaining goals through communicative action. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bevan, J. L. (2010). Serial argument goals and conflict strategies: A comparison between romantic partners and family members. Communication Reports, 23, 52–64. doi:10.1080/08934211003598734
   Google Scholar
• Bevan, J. L. (2014). Dyadic perceptions of goals, conflict strategies, and perceived resolvability in serial arguments. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 31, 1–23. doi:10.1177/0265407513504653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevan, J. L., Finan, A., & Kaminsky, A. (2008). Modeling serial arguments in close relationships: The serial argument process model. Human Communication Research, 34, 600–624. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.00334.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevan, J. L., Hale, J. L., & Williams, S. L. (2004). Identifying and characterizing goals of dating partners engaging in serial argumentation. Argumentation and Advocacy, 41, 28–40.
   Google Scholar
• Bevan, J. L., Tidgewell, K. D., Bardull, K. C., Cusanelli, L., Hartsern, M., Holbeck, D., & Hale, J. L. (2007). Serial argumentation goals and their relationships with perceived resolvability and choice of conflict tactics. Communication Quarterly, 55, 61–77. doi:10.1080/01463370600998640
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5. doi:10.1177/1745691610393980
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthén, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456–466. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canary, D. J., Cunningham, E. M., & Cody, M. J. (1988). Goal types, gender, and locus of control in managing interpersonal conflict. Communication Research, 15, 426–446.10.1177/009365088015004005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caughlin, J. P. (2010). Invited review article: A multiple goals theory of personal relationships: Conceptual integration and program overview. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 824–848. doi:10.1177/0265407510373262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cionea, I. A., Hoelscher, C. S., & Ileș, I. A. (2014, November). Arguing goals: Multicultural measurement and connections to self-construals, face concerns, and power distance. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Cionea, I. A., & Hopârtean, A.-M. (2011, November). Serial arguments: An exploratory investigation in Romania. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Cionea, I. A., Johnson, A. J., Bruscella, J. S., & *an Gilder, B. (2015). Taking conflict personally and the use of the demand/withdraw pattern in intraethnic serial arguments. Argumentation and Advocacy, Special Issue: 30 Years of Research on Serial Argument in Interpersonal Relationships, 52, 32–43.
   Google Scholar
• Cionea, I. A., Wilson Mumpower, S., & Bassick, M. (2015, May). Goals, tactics, and their effects on relational satisfaction in serial arguments: A comparison of long distance and geographically close romantic relationships. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association conference, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, M. J. & Thomas, M. (1988). Cultural identity: An interpretive perspective. In Y. Y. Kim & W. B. Gudykunst (Eds.), Theorizing intercultural communication: International and intercultural communication annual (Vol. 12, pp. 94–120). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Coon, H. M. & Kemmelmeier, M. (2001). Cultural orientations in the United States: (Re)examining differences among ethnic groups. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 348–364. doi:10.1177/0022022101032003006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cupach, W. R., Canary, D. J., & Spitzberg, B. H. (2010). Competence in interpersonal conflict. Long Grove, IL: Waveland.
   Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P. (1997). Explicating the goal construct: Tools for theorists. In J. O. Greene (Ed.), Message production: Advances in communication theory (pp. 47–69). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gabrielidis, C., Stephan, W. G., Ybarra, O., Dos Santos Pearson, V. M., & Villareal, L. (1997). Preferred styles of conflict resolution: Mexico and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28, 661–677. doi:10.1177/0022022197286002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, Y., & Cionea, I. A. (in press). “Do it this way, not that way:” An exploration of Chinese workplace conflicts. International Journal of Conflict Management.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer, M. R., & Gudykunst, W. B. (1987). The influence of ethnicity and sex on social penetration in close friendships. Journal of Black Studies, 17, 418–437. doi:10.1177/002193478701700403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hample, D. (2015). Orientations to interpersonal arguing in Chile and around the world. Cogency, 7, 61–80.
   Google Scholar
• Hample, D., & Allen, S. (2012). Serial arguments in organizations. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 1, 312–330. doi:10.1075/jaic.1.3.03ham
   Google Scholar
• Hample, D., & Cionea, I. A. (2012). Serial arguments in inter-ethnic relationships. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 36, 430–445. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hample, D., & Krueger, B. (2011). Serial arguments in classrooms. Communication Studies, 62, 597–617. doi:10.1080/10510974.2011.576746
   Google Scholar
• Hample, D., Richards, A. S., & Na, L. (2012). A test of the conflict linkage model in the context of serial arguments. Western Journal of Communication, 76, 459–479. doi:10.1080/10570314.2012.703361
   Google Scholar
• Hecht, M. L., Collier, M. J., & Ribeau, S. A. (1993). African-American communication: Ethnic identity and cultural interpretation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hecht, M. L., & Ribeau, S. A. (1984). Ethnic communication: A comparative analysis of satisfying communication. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 8, 135–151. doi:10.1016/0147-1767(84)90036-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. L., & Roloff, M. E. (1998). Serial arguing and relational quality: Determinants and consequences of perceived resolvability. Communication Research, 25, 327–343. doi:10.1177/009365098025003004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. L., & Roloff, M. E. (2000). The influence of argumentative role (initiator vs. resistor) on perceptions of serial argument resolvability and relational harm. Argumentation, 14, 1–15. doi:10.1023/A:1007837310258
   Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2015). LISREL 9.20 [Computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, T. Y., Wang, C., Kondo, M., & Kim, T. H. (2007). Conflict management styles: The differences among the Chinese, Japanese, and Koreans. International Journal of Conflict Management, 18, 23–41. doi:10.1108/10444060710759309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, M., & Wilson, S. R. (2011). The effects of interaction goals on negotiation tactics and outcomes: A dyad-level analysis across two cultures. Communication Research, 38, 248–277. doi:10.1177/0093650210362680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oetzel, J. G., & Ting-Toomey, S. (2003). Face concerns in interpersonal conflict: A cross-cultural empirical test of the face negotiation theory. Communication Research, 30, 599–624. doi:10.1177/0093650203257841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohbuchi, K., & Tedeschi, J. T. (1997). Multiple goals and tactical behavior in social conflicts. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1345–1366. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb01647.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phinney, J. (1991). Ethnic identity and self-esteem: A review and integration. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 13, 193–208.10.1177/07399863910132005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phinney, J. (1992). The multigroup ethnic identity measure: A new scale for use with diverse groups. Journal of Adolescent Research, 7, 156–176. doi:10.1177/074355489272003
   Google Scholar
• Radanielina-Hita, M. L. (2010). Let’s make peace! A cross-cultural analysis of the effects of serial arguing behaviors in romantic relationships: The case of Malagasy romantic partners. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 39, 81–103. doi:10.1080/2F17475759.2010.526314
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, R. E., Phinney, J. S., Masse, L. C., Chen, Y. R., Roberts, C. R., & Romero, A. (1999). The structure of ethnic identity of young adolescents from diverse ethnocultural groups. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 19, 301–322. doi:10.1177/0272431699019003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roloff, M. E., & Wright, C. N. (2009). Conflict avoidance: A functional analysis. In T. D. Afifi & W. A. Afifi (Eds.), Uncertainty, information management, and disclosure decisions: Theory and applications (pp. 320–340). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sass, D. A., & Schmitt, T. A. (2013). Testing measurement and structural invariance. In T. Teo (Ed.), Handbook of quantitative methods for educational research (pp. 315–345). Rotterdam: Sense.10.1007/978-94-6209-404-8
   Google Scholar
• Steinmetz, H., Schmidt, P., Tina-Booh, A., Wieczorek, S., & Schwartz, S. H. (2009). Testing measurement invariance using multigroup CFA: Differences between educational groups in human values measurement. Quality and Quantity, 43, 599–616. doi:10.1007/s11135-007-9143-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephan, C. W., & Stephan, W. G. (2000). The measurement of racial and ethnic identity. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 24, 541–552. doi:10.1016/S0147-1767(00)00016-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ting-Toomey, S. (1999). Communicating across cultures. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ting-Toomey, S., Yee-Jung, K. K., Shapiro, R. B., Garcia, W., Wright, T. J., & Oetzel, J. (2000). Ethnic/cultural identity salience and conflict styles in four US ethnic groups. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 24, 47–81. doi:10.1016/S0147-1767(99)00023-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trapp, R., & Hoff, N. (1985). A model of serial argument in interpersonal relationships. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 22(1), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, S.-Y., & Rubin, D. L. (2000). Evaluating the impact of collectivism and individualism on argumentative writing by Chinese and North American college students. Research in the Teaching of English, 35, 148–178. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40171513
   Google Scholar
• Xie, Y., Hample, D., & Wang, X. (2015). A cross-cultural analysis of argument predispositions in China: Argumentativeness, verbal aggressiveness, argument frames, and personalization of conflict. Argumentation, 29, 265–284. doi:10.1007/s10503-015-9352-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar