From Military Member to Student: An Examination of the Communicative Challenges of Veterans to Perform Communication Accommodation in the University

References

• Aberle, D. F., Cohen, A. K., Davis, A. K., Levy, M. J., & Sutton, F. X. (1950). The functional prerequisites of a society. Ethics, 60(2), 100–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agan, K. E. (1920). Public speaking in a military college. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 6(3), 25–32.
   Google Scholar
• Amer, S., & Jian, G. (2018). It is a man’s world: A qualitative study on females in the military. The Pennsylvania Communication Annual, 74, 48–74.
   Google Scholar
• Army.mil. (2018). Features-values. Retrieved from https://www.army.mil/values/
   Google Scholar
• Baym, N. K. (2006). Finding the quality in qualitative research. In D. Silver & A. Massanari (Eds.), Critical cyberculture studies, (79–87). New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bohman, G. V., Crocker, L., Paul, W. B., Wise, C. M., & Mills, G. E. (1943). Speaking instruction in college military units. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 29(4), 399–400.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Defense. (2016). 2015 demographics: Profile of the military community. Retrieved from http://download.militaryonesource.mil/12038/MOS/Reports/2015-Demographics-Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Erlandson, D. A., Harris, E. L., Skipper, B. L., & Allen, D. S. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry: A guide to methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, X. (2017). When an Indian speaks to a Chinese: Making sense of World Englishes in the framework of communication accommodation theory. Asian Englishes, 19(2), 100–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallois, C., & Callan, V. J. (1997). Communication and culture: A guide for practice. London, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Gallois, C., & Giles, H. (2015). Communication accommodation theory. The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction, 1–18. doi:10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi066
   Google Scholar
• Gasiorek, J., Giles, H., & Soliz, J. (2015). Accommodating new vistas. Language & Communication, 41, 1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures (Vol. 5043). New York, NY: Basic books.
   Google Scholar
• Giles, H., & Johnson, P. (1987). Ethnolinguistic identity theory: A social psychological approach to language maintenance. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 68. doi:10.1515/ijsl.1987.68.69
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, G. G., & DiTomaso, N. (1992). Predicting corporate performance from organizational culture. Journal of Management Studies, 29(6), 783–798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajek, C., Giles, H., Barker, V., Lin, M., Zhang, Y. B., & Lee Hummert, M. (2008). Expressed trust and compliance in police‐civilian encounters: The role of communication accommodation in Chinese and American settings. Chinese Journal of Communication, 1(2), 168–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F., & Matthes, J. (2014). Self-censorship, the spiral of silence, and contemporary political communication. Oxford Handbooks Online. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.013.31
   Google Scholar
• Hinderaker, A. (2014). Severing primary ties: Exit from totalistic organizations. Western Journal of Communication, 79(1). doi:10.1080/10570314.2014.943422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinderaker, A., & O’Connor, A. (2015). The long road out: Exit stories from the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. Communication Studies, 66(5), 509–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosman, L. A. (1997). The relationship between locus of control and the evaluative consequences of powerful and powerless speech styles. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16(1), 70–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosman, L. A., & Siltanen, S. A. (2006). Powerful and powerless language forms. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 25(1), 33–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, W. T., & Hinderaker, A. (2018). “The rule was the rule”: New member socialization in rigidly structured totalistic organizations. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 26(3), 180–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itzhaky, L., Avidor, S., & Solomon, Z. (2017). Long-term guilt and hostility underlying posttraumatic stress symptoms in war combatants and ex-prisoners of war. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 22(3), 228–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jule, A. (2018). All together now: Using conversational analysis and muted group theory to understand gendered classroom discourse in a Cameroonian primary classroom. African Journal of Teacher Education, 7(1). doi:10.21083/ajote.v7i1.3765
   Google Scholar
• Knight, J. P. (1990). Literature as equipment for killing: Performance as rhetoric in military training camps. Text and Performance Quarterly, 10(2), 157–168.
   Google Scholar
• Koenig, C. J., Maguen, S., Monroy, J. D., Mayott, L., & Seal, K. H. (2014). Facilitating culture-centered communication between health care providers and veterans transitioning from military deployment to civilian life. Patient Education and Counseling, 95(3), 414–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, M. W. (2011). Toward a communication model for the socialization of voluntary members. Communication Monographs, 78(2), 233–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Maravilla, C. S. (2007). Prosecuting adultery under the uniform code of military justice after Lawrence V. Texas. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1003689
   Google Scholar
• Military Leadership Diversity Commission. (2009). Department of defense core values. Definition of Diversity, 6, 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Muir, K., Joinson, A., Cotterill, R., & Dewdney, N. (2016). Characterizing the linguistic chameleon: Personal and social correlates of linguistic style accommodation. Human Communication Research, 42(3), 462–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muir, K., Joinson, A., Cotterill, R., & Dewdney, N. (2017). Linguistic style accommodation shapes impression formation and rapport in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Language & Social Psychology, 36(5), 525–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicassio, P. M., & Saral, T. (1978). The role of personality in intercultural communication. Annals of the International Communication Association, 2(1), 345–350.
   Google Scholar
• Office of Public and Intergovernmental Affairs. (2016). VA releases veteran suicide statistics by state. Retrieved from https://www.va.gov/opa/pressrel/pressrelease.cfm?id=2951
   Google Scholar
• Parker, M. (2000). Organizational culture and identity: Unity and division at work. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Soliz, J., & Giles, H. (2014). Relational and identity processes in communication: A contextual and meta-analytical review of communication accommodation theory. Annals of the International Communication Association, 38(1), 107–144.
   Google Scholar
• Toma, C. L. (2014). Towards conceptual convergence: An examination of interpersonal adaptation. Communication Quarterly, 62(2), 155–178.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. (2013). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. Chichester, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. J., & Hinrichs, M. M. (2017). Big tent criteria for qualitative quality. The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods, 1–10. doi:10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0016
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, K., Milburn, T., & Wilkins, R. (2008). Expressive practices: The local enactment of culture in the communication classroom. Business Communication Quarterly, 71(2), 171–183.
   Google Scholar
• Ziff, E. (2017). “The mommy deployment”: Military spouses and surrogacy in the United States. Sociological Forum, 32(2), 406–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar