Testing the Applicability of the Instructional Beliefs Model across Three Countries: The Role of Culture as a Theoretical Parameter

References

• Achilov, D. (2020). Analyzing the nexus of creativity, Islam, and democracy: Evidence from Turkey. Mediterranean Politics, 25(1), 96–127. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13629395.2018.1491425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydın-Düzgit, S. (2020). Can non-democracies support international democracy? Turkey as a case study. Third World Quarterly, 41(2), 264–283. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2019.1636643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backlund, P., Ivy, D. K., & Javidi, M. N. (1996). Multicultural challenges for communication curriculum and instruction. Journal of the Northwest Communication Association, 24(1), 31–48.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, P. (2007). Structural equation modeling: Judging model fit. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 815–824. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beatty, M. J. (1994). Student motivation scale. In R. B. Rubin, P. Palmgreen, & H. E. Sypher (Eds.), Communication research measures: A sourcebook (pp. 343–346). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beiter, R., Nash, R., McCrady, M., Rhoades, D., Linscomb, M., Clarahan, M., & Sammut, S. (2015). The prevalence and correlates of depression, anxiety, and stress in a sample of college students. Journal of Affective Disorders, 173, 390–396. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2014.10.054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berberoglu, G., & Hei, L. M. (2003). A comparison of university students’ approaches to learning across Taiwan and Turkey. International Journal of Testing, 3(2), 173–187. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327574ijt0302_6
   Google Scholar
• Bodie, G. D. (2009). Evaluating listening theory: Development and illustration of five criteria. The Intl. Journal of Listening, 23(2), 81–103. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10904010903014434
   Google Scholar
• Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brophy, J. (1987). Synthesis of research on strategies for motivating students to learn. Educational Leadership, 45(2), 40–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunce, L., Baird, A., & Jones, S. E. (2017). The student-as-consumer approach in higher education and its effects on academic performance. Studies in Higher Education, 42(11), 1958–1978. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1127908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS, EQS, and LISREL: Comparative approaches to testing for the factorial validity of a measuring instrument. International Journal of Testing, 1(1), 55–86. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327574IJT0101_4
   Google Scholar
• Caliskan, A., & Zhu, C. (2020). Organizational culture and educational innovations in Turkish higher education: Perceptions and reactions of students. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 20(1), 20–39. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12738/jestp.2020.1.003
   Google Scholar
• Carbaugh, D., Berry, M., & Nurmikari-Berry, M. (2006). Coding personhood through cultural terms and practices: Silence and quietude as a Finnish “natural way of being”. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 25(3), 203–220. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X06289422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castiello-Gutiérrez, S. (2019). Beyond the melting pot: International students on campus. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/world-view/beyond-melting-pot-international-students-campus
   Google Scholar
• Cha, E. S., Kim, K. H., & Erlen, J. A. (2007). Translation of scales in cross-cultural research: Issues and techniques. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 58(4), 386–395. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04242.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, F., Curran, P. J., Bollen, K. A., Kirby, J., & Paxton, P. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the use of fixed cutoff points in RMSEA test statistic in structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 36(4), 462–494. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124108314720
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chory-Assad, R. M., & Paulsel, M. L. (2004a). Classroom justice: Student aggression and resistance as reactions to perceived unfairness. Communication Education, 53(3), 253–273. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0363452042000265189
   Google Scholar
• Chory-Assad, R. M. (2002). Classroom justice: Perceptions of fairness as a predictor of student motivation, learning, and aggression. Communication Quarterly, 50(1), 58–77. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370209385646
   Google Scholar
• Chory‐Assad, R. M., & Paulsel, M. L. (2004b). Antisocial classroom communication: Instructor influence and interactional justice as predictors of student aggression. Communication Quarterly, 52(2), 98–114. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370409370184
   Google Scholar
• Chory, R. M., & Offstein, E. H. (2018). Too close for comfort? Faculty–student multiple relationships and their impact on student classroom conduct. Ethics & Behavior, 28(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2016.1206475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christophel, D. M. (1990). The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 39(4), 323–340. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529009378813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cickovska, E. (2020). Understanding and teaching Gen Z in higher education. Horizons Series A, 26, 275–290. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20544/HORIZONS.A.26.3.20.P22
   Google Scholar
• Clarkeburn, H., & Kettula, K. (2012). Fairness and using reflective journals in assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 17(4), 439–452. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2011.641000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croucher, S. M., & Kelly, S. (2019). Measurement in intercultural and cross-cultural communication. In E. G. Graham & J. P. Mazer (Eds.), Communication research measures III: A sourcebook (pp. 141–159). Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203730188-10
   Google Scholar
• Croucher, S. M., Rahmani, D., Galy-Badenas, F., Zeng, C., Albuquerque, A., Attarieh, M., & Nshom, E. N. (2021). Exploring the Relationship Between Teacher Confirmation and Student Motivation: The United States and Finland. In M. D. López-Jiménez & J. Sánchez-Torres (Eds.), Intercultural Competence Past, Present and Future (pp. 101–120). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8245-5_5
   Google Scholar
• Croucher, S., Otten, R., Ball, M., Grimes, T., Ainsworth, B., Begley, K., & Corzo, L. (2013). Argumentativeness and political participation: A cross-cultural analysis in the United States and Turkey. Communication Studies, 64(1), 18–32. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2012.727942
   Google Scholar
• Culture Trip (2018). Why Finland’s higher education system is the best in the world. https://theculturetrip.com/europe/finland/articles/why-finlands-higher-education-system-is-the-best-in-the-world/
   Google Scholar
• DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage,
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, K. (2000). Perceived teacher confirmation: The development and validation of an instrument and two studies of the relationship to cognitive and affective learning. Human Communication Research, 26(2), 264–291. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/26.2.264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farris, K. L., Houser, M. L., & Hosek, A. M. (2018). Historical roots and trajectories of instructional communication. In M. L. Houser & A. M. Hosek (Eds.), Handbook of Instructional Communication: Rhetorical and Relational Perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 2–20). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, T. K., & Tatum, N. T. (2016). Hoverboards and “hovermoms”: Helicopter parents and their influence on millennial students’ rapport with instructors. Communication Education, 65(3), 359–361. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2016.1177846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisby, B. N. & Housley Gaffney, A. L. (2015). Understanding the role of instructor rapport in the college classroom. Communication Research Reports, 32, 340–346 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2015.1089847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisby, B. N., & Martin, M. M. (2010). Instructor–student and student–student rapport in the classroom. Communication Education, 59(2), 146–164. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520903564362
   Google Scholar
• Frisby, B. N., Slone, A. R., & Bengu, E. (2017). Rapport, motivation, participation, and perceptions of learning in U.S. and Turkish student classrooms: A replication and cultural comparison. Communication Education, 66(2), 183–195. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2016.1208259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisby, B. N., Weber, K., & Beckner, B. N. (2014). Requiring participation: An instructor strategy to influence student interest and learning. Communication Quarterly, 62(3), 308–322. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2014.911765
   Google Scholar
• Frymier, A. B., & Houser, M. L. (1999). The revised learning indicators scale. Communication Studies, 50(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10510979909388466
   Google Scholar
• Frymier, A. B., Shulman, G. M., & Houser, M. L. (1996). The development of a learner empowerment measure1. Communication Education, 45(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529609379048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frymier, A. B., & Shulman, G. M. (1995). “What’s in it for me?”: Increasing content relevance to enhance students‘ motivation. Communication Education, 44(1), 40–50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529509378996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulbright Finland Foundation (2010). Higher education in Finland. https://www.fulbright.fi/studies-and-research-finland/higher-education-finland
   Google Scholar
• Girgin, K. Z., & Stevens, D. D. (2005). Bridging in-class participation with innovative instruction: Use and implications in a Turkish university classroom. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42(1), 93–106. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290500049059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, Z. W., Cranmer, G. A., Sollitto, M., Labelle, S., & Lancaster, A. L. (2017). What do college students want? A prioritization of instructional behaviors and characteristics. Communication Education, 66(3), 280–298. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2016.1265135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, Z. W., Goodboy, A. K., & Bolkan, S. (2016). A meta-analytical review of students’ out-of-class communication and learning effects. Communication Quarterly, 64(4), 476–493. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2015.1103293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, Z. W., Goodboy, A. K., & Weber, K. (2017). College students’ psychological needs and intrinsic motivation to learn: An examination of self-determination theory. Communication Quarterly, 65(2), 167–191. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2016.1215338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, Z. W., & Martin, M. M. (2014). College Students‘ Academic Beliefs and Their Motives for Communicating With Their Instructor. Communication Research Reports, 31(4), 316–328. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2014.924341
   Google Scholar
• Goodboy, A. K., Myers, S. A., & Bolkan, S. (2012). Personalized education and student motives for communicating with instructors: An examination of Chinese and American Classrooms. China Media Research, 8(2), 94–100.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede Insights (2021). Country comparison. https://www.hofstede-insights.com/country-comparison/finland,turkey,the-usa/
   Google Scholar
• Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.
   Google Scholar
• Horan, S. M., & Myers, S. A. (2009). An Exploration of College Instructors‘ Use of Classroom Justice, Power, and Behavior Alteration Techniques. Communication Education, 58(4), 483–496. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520903055981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imam, S. A., & Jabeen, M. (2018). Finland phenomenon: A paradigm shift in educational practices in an islamic school. Inquiry in Education, 10(1), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Z. D., & LaBelle, S. (2015). Examining the role of self-disclosure and connectedness in the process of instructional dissent: A test of the instructional beliefs model. Communication Education, 64(2), 154–170. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2014.978800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katt, J. A., & Condly, S. J. (2009). A Preliminary Study of Classroom Motivators and De-motivators from a Motivation-hygiene Perspective. Communication Education, 58(2), 213–234. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520802511472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, R., Sellnow, D. D., & Frisby, B. N. (2016). The development and validation of the online learning climate scale (OLCS). Communication Education, 65(3), 307–321. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2015.1101778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, R., & Tatum, N. T. (2017). Do we know what we think we know? On the importance of replication in instructional communication research. Communication Education, 66(4), 479–481. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2017.1342849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories: An overview of their current status (pp. 383–434). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, S., Romero, A., Morrow, J. A., Denton, Z., & Ducking, J. (2020). Instructor misbehaviors and math anxiety. Communication Reports, 33(1), 27–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2019.1675737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, P., & Witt, P. (2009). Teacher immediacy, confidence testing, and the measurement of cognitive learning. Communication Education, 58(1), 110–123. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520802511233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kopp, J. P., Zinn, T. E., Finney, S. J., & Jurich, D. P. (2011). The development and evaluation of the academic entitlement questionnaire. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 44(2), 105–129. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175611400292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosunen, S. (2018). Access to higher education in Finland: Emerging processes of hidden privatization. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 4(2), 67–77. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2018.1487756
   Google Scholar
• Kragh, S. U., & Bislev, S. (2005). Universities and student values across nations. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 9, 48–63.
   Google Scholar
• LaBelle, S., Martin, M. M., & Weber, K. (2013). Instructional dissent in the college classroom: Using the instructional beliefs model as a framework. Communication Education, 62(2), 169–190. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2012.759243
   Google Scholar
• Littlejohn, S. W., & Foss, K. A. (2009). Evaluating communication theory. In S. W. Littlejohn & K. A. Foss (Eds.), Encyclopedia of communication theory (pp. 363–365). Sage. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412959384
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, S. (2014). Turkish delight: Rising in the university rankings. Al-Fanar Media. https://www.al-fanarmedia.org/2014/12/turkish-delight-rising-university-rankings/
   Google Scholar
• Mansson, D. H., & Myers, S. A. (2009). A reexamination of Swedish and American college students’ communicative attributes. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 38(1), 9–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17475750903381622
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis- testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11(3), 320–341. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazer, J. P. (2012). Development and validation of the student interest and engagement scales. Communication Methods and Measures, 6(2), 99–125. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2012.679244
   Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C., & McCroskey, L. L. (2006). Instructional communication: The historical perspective. In T. P. Mottet, V. P. Richmond, & J. C. McCroskey (Eds.), Handbook of instructional communication: Rhetorical and relational perspectives (pp. 33–47). Allyn & Bacon. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315189864
   Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C., Valencic, K. M., & Richmond, V. P. (2004). Toward a general model of instructional communication. Communication Quarterly, 52(3), 197–210. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370409370192
   Google Scholar
• Mottet, T. P., Frymier, A. B., & Beebe, S. A. (2006). Theorizing about instructional communication. In T. P. Mottet, V. P. Richmond, & J. C. McCroskey (Eds.), Handbook of instructional communication: Rhetorical and relational perspectives (pp. 255–282). Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, S. A., Tindage, M. F., & Atkinson, J. (2016). The evolution of instructional communication research. In P. Witt (Ed.), Handbooks of communication and science: Communication and learning (pp. 13–42). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501502446-003
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, J. F., & Friedrich, G. (2005). Instructional/developmental communication: Current theory, research, and future trends. Journal of Communication, 55(3), 578–593. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb02686.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plax, T. G., Kearney, P., McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1986). Power in the classroom VI: Verbal control strategies, nonverbal immediacy and affective learning. Communication Education, 35(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03634528609388318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, W. J. (2014). A critical analysis of cultivation theory. Journal of Communication, 64(6), 1015–1036. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, R. G., & Harville, B. (1990). The effects of teacher immediacy and clarity on instructional outcomes: An intercultural assessment. Communication Education, 39(4), 369–379. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529009378816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, V. P. (1990). Communication in the classroom: Power and motivation. Communication Education, 39(3), 181–195. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529009378801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, learning, and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3–4), 299–323. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2603&4_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellnow, D. D., Limperos, A., Frisby, B. N., Sellnow, T. L., Spence, P. R., & Downs, E. (2015). Expanding the scope of instructional communication research: Looking beyond classroom contexts. Communication Studies, 66(4), 417–432. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2015.1057750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, M. A. (2002). Generalizability in communication research. Human Communication Research, 28(4), 491–500. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00819.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staton‐Spicer, A. Q., & Wulff, D. H. (1984). Research in communication and instruction: Categorization and synthesis. Communication Education, 33(4), 377–391. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03634528409384767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The European Education Directory (2014). Finland higher education system. https://www.euroeducation.net/prof/finco.htm
   Google Scholar
• Tomul, E., Celik, K., & Tas, A. (2012). Justice in the classroom: Evaluation of teacher behaviors according to students’ perceptions. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 48, 59–72.
   Google Scholar
• Topbas, E. (2013). A comparison of teacher training programs in Turkey and Finland. International Journal of Academic Research, 5(4), 111–120. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7813/2075-4124.2013/5-4/B.16
   Google Scholar
• Vallade, J. I., Martin, M. M., & Weber, K. (2014). Academic entitlement, grade orientation, and classroom justice as predictors of instructional beliefs and learning outcomes. Communication Quarterly, 62(5), 497–517. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2014.949386
   Google Scholar
• Waisbord, S., & Mellado, C. (2014). De-westernizing communication studies: A reassessment. Communication Theory, 24(4), 361–372. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldeck, J. H., Kearney, P., & Plax, T. G. (2001). Instructional and developmental communication theory and research in the 1990s: Extending the agenda for the 21st century. Annals of the International Communication Association, 24(1), 207–229. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2001.11678987
   Google Scholar
• Wang, G. (2014). Culture, paradigm, and communication theory: A matter of boundary or commensurability? Communication Theory, 24(4), 373–393. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanzer, M. B., Frymier, A. B., & Irwin, J. (2010). An explanation of the relationship between instructor humor and student learning: Instructional humor processing theory. Communication Education, 59(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520903367238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, K., Martin, M. M., & Cayanus, J. L. (2005). Student interest: A two-study re- examination of the concept. Communication Quarterly, 53(1), 71–86. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370500055996
   Google Scholar
• Weber, K., Martin, M. M., & Myers, S. A. (2011). The development and testing of the instructional beliefs model. Communication Education, 60(1), 51–74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2010.491122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, K., Martin, M., & Patterson, B. (2001). Teacher behavior, student interest and affective learning: Putting theory to practice. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 29(1), 71–90. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00909880128101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wombacher, K. A., Harris, C. J., Buckner, M. M., Frisby, B., & Limperos, A. M. (2017). The effects of computer-mediated communication anxiety on student perceptions of instructor behaviors, perceived learning, and quiz performance. Communication Education, 66(3), 299–312. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2016.1221511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yildirim, I. (2006). Daily hassles and social support as predictors of academic achievement. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 30, 258–267.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q., & Oetzel, J. G. (2006). Constructing and validating a teacher immediacy scale: A Chinese perspective. Communication Education, 55(2), 218–241. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520600566231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q. (2007). Teacher misbehaviors as learning demotivators in college classrooms: A cross-cultural investigation in China. Germany.
   Google Scholar