Assistive technology and daily living challenges among students with disabilities at University of Gondar, Ethiopia: a qualitative study

References

• Abas Hassen DSA, Muzeyin A, et.al. National priority assistive technologies and products list. Ethiopia: Ministry of Health; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Place K, Hodge SR. Social inclusion of students with physical disabilities in general physical education: a behavioral analysis. Adapt Phys Activ Q. 2001;18(4):389–404. doi: 10.1123/apaq.18.4.389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostanjsek N. Use of the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) as a conceptual framework and common language for disability statistics and health information systems. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(4):S3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-S4-S3.
   Google Scholar
• Katz S. Assessing self-maintenance: activities of daily living, mobility, and instrumental activities of daily living. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1983;31(12):721–727. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1983.tb03391.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mlinac ME, Feng MC. Assessment of activities of daily living, self-care, and independence. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2016;31(6):506–516. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acw049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polo Sánchez MT, Chacón-López H, Caurcel Cara MJ, et al. Attitudes towards persons with disabilities by educational science students: importance of contact, its frequency and the type of disability. Int J Disabil Dev Educ. 2021;68(5):617–626. doi: 10.1080/1034912X.2020.1716960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilqis Wuraola A-M, Olubunmi Abiola O, Munirat Ayoola A, et al. Pattern and types of disability among students in schools for special needs in resource limited setting of Africa. MJN. 2023;15(01):107–114. doi: 10.31674/mjn.2023.v15i01.013.
   Google Scholar
• Lockwood G, Henderson C, Thornicroft G. The equality act 2010 and mental health. Br J Psychiatry. 2012;200(3):182–183. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.111.097790.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoenig H, Landerman LR, Shipp KM, et al. Activity restriction among wheelchair users. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51(9):1244–1251. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51408.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin Ginis KA, et al. A systematic review of review articles addressing factors related to physical activity participation among children and adults with physical disabilities. Health Psychol Rev. 2016;10(4):478–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuvalekar K, et al. Quality of life among persons with physical disability in Udupi Taluk: a cross sectional study. J Family Med Prim Care. 2015;4(1):69.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kissow A-M. Participation in physical activity and the everyday life of people with physical disabilities: a review of the literature. Scand J Disabil Res. 2015;17(2):144–166. doi: 10.1080/15017419.2013.787369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutz BJ, Bowers BJ. Disability in everyday life. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(8):1037–1054. doi: 10.1177/1049732305278631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksson G, Skär L, Lexell J. Women’s perception of changes in the social network after a spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(17):1013–1021. doi: 10.1080/09638280500030431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul S. Students with disabilities in higher education: A ­review of the literature. Coll Stud J. 2000;34(2):200–211.
   Google Scholar
• Ajisuksmo CR. Practices and challenges of inclusive education in Indonesian higher education. In: ASEACCU Conference on “Catholic Educational Institutions and Inclusive Education: transforming Spaces, Promoting Practices, and Changing Minds. Bangkok: Assumption University of Thailand; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Carver J, Ganus A, Ivey JM, et al. The impact of mobility assistive technology devices on participation for individuals with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;11(6):468–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson CG, McBride R, Spencer VG, et al. Assistive ­technology: supporting learners in inclusive ­classrooms. Kappa Delta Pi Record. 2009;45(4):172–175. doi: 10.1080/00228958.2009.10516540.
   Google Scholar
• Widehammar C, Lidström H, Hermansson L. Environmental barriers to participation and facilitators for use of three types of assistive technology devices. Assist Technol. 2019;31(2):68–76. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2017.1363828.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stumbo NJ, Martin JK, Hedrick BN. Assistive technology: impact on education, employment, and independence of individuals with physical disabilities. J Vocat Rehabil. 2009;30(2):99–110. doi: 10.3233/JVR-2009-0456.
   Google Scholar
• Parette HP. Assistive technology devices and services. In: Education and training in mental retardation and developmental disabilities. 1997; p. 267–280.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. Assistive technology, challenges, resposnses. 2022 [cited 2022 Jan 1]. https://www.who.int/health-topics/assistive-technology.
   Google Scholar
• Duhaney LMG, Duhaney DC. Assistive technology: meeting the needs of learners with disabilities. Int J Instruct Media. 2000;27(4): p):393–393.
   Google Scholar
• Hoogerwerf E-J, Mavrou K, Traina I. The role of assistive technology in fostering inclusive education. Strategies and tools to support change. London & New York: Routledge; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Bell D, Foiret J, Bell D. The impact of assistive technology on the educational performance of students with hearing impairment: A rapid review of the research. In: Layton N, Borg J, editors. Global perspectives on assistive technology. Geneva: WHO; 2019. p. 284.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. Global perspectives on assistive technology: proceedings of the GReAT Consultation 2019. Vol. 1. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2019. p. 22–23.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ. Connecting to learn: educational and assistive technology for people with disabilities. Washington: American Psychological Association; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Clouder L, Cawston J, Wimpenny K, et al. The role of assistive technology in renegotiating the inclusion of students with disabilities in higher education in North Africa. Stud High Educ. 2019;44(8):1344–1357. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2018.1437721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNicholl A, Desmond D, Gallagher P. Assistive technologies, educational engagement and psychosocial outcomes among students with disabilities in higher education. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023;18(1):50–58. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2020.1854874.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kisanga SE, Kisanga DH. The role of assistive technology devices in fostering the participation and learning of students with visual impairment in higher education institutions in Tanzania. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2022;17(7):791–800. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2020.1817989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNicholl A, et al. The impact of assistive technology use for students with disabilities in higher education: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021;16(2):130–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copley J, Ziviani J. Barriers to the use of assistive technology for children with multiple disabilities. Occup Ther Int. 2004;11(4):229–243. doi: 10.1002/oti.213.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hemmingsson H, Lidström H, Nygård L. Use of assistive technology devices in mainstream schools: students’ perspective. Am J Occup Ther. 2009;63(4):463–472. doi: 10.5014/ajot.63.4.463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ, Craddock G, Mackeogh T. The relationship of personal factors and subjective well-being to the use of assistive technology devices. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(10):811–817. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2010.511418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith LE, Raina P, Levasseur M, et al. Functional disability and social participation restriction associated with chronic conditions in middle-aged and older adults. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017;71(4):381–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1753–1760. doi: 10.1177/1049732315617444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell K, Orr E, Durepos P, et al. Reflexive thematic analysis for applied qualitative health research. TQR. 2021;26(6): p):2011–2028. doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2021.5010.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke V, Braun V. Thematic analysis. J Posit Psychol. 2017;12(3):297–298. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polo Sánchez MT, Aparicio Puerta M. Perceptions of university students with disabilities in Spain: ideas and beliefs about attitudes towards their inclusion. Disabil Soc. 2021;38(8):1435–1450. doi: 10.1080/09687599.2021.1997716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munyi CW. Past and present perceptions towards disability: a historical perspective. DSQ. 2012;32(2):97 doi: 10.18061/dsq.v32i2.3197.
   Google Scholar
• Goreczny AJ, Bender EE, Caruso G, et al. Attitudes toward individuals with disabilities: results of a recent survey and implications of those results. Res Dev Disabil. 2011;32(5):1596–1609. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.02.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baffoe M. Stigma, discrimination & marginalization: gateways to oppression of persons with disabilities in Ghana, West Africa. J Educ Soc Res. 2013;3(1):187–198.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders KY. Overprotection and lowered expectations of persons with disabilities: the unforeseen consequences. Work. 2006;27(2):181–188.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang Z, Xu X, Han Q, et al. Factors associated with public attitudes towards persons with disabilities: a systematic ­review. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):1058. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11139-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt CS, Hunt B. Changing attitudes toward people with disabilities: experimenting with an educational intervention. J Managerial Issues. 2004;16:266–280.
   Google Scholar
• Polo Sánchez MT, Fernández-Jiménez C, Fernández Cabezas M. The attitudes of different partners involved in higher education towards students with disabilities. Int J Disabil Dev Educ. 2018;65(4):442–458. doi: 10.1080/1034912X.2017.1406066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grills N, Singh L, Pant H, et al. Access to services and barriers faced by people with disabilities: a quantitative survey. DCID. 2017;28(2):23–23. doi: 10.5463/dcid.v28i2.615.
   Google Scholar
• Bezyak JL, Sabella S, Hammel J, et al. Community participation and public transportation barriers experienced by people with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42(23):3275–3283. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1590469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moriña A, Morgado B. University surroundings and infrastructures that are accessible and inclusive for all: listening to students with disabilities. J Furth High Educ. 2018;42(1):13–23. doi: 10.1080/0309877X.2016.1188900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moswela E, Mukhopadhyay S. Asking for too much? The voices of students with disabilities in Botswana. Disabil Soc. 2011;26(3):307–319. doi: 10.1080/09687599.2011.560414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haihambo C. Inclusive education: challenges of students with disabilities in institutions of higher education in Namibia. [Unpublished Master’s Thesis]. University of South Africa; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad W. Higher education for persons with disabilities in India: challenges and concerns. J Disabil Manag Rehabil. 2016;2(1):1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Ari IA, Inan FA. Assistive technologies for students with disabilities: a survey of access and use in Turkish Universities. TOJET. 2010;9(2):40–45.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-Batanero JM, Montenegro-Rueda M, Fernández-Cerero J, et al. Assistive technology for the inclusion of students with disabilities: a systematic review. Education Tech Research Dev. 2022;70(5):1911–1930. doi: 10.1007/s11423-022-10127-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ntombela S, Soobrayen R. Access challenges for students with disabilities at the University of KwaZulu-Natal: A situational analysis of the Edgewood Campus. J Soc Sci. 2013;37(2):149–155. doi: 10.1080/09718923.2013.11893213.
   Google Scholar
• Gilson CL, Dymond SK. Barriers impacting students with disabilities at a Hong Kong university. JPED. 2012;25(2):103–118.
   Google Scholar
• McNicholl A. Assistive technology outcomes and impacts among students with disabilities in higher education. Dublin City University; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Tangcharoensathien V, Witthayapipopsakul W, Viriyathorn S, et al. Improving access to assistive technologies: challenges and solutions in low-and middle-income countries. WHO South East Asia J Public Health. 2018;7(2):84–89. doi: 10.4103/2224-3151.239419.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar