Collaborating on the development and implementation of evidence-based practices: Advancing science and practiceFootnote

Preparation of this manuscript was in part supported by a Research Partnership grant supported by the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, through Grant R305H160034 to the University of South Florida. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent views of the Institute or the U.S. Department of Education.

References

• Aarons, G. (2004). Mental health provider attitudes toward adoption of evidence-based practice: The evidence-based practice attitude scale (EBPAS). Mental Health Services Research, 6(2), 61–74. doi:10.1023/B:MHSR.0000024351.12294.65
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brownson, R. C., & Colditz, G. A. (2012). Furthering dissemination and implementation research: The need for more attention to external validity. In R. Brownson, G. Colditz, & E. Proctor (Eds.), Dissemination and implementation research in healthtranslating science to practice (pp. 305–326). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199751877.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, W., Camden, C., & Missiuna, C. (2016). Reflections on using a community-based and multisystem approach to transforming school-based intervention for children with developmental motor disorders. Current Developmental Disorders Reports, 3(2), 129–137. doi:10.1007/s40474-016-0081-y
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, W., & Douglas, N. (2017). Supporting evi- dence-based practice in speech-language pathology: A review of implementation strategies for promot- ing health professional behavior change. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention. Published online 11 Sept 2017. doi:10.1080/17489539.2017.1370215
   Google Scholar
• Crooke, P., & Olswang, L. (2015). Practice-based research: Another pathway for closing the research–practice gap. Journal of Speech, Language Hearing Research, 58, S1871–S1882.10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-15-0243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, I. (2009). Clinical data-mining. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195335521.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Fixen, D., Naoom, S., Blasé, K., Friedman, R., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, The National Implementation Research Network, (FMHI Publication #231).
   Google Scholar
• Fixsen, D. L., Blase, K. A., Naoom, S. F., & Wallace, F. (2009). Core implementation components. Research on Social Work Practice, 19(5), 531–540.10.1177/1049731509335549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasgow, R. E., Vinson, C., Chambers, D., Khoury, M. J., Kaplan, R. M., & Hunter, C. (2012). National institutes of health approaches to dissemination and implementation science: Current and future directions. American Journal of Public Health, 102, 1274–1281.10.2105/AJPH.2012.300755
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, H. (2016). Where does social validity measurement fit into identifying and developing evidence-based practices? In M. A. Romski & R. Sevcik (Eds.), Examining the science and practice of communication interventions for individuals with severe disabilities (pp. 299–312). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, H., & Cisar, C. L. (1992). Promoting interaction during sociodramatic play: Teaching scripts to typical preschoolers and classmates with disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25(2), 265–280. doi:10.1901/jaba.1992.25-265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, H., & Olszewski, A. (2015). Developing a phonological awareness curriculum: Reflections on an implementation science framework. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58(6), S1837–1850. doi:10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-14-0351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, H., Wickstrom, S., Hoyson, M., Jamieson, B., & Odom, S. L. (1988). Effects of sociodramatic script training on social and communicative interaction. Education & Treatment of Children, 11(2), 97–117.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, H., Schneider, N., & Thiemann, K. (2007). Peer-mediated social communication intervention. Topics in Language Disorders, 27(2), 182–199. doi:10.1097/01.TLD.0000269932.26504.a8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, L. W. (2008). Making research relevant: If it is an evidence-based practice, where’s the practice-based evidence? Family Practice, 25, 120–124. doi:10.1093/fampra/cmn055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, L., & Glasgow, R. (2006). Evaluating the relevance, generalization, and applicability of research. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 29, 126–153.10.1177/0163278705284445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, L., Ottoson, J., García, C., & Hiatt, R. (2009). Diffusion theory and knowledge dissemination, utilization, and integration in public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 30, 151–174. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.031308.100049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., & Kyriakidou, O. (2004). Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Quarterly, 82(4), 581–629.10.1111/milq.2004.82.issue-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grol, R., & Wensing, M. (2013). Characteristics of successful innovations. In R. Grol, M. Wensing, M. Eccles, & D. Davis (Eds.), Improving patient care (2nd ed.). (pp. 79–90). Oxford: Wiley.10.1002/9781118525975
   Google Scholar
• Grol, R., Ouwens, M., & Wollersheim, H. (2013). Planning and organizing the change process. In R. Grol, M. Wensing, M. Eccles, & D. Davis (Eds.), Improving patient care (2nd ed.). (pp. 64–76). Oxford: Wiley.10.1002/9781118525975
   Google Scholar
• Grol, R., Wensing, M., Eccles, M., & Davis, D. (2013). Improving patient care (2nd ed.). West Sussex: Wiley.10.1002/9781118525975
   Google Scholar
• Harn, B., Parisi, D., & Stoolmiller, M. (2013). Balancing fidelity with flexibility and fit: What do we really know about fidelity of implementation in schools?. Exceptional Children, 79(2), 181–193.10.1177/001440291307900204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heaton, J., Day, J., & Britten, N. (2015). Inside the “Black Box” of a knowledge translation program in applied health research. Qualitative Health Research, 25(11), 1477–1491. doi:10.1177/1049732315580104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heaton, J., Day, J., & Britten, N. (2016). Collaborative research and the co-production of knowledge for practice: An illustrative case study. Implementation Science, 11(20), 1–10. doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0383-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hegde, N. (2003). Clinical research in communicative disorders: Principles and strategies (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-ED.
   Google Scholar
• Kieser, A., & Leiner, L. (2012). Collaborate with practitioners. Journal of Management Inquiry, 21(1), 14–28. doi:10.1177/1056492611411923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krathwohl, D. R. (2009). Methods of educational and social science research: The logic of methods. Long Grove, IL: Waveland.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, C., Darnell, D., Kerns, S., Monroe-DeVita, M., Landes, S., Lyon, A., … Comtois, K. (2016). Proceedings of the 3rd Biennial Conference of the Society for Implementation Research Collaboration (SIRC) 2015: Advancing efficient methodologies through community partnerships and team science. Implementation Science, 11 (Suppl. 1), 1–38. doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0428-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martin, S. (2010). Co-production of social research: Strategies for engaged scholarship. Public Money and Management, 30(4), 211–218.10.1080/09540962.2010.492180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, K. (1981). Social cognition in a script framework. In J. H. Flavell & L. Ross (Eds.), Social cognitive development: Frontiers and possible futures (pp. 97–118). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• NIH Roadmap. (2004). Retrieved April 22, 2017, from http://www.niehs.nih.gov/funding/grants/announcements/roadmap/
   Google Scholar
• Olswang, L., & Bain, B. (2013). Treatment research. In L. A. Golper & C. Fratalli (Eds.), Outcomes in speech-language pathology (2nd ed.., pp. 245–264). New York, NY: Thieme.
   Google Scholar
• Olswang, L., & Prelock, P. (2015). Bridging the gap between research and practice: Implementation science. Journal of Speech, Language, Hearing Research, 58, S1818–S1826. doi:10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-14-0305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1996). Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development. World Development, 24(6), 1073–1087.10.1016/0305-750X(96)00023-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robson, C. (2002). Real world research (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Stokes, D. E. (1997). Pasteur’s quadrant – Basic science and technological innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, A. H. (2007). Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Westfall, J., Mold, J., & Fagnan, L. (2007). Practice-Based Research – “Blue Highways” on the NIH Roadmap. Journal of the American Medical Association, 297(4), 403–406.10.1001/jama.297.4.403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar