487
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

Adaptation and the Measurement of Well-being

References

  • Bache, I. 2013. “Measuring Quality of Life for Public Policy: An Idea Whose Time Has Come? Agenda-setting Dynamics in the European Union.” Journal of European Public Policy 20 (1): 21–38. doi:10.1080/13501763.2012.699658.
  • Bache, I., and L. Reardon. 2013. “An Idea Whose Time Has Come? Explaining the Rise of Well-Being in British Politics.” Political Studies 61 (4): 898–914. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.12001.
  • Bradley, B. 2014. “Objective Theories of Well-being.” In The Cambridge Companion to Utilitarianism, edited by B. Eggleston and D. Miller, 220–238. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Brickman, P., D. Coates, and R. Janoff-Bulman. 1978. “Lottery Winners and Accident Victims: Is Happiness Relative?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36 (8): 917–927. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.36.8.917.
  • Cantril, H. 1965. The Pattern of Human Concerns. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  • Crisp, R. 2006. “Hedonism Reconsidered.” Philosophy and Phemomenological Research 73 (3): 619–645. doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2006.tb00551.x.
  • Diener, E., R. J. Larsen, S. Levine, and R. A. Emmons. 1985. “Intensity and Frequency: Dimensions Underlying Positive and Negative Affect.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48 (5): 1253–1265. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.5.1253.
  • Diener, E., and F. Fujita. 1997. “Social Comparison and Subjective Well-being.” In Health, Coping, and Well-being: Perspectives from Social Comparison Theory, edited by B. P. Buunk and F. X. Gibbons, 329–358. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Diener, E., R. E. Lucas, and C. N. Scollon. 2006. “Beyond the Hedonic Treadmill: Revising the Adaptation Theory of Well-being.” American Psychologist 61 (4): 305–314. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.61.4.305.
  • Diener, E., R. E. Lucas, U. Schimmack, and J. F. Helliwell. 2009a. Well-Being for Public Policy. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Diener, E., E. Sandvik, and W. Pavot. 2009b. “Happiness is the Frequency, Not the Intensity, of Positive Versus Negative Affect.” In Assessing Well-being: The Collected Works of Ed Diener, edited by E. Deiner, 213–231. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Dijkers, M. 1997. “Quality of Life After Spinal Cord Injury: A Meta Analysis of the Effects of Disablement Components.” Spinal Cord 35 (12): 829–840. doi:10.1038/sj.sc.3100571.
  • Dijkers, M. 1999. “Correlates of Life Satisfaction among Persons with Spinal Cord Injury.” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 80 (8): 867–876. doi:10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90076-X.
  • Easterlin, R. A. 1974. “Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot?: Some Empirical Evidence.” In Nations and Households in Economic Growth, edited by P. David and M. Reder, 85–125. New York: Academic Press.
  • Elster, J. 1982. “Sour Grapes–Utilitarianism and the Genesis of Wants.” In Utilitarianism and Beyond, edited by A. Sen and B. Williams, 219–238. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Frederick, S., and G. Lowenstein. 1999. “Hedonic Adaptation.” In Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology, edited by D. Kahneman, E. Diener, and N. Schwarz, 302–329. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Griffin, J. 1996. Value Judgment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Haybron, D. 2007. “Life-satisfaction, Ethical Reflection and the Science of Happiness.” Journal of Happiness Studies 8 (1): 99–138. doi:10.1007/s10902-006-9006-5.
  • Kawall, J. 1999. “The Experience Machine and Mental State Theories of Well-Being.” Journal of Value Inquiry 33 (3): 381–387. doi:10.1023/A:1004557501837.
  • Kraut, R. 2007. What Is Good and Why. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Lucas, R. E. 2005. “Time does Not Heal all Wounds: A Longitudinal Study of Reaction and Adaptation to Divorce.” Psychological Science 16 (12): 945–950. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01642.x.
  • Lucas, R. E. 2007. “Long-term Disability is Associated with Lasting Changes in Subjective Well-being: Evidence From Two Nationally Representative Longitudinal Studies.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 92 (4): 717–730. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.4.717.
  • Luttmer, E. F. P. 2005. “Neighbours as Negatives Relative Earnings and Well-being.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 120 (3): 963–1002.
  • Nozick, R. 1974. Anarchy, State and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.
  • Nussbaum, M. C. 2000. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Railton, P. 1986. “Facts and Values.” Philosophical Topics 14 (2): 5–31. doi:10.5840/philtopics19861421.
  • Schwarz, N. 1987. Stimmungals Information: Untersuchungenzum Einfluß von Stimmungen auf die Bewertung des eigenen Lebens. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.
  • Schwarz, N., and F. Strack. 1999. “Reports of Subjective Well-Being: Judgmental Processes and Their Methodological Implications.” In Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology, edited by D. Kahneman, E. Diener, and N. Schwarz, 1–84. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Sen, A. 1980. “Equality of What?” In The Tanner Lectures on Hyman Values, Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sen, A. 1985a. “Well-Being, Agency and Freedom: The Dewey Lectures 1984.” Journal of Philosophy 82 (4): 169–221. doi:10.2307/2026184.
  • Sen, A. 1985b. “Rights and Capabilities.” In Morality and Objectivity: A Tribute to J. L, Mackie, edited by E. Honderich, 130–148. London: Routledge and Kagan Paul.
  • Sen, A. 1987. On Ethics and Economics. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Sen, A., and M. Nussbaum, eds. 1993. The Quality of LifeA Study Prepared for the World Institute for Development Economics Research (WIDER) of the United Nations University. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Sumner, W. 1996. Welfare, Happines, and Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Taylor, T. 2012. Knowing What is Good For You: A Theory of Prudential Value and Well-Being. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Taylor, T. Forthcoming. “Towards Consensus on Well-being.” In Well-being in Contemporary Society, edited by J. Søraker, van der R. Jan-Willem, J. de Boer, P.-H. Wong, and P. Brey. Berlin: Springer.
  • Veenhoven, R., and F. Vergunst. 2013. “The Easterlin Illusion: Economic Growth Does go with Greater Happiness.” EHERO Working Papers 2013/1, Erasmus Happiness Economics Research Organization, January 23.
  • Watson, D., L. Clark, and A. Tellegen. 1988. “Development and Validation of Brief Measures of Positive and Negative Affect: The PANAS Scales.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54 (6): 1063–1070. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063.
  • Weijers, D., and V. Schouten. 2013. “An Assessment of Recent Responses to the Experience Machine Objection to Hedonism.” Journal of Value Inquiry 47 (4): 461–482. doi:10.1007/s10790-013-9395-8.
  • Wortman, C., R. Kessler, N. Bolger, and J. House. 1992. “The Time Course of Adjustment to Widowhood: Evidence from a National Probability Sample.” Unpublished manuscript, Duke University.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.