Redoing Care: Societal Transformation through Critical Practice

References

• Baart, Andries, and Klaartje Klaver. 2011. “Attentiveness in Care: Towards a Theoretical Framework.” Nursing Ethics 18 (September): 686–693.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, Marian. 2008. “Passionate Participation: Emotional Experiences and Expressions in Deliberative Forums.” Critical Social Policy 28 (November): 461–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, Marian. 2012. Care in Everyday Life: An Ethic of Care in Practice. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, Marian, and Phil Cotterell. 2012. Critical Perspectives on User Involvement. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benhabib, Seyla. 1986. Critique, Norm, and Utopia: A Study of the Foundations of Critical Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benhabib, Seyla. 1992. Situating the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brechin, Ann. 2000. “Introducing Critical Practice.” Chapter 2. In Critical Practice in Health and Social Care, edited by Ann Brechin, Hilary Brown, and Maureen A. Eby, 25–47. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bubeck, Diemut. 1995. Care, Gender, and Justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, Patricia Hill. 1995. “Black Women and Motherhood.” In Justice and Care, edited by Virginia Held, 117–136. Boulder, CO: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Conradi, Elisabeth. 2001. Take Care: Grundlagen einer Ethik der Achtsamkeit [Take Care: Foundation of an Ethics of Attentiveness]. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Conradi, Elisabeth. 2010. “Ethik und Politik: Wie eine Ethik der Achtsamkeit mit politischer Verantwortung verbunden werden kann [Ethics and Politics: How an Ethics of Care can be a Source of Political Responsibility].” In Bioethics, Care and Gender: Herausforderungen für Medizin, Pflege und Politik [Challenges for Medicine, Nursing and Politics], edited by Hartmut Remmers and Helen Kohlen, 91–117. Universitätsverlag Osnabrück: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
   Google Scholar
• Conradi, Elisabeth. 2011. Kosmopolitische Zivilgesellschaft: Inklusion durch gelingendes Handeln [Cosmopolitan Civil Society: Inclusion by successfull Practice]. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Conradi, Elisabeth, and Jorma Heier. 2014. “Towards a Political Theory of Care.” In Moral Boundaries Redrawn: The Significance of Joan Tronto’s Argument for Political Theory, Professional Ethics, and Care as Practice, edited by Gert Olthuis, Helen Kohlen, and Jorma Heier, 29–50. Leuven: Peeters.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, Nancy. 1988. “Talking about Needs.” Public Culture Bulletin 1 (1): 39–51. doi:10.1215/08992363-1-1-39.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, Nancy. 1989. Unruly Practices: Power, Discourse, and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilligan, Carol. 1987. “Moral Orientation and Moral Development.” In Women and Moral Theory, edited by E. Kittay and D. Meyers, 19–33. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Gilligan, Carol. 1988a. “Prolog.” In Mapping the Moral Domain, edited by C. Gilligan, J. V. Ward, and J. M. Taylor, vii–xxxviii. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilligan, Carol. 1988b. “Remapping the Moral Domain: New Images of Self in Relationship.” In Mapping the Moral Domain, edited by C. Gilligan, J. V. Ward, and J. M. Taylor, 3–19. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. 1990. “Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action.” In Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Translated by Christian Lenhardt and Shierry Weber Nicholsen. Introduction by Thomas McCarthy, 116–193. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. 1992. “Lawrence Kohlberg and Neo-Aristotelianism.” In Justification and Application: Remarks on Discourse Ethics. Translated by Ciaran Cronin, 113–131. Boston: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contribution to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Translated by William Rehg. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Held, Virginia. 2010. “Can the Ethics of Care Handle Violence?” Ethics and Social Welfare 4 (2): 115–29.
   Google Scholar
• Horkheimer, Max. [1937] 2002. “Traditional and Critical Theory”. In Critical Theory: Selected Essays. Translated by Matthew J. O’Connell. Introduced by Stanley Aronowitz, 188–243. New York: Seabury Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horkheimer, Max, and Theodor Adorno. [1947] 2009. Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments. Edited by Gunzelin Schmid Noerr. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchings, Kimberly. 2005. “Speaking and Hearing: Habermasian Discourse Ethics, Feminism and IR.” Review of International Studies 31 (1): 155–165. doi:10.1017/S0260210505006352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, Stanlie M. 1993. “Mothering: A Possible Black Feminist Link to Social Transformation?” In Theorizing Black Feminisms: The Visionary Pragmatism of Black Women, edited by Stanlie M. James and Abena P. A. Busia, 44–54. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, Immanuel. [1785] 1911. “Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten [Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals].” In Kants gesammelte Schriften [Kant's Collected Writings]. Herausgegeben von der Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften [Akademie edition], Bd. 4 (I/4), 385–464. Berlin: Reimer, de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Köbsell, Swantje, and Anne Waldschmidt. 2006. “Disability Studies in Austria, Germany and Switzerland: Introduction.” Disability Studies Quarterly 26 (2): 1–6. <www.dsq-sds.org>.
   Google Scholar
• Koggel, Christine. 2005. “Poverty and Global Justice.” Chapter 7 in Contemporary Moral Issues, edited by Wesley Cragg and Christine Koggel. 5th ed., 389–401. Toronto: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Kohlberg, Lawrence. 1981. “From Is to Ought: How to Commit the Naturalistic Fallacy and Get away with It.” In Essays on Moral Development: The Philosophy of Moral Development, edited by Lawrence Kohlberg, 101–189. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Kohlberg, Lawrence, Charles Levine, and Alexander Hewer. 1984. “Synopses and Detailed Replies to Critics.” In Essays on Moral Development: The Psychology of Moral Development, edited by Lawrence Kohlberg, 320–86. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Kohlen, Helen. 2009. Conflicts of Care: Hospital Ethics Committees in the USA and in Germany. Frankfurt, NY: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, Maureen, and Barbara Yngvesson. 1992. “The Construction of Subjectivity and the Paradox of Resistance: Reintegrating Feminist Anthropology and Psychology.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 18 (1): 44–73. doi:10.1086/494778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maskos, Rebecca, and Birger Siebert. 2006. “Self-Determination: The Other Side of the Coin. Reflections on a Central but Ambiguous Term of the German Disability Rights Movement.” Disability Studies Quarterly 26 (2). <www.dsq-sds.org>.ss
   Google Scholar
• Morris, Jenny. 2001. “Impairment and Disability: Constructing an Ethics of Care that Promotes Human Rights.” Hypatia 16 (4): 1–16. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2001.tb00750.x.
   Google Scholar
• Pratesi, Alessando. 2011. “The Productivity of Care: Contextualizing Care in Situated Interaction and Shedding Light on Its Latent Purposes.” Ethics and Social Welfare 5 (2): 123–137. doi:10.1080/17496535.2011.571063.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, Fiona. 2011. “Stop Talking and Listen: Discourse Ethics and Care Ethics.” International Political Theory Millennium—Journal of International Studies 39 (March): 845–860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sevenhuijsen, Selma. 1998. Citizenship and the Ethics of Care: Feminist Considerations on Justice, Morality and Politics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, Tom. 2000. Help: Imagining Welfare. Birmingham: Venture Press.
   Google Scholar
• Theunissen, Georg. 2009. Empowerment und Inklusion behinderter Menschen: Eine Einführung in Heilpädagogik und Soziale Arbeit [Empowerment and Inclusion: An Introduction into Disability Studies and Social Work]. 2., aktual. Auflage. Freiburg im Breisgau: Lambertus.
   Google Scholar
• Titmuss, Richard M. [1970] 1997. The Gift Relationship: From Human Blood to Social Policy. Edited by Ann Oakley and John Ashton, expanded and updated edition. New York: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tronto, Joan C. 1993. Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tronto, Joan C. 2010. “Creating Caring Institutions: Politics, Plurality and Purpose.” Ethics & Social Welfare 4 (2): 158–171. doi:10.1080/17496535.2010.484259.
   Google Scholar
• Visse, Merel, Guy Widdershoven, and Tineke Abma. 2012. “Moral Learning in an Integrated Social and Healthcare Service Network.” Health Care Analysis 20 (3): 281–296. doi:10.1007/s10728-011-0187-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, Margaret Urban. 2006. “The Curious Case of Care and Restorative Justice in the U.S. Context.” In Socializing Care: Feminist Ethics and Public Issues, edited by Maurice Hamington and Dorothy Miller, 145–162. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• West, Candace, and Don H. Zimmerman. 2009. “Accounting for Doing Gender.” Gender and Society 23 (1): 112–122. doi:10.1177/0891243208326529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, Iris Marion. 1997. “Asymmetrical Reciprocity: On Moral Respect, Wonder, and Enlarged Thought.” Constellations: An International Journal of Critical and Democratic Theory 3 (3): 340–363.
   Google Scholar
• Young, Iris Marion. 2000. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zande, Marlies van der, Andries Baart, and Frans Vosman. 2013. “Ethical Sensitivity in Practice: Finding Tacit Moral Knowing.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 1: 1–9.
   Google Scholar