Street-Level Bureaucrats and Ethical Conflicts in Service Provision to Sex Workers

References

• Anasti, T. 2018. "Survivor or Laborer: How Human Service Managers Perceive Sex Workers?" Affilia: Journal for Women and Social Work 33 (4): 453–476. doi: 10.1177/0886109918778075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks, S. 2012. Ethics and Values in Social Work. 4th ed. London: Macmillan International Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Bromfield, N. F. 2016. “Sex Slavery and Sex Trafficking of Women in the United States: Historical and Contemporary Parallels, Policies, and Perspectives in Social Work.” Affilia 31 (1): 129–139. doi: 10.1177/0886109915616437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Corcoran, E. 2018. “Sixteen Going on Twenty-Six: Reflections on End Demand Legislation and Street-Based Sex Work.” In Challenging Perspectives on Street-Based Sex Work, edited by K. Hail-Jares, C. Shdaimah, and C. Leon, 182–192. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cusick, L. 2006. “Widening the Harm Reduction Agenda: From Drug Use to Sex Work.” International Journal of Drug Policy 17 (1): 3–11. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2005.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, S., and T. S. Germain. 2017. Women of the Street: How the Criminal Justice-Social Services Alliance Fails Women in Prostitution. New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ditmore, M. 2013. When Sex Work and Drug Use Overlap: Considerations for Advocacy and Practice. London: Harm Reduction International.
   Google Scholar
• Galligan, D. 1990. Discretionary Powers: A Legal Study of Official Discretion. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Handler, J. 1986. The Conditions of Discretion. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Hankel, J., M. Heil, S. Dewey, and N. Martinez. 2016. “Characteristics of Women Seeking Services at a Transitional Housing Facility for Women Leaving Street-Based Sex Work: Implications for Social Service Providers.” Journal of Social Service Research 42 (1): 41–56. doi: 10.1080/01488376.2015.1077188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harm Reduction International. 2019. “What is Harm Reduction?” Accessed April 2, 2019. https://www.hri.global/what-is-harm-reduction.
   Google Scholar
• Helping Individual Prostitutes Survive. n.d. “Harm Reduction.” Accessed April 3, 2019. http://www.hips.org/uploads/6/2/2/9/62290383/hips_statement_harmreduction.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kinney, E. 2018. “Policing, Protectionism, and Prevention: Prostitution, Sexual Delinquency, and the Politics of Victimhood in Thai and American Antitrafficking Campaigns.” In Challenging Perspectives on Street-Based Sex Work, edited by K. Hail-Jares, C. Shdaimah, and C. Leon, 152–181. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leon, C. S., and C. S. Shdaimah. 2012. “JUSTifying Scrutiny: State Power in Prostitution Diversion Programs.” Journal of Poverty 16: 250–273. doi: 10.1080/10875549.2012.695539
   Google Scholar
• Leser, J., R. Pates, and A. Dölemeyer. 2017. “The Emotional Leviathan—How Street-Level Bureaucrats Govern Human Trafficking Victims.” Digithum 19: 19–36. doi: 10.7238/d.v0i19.3088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. 1980. Street Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Loyens, K., and J. Maesschalck. 2010. "Toward a Theoretical Framework for Ethical Decision Making of Street-Level Bureaucracy: Existing Models Reconsidered." Administration & Society 42 (1): 66–100. doi: 10.1177/0095399710362524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutnick, A. 2016. Domestic Minor Sex Trafficking: Beyond Victims and Villains. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lutnick, A. 2019. “The ‘Prioritizing Safety for Sex Workers’ Organizing:’ A Sex Worker Rights and Anti-Trafficking Initiative.” Anti-Trafficking Review 12: 140–154. doi: 10.14197/atr.201219129
   Google Scholar
• Mac J., and Smith, M. 2018. Revolting Prostitutes: The Fight for Sex Workers’ Rights. London: Verso Trade.
   Google Scholar
• Marlatt, G. A. 1996. “Harm Reduction: Come As You Are.” Addictive Behaviors 21 (6): 779–788. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(96)00042-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard-Moody, S., and M. Musheno. 2000. “State Agent or Citizen Agent: Two Narratives of Discretion.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10 (2): 329–358.
   Google Scholar
• Musto, J. 2016. Control and Protect: Collaboration, Carceral Protection, and Domestic Sex Trafficking in the United States. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Association of Social Workers (NASW). 1996. Code of Ethics of the National Association of Social Workers. Washington, DC: NASW Distribution Center.
   Google Scholar
• Oselin, S. S., and R. Weitzer. 2013. “Organizations Working on Behalf of Prostitutes: An Analysis of Goals, Practices, and Strategies.” Sexualities 16 (3–4): 445–466. doi: 10.1177/1363460713481741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollack, S. 2008. "Labelling Clients ‘Risky’: Social Work and the Neo-liberal Welfare State." The British Journal of Social Work 40 (4): 1263–1278. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcn079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rekart, M. L. 2005. “Sex-Work Harm Reduction.” The Lancet 366 (9503): 2123–2134. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67732-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, E., and S. A. Venkatesh. 2008. "A 'Perversion' of Choice: Sex Work Offers Just Enough in Chicago's Urban Ghetto." Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 37 (4): 417–441. doi: 10.1177/0891241607309879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shdaimah, C. S., and C. S. Leon. 2016. “Relationships among Stigmatized Women Engaged in Street-Level Prostitution: Coping with Stigma and Stigma Management.” In Special Issue: Problematizing Prostitution: Critical Research and Scholarship, edited by A. Sarat, 43–62. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Shdaimah, C. S., and S. A. Wiechelt. 2012a. “Crime and Compassion: Women in Prostitution at the Intersection of Criminality and Victimization.” International Review of Victimology 19 (1): 23–35. doi: 10.1177/0269758012447217
   Google Scholar
• Shdaimah, C. S., and S. A. Wiechelt. 2012b. “Converging on Empathy: Perspectives on Baltimore City’s Specialized Prostitution Diversion Program.” Women and Criminal Justice 22 (2): 156–173. doi: 10.1080/08974454.2012.662131
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S. 2003. “Street-Level Bureaucracy and Public Policy.” In Handbook of Public Administration, edited by B. G. Peters, and J. Pierre, 354–365. London: SAGE Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M., and V. Cree. 2014. “Social Work and Pornography: Some Ethical Considerations.” Ethics and Social Welfare 8 (4): 317–331. doi: 10.1080/17496535.2014.889735
   Google Scholar
• Thukral, J., and M. Ditmore. 2001. Revolving Door: An Analysis of Street-Based Prostitution in New York City. New York: Urban Justice Center.
   Google Scholar
• Wahab, S. 2002. “For their Own Good: Sex Work, Social Control and Social Workers, a Historical Perspective.” Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare 29: 39–57.
   Google Scholar
• Wahab, S., and M. Panichelli. 2013. “Ethical and Human Rights Issues in Coercive Interventions with Sex Workers.” Affilia 28 (4): 344–349. doi: 10.1177/0886109913505043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins-Hayes, C. 2009. The New Welfare Bureaucrats: Entanglements of Race, Class, and Policy Reform. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weitzer, R. 2009. “Sociology of Sex Work.” Annual Review of Sociology 35: 213–234. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-120025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitzer, R. 2010. “The Movement to Criminalize Sex Work in the United States.” Journal of Law and Society 37 (1): 61–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6478.2010.00495.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittle, T. N. 2018. “Conflict, Adaption, and Strategic Defiance: Service Providers’ Roles in Constructing Prisoner Reentry Through Role Adaption.” Journal of Crime and Justice 41 (3): 276–293. doi: 10.1080/0735648X.2017.1366929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar