Ethical Approval and Being a Virtuous Social Work Researcher. The Experience of Multi-site Research in UK Health and Social Care: An Approved Mental Health Professional Case Study

References

• ADASS. 2018. AMHPS, Mental Health Act Assessments and the Mental Health Social Care Workforce. London: Association of Directors of Adult Social Services.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, D. 2005. “Research as Social Work: Participatory Research in Learning Disability.” British Journal of Social Work 3 (4): 425–434. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bch189
   Google Scholar
• Barsky, A. E. 2010. “The Virtuous Social Work Researcher.” Journal of Social Work Values and Ethics 7 (1): 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Bogg, D. 2011. National AMHP Leads Data. AMHP Leads Network. Unpublished.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, I. 2002. “A Code of Ethics for Social Work and Social Care Research.” British Journal of Social Work 32 (2): 239–248. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/32.2.239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canella, G. S., and Y. S. Lincoln. 2007. “Predatory vs. Dialogic Ethics Constructing an Illusion or Ethical Practice as the Core of Research Methods.” Qualitative Inquiry 13 (3): 315–335. doi: 10.1177/1077800406297648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, D. 2015. “Virtue Ethics in the Practice and Review of Social Science Research.” Paper, Academy of Social Sciences, organised in conjunction with British Sociological Association, Friday 1 May.
   Google Scholar
• CSIP/NIMHE. 2007. Mental Health: New Ways of Working for Everyone Developing and Sustaining a Capable and Flexible Workforce. Department of Health, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education. 2018. Social Work England Consultation on Secondary Legislative Framework. London: Department for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. 2015. Mental Health Act Code of Practice. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Dingwall, R. 2006. “Confronting the Anti-Democrats: the Unethical Nature of Ethical Regulation in Social Science.” Medical Sociology Online 1: 51–58.
   Google Scholar
• Dingwall, R., R. Iphofen, J. Lewis, J. Oates, and N. Emmerich. 2017. “Towards Common Principles for Social Science Research Ethics: a Discussion Document for the Academy of Social Sciences.” In Advances in Research Ethics and Integrity, Volume 1: Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences, edited by R. Iphofen, 111–123. Bingley: Emerald Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• ESRC. 2015. Framework for Research Ethics. Accessed 9 July 2018. http://www.esrc.ac.uk/files/funding/guidance-for-applicants/esrc-framework-for-research-ethics-2015/.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, S., P. Huxley, C. Gately, M. Webber, A. Mears, S. Pajak, J. Medina, T. Kendall, and C. Katona. 2006. “Mental Health Burnout and Job Satisfaction among Mental Health Social Workers in England and Wales.” The British Journal of Psychiatry 188: 75–80. doi: 10.1192/bjp.188.1.75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, S., P. Huxley, M. Webber, C. Katona, C. Gately, A. Mears, A. Medina, S. Pajak, and T. Kendall. 2005. “The Impact of ‘Statutory Duties’ on Mental Health Social Workers in the UK.” Health and Social Care in the Community 13 (2): 145–154. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2005.00540.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn, S. 2000. “Multi-centre Research Ethics Committees: has the Cure Been Worse Than the Disease?” British Medical Journal 220: 1157–1158.
   Google Scholar
• Gilgun, J. F. 1994. “Hand Into Glove: The Grounded Theory Approach and Social Work Practice Research.” In Qualitative Research in Social Work, edited by E. Sherman and W. J. Reid, 115–125. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilgun, J. F., and L. S. Abrams. 2002. “The Nature and Usefulness of Qualitative Social Work Research: Some Thoughts and an Invitation to Dialogue.” Qualitative Social Work 1 (1): 39–55. doi: 10.1177/1473325002001001743
   Google Scholar
• Guillemin, M., and L. Gillam. 2004. “Ethics, Reflexivity, and “Ethically Important Moments” in Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 10 (2): 261–280. doi: 10.1177/1077800403262360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M. 2010. “Creeping Ethical Regulation and the Strangling of Research.” Sociological Review Online 15 (4): 16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huxley, P., S. Evans, M. Webber, and C. Gately. 2005. “Staff Shortages in the Mental Health Workforce: the Case of the Disappearing Approved Social Worker.” Health and Social Care in the Community 13 (6): 504–513. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2005.00575.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huxley, P., and M. Kerfoot. 1994. “A Survey of Approved Social Work in England and Wales.” British Journal of Social Work 24: 311–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iphofen, R., ed. 2017. Advances in Research Ethics and Integrity. Vol. 1. Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics across the Social Sciences Emerald Insight. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jamrozik, K. 2004. “Research Ethics Paperwork: What is the Plot We Seem to Have Lost?” British Medical Journal 329: 286–287. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7460.286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joint University Council Social Work Education. 2018. Accessed 01 September 2019. https://www.juc.ac.uk/social-work-education-committee/sub-committees/research/
   Google Scholar
• Macfarlane, B. 2009. Researching with Integrity: The Ethics of Academic Enquiry. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Macfarlane, B. 2010. “Values and Ethics in Qualitative Research.” In New Approaches to Qualitative Research: Wisdom and Uncertainty, edited by M. Savin-Baden and C. H. Major. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mental Health Act. 1983. As Amended by Mental Health Act (2007). London, HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, E., and R. Dingwall. 2007. “Informed Consent, Anticipatory Regulation and Ethnographic Practice.” Social Science & Medicine 65 (2007): 2223–2223. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/02779536 doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.08.008
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oates, J. 2018. Being a Virtuous Researcher, March 29th, Open University.
   Google Scholar
• Padgett, D. 1998. “Does the Glove Really Fit?” Qualitative Research and Clinical Social Work Practice Social Work 43 (4): 373–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QAA. 2018. Quality Code for Education, 2018 Quality Assurance Agency.
   Google Scholar
• SCREC. 2018. The Social Care Research Ethics Committee. Accessed 11 July 2018. https://www.hra.nhs.uk/about-us/committees-and-services/res-and-recs/search-research-ethics-committees/social-care-research-ethics-committee/.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, I. 2005. “Practitioner Research: Evidence or Critique.” British Journal of Social Work 35 (8): 1231–1248, 1 December 2005. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bch223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheppard, M. 1993. “Theory for Approved Social Work: The Use of the Compulsory Admissions Assessment Schedule.” British Journal of Social Work 23 (3): 231–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley, L., and S. Wise. 2010. “The ESRC's 2010 Framework for Research Ethics: fit for research purpose?” Sociological Research Online 15 (4): 106–115. doi: 10.5153/sro.2265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, K. 2019. “Approved Mental Health Professionals and Detention: An Exploration of Professional Differences and Similarities.” Practice 31 (2): 83–96. doi: 10.1080/09503153.2018.1445709
   Google Scholar
• UUK. 2012. The Concordat to Support Research Integrity. London: Universities UK.
   Google Scholar
• UUK. 2016. The Concordat to Support Research Integrity – a Progress Report. London: Universities UK.
   Google Scholar
• Vicary, S. 2017. “An Interpretative Phenomenological Interpretation of the Impact of Professional Background on Role Fulfilment: a Study of Approved Mental Health Practice.” PhD thesis, University of Manchester.
   Google Scholar
• Walter, I., S. Nutley, J. Percey-Smith, D. McNeish, and S. Frost. 2004. Improving the use of Research in Social Care Practice. London: SCIE.
   Google Scholar