In the Periphery: Ethical Considerations When Indirectly Involving Children in Research

References

• Aakvaag, H. F., and I. F. Strøm, eds. 2019. Vold i oppveksten: Varige spor? - En longitudinell undersøkelse av reviktimisering, helse, rus og sosiale relasjoner hos unge utsatt for vold i barndommen. Nasjonal kunnskapssenter om vold og traumatisk stress (NKVTS). Epub ahead of print 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Acconciamessa, L. 2020. “The Case Strand Lobben on the (missing) Balancing Between the Right to Family Life and the Best Interest of the Child.” Diritti Umani E Diritto Internazionale 14 (1): 225–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, L., and M. Moore. 2021. “Deontological Ethics.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta. Winter 2021. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Accessed 14 June 2023. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/ethics-deontological/.
   Google Scholar
• App no 17383/90. 1996. Johansen v. Norway.
   Google Scholar
• App no 22430/93. 1998. Bronda v. Italy.
   Google Scholar
• App no 37283/13. 2019. Strand Lobben and others v. Norway.
   Google Scholar
• App no 4547/10. 2012. Y.C. v. The United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• App no 60371/15. 2019. A.S. v. Norway.
   Google Scholar
• App no 64808/16. 2019. K.O. and V.M. v. Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Backe-Hansen, E. 2016. Children. Accessed 13 June 2023. https://www.forskningsetikk.no/en/resources/the-research-ethics-library/research-on-particular-groups/barn/.
   Google Scholar
• Barne- og familidepartementet. 2023. NOU 2023: 7 Trygg Barndom, Sikker Fremtid – Gjennomgang Av Rettssikkerheten for Barn Og Foreldre i Barnevernet. Oslo: Departementenes sikkerhets- og serviceorganisasjon Teknisk redaksjon. Accessed 14 June 2023. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/nou-2023-7/id2966836/?ch=1.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett-Maitland, N. and J. Lynch 2020. “Social media, ethics and the privacy paradox.” In Security and privacy from legal, ethical, and technical perspective, edited by C. Kalloniatis and C. Travieso-Gonzalez, https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.90906.
   Google Scholar
• boyd, danah, and K. Crawford. 2012. “CRITICAL QUESTIONS FOR BIG DATA.” Information, Communication & Society 15 (5): Routledge: 662–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bratberg, Ø. 2017. Tekstanalyse for Samfunnsvitere. 2. utg. Forskningsmetoder. Oslo: Cappelen Damm akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• Brinkmann, S., and S. Kvale. 2017. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. Accessed 2 May 2023. https://methods.sagepub.com/book/the-sage-handbook-of-qualitative-research-in-psychology-second-edition.
   Google Scholar
• Elgesem, D. 2015. “Consent and Information - Ethical Considerations When Conducting Research on Social Media.” In Internet Research Ethics, edited by H. Fossheim and H. Ingierd, 14–32. Oslo: Cappelen Damm Akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• Felzmann, H. 2009. “Ethical Issues in School-Based Research.” Research Ethics 5 (3): SAGE Publications Ltd: 104–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701610900500304.
   Google Scholar
• Fiesler, C., and N. Proferes. 2018. “Participant’ Perceptions of Twitter Research Ethics.” Social Media + Society 4 (1), 1–14. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golder, S., S. Ahmed, G. Norman, and A. Booth. 2017. “Attitudes Toward the Ethics of Research Using Social Media: A Systematic Review.” Journal of Medical Internet Research 19 (6): e195. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7082.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helland, T., and R. Hollekim. 2023. “Care Order Cases in the European Court of Human Rights: Parents vs. Children’s Rights.” The International Journal of Children’s Rights 31 (1): Brill: 190–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HR-2020-661-S. 2020. HR-2020-661-S.
   Google Scholar
• Klassen, S., and C. Fiesler. 2022. “This Isn’t Your Data, Friend’: Black Twitter as a Case Study on Research Ethics for Public Data.” Social Media + Society 8 (4). London: Sage Publications Ltd: 20563051221144317. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221144317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kletzka, N. T., and C. Siegfried. 2008. “Helping Children in the Child Welfare Systems Heal from Trauma: A Systems Integration Approach.” Juvenile and Family Court Journal 59 (4): 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-6988.2008.00018.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köhler-Olsen, J. 2019. “EMD: Strand Lobben med flere mot Norge.” Tidsskrift for velferdsforskning 22 (4): 341–346. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2464-3076-2019-04-07.
   Google Scholar
• Kvalnes, Ø. 2020. Digital Dilemmas: Exploring Social Media Ethics in Organizations. Cham: Springer International Publishing. Accessed 2 May 2023. http://link.springer.com/10.1007978-3-030-45927-7.
   Google Scholar
• Lohne, J., R. T. Ege, M. G. Norman, S. Åsebø. 2015. Tsjekkias president sammenligner norsk barnevern med nazi-program. 9 February. VG. Accessed 2 May 2023. https://www.vg.no/i/o0zkK.
   Google Scholar
• Mathews, B. 2023. “Adolescent Capacity to Consent to Participate in Research: A Review and Analysis Informed by Law, Human Rights, Ethics, and Developmental Science.” Laws 12 (1): 1. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute: 2.
   Google Scholar
• Mæland, K. 2015. Europeiske demonstrasjoner mot det norske barnevernet. Accessed 28 June 2019. http://nettavisen.no/artikkel/3422790876.
   Google Scholar
• Mikal, J., S. Hurst, and M. Conway. 2016. “Ethical Issues in using Twitter for Population-Level Depression Monitoring: A Qualitative Study.” BMC Medical Ethics 17. London: Bmc: 22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mill, J. S. 2000. Utilitarianism. London, UK: Electric Book Company. Accessed 14 June 2023. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bergen-ebooks/detail.action?docID=3008465.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, V. A., D. Drotar, and E. Kodish. 2004. “Children’s Competence for Assent and Consent: A Review of Empirical Findings.” Ethics & Behavior 14 (3): Routledge: 255–295. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327019eb1403_3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NESH. 2021. Forskningsetiske retningslinjer for samfunnsvitenskap og humaniora. www.forskningsetikk.no.
   Google Scholar
• NIM. 2020. Hvorfor dømmes Norge i EMD? 21 December. Norges Institusjon for Menneskerettigheter. Accessed 17 March 2023. https://www.nhri.no/rapport/barnevern/.
   Google Scholar
• Ringdal, K. 2013. Enhet Og Mangfold : Samfunnsvitenskapelig Forskning Og Kvantitativ Metode. 3. utg. Bergen: Fagbokforl.
   Google Scholar
• Sellers, C., G. Samuel, and G. Derrick. 2020. “Reasoning “Uncharted Territory”: Notions of Expertise Within Ethics Review Panels Assessing Research Use of Social Media.” Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 15 (1–2): SAGE Publications Inc: 28–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619837088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sormanen, N., J. Rohila, E. Lauk, T. Uskali, J. Jouhki, M. Penttinen. 2016. “Chances and Challenges of Computational Data Gathering and Analysis The Case of Issue-Attention Cycles on Facebook.” Digital Journalism 4 (1): Abingdon: Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd: 55–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Søvig, K. H., and M. E. Tjelmeland. 2019. “Strand Lobben mot Norge – noen refleksjoner.” Tidsskrift for familierett, arverett og barnevernrettslige spørsmål 17 (04): 345–352. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.0809-9553-2019-04-05.
   Google Scholar
• Stang, E. 2018. “Ethical Decision-Making in Internet Research – Investigating Protest Groups against Child Welfare Services on Facebook.” Qualitative Social Work, 19 (2): 301–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stommel, W., and L. de Rijk. 2021. “Ethical Approval: None Sought. How Discourse Analysts Report Ethical Issues Around Publicly Available Online Data.” Research Ethics 17 (3): Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc: 275–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016120988767.
   Google Scholar
• Tamutienė, I. 2018. “Alcohol-related child maltreatment: Reports to the Child Rights Protection Service in Kaunas municipality.” Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 35 (1): 9–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1455072517749132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend, L., and C. Wallace. 2016. Social Media Research: A Guide to Ethics. Aberdeen: University of Aberdeen. Accessed 2 May 2023. https://www.gla.ac.uk/media/Media_487729_smxx.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Tregeagle, S., L. Moggach, H. Trivedi, H. Ward. 2019. “Previous Life Experiences and the Vulnerability of Children Adopted from Out-Of-Home Care: The Impact of Adverse Childhood Experiences and Child Welfare Decision Making.” Children and Youth Services Review 96: 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.11.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, M. L., P. Burnap, and L. Sloan. 2017. “Towards an Ethical Framework for Publishing Twitter Data in Social Research: Taking into Account Users’ Views, Online Context and Algorithmic Estimation.” Sociology 51 (6): SAGE Publications Ltd: 1149–1168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038517708140.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar