The effects of input enhancement and recasts on the development of second language pragmatic competence

References

• Alcón-Soler, E. 2005. “Does Instruction Work for Learning Pragmatics in the EFL Context?” System 33 (3): 417–435. doi:10.1016/j.system.2005.06.005.
   Google Scholar
• Alcón-Soler, E., ed. 2008. Learning How to Request in an Instructed Language Learning Context. Bern: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Ammar, A., and N.Spada. 2006. “One Size Fits All? Recasts, Prompts, and L2 Learning.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28 (4): 543–574. doi:10.1017/S0272263106060268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachman, L. 1990. Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bardovi-Harlig, K., and B.Hartford. 1993. “Learning the Rules of Academic Talk: A Longitudinal Study of Pragmatic Change.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15 (3): 279–304.doi:10.1017/S0272263100012122.
   Google Scholar
• Bardovi-Harlig, K., and R. Mahan-Taylor, eds. 2003. Teaching Pragmatics. Washington, DC: United States Department of State.
   Google Scholar
• Bouton, L. F. 1994. “Can NNS Skill in Interpreting Implicature in American English be Improved through Explicit Instruction? – A Pilot Study.” In Pragmatics and Language Learning. Vol. 5, edited by L. Bouton, 88–109. Urbana: Division of English as an International Language Intensive English Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
   Google Scholar
• Canale, M. 1983. “On Some Dimensions of Language Proficiency.” In Issues in Language Testing Research, edited by W. Oller, 332–342. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
   Google Scholar
• Canale, M., and M.Swain. 1980. “Theoretical Bases of Communicative Approaches to Second Language Teaching and Testing.” Applied Linguistics 1 (1): 1–47. doi:10.1093/applin/1.1.1.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, S., and M.Swain. 1993. “Explicit and Implicit Negative Feedback: An Empirical Study of the Learning of Linguistic Generalizations.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15 (3): 357–386.doi:10.1017/S0272263100012158.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Doughty, C. 1991. “Second Language Instruction Does Make a Difference: Evidence from an Empirical Study of SL Relativization.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 13 (4): 431–469. doi:10.1017/S0272263100010287.
   Google Scholar
• Doughty, C. 2001. “Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form.” In Cognition and Second Language Instruction, edited by P. Robinson, 206–257. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doughty, C., and E.Varela. 1998. “Communicative Focus on Form.” In Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition, edited by C. Doughty and J. Williams, 114–1380. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doughty, C., and J. Williams, eds. 1998. Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge, University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Egi, T. 2010. “Uptake, Modified Output, and Learner Perceptions of Recasts: Learner Responses as Language Awareness.” The Modern Language Journal 94 (1): 1–21. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00980.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. 2001. “Investigating Form-focused Instruction.” Language Learning 51 (Suppl.1): 1–46. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.2001.tb00013.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. 2008. The Study of Second Language Acquisition. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R., and Y.Sheen. 2006. “Reexamining the Role of Recasts in Second Language Acquisition.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28: 575–600. doi:10.1017/S027226310606027X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eslami, Z. R., A. Mirzaei, and S.Dini. 2014. “The Role of Asynchronous Computer Mediated Communication in the Instruction and Development of EFL Learners’ Pragmatic Competence.” System 48: 99–111. doi:10.1016/j.system.2014.09.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuya, Y. J. 1998. “Consciousness-raising of Downgraders in Requests.” Paper presented at Second Language Research Forum ‘98, University of Hawai’i at Manoa, Honolulu, October 15–18.
   Google Scholar
• Fukuya, Y., and M. Clark. 2001. “A Comparison of Input Enhancement and Explicit Instruction of Mitigators.” In Pragmatics and Language Learning. Vol. 10, edited by L. Bouton, 111–130. Urbana-Champaign: Division of English as an International Language, University of Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Fukuya, Y., M. Reeve, J. Gisi, and M. Christianson. 1998. “Does Focus on Form Work for Teaching Sociopragmatics?” Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Conference on Pragmatics and Language Learning, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL, February 27. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 452736).
   Google Scholar
• Fuykuya, Y., and Y. Zhang. 2002. “Effects of Recasts on EFL Learners’ Acquisition of Pragmalinguistic Conventions of Request.” Second Language Studies 21 (1): 1–47.
   Google Scholar
• Gass, S. 1988. “Integrating Research Areas: A Framework for Second Language Studies.” Applied Linguistics 9 (2): 198–217.doi:10.1093/applin/9.2.198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gass, S., and M. Alison. 2007. “Input, Interaction, and Output in Second Language Acquisition.” In Theories in Second Language Acquisition: An Introduction, edited by B. VanPatten and J. Williams, 175–199. New Jersey, NJ: Lawrence, Mahwah.
   Google Scholar
• Ghavamnia, M., A. Eslami-Rasekha, and H. Vahid-Dastjerdia. 2014. “The Effects of Input-enhanced Instruction on Iranian EFL Learners’ Production of Appropriate and Accurate Suggestions.” The Language Learning Journal. doi:10.1080/09571736.2014.972431.
   Google Scholar
• Han, Z., E. Park, and C. Combs. 2008. “Textual Enhancement of Input: Issues and Possibilities.” Applied Linguistics 29 (4): 597–618. doi:10.1093/applin/amn010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassal, T. 2001. “Modifying Requests in a Second Language.” International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 39: 59–283. doi:10.1515/iral.2001.005.
   Google Scholar
• House, J. 1996. “Developing Pragmatic Fluency in English as a Foreign Language: Routines and Metapragmatic Awareness.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18 (2): 225–252. doi:10.1017/S0272263100014893.
   Google Scholar
• Izumi, S. 2002. “Output, Input Enhancement, and the Noticing Hypothesis: An Experimental Study on ESL Relativization.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24 (4): 541–577. doi:10.1017/S0272263102004023.
   Google Scholar
• Jeon, E. H., and T. Kaya. 2006. “Effects of L2 Instruction on Interlanguage Pragmatic Development: A Meta-analysis.” In Synthesizing Research on Language Learning and Teaching, edited by M. Norris and L. Ortega, 165–211. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Kasper, G., and K. Rose. 2002. Pragmatic Development in a Second Language. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Kasper, G., and R. Schmidt. 1996. “Developmental Issues in Interlanguage Pragmatics.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18 (2): 149–169. doi:10.1017/S0272263100014868.
   Google Scholar
• Koike, D. A., and L. Pearson. 2005. “The Effect of Instruction and Feedback in the Development of Pragmatic Competence.” System 33 (3): 481–501. doi:10.1016/j.system.2005.06.008.
   Google Scholar
• Leeman, J., I. Arteagoitia, B. Fridman, and C. Doughty. 1995. “Integrating Attention to Form with Meaning: Focus on Form in Content-based Spanish Instruction.” In Attention and Awareness in Foreign Language Learning, edited by R. Schmidt, 217–258. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.
   Google Scholar
• Long, M. 1991. “Focus on Form: A Design Feature in Language Teaching Methodology.” In Foreign Language Research in Cross-cultural Perspective, edited by K. de Bot, Kees, R. Ginsberg, and C. Kramsch, 39–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamin.
   Google Scholar
• Long, M. 1996. “The Role of the Linguistic Environment in Second Language Acquisition.” In Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, edited by W. Ritchie and T. Bhatia, 413–468. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Long, M., and P. Robinson 1998. “Focus on Form: Theory, Research, and Practice.” In Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition, edited by C. Doughty and J. Williams, 15–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Long, M. 2006. Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Long, M., and P. Robinson. 1998. “Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice.” In Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition, edited by C. Doughty and J. Williams, 15–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Long, M., and J. Norris. 2009. “Task-based Teaching and Assessment.” In Task-based Language Teaching: A reader, edited by K. van den Branden, M. Bygate, and J. Norris, 135–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Lyster, R. 1998. “Recasts, Repetition, and Ambiguity in L2 Classroom Discourse.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20 (1): 51–81. doi:10.1017/S027226319800103X.
   Google Scholar
• Lyster, R. 2004. “Differential Effects of Prompts and Recasts in Form-focused Instruction.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26 (3): 399–432. doi:10.1017/S0272263104263021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyster, R., and L. Ranta. 1997. “Corrective Feedback and Learner Uptake: Negotiation of Form in Communicative Classrooms.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19 (1): 37–66.doi:10.1017/S0272263197001034.
   Google Scholar
• Lyster, R., K. Saito, and M. Sato. 2013. “Oral Corrective Feedback in Second Language Classrooms.” Language Teaching 46 (1): 1–40. doi:10.1017/S0261444812000365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackey, A., and J. Philp. 1998. “Conversational Interaction and Second Language Development: Recasts, Responses, and Red Herrings?” The Modern Language Journal 82 (3): 338–356. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01211.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Flor, A. 2006. “The Effectiveness of Explicit and Implicit Treatments on EFL Learners’ Confidence in Recognizing Appropriate Suggestions.” In Pragmatics and Language Learning. Vol. 11, edited by K. Bardovi-Harlig, C. Félix-Brasdefer, and A. S. Ormar, 199–223. Honolulu: National Foreign Language Resource Center, University of Hawaii.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez-Flor, A. 2008. “The Effects of an Inductive-deductive Teaching Approach to Develop Learners’ Use of Request Modifiers in the EFL Classroom.” In Learning How to Request in an Instructed Language Learning Context, edited by E. Alcón-Soler, 191–225. Bern: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez-Flor, A., and E. Alcón-Soler. 2007. “Developing Pragmatic Awareness of Suggestions in the EFL Classroom: A Focus on Instructional Effects.” Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics 10 (1): 47–76.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez-Flor, A., and Y. J. Fukuya. 2005. “The Effects of Instruction on Learners’ Production of Appropriate and Accurate Suggestions.” System 33: 463–480. doi:10.1016/j.system.2005.06.007.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez-Flor, A., E. Usó-Juan, and A. Fernández-Guerra, eds. 2003. Pragmatic Competence and Foreign Language Teaching. Castelló, Spain: Servei de Publicacions de la Universitat Jaume I, Castello.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T. T. M. 2005. “ Criticizing and Responding to Criticism in a Foreign Language: A Study of Vietnamese Learners of English.” PhD. thesis, The University of Auckland.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T. T. M. 2008. “Modifying L2 Criticisms: How Learners Do It?” Journal of Pragmatics 40 (4): 768–791. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2007.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T. T. M. 2013. “Instructional Effects on the Acquisition of Modifiers in Constructive Criticism by EFL Learners.” Language Awareness 22 (1): 76–94. doi:10.1080/09658416.2012.658810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T. T. M., M. T. Pham, and T. H. Cao. 2013. “The Effects of Explicit Meta-pragmatic Instruction on EFL Learners’ Performance of Constructive Criticisms in an Academic Setting.” In Pragmatics and Language Learning. Vol 13, edited by T. Greer, D. Tatsuki, and C. Roever, 199–230. Honolulu: National Foreign Language Resource Center, University of Hawaii.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T. T. M., T. H. Pham, and M. T. Pham. 2012. “The Relative Effects of Explicit and Implicit Form-focused Instruction on the Development of L2 Pragmatic Competence.” Journal of Pragmatics 44 (4): 416–434. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2012.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortega, L., and M. Long. 1997. “The Effects of Models and Recasts on Object Topicalization and Adverb Placement in L2 Spanish.” Spanish Applied Linguistics 1: 65–86.
   Google Scholar
• Panova, I., and R. Lyster. 2002. “Patterns of Corrective Feedback and Uptake in an Adult ESL Classroom.” TESOL Quarterly 36 (4): 573–595. doi:10.2307/3588241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, L. 1998. “Spanish L2 Pragmatics: The Effects of Metapragmatic Discussion.” Paper presented at Second Language Research Forum ‘98, University of Hawai‘i at Manoa, October 15–18.
   Google Scholar
• Roever, C. 2009. “Teaching and Testing Pragmatics.” In Handbook of Language Teaching, edited by M. H. Long and C. J. Doughty, 560–577. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Rollinson, P. 2005. “Using Peer Feedback in the ESL Writing Class.” ELT Journal 59 (1): 23–30. doi:10.1093/elt/cci003.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, K. 2005. “On the Effects of Instruction in Second Language Pragmatics.” System 33 (3): 385–399. doi:10.1016/j.system.2005.06.003.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, K., and G. Kasper. 2001. Pragmatics in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Safont, M. P. 2003. “Instructional Effects on the Use of Request Acts Modification Devices by EFL Learners.” In Pragmatic Competence and Foreign Language Teaching, edited by A. Martınez-Flor, E. Uso-Juan and A. Fernandez-Guerra, 211–232. Castelló, Spain: Servei de Publicacions de la Universitat Jaume I, Castello.
   Google Scholar
• Salazar, P. C. 2003. “Pragmatic Instruction in the EFL Context.” In Pragmatic Competence and Foreign Language Teaching, edited by A. Martınez-Flor, E. Uso, and A. Fernandez, 233–246. Castelló: Servei de Publicacions de la Universitat Jaume I, Castello.
   Google Scholar
• Saxton, M. 1997. “The Contrast Theory of Negative Input.” Journal of Child Language 24 (1): 139–161. doi:10.1017/S030500099600298X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. 1990. “The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning.” Applied Linguistics 11 (2): 129–158. doi:10.1093/applin/11.2.129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. 1993. “Consciousness, Learning, and Interlanguage Pragmatics.” In Interlanguage Pragmatics, edited by G. Kasper and S. Blum-Kulka, 21–42. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sharwood Smith, M. 1981. “Consciousness Raising and Second Language Acquisition Theory.” Applied Linguistics 7 (3): 239–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharwood Smith, M. 1993. “Input enhancement in instructed SLA: Theoretical bases.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15 (2): 165–179. doi:10.1017/S0272263100011943.
   Google Scholar
• Sheen, Y. 2004. “Corrective Feedback and Learner Uptake in Communicative Classrooms across Instructional Settings.” Language Teaching Research 8 (3): 263–300. doi:10.1191/1362168804lr146oa.
   Google Scholar
• Sheen, Y. 2006. “Exploring the Relationship between Characteristics of Recasts and Learner Uptake.” Language Teaching Research 10 (4): 361–392. doi:10.1191/1362168806lr203oa.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheen, Y. 2008. “Recasts, Language Anxiety, Modified Output and L2 Learning.” Language Learning 58 (4): 835–874. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00480.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheen, Y. 2010. “Differential Effects of Oral and Written Corrective Feedback in the ESL Classroom.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32 (2): 203–234. doi:10.1017/S0272263109990507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taguchi, N. 2011. “Teaching Pragmatics: Trends and Issues.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 31: 289–310. doi:10.1017/S0267190511000018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi, S. 2001. “The Role of Input Enhancement in Developing Pragmatic Competence.” In Pragmatics in Language Teaching, edited by K. Rose and G. Kasper, 171–199. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Takahashi, S. 2005. “Noticing in Task Performance and Learning Outcomes: A Qualitative Analysis of Instructional Effects in Interlanguage Pragmatics.” System 33 (3): 437–461. doi:10.1016/j.system.2005.06.006.
   Google Scholar
• Takahashi, S. 2010. “The Effect of Pragmatic Instruction on Speech Act Performance.” In Speech Act Performance: Theoretical, Empirical and Methodological Issues, edited by A. Martínez-Flor and E. Usó-Juan, 127–144. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Takimoto, M. 2009. “The Effects of Input-based Tasks on the Development of Learners’ Pragmatic Proficiency.” Applied Linguistics 30 (1): 1–25. doi:10.1093/applin/amm049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tateyama, Y. 2001. “Explicit and Implicit Teaching of Pragmatic Routines: Japanese Sumimasen.” In Pragmatics in Language Teaching, edited by K. Rose and G. Kasper, 200–222. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. 1983. “Cross-cultural Pragmatic Failure.” Applied linguistics 4 (2): 91–112. doi:10.1093/applin/4.2.91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, K., D. Van Dusen, and S. Robinson. 1987. “Good and Bad Criticism: A Descriptive Analysis.” Journal of Communication 37 (2): 46–60. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1987.tb00982.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, J. 1998. “Getting the Learners’ Attention: A Typographical Input Enhancement Study.” In Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition, edited by C. Doughty and J. Williams, 85–113. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, W. 2003. “Textual Enhancement and Simplified Input: Effects on L2 Comprehension and Acquisition of Non-meaningful Grammatical Form.” Applied Language Learning 13 (2): 17–45.
   Google Scholar