Enhancing L2 learners’ ZPD modification through computerized-group dynamic assessment of reading comprehension

References

• Ableeva, R. 2010. “ Dynamic Assessment of Listening Comprehension in Second Language Learning.” Unpublished doctoral diss., The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Alavi, S. M., S. Kaivanpanah, and K. Shabani. 2012. “Group Dynamic Assessment: An Inventory of Mediational Strategies for Teaching Listening.” The Journal of Teaching Language Skills (JTLS) 3 (4): 27–58.
   Google Scholar
• Aljaafreh, A., and J. P. Lantolf. 1994. “Negative Feedback as Regulation and Second Language Learning in the Zone of Proximal Development.” The Modern Language Journal 78 (4): 465–483. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02064.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antón, M. 2003. “ Dynamic Assessment of Advanced Foreign Language Learners.” Paper Presented at the Meeting of the American Association of Applied Linguistics, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhoda, I., and K. Shabani. 2016. “Response Latency as a Tool to Study L2 Learners’ ZPD, ZAD and Ongoing Information Processing.” Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education 1: 2. doi:10.1186/s40862-016-0009-4.
   Google Scholar
• Campione, J. C., and A. L. Brown. 1987. “Linking Dynamic Assessment with School Achievement.” In Dynamic Assessment: An International Approach to Evaluating Learning Potential, edited by Carol s. Lidz, 82–115. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davin, K. J. 2011. “ Group Dynamic Assessment in an Early Foreign Language Learning Program: Tracking Movement through the Zone of Proximal Development.” Unpublished doctoral diss., Pittsburgh University. Accessed, January 29, 2013. http://dscholarship.pitt.edu/7269/1/DAVINKJ_ETD.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Donato, R., and D. McCormick. 1994. “A Sociocultural Perspective on Language Learning Strategies: The Role of Mediation.” The Modern Language Journal 78 (4): 453–464. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02063.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feuerstein, R., Y. Rand, and M. B. Hoffman. 1980. The Dynamic Assessment of Retarded Performers: The Learning Potential Assessment Device (LPAD). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feuerstein, R., Y. Rand, and J. Rynders. 1988. Don’t Accept Me as I Am. Helping Retarded Performers Excel. New York: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, P. 2003. “Mediating Language Learning: Teacher Interactions with ESL Students in a Content-based Classroom.” TESOL Quarterly 37 (2): 247–273. doi: 10.2307/3588504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenberg, A. M., and W. Epstein. 1985. “Calibration of Comprehension.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 11: 702–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthke, L. 1993. “Current Trends in Theories and Testing of Intelligence.” In Learning Potential Assessment: Theoretical, Methodological and Practical Issues, edited by Jo H. M. Hamers, K. Sijtsma, and Wied A. J. J. M. Ruijssenaars, 43–67. Amsterdam: Swets&Zeitlinger.
   Google Scholar
• Guthke, L. J., and J. F. Beckmann. 2000. “The Learning Test Concept and Its Applications in Practice.” In Dynamic Assessment: Prevailing Models and Applications, edited by Carol s. Lidz and Julian Elliott, 17–69. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Kincaid, J. P., R. P. Fishburne, R. L. Rogers, and B. S. Chissom. 1975. “ Derivation of New Readability Formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count, and Flesch Reading Ease Formula) for Navy Enlisted Personnel.” Research Branch Report 8–75. Chief of Naval Technical Training: Naval Air Station Memphis.
   Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. P., ed. 2000. Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. P., and M. E. Poehner. 2004. “Dynamic Assessment: Bringing the Past into the Future.” Journal of Applied Linguistics 1: 49–72. doi: 10.1558/japl.1.1.49.55872
   Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. P., and M. E. Poehner. 2011. “Dynamic Assessment in the Classroom: Vygotskian Praxis for Second Language Development.” Language Teaching Research 15 (11): 11–33. doi: 10.1177/1362168810383328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. P., and S. L. Thorne. 2006. Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second Language Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maki, R. H. 1998. “Test Predictions over Text Material.” In Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice, edited by Douglas J. Hacker, John Dunlosky, and Arthur C. Graesser, 117–144. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S. 2007. Reading Comprehension Strategies: Theory, Interventions, and Technologies. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Peña, E. D., and R. B. Gillam. 2000. “Dynamic Assessment of Children Referred for Speech and Language Evaluations.” In Dynamic Assessment: Prevailing Models and Applications, edited by Carol s. Lidz and Joe Elliott, 543–576. Amsterdam: JAI/Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Petrovsky, A. V. 1985. Studies in Psychology: The Collective and the Individual. Moscow: Progress.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, D. 2001. Longman Complete Course for the TOEFL Test: Preparation for the Computer and Paper Tests. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Poehner, M. E. 2005. “Dynamic Assessment of Oral Proficiency among Advanced L2 Learners of French.” Unpublished doctoral diss., The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Poehner, M. E. 2008. Dynamic Assessment: A Vygotskian Approach to Understanding and Promoting Second Language Development. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Poehner, M. E. 2009. “Group Dynamic Assessment: Mediation for the L2 Classroom.” TESOL Quarterly 43 (3): 471–491. doi: 10.1002/j.1545-7249.2009.tb00245.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poehner, M. E., and J. P. Lantolf. 2003. “ Dynamic Assessment of L2 Development: Bringing the Past into future.” CALPER Working Papers Series, No. 1, Center for Advanced Language Proficiency Education and Research, University Park: The Pennsylvania State University.
   Google Scholar
• Poehner, M. E., and J. P. Lantolf. 2005. “Dynamic Assessment in the Language Classroom.” Language Teaching Research 9 (3): 233–265. doi: 10.1191/1362168805lr166oa
   Google Scholar
• Ravitch, D. 2010. The Death and Life of the Great American School System: How Testing and Choice are Undermining Education. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Shabani, K. 2012. “Dynamic Assessment of L2 Learners’ Reading Comprehension Processes: A Vygotskian Perspective.” Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 32: 321–328. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.01.047
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., and E. L. Grigorenko. 2002. Dynamic Testing. The Nature and Measurement of Learning Potential. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tzuriel, D. 2001. Dynamic Assessment of Young Children. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Tzuriel, D., and A. Shamir. 2002. “The Effects of Mediation in Computer Assisted Dynamic Assessment.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 18: 21–32. doi: 10.1046/j.0266-4909.2001.00204.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Edited by M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, and E. Souberman. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1998. “The Problem of age.” In The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky, edited by Robert W. Rieber, 187–205, Child Psychology, Vol. 5. New York: Plenum.
   Google Scholar