‘Speaking French alive’: learner perspectives on their motivation in Content and Language Integrated Learning in England

References

• Bassey, M. 1999. Case Study Research in Educational Settings. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, D. 2004. “A New Paradigm for Modern Foreign Languages?” Language World Newsletter, Winter.
   Google Scholar
• Bower, Kim. 2006. “An Analysis of Pupils’ and Teachers’ Views on the Use of ‘Immersion’ Techniques in the Teaching of Modern Foreign Languages at One Secondary School.“ (Unpublished Masters dissertation), The University of Hull..
   Google Scholar
• Bower, Kim. 2014. To What Extent Does Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) as a Language-based Project Approach Promote Pupil Motivation in the Teaching of MFL in Three Secondary Schools in England? Hull: The University of Hull.
   Google Scholar
• British Educational Research Council. 2011. Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research, BERA (ed.). London: BERA.
   Google Scholar
• Cenoz, J., F. Genesee, and D. Gorter. 2014. “Critical Analysis of CLIL: Taking Stock and Looking Forward.” Applied Linguistics 35 (3): 243–262. doi:10.1093/applin/amt011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, G. 1999. Motivating Learners. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. A., A. Galaczi, and L. Astruc. 2007. “Motivation of UK School Pupils Towards Foreign Languages: A Large-scale Survey at Key Stage 3.” Language Learning Journal 35 (2): 245–281. doi:10.1080/09571730701599252.
   Google Scholar
• Commission of the European Communities. 2003. Promoting Language Learning and Linguistic Diversity: An Action Plan 2004-2006. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Coyle, D. 2000. “Meeting the Challenge: Developing the 3Cs Curriculum.” In New Perspectives on Teaching and Learning Modern Languages, edited by S. Green, 158–182. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters: Modern Languages in Practice.
   Google Scholar
• Coyle, D. 2002. “Against All Odds: Lessons from Content and Language Integrated Learning in English Secondary Schools.” In Education and Society in Plurilingual Contexts, edited by D. W. C. So and G. M. Jones, 37–55. Brussels: VUB Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coyle, D. 2011. ITALIC Research Report Investigating Student Gains: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Edinburgh: University of Aberdeen, Esmée Fairbairn Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Coyle, D. 2013. “Listening to Learners: An Investigation into ‘Successful Learning’ Across CLIL Contexts.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 16 (3): 244–266. doi:10.1080/13670050.2013.777384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyle, D., P. Hood, and D. Marsh. 2010. Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, R. 2014. “Defining Content and Language Integrated Learning for Languages Education in Australia.” Babel 49 (2): 4-15.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, R., and M. Gearon. 2013. Research and Evaluation of the Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Approach to Teaching and Learning in Victorian Schools. Melbourne: Melbourne Graduate School of Education, The University of Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• De Courcy, M. 2002. Learners’ Experiences of Immersion Education. Case Studies of French and Chinese. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Dearing, R., and L. King. 2007. The Languages Review. London: DfES.
   Google Scholar
• Dooly, M. 2008. “Content and Language Integrated Learning: Introduction.” In “How We’re Going About It.” Teachers’ Voices on Innovative Approaches to Teaching and Learning Languages, edited by D. E. M. Dooly, 104–108. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z. 1994. “Motivation and Motivating in the Foreign Language Classroom.” The Modern Language Journal 78 (3): 273–284. doi:10.2307/330107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z. 2005. The Psychology of the Language Learner: Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition. London: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z., and I. Ottó. 1998. “Motivation in Action: A Process Model of L2 Motivation.” Working Papers in Applied Linguisitics (Thames Valley University, London) 4: 43–69.
   Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z., and E. Ushioda. 2011. Teaching and Researching Motivation. Harlow: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Eurydice. 2006a. Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) at Schools in Europe, England, Wales and Northern Ireland, National Description 2004/2005. Slough: Eurydice at NFER.
   Google Scholar
• Eurydice. 2006b. Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) at School in Europe. Belgium: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, M. 2007. “The Languages Review in England: Foreign Language Planning in the Absence of an Overarching Policy.” Language Learning Journal. 35 (2): 301–303. doi: 10.1080/09571730701605190
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, R. C. 1985. Social Psychology and Second Language Learning: The Role of Attitudes and Motivation. Baltimore, MD: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, R. C. 2007. “Motivation and Second Language Acquisition.” Porta Linguarum (8): 9–20.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins. 1987. Modern Languages in the Curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holobow, N. E., F. Genesee, W. E. Lambert, J. Gastright, and M. Met. 1987. “Effectiveness of Partial French Immersion for Children from Different Social Class and Ethnic Backgrounds.” Applied Psycholinguistics 8: 137–152. doi: 10.1017/S0142716400000175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvinen, H. M. 2007. “Language in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL).” In Diverse Contexts-converging Goals: CLIL in Europe, edited by D. Marsh, and D. Wolff, 253–260. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, B. 2005. Boosting Boys’ Motivation in MFL. London: CILT.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, B., and G. Jones. 2001. Boys’ Performance in Modern Foreign Languages. Listening to learners. London: CILT.
   Google Scholar
• Lasagabaster, D. 2011. “English Achievement and Student Motivation in CLIL and EFL Settings.” Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 5 (1): 3–18. doi: 10.1080/17501229.2010.519030
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J., D. Buckland, and G. Shaw. 1998. The Invisible Child. London: CILT.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenzo, F., S. Casal, and P. Moore. 2010. “The Effects of Content and Language Integrated Learning in European Education: Key Findings from the Andalusian Bilingual Sections Evaluation Project.” Applied Linguistics 31 (3): 418–442. doi:10.1093/applin/amp041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macaro, E. 2008. “The Decline in Language Learning in England: Getting the Facts Right and Getting Real.” Language Learning Journal 36 (1): 101–108. doi: 10.1080/09571730801988595
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, D. 2000. “Using Languages to Learn and Learning to Use Languages.” In Using Languages to Learn and Learning to Use Languages, edited by D. Marsh and G. Langé, 1–14. Jyväskylä: TIE-CLIL.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, D. 2008. “Language Awareness and CLIL.” In Encyclopedia of Language and Education, Vol. 6. Knowledge about Language, edited by J. Cenoz, and N. Hornberger, 233–246. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Met, M. 1998. “Curriculum Decision-making in Content-based Language Teaching.” In Beyond Bilingualism: Multilingualism and Multilingual Education, edited by J. Cenoz and F. Genesee, 35–63. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Cañado, M. L. 2012. “CLIL Research in Europe: Past, Present, and Future.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 15 (3): 315–341. doi: 10.1080/13670050.2011.630064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. 2008. “CLIL and Foreign Language Learning: A Longitudinal Study in the Basque Country.” International Journal of CLIL Research 1: 60–73.
   Google Scholar
• Seikkula-Leino, J. 2007. “CLIL Learning: Achievement Levels and Affective Factors.” Language and Education 21 (4): 328–341. doi: 10.2167/le635.0
   Google Scholar
• Stork, D. 1998. Raising the Attainment of Boys in Modern Foreign Languages, Report from the Development group. Beverley: East Riding of Yorkshire County Council.
   Google Scholar
• Sugita, M., and O. Takeuchi. 2010. “What Can Teachers Do to Motivate Their Students? A Classroom Research on Motivational Strategy use in the Japanese EFL Context.” Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 4 (1): 21–35. doi: 10.1080/17501220802450470
   Google Scholar
• Tinsley, T., and K. Board. 2013. Language Learning in Primary and Secondary Schools in England. Findings from the 2012 Language Trends Survey. Reading: CfBT, ALL, ISMLA.
   Google Scholar
• Tinsley, T., and K. Board. 2015. Language Trends 2014/15. The State of Language Learning In Primary and Secondary Schools in England. Reading: CfBT.
   Google Scholar
• Wiesemes, R. 2005. The Final Report for the Content and Language Integrated Project. London: CILT.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M., and R. L. Burden. 1997. Psychology for Language Teachers: A Social Constructivist Approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M., R. Burden, and U. Lanvers. 2002. “‘French Is the Language of Love and Stuff’: Student Perceptions of Issues Related to Motivation in Learning a Foreign Language.” British Educational Research Journal 28 (4): 503–528. doi:10.1080/0141192022000005805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, M., R. Burden, G. Poulet, and I. Maun. 2004. “Learners’ Perceptions of Their Success and Failures in Foreign Language Learning.” The Language Learning Journal 30: 19–29. doi:10.1080/09571730485200191.
   Google Scholar