The 10Cs of project-based learning TESOL curriculum

References

• Beckett, Gulbahar H., and Tammy Slater. 2005. “The Project Framework: A Tool for Language, Content, and Skills Integration.” ELT Journal 59 (2): 108–16. doi: 10.1093/eltj/cci024
   Google Scholar
• Bender, William N. 2012. Project-based Learning: Differentiating Instruction for the 21st Century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• BIE. 2017. “Buck Institute of Education: Why Project-based Learning.” http://www.bie.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley-Levine, Jill, Beth Berghoff, Joy Seybold, Rachel Sever, Susan Blackwell, and Azure Smiley. 2010. “What Teachers and Administrators “Need to Know” About Project-Based Learning Implementation.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American educational research association, Denver, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, D., and T. McGraw. 2001. “Students as Curators.” In Student art Exhibitions: New Ideas and Approaches, edited by B. and R. Dalton Zuk, 28–32. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Chamot, Anna Uhl, and J. Michael O'Malley. 1996. “The Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach: A Model for Linguistically Diverse Classrooms.” The Elementary School Journal 96(3): 259–273. doi: 10.1086/461827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings, Carol Bradford. 2000. Winning Strategies for Classroom Management. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, Katherine M., and Diane B. Jaquith. 2015. Engaging Learners Through Artmaking: Choice-Based art Education in the Classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edutopia. 2008. “Why Teach with Project Learning?: Providing Students With a Well-Rounded Classroom Experience.” Edutopia, George Lucas Educational Foundation. https://www.edutopia.org/project-learning-introduction
   Google Scholar
• Gladwell, Malcolm. 2008. Outliers: The Story of Success. London, UK: Hachette UK.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, M. 2009. “Understanding Projects in Projectbased Learning: A Student’s Perspective.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American educational research association, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Hertzog, Nancy B. 2007. “Transporting Pedagogy: Implementing the Project Approach in two First-Grade Classrooms.” Journal of Advanced Academics 18 (4): 530–64. doi: 10.4219/jaa-2007-559
   Google Scholar
• Hetland, Lois, Ellen Winner, Shirley Veenema, and Kimberly M. Sheridan. 2007. Studio Thinking: The Real Benefits of Visual Arts Education. New York, NY: Teachers College, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Hmelo-Silver, Cindy E. 2004. “Problem-based Learning: What and how do Students Learn?” Educational Psychology Review 16 (3): 235–66. doi: 10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtzberg, Terri R., and Teresa M. Amabile. 2001. “From Guilford to Creative Synergy: Opening the Black box of Team-Level Creativity.” Creativity Research Journal 13 (3-4): 285–94. doi: 10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Jean S, Sue Blackwell, Jennifer Drake, and Kathryn A Moran. 2014. “Taking a Leap of Faith: Redefining Teaching and Learning in Higher Education Through Project-Based Learning.” Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning 8 (2): 2. doi: 10.7771/1541-5015.1426
   Google Scholar
• Markham, T., J. Larmer, and J. Ravitz. 2008. “Project Based Learning HandBook–A Guide to Standards-focused Project based learning, BIE-Buck Institute for Education.” In.
   Google Scholar
• Nemeth, Charlan J., Bernard Personnaz, Marie Personnaz, and Jack A. Goncalo. 2004. “The Liberating Role of Conflict in Group Creativity: A Study in two Countries.” European Journal of Social Psychology 34 (4): 365–74. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, Ronald J. 2003. Passion for Learning: How Project-Based Learning Meets the Needs of 21st-Century Students. Vol. 3. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Oxford, Rebecca. 2002. “Language learning strategies in a nutshell: Update and ESL suggestions.” In Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice, edited by Jack C. Richards and Willy A. Renandya, 124–132. New York, United States: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Papert, Seymour, and Idit Harel. 1991. “Situating Constructionism.” In Constructionism: Research Reports and Essays, 1985–1990, 1–11. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Ravitz, Jason. 2009. “Introduction: Summarizing Findings and Looking Ahead to a new Generation of PBL Research.” Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning 3 (1): 2. doi: 10.7771/1541-5015.1088
   Google Scholar
• Redmond, Matthew R., Michael D. Mumford, and Richard Teach. 1993. “Putting Creativity to Work: Effects of Leader Behavior on Subordinate Creativity.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 55 (1): 120–51. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1993.1027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, Ken, and Lou Aronica. 2015. Creative Schools: Revolutionizing Education from the Ground up. London, UK: Penguin UK.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlberg, Pasi. 2009. “The Role of Education in Promoting Creativity: Potential Barriers and Enabling Factors.” In Measuring Creativity: Can Creativity be Measured?, edited by Ernesto Villalba, 337–44. Luxemburg, LU: OPOCE.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, Keith. 2013. Zig Zag: the Surprising Path to Greater Creativity. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, Leigh. 2013. Creative Conspiracy: The new Rules of Breakthrough Collaboration. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, Brian. 2012. “Materials Development for Language Learning and Teaching.” Language Teaching 45 (02): 143–79. doi: 10.1017/S0261444811000528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsiplakides, Iakovos, and Iosif Fragoulis. 2009. “Project-based Learning in the Teaching of English as a Foreign Language in Greek Primary Schools: From Theory to Practice.” English Language Teaching 2 (3): 113. doi: 10.5539/elt.v2n3p113
   Google Scholar