Higher-proficiency students’ engagement with and uptake of teacher and Grammarly feedback in an EFL writing course

References

• Bonilla Lopez, M., E. Van Steendam, and K. Buyse. 2017. “Comprehensive Corrective Feedback on low and High Proficiency Writers: Examining Attitudes and Preferences.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 168 (1): 91–128. doi:10.1075/itl.168.1.04bon.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C. F. E., and W. Y. E. Cheng. 2008. “Beyond the Design of Automated Writing Evaluation: Pedagogical Practices and Perceived Learning Effectiveness in EFL Writing Classes.” Language Learning and Technology 12 (2): 94–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, X., and Y. Liu. 2022. “Student Engagement with Teacher Written Feedback: Insights from low-Proficiency and High-Proficiency L2 Learners.” System 109: 102880. doi:10.1016/j.system.2022.102880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. 2018. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Dikli, S., and S. Bleyle. 2014. “Automated Essay Scoring Feedback for Second Language Writers: How Does it Compare to Instructor Feedback?” Assessing Writing 22: 1–17. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dressler, R., M. W. Chu, K. Crossman, and B. Hilman. 2019. “Quantity and Quality of Uptake: Examining Surface and Meaning-Level Feedback Provided by Peers and an Instructor in a Graduate Research Course.” Assessing Writing 39: 14–24. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2018.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. 2010. “EPILOGUE: A Framework for Investigating Oral and Written Corrective Feedback.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32: 335–349. doi:10.1017/S0272263109990544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ene, E., and T. A. Upton. 2014. “Learner Uptake of Teacher Electronic Feedback in ESL Composition.” System 46 (1): 80–95. doi:10.1016/j.system.2014.07.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faigley, L., and S. Witte. 1981. “Analyzing Revision.” College Composition and Communication 32 (4): 400–414.
   Google Scholar
• Ferris, D. 2006. “Does Error Feedback Help Student Writers? New Evidence on the Short- and Long-Term Effects of Written Error Correction.” In Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues, edited by K. Hyland, and F. Hyland, 81–104. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1201/9781420037593.ch26.
   Google Scholar
• Ferris, D. R., S. Pezone, C. R. Tade, and S. Tinti. 1997. “Teacher Commentary on Student Writing: Descriptions & Implications.” Journal of Second Language Writing 6 (2): 155–182. doi:10.1016/S1060-3743(97)90032-1.
   Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J. A., P. C. Blumenfeld, and A. H. Paris. 2004. “School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence.” Review of Educational Research 74 (1): 59–109. doi:10.3102/00346543074001059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, Y. 2017. “Mediating and Being Mediated: Learner Beliefs and Learner Engagement with Written Corrective Feedback.” System 69: 133–142. doi:10.1016/j.system.2017.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, Y., and F. Hyland. 2015. “Exploring Learner Engagement with Written Corrective Feedback in a Chinese Tertiary EFL Classroom.” Journal of Second Language Writing 30: 31–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, Y., and Y. Xu. 2019. “Student Feedback Literacy and Engagement with Feedback: A Case Study of Chinese Undergraduate Students.” Teaching in Higher Education 26 (2): 181–196. doi:10.1080/13562517.2019.1648410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karim, K., and H. Nassaji. 2018. “The Revision and Transfer Effects of Direct and Indirect Comprehensive Corrective Feedback on ESL Students ‘ Writing.” Language Teaching Research, 1–21. doi:10.1177/1362168818802469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koltovskaia, S. 2020. “Student Engagement with Automated Written Corrective Feedback (AWCF) Provided by Grammarly: A Multiple Case Study.” Assessing Writing 44: 100450. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, I. 2009. “Ten Mismatches Between Teachers’ Beliefs and Written Feedback Practice.” ELT Journal 63 (1): 13–22. doi:10.1093/elt/ccn010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., C. A. Wolters, and G. P. Baxter. 2000. “Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulated Learning.” In Issues in the Measurement of Metacognition, edited by G. Schraw, and J. C. Impara, 43–97. Buros Institute of Mental Measurements. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/burosmetacognition/3.
   Google Scholar
• Ranalli, J. 2021. “L2 Student Engagement with Automated Feedback on Writing: Potential for Learning and Issues of Trust.” Journal of Second Language Writing 52: 100816. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, R., and S. W. Chong. 2022. “Learner Engagement with Written Corrective Feedback in ESL and EFL Contexts: A Qualitative Research Synthesis Using a Perception-Based Framework.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 0 (0): 1–15. doi:10.1080/02602938.2022.2072468.
   Google Scholar
• Shi, Y. 2021. “Exploring Learner Engagement with Multiple Sources of Feedback on L2 Writing Across Genres.” Frontiers in Psychology 12. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.758867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thi, N. K., and M. Nikolov. 2021. “How Teacher and Grammarly Feedback Complement one Another in Myanmar EFL Students’ Writing.” The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, doi:10.1007/s40299-021-00625-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, L., and Y. Zhou. 2020. “Learner Engagement with Automated Feedback, Peer Feedback and Teacher Feedback in an Online EFL Writing Context.” System 91: 102247. doi:10.1016/j.system.2020.102247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truscott, J., and A. Y. ping Hsu. 2008. “Error Correction, Revision, and Learning.” Journal of Second Language Writing 17 (4): 292–305. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2008.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winstone, N. E., R. A. Nash, J. Rowntree, and M. Parker. 2017. ““It’d be Useful, but I Wouldn’t use it”: Barriers to University Students’ Feedback Seeking and Recipience.” Studies in Higher Education 42 (11): 2026–2041. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1130032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, M., R. Badger, and Z. Yu. 2006. “A Comparative Study of Peer and Teacher Feedback in a Chinese EFL Writing Class.” Journal of Second Language Writing 15 (3): 179–200. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi, B., and C. Ni. 2015. “Planning and Working Memory Effects on L2 Performance in Chinese EFL Learners’ Argumentative Writing.” Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics 5 (1): 43–51. doi:10.17509/ijal.v5i1.830.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, S., N. Zhou, Y. Zheng, L. Zhang, H. Cao, and X. Li. 2019. “Evaluating Student Motivation and Engagement in the Chinese EFL Writing Context.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 62 (19): 129–141. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.06.002.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z. (Victor). 2020. “Engaging with Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) Feedback on L2 Writing: Student Perceptions and Revisions.” Assessing Writing 43: 100439. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2019.100439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z. (Victor), and K. Hyland. 2018. “Student Engagement with Teacher and Automated Feedback on L2 Writing.” Assessing Writing 36: 90–102. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2018.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, Y., and S. Yu. 2018. “Student Engagement with Teacher Written Corrective Feedback in EFL Writing: A Case Study of Chinese Lower-Proficiency Students.” Assessing Writing 37: 13–24. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2018.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar