Shameful interest in educational research

References

• Ahmed, S. (2004). The cultural politics of emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. (2017). Living a feminist life. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amsler, S. (2011). From ‘therapeutic’ to political education: The centrality of affective sensibility in critical pedagogy. Critical Studies in Education, 52:(1), 47–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, P. (1990). The ethnographic imagination: Textual constructions of reality. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs, 28(3), 801–831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2010). Quantum entanglements and hauntological relations of inheritance: Dis/continuities, spacetime enfoldings, and justice-to-come. Derrida Today, 3(2), 240–268.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2012). On touching – The inhuman that therefore I am. Differences, 25(5), 206–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benade, L. (2015). Shame: Does it have a place in an education for democratic citizenship? Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(7), 661–674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackman, L. (2007). Researching affect and embodied hauntologies: Exploring an analytics of experimentation. In B. T. Knudsen & C. Stage (eds), Affective methodologies. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Boler, M., & Zembylas, M. (2003). Discomforting truths: The emotional terrain of understanding difference. In P. P. Trifonas (Ed.), Pedagogies of difference: Rethinking education for social change (pp. 110–136). New York & London: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Boler, M. (2015). Feminist politics of emotions and critical digital pedagogies: A call to action. PMLA, 130, 1489–1496.
   Google Scholar
• Brøgger, K., & Staunæs, D. (2016). Standards and (self)implosion: How the circulation of affects accelerates the spread of standards and intensifies the embodiment of colliding, temporal ontologies. Theory & Psychology, 26(2), 223–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, L. R. (2011). The ethics of the event: Deleuze and ethics without ‘ApXƞ’. In N. Jun & D. W. Smith (Eds.), Deleuze and ethics (pp. 21–43). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cammarota, J., & Fine, M. (Eds.). (2008). Youth participatory action research in motion. New York and Oxon, UK: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Ellsworth, E. (1989). Why doesn’t this feel empowering? Working through the repressive myths of critical pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 59(3), 297–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossberg, L. (2010). Affect’s future: Rediscovering the virtual in the actual. In M. Gregg & G. J. Seigworth (Eds.), The affect theory reader (pp. 309–338). Durham & London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grosz, E. (2017). The incorporeal: Ontology, ethics, and the limits of materialism. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1992). The promises of monsters: A regenerative politics for inappropriate/d others. In L. Grossberg, C. Nelsen, & P. Treichler (Eds.), Cultural studies (pp. 295-337). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hickey-Moody, A. (2013). Affect as method: Feelings, aesthetics and affective pedagogy. In R. Coleman & J. Ringrose (Eds.), Deleuze and research methodologies (pp. 79-95). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hultman, K., & Lenz Taguchi, H. (2010). Challenging anthropocentric analysis of visual data: A relational materialist methodological approach to educational research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23(5), 525–542.
   Google Scholar
• Lenz Taguchi, H. (2013). Images of thinking in feminist materialisms: Ontological divergences and the production of researcher subjectivities. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 706–716.
   Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. (2015). The politics of affect. Cambridge, UK & Malden, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayes, E. (2016a). The Lines of the Voice: An Ethnography of the Ambivalent Affects of Student Voice. ( Unpublished PhD thesis), University of Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Mayes, E. (2016b). Shifting research methods with a becoming-child ontology: Co-theorising puppet production with high school students. Childhood, 23(1), 105–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayes, E. (2018). Student voice in an age of ‘security’? Critical Studies in Education, 1–18. doi:10.1080/17508487.2018.1455721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzei, L. A., & Jackson, A. Y. (2012). Complicating voice in a refusal to ‘let participants speak for themselves’. Qualitative Inquiry, 18(9), 745–751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Health and Medical Research Council, Australian Research Council, & Australian Vice -Chancellors’ Committee. (2015). National statement on ethical conduct in human research 2007 (updated may 2015). Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. Retrieved from www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines/publications/e72
   Google Scholar
• Niccolini, A. D., & Pindyck, M. (2015). Classroom acts: New materialisms and haptic encounters in an urban classroom. Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology, 6(2), 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Probyn, E. (2004). Blush: Faces of shame. Sydney: University of NSW Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, M. (2014) ‘Affecting affiliations: Queer relationality and the boy in the dress’. Methodological Affects: Considering Research Emotion in Qualitative Research. Symposium - American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Renold, E. (2018). ‘Feel what I feel’: Making da(r)ta with teen girls for creative activisms on how sexual violence matters. Journal of Gender Studies, 27(1), 37–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedgwick, E. K. (2009). Shame, Theatricality, and Queer Performativity: Henry James’s The Art of the Novel. In D. M. Halperin & V. Traub (Eds.), Gay Shame (pp. 49-62). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Sedgwick, E. K., & Frank, A. (1995). Shame in the cybernetic fold: Reading Silvan Tomkins. Critical Inquiry, 21(2), 496–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seigworth, G. J., & Gregg, M. (2010). An inventory of shimmers. In M. Gregg & G. J. Seigworth (Eds.), The affect theory reader (pp. 1–25). Durham & London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shaviro, S. (2009). Without criteria : Kant, Whitehead, Deleuze, and aesthetics. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skattebol, J., & Hayes, D. (2016). Cracking with affect: Relationality in young people’s movements in and out of mainstream schooling. Critical Studies in Education, 57(1), 6–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, E. A. (2017). Writing post qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 107780041773456. doi:10.1177/1077800417734567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stearns, P. N., & Stearns, C. (2017). American schools and the uses of shame: An ambiguous history. History of Education, 46(1), 58–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenberg, S. J. (2018). “Tweet me your first assaults”: Writing shame and the rhetorical work of #NotOkay. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 48(2), 119–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiele, K. (2016). Quantum physics and/as philosophy: Immanence, diffraction, and the ethics of mattering. Rhizomes, 30. doi:10.20415/rhiz/030.e04
   Google Scholar
• Tomkins, S. (1995a). Exploring affect: The selected writings of Silvan S. Tomkins. (E. V. (Demos, Editor). Cambridge, New York, Melbourne & Paris: Cambridge University Press & Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.
   Google Scholar
• Tomkins, S. (1995b). Shame and its sisters: A Silvan Tomkins reader. (E. K. Sedgwick & A. Frank, Editors). Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Werry, M., & O’Gorman, R. (2007). Shamefaced: Performing pedagogy, outing affect. Text and Performance Quarterly, 27(3), 213–230.
   Google Scholar
• Wetherell, M. (2012). Affect and emotion: A new social science understanding. Los Angeles; London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, M. J. (2017a). Post-qualitative filmic research in education. Qualitative Inquiry, 1077800416673660. doi:10.1177/1077800416673660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, M. J. (2017b). Refracting schoolgirls: Pedagogical intra-actions producing shame. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. doi:10.1080/01596306.2016.1143451
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M. (2013). Critical pedagogy and emotion: Working through ‘troubled knowledge’ in posttraumatic contexts. Critical Studies in Education, 54(2), 176–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar