1,797
Views
29
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Governing by visual shapes: university rankings, digital education platforms and cosmologies of higher education

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 17-33 | Received 11 Jul 2019, Accepted 21 Jan 2020, Published online: 21 Feb 2020

References

  • Agre, P. E. (1994). Surveillance and capture. Two models of privacy. Information Society, 10(2), 101–127.
  • Amsler, S. S., & Bolsmann, C. (2012). University ranking as social exclusion. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 33(2), 283–301.
  • Baty, P. (2012). U-multirank may be a waste of taxpayers’ money. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/news/u-multirank-may-be-a-waste-of-taxpayers-money
  • Bourdin, M. J. (2008). Rapport d’information fait au nom de le délégation du Sénat pour la Planification sur le défi des classements dans l’enseignement supérieur. Paris: Sénat Session extraordinaire de 2007-2008.
  • Bratton, B. (2015). The stack: On software and sovereignty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Brink, C. (2018). The soul of a university. Why excellence is not enough. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
  • Callon, M. (1984). Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of st brieuc bay. The Sociological Review, 32(1_suppl), 196–233.
  • Carvalho, L. M. 2014. The Attraction of Mutual Surveillance of Performances: PISA as a Knowledge-policy Instrument. In T. Fenwick, E. Mangez, and J. Ozga (Eds.), Governing Knowledge: Comparison, Knowledge-based Technologies and Expertise in the Regulation of Education (pp. 58–72). London: Routledge.
  • Chang, E. (2019). Beyond workforce preparation: Contested visions of ‘twenty-first century’ education reform. Discourse, 40(1), 29–45.
  • Coimbra Group (2016). U-Multirank today: position paper of the coimbra group. Retrieved from http://www.coimbra-group.eu/wp-content/uploads/U-Multirank-today-Position-Paper-1.pdf
  • Collyer, F. (2013). The production of scholarly knowledge in the global market arena: University ranking systems, prestige and power. Critical Studies in Education, 54(3), 245–259.
  • Commission, E. (2007). Modernising universities. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=LEGISSUM:c11089
  • Decuypere, M. (2016). Diagrams of Europeanization: European Education Governance in the Digital Age. Journal of Education Policy, 31(6), 851–872. doi:10.1080/02680939.2016.1212099
  • Decuypere, M. (2019a). STS in/as education: where do we stand and what is there still to gain? Some outlines for a future research agenda. Discourse: Studies in The Cultural Politics of Education, 40(1), 136–145. doi:10.1080/01596306.2018.1549709
  • Decuypere, M. (2019b). Open Education platforms: Theoretical ideas, digital operations and the figure of the open learner. European Educational Research Journal, 18(4),439–460. doi:10.1177/1474904118814141.
  • Decuypere, M. (2019c). Researching educational apps: ecologies, technologies, subjectivities and learning regimes. Learning, Media and Technolgy, 44(4), 414–429. doi:10.1080/17439884.2019.1667824
  • Decuypere, M, & Simons, M. (2016). Relational thinking in education: topology, sociomaterial studies and figures. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 24(3), 371–386. doi:10.1080/14681366.2016.1166150
  • Decuypere, M, & Simons, M. (2019). Continuing attachments in academic work in neoliberal times: On the academic mode of existence. Critical Studies in Education, 60(2), 226–244. doi:10.1080/17508487.2016.1240095
  • Decuypere, M, Simons, M, & Masschelein, J. (2011). “perform, measure accurately, optimise”: on the constitution of (evidence-based) education policy. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 21(2), 115–135. doi:10.1080/09620214.2011.575101
  • Denzin, N. K., & Giardina, M. D. (2017). Qualitative inquiry in neoliberal times. In N. K. Denzin & M. D. Giardina (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry in neoliberal times, 1–16. New York: Routledge.
  • EPRS. (2013). University ranking and U-multirank. Retrieved from https://epthinktank.eu/2013/10/08/university-ranking-and-u-multirank/
  • European Commission. (2011). Supporting growth and jobs – An agenda for the modernisation of Europe’s higher education systems. Luxemburg: COM (2011) 567 final.
  • Fourcade, M. (2016). Ordinalization: Lewis A. Coser Memorial Award for Theoretical Agenda Setting 2014. Sociological Theory, 34(3), 175–195.
  • Fuller, M. (2008). Software Studies: A Lexicon. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Gillespie, T. (2015, April-June). Platforms intervene. Social Media and Society, 1–2. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/20563051155804
  • Gorwa, R. (2019). What is platform governance? Information Communication and Society, 22(6), 854–871.
  • Grove, J. (2013). Leru pulls out of eu’s u-multirank scheme. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/leru-pulls-out-of-eus-u-multirank-scheme/2001361.article
  • Gulson, K. N., & Sellar, S. (2019). Emerging data infrastructures and the new topologies of education policy. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 37(2), 350–366.
  • Hartong, S. (2016). Between assessments, digital technologies and big data: The growing influence of ‘hidden’ data mediators in education. European Educational Research Journal, 15(5), 523–536.
  • Hazelkorn, E. (2008). Learning to live with league tables and ranking: The experience of institutional leaders. Higher Education Policy, 21(2), 193–215.
  • Jarke, J., & Breiter, A. (2019). Editorial: The datafication of education. Learning, Media and Technology, 44(1), 1–6.
  • Latour, B. (1986). Visualisation and cognition: Drawing things together. Knowledge and Society: Studies in the Sociology of Culture past and Present, 6, 1–40.
  • Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Law, J. (2009). Actor network theory and material semiotics. In B. S. Turner (Ed.), The new Blackwell companion to social theory (pp. 141–158, 3rd ed.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Lawn, M. (2013). The rise of data in education systems: Collection, visualization and use. London: Symposium Books.
  • Lewis, S. (2017). Governing schooling through ‘what works’: the oecd’s pisa for schools. Journal of Education Policy, 32(3), 281–302.
  • Lincoln, Y. S. (2012). The political economy of publication: Marketing, commodification, and qualitative scholarly work. Qualitative Health Research, 22(11), 1451–1459.
  • Lingard, B. (2011). Policy as numbers: Ac/counting for educational research. Australian Educational Researcher, 38, 355–382.
  • Lynch, K. (2015). Control by numbers: New managerialism and ranking in higher education. Critical Studies in Education, 56(2), 190–207.
  • Lynch, M. (1991). Pictures of nothing? Visual Construals in Social Theory, 9(1), 1–21.
  • Marginson, S. (2014). University rankings and social science. European Journal of Education, 49(1), 45–59.
  • Marginson, S., & van der Wende, M. (2007). To rank or to be ranked: The impact of global rankings in higher education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(3/4), 306–329.
  • Marres, N. (2017). Digital sociology. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
  • Marshall, J. (2008). New ranking scheme for universities. Retrieved from https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=2008112015513946&query=university+ranking
  • Mol, A. (2010). Actor-network theory: Sensitive terms and enduring tensions. Kölner Zeitschrift Für Soziologie Und Sozialpsychologie, 50(1), 253–269.
  • Packer, M. J. (2018). The science of qualitative research. Cambridge University Press.
  • Pusser, B., & Marginson, S. (2013). University rankings in critical perspective. The Journal of Higher Education, 84(4), 544–568.
  • Robertson, S. L. (2019). Comparing platforms and the new value economy in the academy. In R. Gorur, S. Sellar and G. Steiner-Khamsi (Eds.), Comparative methodology in the era of big data and global neworks (pp. 169–186). London: Routledge.
  • Ruppert, E., Law, J., & Savage, M. (2013). Reassembling social science methods: The challenge of digital devices. Theory, Culture & Society, 30(4), 22–46.
  • Sauder, M., & Espeland, W. N. (2009). The discipline of rankings: Tight coupling and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 74, 63–82.
  • Shin, J. C., & Toutkoushian, R. K. (2011). The past, present, and future of university rankings. In J. C. Shin, R. K. Toutkoushian, U. Teichler (Eds.), University rankings (pp. 1–16). Cham: Springer.
  • Shore, C., & Wright, S. (2015). Governing by numbers: Audit culture, rankings and the new world order. Social Anthropology, 23(1), 22–28.
  • Simons, M. (2014). Governing education without reform: The power of the example. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(5), 712–731.
  • Souto-Otero, M., & Beneito-Montagut, R. (2016). From governing through data to governmentality through data: Artefacts, strategies and the digital turn. European Educational Research Journal, 15(1), 14–33.
  • Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform capitalism. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
  • Sundström Sjöding, E. (2019). Where is the critical in literacy? Örebro University (Unpublished dissertation).
  • Thompson, G., & Sellar, S. (2018). Datafication. Testing Events and The outside Of Thought. Learning, Media and Technology, 43(2), 139–151.
  • U-Multirank. (2018). Frequently asked questions (FAQ). Retrieved from https://www.umultirank.org/export/sites/default/press-media/documents/FAQ_U-Multirank_2018.pdf
  • U-Multirank. (2019). U-Multirank 2019: Belgian universities in global comparison. Retrieved from https://www.umultirank.org/export/sites/default/press-media/documents/UMR-Proposal/Country-Reports-2019/BE-Country-report-2019.pdf
  • van de Oudeweetering, K., & Decuypere, M. (2019). Understanding openness through (in)visible platform boundaries: a topological study on MOOCs as multiplexes of spaces and times. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, Art.no. 28. doi:10.1186/s41239-019-0154-1
  • Van Dijck, J., Thomas P., & Martijn De Waal et al. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • van Vught, F. A., Kaiser, F., File, J. M., Gaethgens, C., Peter, R., Westerheijden, D. F. (2010). The European classification of higher education institutions. The Netherlands: Enschede.
  • van Vught, F. A., & Ziegele, F. (2011). Design and testing the feasibility of a multidimensional global university ranking. Retrieved from https://www.eurashe.eu/library/quality-he/U-Multirank_Design%20and%20Testing%20the%20Feasibility%20of%20a%20Multidimensional%20Global%20University%20Ranking.pdf 
  • Vassiliou, A. (2013a). Launch of new university ranking. Retrieved from http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-13-77_en.htm
  • Vassiliou, A. (2013b). Opening up higher education to the world and the new university ranking, U-Multirank. Retrieved from http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-13-306_en.htm
  • Webb, P. T., & Gulson, K. N. (2015). Policy scientificity 3.0: Theory and policy analysis in-and-for this world and other-worlds. Critical Studies in Education, 56(1), 161–174.
  • Williamson, B. (2016). Digital education governance: Data visualization, predictive analytics, and ‘real-time’ policy instruments. Journal of Education Policy, 31(2), 123–141.
  • Woolgar, S. (1990). Configuring the user: the case of usability trials. The Sociological Review, 38(1), 58–99.
  • Woolgar, S., & Lezaun, J. (2013). The wrong bin bag: A turn to ontology in science and technology studies? Social Studies of Science, 43(3), 321–340.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.