Subscribing school: digital platforms, affective attachments, and cruel optimism in a Danish public primary school

References

• Anderson, B. (2009). Affective atmospheres. Emotion, Space and Society, 2(2), 77–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2009.08.005
   Google Scholar
• Balslev, J. (2020). Evidence of a potential: The political arguments for digitizing education 1983-2015 [ PhD Dissertation]. Roskilde University.
   Google Scholar
• Berlant, L. (2007). Cruel optimism: On Marx, loss and the senses. New Formations, 63(1), 33–51. http://www.chineseollie.com/didyouread/Berlant-Cruel-Optimism.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel optimism. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Birch, K., & Muniesa, F. (2020). Introduction: Assetization and technoscientific capitalism. In K. Birch & F. Muniesa (Eds.), Assetization (issue December). MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12075.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Birch, K., Ward, C., & Tretter, E. (2022). Introduction. Competition & Change, 26(3–4), 407–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/10245294221082243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackman, L. (2012). Immaterial bodies: Affect, embodiment, mediation. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Brøgger, K. (2018). The performative power of (non)human agency assemblages of soft governance. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 31(5), 353–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2018.1449985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brøgger, K. (2019). How education standards gain hegemonic power and become international: The case of higher education and the bologna process. European Educational Research Journal, 18(2), 158–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904118790303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucher, T. (2018). If…then: Algorithmic power and politics. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bukht, R., & Heeks, R. (2017, August 3). Defining, conceptualising and measuring the digital economy. Development Informatics Working Paper no. 68. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3431732
   Google Scholar
• Burch, P., & Good, A. G. (2014). Equal scrutiny: Privatization and accountability in digital education. In Harvard education press. Harvard Education Press. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=ED568760&site=ehost-live
   Google Scholar
• Cone, L. (2022). Teachers on the market: Professional relations, desires, and ambiguities in digital teacher-to-teacher economies. Teachers & Teaching: Theory & Practice, 28(6), 742–756. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2022.2098272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cone, L. (2023). The platform classroom: Troubling student configurations in a Danish primary school. Learning, Media and Technology, 48(1), 52–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2021.2010093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cone, L., & Brøgger, K. (2020). Soft privatisation: Mapping an emerging field of European education governance. Globalisation, Societies & Education, 18(4), 374–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2020.1732194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cone, L., & Moos, L. (2022). Introduction: Mapping commercial interests and imaginaries in Nordic education. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 8(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2022.2045164
   Google Scholar
• Danish Ministry of Education. (2010). IT and Media Competences in the Public School [It- Og Mediekompetencer I Folkeskolen] (Issue 5). http://www.faghæfte48.dk/index.php?id=8&lang=dk%5Cnhttp://www.uvm.dk/~/media/Publikationer/2009/Folke/Faelles Maal/Filer/Faghaefter/100325_it_medie_foreloebigt_layout.ashx
   Google Scholar
• Danish Ministry of Education. (2021). Teachers’ use of digital technology in the everyday - a quantitative mapping [lærerens digitale hverdag - kvantitativ kortlægning]. https://www.uvm.dk/-/media/filer/uvm/aktuelt/pdf21/jun/210621-rapporten-laererens-digitale-hverdag.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Danish Ministry of Finance, Local Government Denmark, & Danish regions. (2016). A stronger and more secure digital denmark. Agency for Digitalisation. www.regioner.dk
   Google Scholar
• Danish Teacher Union. (2013). Act 409 – Selected Rules [Lov 409 – Udvalgte Regler]. https://www.dlf.org/media/962619/dlf_Lov409-pdf.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Decuypere, M., Grimaldi, E., & Landri, P. (2021). Introduction: Critical studies of digital education platforms. Critical Studies in Education, 62(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2020.1866050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (1986). Foucault. Éditions de Minuit.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2004). On capitalism and desire. In Lapoujade, D. (Ed.), Desert Islands and other texts: 1953-1974 (pp. 262–273). Semiotext(e).
   Google Scholar
• Dernikos, B. P., Lesko, N., Mccall, S. D., & Niccolini, A. D. (2020). Feeling education. In B. P. D. In, N. Lesko, S. D. Mccall, & A. D. Niccolini (Eds.), Mapping the affective turn in education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003004219
   Google Scholar
• Dijck, J., Van Poell, T., & Waal de, M. (2018). The platform Society. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190889760.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R. (2016). Exploring the impact of digital technologies on professional responsibilities and education. European Educational Research Journal, 15(1), 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904115608387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1983). The subject and power. In H. L. D. P. Rainbow (Ed.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (pp. 208–226). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gorur, R., & Dey, J. (2021). Making the user friendly: The ontological politics of digital data platforms. Critical Studies in Education, 62(1), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2020.1727544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, M., & Komljenovic, J. (2023). Automating learning situations in EdTech: Techno-commercial logic of assetisation. Postdigital Science & Education, 5(1), 100–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-022-00359-4
   Google Scholar
• Hartong, S. (2021). The power of relation-making: Insights into the production and operation of digital school performance platforms in the US. Critical Studies in Education, 62(1), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2020.1749861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickey-Moody, A. (2021). Youth, arts, and education: Reassembling subjectivity through affect. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, A., & Thompson, G. (2017). Commercialization in education. In G. W. Noblit (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of education (pp. 1–21). Oxford University Press. https://oxfordre.com/education/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.001.0001/acrefore-9780190264093-e-180
   Google Scholar
• Illouz, E. (2007). Cold intimacies: The making of emotional capitalism. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, R. F. (2019). Human rights in the age of platforms. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kerssens, N., & van Dijck, J. (2021). The platformization of primary education in the Netherlands. Learning, Media and Technology, 46(3), 250–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2021.1876725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerssens, N., & van Dijck, J. (2022). Governed by Edtech? Valuing pedagogical autonomy in a platform Society. Harvard Educational Review, 92(2). https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-92.2.284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kofoed, J., & Staunæs, D. (2015). Hesitancy as ethics. Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology, 6(1), 24–39. https://doi.org/10.7577/rerm.1559
   Google Scholar
• Komljenovic, J. (2021). The rise of education rentiers: Digital platforms, digital data and rents. Learning, Media and Technology, 46(3), 320–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2021.1891422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, S. S., Andelsman, V., & Flensburg, S. (2023). Datafied school life: The hidden commodification of digital learning. Learning, Media and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2023.2219063
   Google Scholar
• Ljungqvist, M., & Sonesson, A. (2022). Selling out education in the name of digitalization: A critical analysis of Swedish policy. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 8(2), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2021.2004665
   Google Scholar
• Local Government Denmark. (2014). Agreement on the realization of a common user portal for the public school [aftale om konkretisering af det fælles brugerportalinitiativ for folkeskolen]. Local Government Denmark. https://www.kl.dk/media/11596/aftale-om-konkretisering-af-det-faelles-brugerportalsinitiativ.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lundahl, L. (2016). Equality, inclusion and marketization of Nordic education: Introductory notes. Research in Comparative & International Education, 11(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499916631059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macgilchrist, F. (2019). Cruel optimism in edtech: When the digital data practices of educational technology providers inadvertently hinder educational equity. Learning, Media and Technology, 44(1), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2018.1556217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mifsud, L. (2014). Mobile learning and the socio-materiality of classroom practices. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(1), 142–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.817420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moos, L. (2011). Educating Danish school leaders to meet new expectations? School Leadership & Management, 31(2), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2011.560600
   Google Scholar
• Mühlhoff, R., & Slaby, J. (2018). Immersion at work: Affect and power in post-Fordist work cultures. In B. Röttger-Rössler & J. Slaby (Eds.), Affect in relation: Families, places, technologies (pp. 155–174). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ozga, J. (2009). Governing education through data in England: From regulation to self-evaluation. Journal of Education Policy, 24(2), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930902733121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pangrazio, L., Selwyn, N., & Cumbo, B. (2023). A patchwork of platforms: Mapping data infrastructures in schools. Learning, Media and Technology, 48(1), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2022.2035395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pangrazio, L., Stornaiuolo, A., Nichols, T. P., Garcia, A., & Thomas, P. M. (2022). Datafication meets platformization: Materializing data processes in teaching and learning. Harvard Educational Review, 92(2), 257–283. https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-92.2.257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrotta, C., Gulson, K. N., Williamson, B., & Witzenberger, K. (2021). Automation, APIs and the distributed labour of platform pedagogies in Google Classroom. Critical Studies in Education, 62(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2020.1855597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pink, S., Ruckenstein, M., Berg, M., & Lupton, D. (2022). Everyday automation: Setting a research agenda. In S. Pink, M. Berg, D. Lupton, & M. Ruckenstein (Eds.), Everyday automation: Experiencing and anticipating emerging technologies (pp. 1–20). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pittard, E. A. (2017). Gettin’ a little crafty: Teachers pay teachers©, Pinterest© and neo-liberalism in new materialist feminist research. Gender and Education, 29(1), 28–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2016.1197380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plantin, J. C., Lagoze, C., Edwards, P. N., & Sandvig, C. (2018). Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook. New Media and Society, 20(1), 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816661553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratner, H., Andersen, B. L., & Madsen, S. R. (2019). Configuring the teacher as data user: Public-private sector mediations of national test data. Learning, Media and Technology, 44(1), 22–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2018.1556218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratner, H., & Ruppert, E. (2019). Producing and projecting data: Aesthetic practices of government data portals. Big Data & Society, 6(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719853316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read, J. (2006). The age of cynicism: Deleuze and Guattari on the production of subjectivity in capitalism. Deleuze and Politics, 139–159. https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748632879.003.0007
   Google Scholar
• Sadowski, J. (2020a). The internet of landlords: Digital platforms and New mechanisms of rentier capitalism. Antipode, 52(2), 562–580. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadowski, J. (2020b). Too smart: How digital capitalism is extracting data, controlling our lives, and taking over the World. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saltman, K. J. (2016). Scripted bodies. Corporate power, Smart technologies, and the Undoing of public education. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Saltman, K. J. (2020). Artificial intelligence and the technological turn of public education privatization: In defence of democratic education. London Review of Education, 18(2), 196–208. https://doi.org/10.14324/LRE.18.2.04
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedgwick, E. K. (2003). Touching feeling: Affect, pedagogy, performativity. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sellar, S. (2015). A feel for numbers: Affect, data and education policy. Critical Studies in Education, 56(1), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2015.981198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2010). The ‘new’ connectivities of digital education. In M. Apple, S. J. Ball, & L. A. Gandin (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of the sociology of education routledge (pp. 90–98). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203863701.ch8
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2021). The human labour of school data: Exploring the production of digital data in schools. Oxford Review of Education, 47(3), 353–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2020.1835628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2022). ‘Just playing around with Excel and pivot tables’ - the realities of data-driven schooling. Research Papers in Education, 37(1), 95–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2020.1812107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E. (2009). The materiality of learning. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spinoza, B. (1959). Ethics; on the correction of understanding. Everyman’s Library.
   Google Scholar
• Srnicek, N. (2016). Platform capitalism. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Staunæs, D. (2018). ‘Green with envy:’ affects and gut feelings as an affirmative, immanent, and trans-corporeal critique of new motivational data visualizations. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 31(5), 409–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2018.1449983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, K. (2007). Ordinary affects. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, G. (2010). Acting, accidents and performativity: Challenging the hegemonic good student in secondary schools. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 31(4), 413–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2010.484919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagener-Böck, N., Macgilchrist, F., Rabenstein, K., & Bock, A. (2022). From automation to symmation: Ethnographic perspectives on what happens in front of the screen. Postdigital Science & Education, 5(1), 136–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-022-00350-z
   Google Scholar
• Wermke, W., & Prøitz, T. S. (2021). Integration, fragmentation, and complexity governing the teaching profession and the Nordic model. In J. Larsen, B. Schulte, & F. Thue (Eds.), Schoolteachers and the Nordic Model (pp. 216–232). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wiborg, S. (2013). Neo-liberalism and universal state education: The cases of Denmark, Norway and Sweden 1980-2011. Comparative Education, 49(4), 407–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2012.700436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, P. (2008). Leading schools in the digital age: A clash of cultures. School Leadership and Management, 28(3), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632430802145779
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, B. (2016a). Digital education governance: An introduction. European Educational Research Journal, 15(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904115616630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, B. (2016b). Digital education governance: Data visualization, predictive analytics, and “real-time” policy instruments. Journal of Education Policy, 31(2), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2015.1035758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, B. (2016c). Powerful algorithms in education. Code Acts in Education - Research Summary 1 Powerful. University of Stirling. https://codeactsineducation.files.wordpress.com/2016/03/powerful-algorithms-in-education-code-acts-summary-1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, B. (2017). Decoding ClassDojo: Psycho-policy, social-emotional learning and persuasive educational technologies. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(4), 440–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2017.1278020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, B., Alervo, K., Gulson, N., Perrotta, C., & Witzenberger, K. E. (2022). Amazon and the New global connective architectures of education governance. Harvard Educational Review, 92(2), 231–256. https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-92.2.231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, B., & Piattoeva, N. (2019). Objectivity as standardization in data-scientific education policy, technology and governance. Learning, Media and Technology, 44(1), 64–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2018.1556215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M. (2007). The specters of bodies and affects in the classroom: A rhizo-ethological approach. Pedagogy Culture & Society, 15(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681360601162030
   Google Scholar
• Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the New frontier of power. Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar