Sustainability as a ‘super-wicked’ problem; opportunities and limits for engineering methodology

References

• Ackermann, F. 2012. “Problem Structuring Methods ‘in the Dock’: Arguing the Case for Soft OR.” European Journal of Operational Research 219 (3): 652–658. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2011.11.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ackoff, R. L. 1981. “The Art and Science of Mess Management.” Interfaces 11 (1): 20–26. doi: 10.1287/inte.11.1.20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ainslie, G. 1991. “Derivation of ‘Rational’ Economic Behavior from Hyperbolic Discount Curves.” American Economic Review 81: 334–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, S., B. Cashore, K. Levin, and G. Auld. 2007. “ Playing it Forward: Path Dependency, Progressive Incrementalism, and the Super Wicked Problem of Global Climate Change.” Paper presented at the 48th Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association, Chicago, IL, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, B. 2007. “ The Dynamics of the Eroding Goals Archetype.” Paper presented at the 25th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, Boston, MA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, V. A., and J. A. Harris. 2013. “Transformation Science: Seven Collective Questions for a Just and Sustainable Future.” Knowledge Management for Development Journal 9 (2): 53–66.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. 1999. “The Role of Lay People in the Production and Dissemination of Scientific Knowledge.” Science, Technology & Society 4 (1): 81–94. doi:10.1177/097172189900400106.
   Google Scholar
• Checkland, P. 1981a. Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. Chichester: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Checkland, P. 1981b. Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Checkland, P. 2000. “Soft Systems Methodology: A Thirty Year Retrospective.” Systems Research and Behavioral Science 17: S11–S58. doi:10.1002/1099-1743(200011)17:1+<::aid-sres374>3.0.co;2-o.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Checkland, P., and J. Scholes. 1999. Soft Systems Methodology in Action: Including a 30-Year Retrospective. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Checkland, P. M., and G. M. Jenkins. 1974. “Learning by Doing: Systems Education at Lancaster University.” Journal of Systems Engineering 4 (1): 40–51.
   Google Scholar
• Coelho, D., C. H. Antunes, and A. G. Martins. 2010. “Using SSM for Structuring Decision Support in Urban Energy Planning.” Technological and Economic Development of Economy 16 (4): 641–653. doi:10.3846/tede.2010.39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eden, C., and F. Ackermann. 2006. “Where Next for Problem Structuring Methods.” Journal of the Operational Research Society 57 (7): 766–768. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franco, L. A. 2007. “Assessing the Impact of Problem Structuring Methods in Multi-Organizational Settings: An Empirical Investigation.” Journal of the Operational Research Society 58 (6): 760–768. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franco, L. A., and G. Montibeller. 2010. “Facilitated Modelling in Operational Research.” European Journal of Operational Research 205 (3): 489–500. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2009.09.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gezelius, S. S., and K. Refsgaard. 2007. “Barriers to Rational Decision-Making in Environmental Planning.” Land Use Policy 24 (2): 338–348. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2006.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godfrey, P. 2012. “ The Engineering Doctorate (EngD): Developing Leaders for Tomorrow with Industry.” Paper presented at the CLAIU – EU (Council of Association of long-cycle Engineers, of a university or higher school of engineering of the European Union), Madrid. http://claiu.fabi.be/home/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/The-Engineering-Doctorate-final-Godfrey.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Keys, P. 2006. “On Becoming Expert in the Use of Problem Structuring Methods.” Journal of the Operational Research Society 57 (7): 822–829. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotiadis, K., and J. Mingers. 2006. “Combining PSMs with Hard OR Methods: The Philosophical and Practical Challenges.” Journal of the Operational Research Society 57 (7): 856–867. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, S. N., N. Odoni, C. Landstrom, S. J. Whatmore, N. Ward, and S. Bradley. 2011. “Doing Flood Risk Science Differently: An Experiment in Radical Scientific Method.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 36 (1): 15–36. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2010.00410.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Midgley, G., R. Y. Cavana, J. Brocklesby, J. L. Foote, D. R. R. Wood, and Ahuriri-Driscoll, A. 2013. “Towards a New Framework for Evaluating Systemic Problem Structuring Methods.” European Journal of Operational Research 229 (1): 143–154. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2013.01.047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mingers, J. 2011. “Soft OR Comes of Age-But not Everywhere!” Omega-International Journal of Management Science 39 (6): 729–741. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2011.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mingers, J., and J. Rosenhead. 2004. “Problem Structuring Methods in Action.” European Journal of Operational Research 152 (3): 530–554. doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(03)00056-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mingers, J., and J. Rosenhead. 2011. “Introduction to the Special Issue: Teaching Soft O.R., Problem Structuring Methods, and Multimethodology.” INFORMS Transactions on Education 12 (1): 1–3. doi: 10.1287/ited.1110.0073
   Google Scholar
• Morton, A., F. Ackermann, and V. Belton. 2007. “Problem Structuring without Workshops? Experiences with Distributed Interaction within a PSM Process.” Journal of the Operational Research Society 58 (5): 547–556. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neves, L. M. P., A. G. Martins, C. H. Antunes, and L. C. Dias. 2004. “Using SSM to Rethink the Analysis of Energy Efficiency Initiatives.” Journal of the Operational Research Society 55 (9): 968–975. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Brien, G., and A. Hope. 2010. “Localism and Energy: Negotiating Approaches to Embedding Resilience in Energy Systems.” Energy Policy 38 (12): 7550–7558. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.03.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ormerod, R. 2014. “The Mangle of OR Practice: Towards More Informative Case Studies of ‘Technical’ Projects.” Journal of the Operational Research Society 65: 1245–1260. doi:10.1057/jors.2013.78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawson, R., and N. Tilley. 1997. Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pollack, J. 2009. “Multimethodology in Series and Parallel: Strategic Planning using Hard and Soft OR.” Journal of the Operational Research Society 60 (2): 156–167. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranyard, J. C., R. Fildes, and T.-I. Hu. 2015. “Reassessing the Scope of OR Practice: The Influences of Problem Structuring Methods and the Analytics Movement.” European Journal of Operational Research 245 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.01.058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ring, J. 1998. “ A Value-Seeking Approach to the Engineering of Systems.” Paper presented at the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. doi:10.1109/ICSMC.1998.725069.
   Google Scholar
• Rittel, H. W. J., and M. M. Webber. 1973. “Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning.” Policy Sciences 4 (2): 155–169. doi: 10.1007/BF01405730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenhead, J. 1992. “Into the Swamp – the Analysis of Social-Issues.” Journal of the Operational Research Society 43 (4): 293–305. doi:10.1057/jors.1992.44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenhead, J. 1996. “What's the Problem? An Introduction to Problem Structuring Methods.” Interfaces 26 (6): 117–131. doi:10.1287/inte.26.6.117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenhead, J. 2006. “Past, Present and Future of Problem Structuring Methods.” Journal of the Operational Research Society 57 (7): 759–765. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, D., M. Westcombe, J. Hodgkin, and G. Montibeller. 2004. “Problem Structuring Methods for Large Group Interventions.” Journal of the Operational Research Society 55 (5): 453–463. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheffield, J. 2004. “The Design of GSS-Enabled Interventions: A Habermasian Perspective.” Group Decision and Negotiation 13 (5): 415–435. doi:10.1023/B:GRUP.0000045750.48336.f7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Ven, A. H. V., and M. S. Poole. 2005. “Alternative Approaches for Studying Organizational Change.” Organization Studies 26 (9): 1377–1404. doi:10.1177/0170840605056907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voinov, A., R. Seppelt, S. Reis, J. E. M. S. Nabel, and S. Shokravi. 2014. “Values in Socio-Environmental Modelling: Persuasion for Action or Excuse for Inaction.” Environmental Modelling & Software 53: 207–212. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.12.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, G., S. Hunter, P. Devine-Wright, B. Evans, and H. Fay. 2007. “Harnessing Community Energies: Explaining and Evaluating Community-Based Localism in Renewable Energy Policy in the UK.” Global Environmental Politics 7 (2): 64–82+viii. doi:10.1162/glep.2007.7.2.64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, L. 2006. “Evaluating Problem-Structuring Methods: Developing an Approach to Show the Value and Effectiveness of PSMs.” Journal of the Operational Research Society 57 (7): 842–855. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, L. 2009. “Understanding Problem Structuring Methods Interventions.” European Journal of Operational Research 199 (3): 823–833. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yearworth, M. 2014. D2.5 Evaluation STEEP PROJECT (314277) – Systems Thinking for Comprehensive City Efficient Energy Planning (pp. 56). Bristol: University of Bristol.
   Google Scholar
• Yearworth, M., and S. Cornell. 2014. “Contested Modelling: A Critical Examination of expert Modelling in Sustainability.” Systems Research and Behavioral Science. doi:10.1002/sres.2315.
   Google Scholar
• Yearworth, M., and G. Edwards. 2014. “On the Desirability of Integrating Research Methods into Overall Systems Approaches in the Training of Engineers: Analysis using SSM.” Systems Research and Behavioral Science 31 (1): 47–66. doi:10.1002/sres.2167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yearworth, M., G. Edwards, J. Davis, K. Burger, and A. Terry. 2013. “ Integrating Problem Solving and Research Methods Teaching for Systems.” Paper presented at the 11th Annual Conference on Systems Engineering Research (CSER 2013), Atlanta, GA. USA. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2013.01.113.
   Google Scholar
• Yearworth, M., and L. White. 2014. “The Non-Codified use of Problem Structuring Methods and the Need for a Generic Constitutive Definition.” European Journal of Operational Research 237 (3): 932–945. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2014.02.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yearworth, M., J. Willis Singer, R. Adcock, D. Hyberston, M. Singer, G. Chroust, and K. Kijima. 2015. “ Systems Engineering in a Context of Systemic Cooperative Praxis (SCOOPs): Development and Implications.” Paper presented at the 13th Annual Conference on Systems Engineering Research (CSER 2015), Hoboken, NJ. USA.
   Google Scholar