Enhancing the quality of bid evaluation in government refurbishment projects

References

• Aikivuori, A. 1996. “Periods and Demand for Private Sector Housing Refurbishment.” Journal of Construction Management and Economics 14: 3–12. doi:10.1080/0144619960000000.
   Google Scholar
• Ali, A. S., N. F. Azmi, and T. K. Baaki. 2018. “Cost Performance of Building Refurbishment Works: The Case of Malaysia.” International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation 36 (1): 41–62. doi:10.1108/IJBPA-02-2017-0010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali, A. S., S. N. Kamaruzzaman, K. H. Zulkiflee, and H. Salleh. 2009. “The Characteristics of Refurbishment Projects in Malaysia.” Facilities 27 (02): 56–65. doi:10.1108/02632770910923090.
   Google Scholar
• Ali, A. S., A. Y. C. Peng, and S. C. Ling. 2014. “Managing Refurbishment Projects Through Selection of Procurement System: The Case of Malaysia.” European Journal of Sustainable Development 3 (4): 311–322. doi:10.14207/ejsd.2014.v3n4p311.
   Google Scholar
• Alvi, M. 2016. A Manual for Selecting Sampling Techniques in Research. Munich Personal RePEc Archivel. Accessed 6 October 2019. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/70218.
   Google Scholar
• Azman, M. A. 2016. “Bidding Competitiveness: a Comparative Analysis of Different Bid Auctions in Malaysia.” Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology 14 (4): 678–698. doi:10.1108/JEDT-11-2014-0072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batoev, G., and C. Schlosser. 2013. The Advantages and Disadvantages of the Various Procurement Procedures. Maastricht University. Accessed 2019 September 25. https://www.maastrichtuniversity.nl/sites/default/files/2013/batoev.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bochenek, J. 2014. “The Contractor Selection Criteria in Open and Restricted Procedures in Public Sector in Selected EU Countries.” Procedia Engineering 85: 69–74. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.530.
   Google Scholar
• BSI (British Standard Institute). 1974. BS 3811:1974 Glossary of Maintenance Terms in Tero- Technology. London: BSI.
   Google Scholar
• CBSL (Central Bank of Sri Lanka). 2019. Annual Report 2018. Colombo: CBSL.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, S. O., P. S. P. Wong, A. Y. S. Fung, and W. V. Coffey. 2008. “Examining the Use of Bid Information in Predicting the Contractor’s Performance.” Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction 13 (2): 111–122. doi:10.1108/13664380810898.122.
   Google Scholar
• Chileshe, N., J. M. Khatib, and M. Farah. 2013. “The Perceptions of Contractor’s and Landlord’s Representatives in the Refurbishment of Tower Blocks.” Facilities 31 (11/12): 521–541. doi:10.1108/F-02-2012-0008.
   Google Scholar
• CIRIA (Construction Industry Research and Association). 1994. A Guide to Management of Building Refurbishment. London: CIRIA.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2013. Research Design. 4th ed. California: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Croatto, G., U. Turrini, and A. Bertolazzi. 2017. “Criteria and Guidelines about Structural Reversibility for Reinforced Concrete Historical Buildings Refurbishment: The Excelsior Cinema in Milan.” Journal of Architectural Conservation 22 (3): 189–198. doi:10.1080/13556207.2017.1279866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronhjort, Y. 2011. “Improving the Energy Efficiency of Our Built Environment Through Retrofitting and Urban Infill: TES Energy Facade in the Finnish.” Proceedings of World Sustainable Building Conference, October 18–21, Technical Research Centre of Finland, Helsinki, Finland. Helsinki: Finnish Association of Civil Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Crowley, L. G., and D. E. Hancher. 1995. “Evaluation of Competitive Bids.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 121 (2): 238–245. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1995)121:2(238).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dave, R., K. Parmar, B. Patel, and R. Prajapati. 2017. “The Criteria for Contractors’ Selection and bid Evaluation & Factors Affecting Bidding Strategy in Construction.” International Journal of Scientific Development & Research 2 (4): 488–491. http://www.ijsdr.org/papers/IJSDR1704094.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Du Toit, J. L., and J. Mouton. 2013. “A Typology of Designs for Social Research in the Built Environment.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 16 (2): 125–139. doi:10.1080/13645579.2012.657013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egbu, C. O. 1997. “Refurbishment Management: Challenges and Opportunities.” Building Research & Information 25 (6): 338–347. doi:10.1080/096132197370156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagan, R., W. Lu, L. Shen, and C. Jewell. 2007. “Competitiveness in Construction: A Critical Review of Research.” Construction Management and Economics 25 (9): 989–1000. doi:10.1080/01446190701258039.
   Google Scholar
• Gentles, S. J., C. Charles, J. Ploeg, and K. McKibbon. 2015. “Sampling in Qualitative Research: Insights from an Overview of the Methods Literature.” Qualitative Report 20 (11): 1772–1789. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol20/iss11/5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghasabeh, M. S., and N. Chileshe. 2016. “Critical Factors Influencing the Bid/No Bid Decision in the Australian Construction Industry.” Construction Innovation 16 (2): 127–157. doi:10.1108/CI-04-2015-0021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grover, V. 2015. “Research Approach: An Overview.” Golden Research Thoughts 04 (08): 1–8. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273352276_research_approach_an_overview.
   Google Scholar
• Gunawardhana, P., and G. Karunasena. 2014. “Sustainable Public Procurement Process in Sri Lankan Construction Industry: Literature Review.” Proceedings of the 8th Faculty of Architecture Research Unit (FARU) International Conference; Dec 11–12, University of Moratuwa. Sri Lanka. Moratuwa: University of Moratuwa.
   Google Scholar
• Hossain, D. M. 2011. “Qualitative Research Approach.” Postmodern Openings 7: 143–156. http://postmodernopenings.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Qualitative-Research-Process.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ishak, N. 2018. “The Influences of Attributes, Skills and Knowledge of Managers on Refurbishment Project Performance.” In Proceedings of AIP Conference; Feb 2; Putrajaya, Malaysia, edited by Z. I. Rizman, F. R. Hashim, K. A. Ahmad, M. T. Ishak, M. M. Shahimin, M. Faiz, M. T. Jusoh, and J. Adnan. Melville, NY: AIP Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jaafar, M., and N. M. Radzi. 2013. “Level of Satisfaction and Issues with Procurement Systems Used in the Malaysian Public Sector.” Australasian Journal of Construction Economics and Building 13 (1): 50–65. https://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/AJCEB/article/download/2830/3408. doi: 10.5130/AJCEB.v13i1.2830
   Google Scholar
• Kang, B. G., M. M. M. E. Elbashier, L. Tang, R. Jin, and S. Tang. 2018. “Competitive Tendering for Construction Projects in Sudan.” Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences 10 (3S): 828–835. doi:10.4314/jfas.vloi35.71.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmer, S. 2018. “Development of a Method for Construction Management in Refurbishment Projects.” PhD diss., University of Huddersfield.
   Google Scholar
• Keung, C. W., and T. W. Yiu. 2015. “Potential for Long-Term Sustainability.” Facilities 33 (3/4): 177–194. doi:10.1108/F-07-2013-0056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, Y. M., and Y. Ahmad. 2015. “Barriers to Competitive Tenders in Building Conservation Works.” International Journal of Social, Behavioural, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering 9 (3): 804–809. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/7a22/e78d9ae302cfca91b7108cd5986d157e571f.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lindbergh, L., T. Olofsson, J. Vesterberg, S. Andersson, and T. L. Wilson. 2018. “Reflections on Sustainable Ålidhem: A Case Study in Swedish Municipal Public Housing Refurbishment.” Property Management 36 (2): 203–220. doi:10.1108/PM-04-2016-0017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lune, H., and B.L. Berg. 2016. Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. Hudson, NY: Pearson Higher Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Mashaleh, M. 2010. “Decision to Bid or Not to Bid: A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach.” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 37 (1): 37–44. doi:10.1139/L09-119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monyane, T., and F. A. Emuze. 2015. “Exploring the Contractor Selection Process for Public Sector Projects in South Africa: A Provisional Case.” Proceedings of Fourth Construction Management Conference, Nov 31–Dec 1; Port Elizabeth, edited by F. A. Emuze. Port Elizabeth (SA): Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University.
   Google Scholar
• NADB (North American Development Bank). 2012. Bid Evaluation Procedures. San Antonio: NADB. https://docplayer.net/20840104-North-american-development-bank-bid-evaluation-procedures.html.
   Google Scholar
• Ngebeni, S. 2011. “An Analysis of the Tender Process in National Government in South Africa.” Master’s diss., North-West University, Vanderbijlpark.
   Google Scholar
• Nibbelink, J. G., M. Sutrisna, and A. U. Zaman. 2017. “Unlocking the Potential of Early Contractor Involvement in Reducing Design Risks in Commercial Building Refurbishment Projects – a Western Australian Perspective.” Architectural Engineering and Design Management 13 (6): 439–456. doi:10.1080/17452007.2017.1348334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NPA (National Procurement Agency). 2006. Government Procurement Guidelines: Goods and Works. Colombo: NPA.
   Google Scholar
• NPC (National Procurement Commission). 2018. Government Procurement Guidelines – 2018 for Goods, Works, Services and Information Systems. Colombo: NPC.
   Google Scholar
• Okohor, M. I., and V. B. Torrance. 1999. “A Model for Subcontractor Selection in Refurbishment Projects.” Construction Management & Economics 17 (3): 315–327. doi:10.1080/014461999371529.
   Google Scholar
• Oloke, D. 2017. “Improving Structural Safety in the Alteration & Refurbishment of Old Buildings.” Vol. 107 of IABSE Symposium Report. Zurish: IABSE.
   Google Scholar
• Palaneeswaran, E., and M. Kumaraswamy. 1999. “Recent Advances and Proposed Improvements in Contractor Prequalification Methodologies.” Building and Environment 36 (2001): 73–87. doi:10.1016/S0360-1323(99)00069-4.
   Google Scholar
• Perng, Y. H., Y. P. Hsia, and H. J. Lu. 2007. “A Service Quality Improvement Dynamic Decision Support System for Refurbishment Contractors.” Total Quality Management and Business Excellence 18 (7): 731–749. doi:10.1080/14783360701349716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope, C., E. Marks, E. Back, T. Leopard, and T. Love. 2016. “Renovation Versus new Construction and Building Decision Tool for Educational Facilities.” Journal of Construction Engineering 2016. doi:10.1155/2016/5737160.
   Google Scholar
• Puri, D., and S. Tiwari. 2014. “Evaluating the Criteria for Contractors’ Selection and bid Evaluation.” International Journal of Engineering Science Invention 3 (7): 44–48. http://www.academia.edu/download/34419853/I0372044048.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rahmat, I., V. B. Torrance, and A. H. Ezanee. 2003. Refurbishment Cycles and the Management of Refurbishment Projects. Malaysia: UiTM Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Rameezdeen, R., and S. De Silva. 2002. “Trends in Construction Procurement Systems in Sri Lanka.” Built Environment Sri Lanka 2 (1): 2–9. http://dl.nsf.ac.lk/bitstream/handle/1/8303/BESL-2%282%29-2.pdf?sequence=2. doi: 10.4038/besl.v2i2.7631
   Google Scholar
• Rameezdeen, R., and T. Ramachandra. 2008. “Construction Linkages in a Developing Economy: The Case of Sri Lanka.” Construction Management and Economics 26 (5): 499–506. doi:10.1080/01446190802017706.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, M. V. K., V. S. S. Kumar, and P. R. Kumar. 2018. “Optimal Contractor Selection in Construction Industry: The Fussy Way.” The Institute of Engineers (India) 99 (1): 67–78. doi:10.1007/s40030-018-0271-I.
   Google Scholar
• Rayers, J., and J. Mansfield. 2001. “The Assessment of Risk in Conservation Refurbishment Projects.” Structural Survey 19 (5): 238–244. doi:10.1108/02630800110412480.
   Google Scholar
• Revilla, E. 2017. “Sri Lanka’s Public Procurement to be Streamlined Made More Transparent.” Business Times, March 5. http://www.sundaytimes.lk/170305/business-times/sri-lankas-public-procurement-to-be-streamlined-made-more-transparent-231284.html.
   Google Scholar
• RICS (Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors). 2009. Historic Building Conservation: RICS Guidance Note. Coventry, UK: RICS.
   Google Scholar
• RICS (Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors). 2014. Tendering Strategies: RICS Guidance Note. London: RICS.
   Google Scholar
• Ruparathna, R. J., and K. Hewage. 2015. “Sustainable Procurement in the Canadian Construction Industry: Challenges and Benefits.” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 42 (6): 417–426. doi:10.1139/cjce-2014-0376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryu, H. 2014. “Sustainable Building Refurbishment: Process-based Approaches with the Hotel Klaus K Refurbishment Case.” Master’s diss., Aalto University, Espoo.
   Google Scholar
• Saari, A. 2008. “Precision Refurbishment of Buildings: a Façade Refurbishment Case Study.” Structural Survey 26 (2): 108–119. doi:10.1108/02630800810883049.
   Google Scholar
• Sezer, A. A. 2015. “Contractor Use of Productivity and Sustainability Indicators for Building Refurbishment.” Built Environment Project and Asset Management 5 (2): 141–153. doi:10.1108/BEPAM-11-2013-0065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Signor, R., P. Love, O. Olatunji, J. J. C. B. Vallim, and A. Raupp. 2017. “Collusive Bidding in Brazilian Infrastructure Projects.” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Forensic Engineering 170 (3): 113–123. doi:10.1680/jfoen.17.00013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, A. S., and M. B. Masuku. 2014. “Sampling Techniques and Determination of Sample Size in Applied Statistics Research: An Overview.” International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management 2 (11): 1–22. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.678.1300&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sumanarathna, D. M. G. A. N. M., and B. A. K. S. Perera. 2015. “Suitability of Government Bid Evaluation Procedure for Building Projects in Sri Lanka.” CIDA Journal XIV: 1–21. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Nipuni_Sumanarathna2/publication/312584761_Suitability_of_Government_Bid_Evaluation_Procedure_for_Building_Projects_in_Sri_Lanka/links/588a2eb592851c2779b257e9/Suitability-of-Government-Bid-Evaluation-Procedure-for-Building-Projects-in-Sri-Lanka.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Teo, D. H. P., L. K. Qua, V. B. Torrance, and M. I. Okoro. 1991. “Risk Evaluation and Decision Support System for Tendering & Bidding in Refurbishment Contracts.” In Management, Quality and Economics in Building, edited by A. Bezelga and P. Brandon, 272–288. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Topcu, Y. I. 2004. “A Decision Model Proposal for Construction Contractor Selection in Turkey.” Building and Environment 39 (4): 469–481. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2003.09.09.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watt, D. J., B. Kayis, and K. Willey. 2010. “The Relative Importance of Tender Evaluation and Contractor Selection Criteria.” International Journal of Project Management 28 (1): 51–60. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yacob, R., I. Rahmat, M. Saruwono, and Z. Ismail. 2017. “Effects of Uncertainty Factors & Refurbishment Projects Performance in Relation to Leadership Quality of Project Managers.” Journal of Building Performance 8 (1). https://www.researchgate.net/profile/ridzuan_yacob3/publication/321300521_effects_of_uncertainty_factors_and_refurbishment_projects_performance_in_relation_to_leadership_quality_of_project_managers/links/5a1a799caca272df080d9aaf/effects-of-uncertainty-factors-and-refurbishment-projects-performance-in-relation-to-leadership-quality-of-project-managers.pdf.
   Google Scholar