A data-driven optimized daylight pattern for responsive facades design

References

• Bozorg-Haddad, O., M. Solgi, and H. Loaiciga. 2017. Meta-Heuristic and Evolutionary Algorithms for Engineering Optimization. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. doi:10.1002/9781119387053
   Google Scholar
• Chauvel, Collins, Dogniaux, & Longmore. 1982. “Glare from Windows: Current Views of the Problem.” Lighting Research & Technology 14 (1): 31–46.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, S., D. Lee, and J. Jo. 2017. “Method of Deriving Shaded Fraction According to Shading Movements of Kinetic Façade.” Sustainability 9 (8): 1449. doi:10.3390/su9081449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elghazi, Y., and A. Mahmoud. 2016. Origami Explorations A Generative Parametric Technique For kinetic cellular facadeto optimize Daylight Performance,Proceeding of 34th Annual eCAADe Conference, Oulu, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Elghazi, Y., A. Wagdy, and S. Abdalrahman. 2015. Simulation Driven Design For Kinetic System; Optimize kaliedocycle Facade Configuration for Daylighting Adequacy in Hot Arid Climate, Proceeding of 14th Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association, Hyderabad, India.
   Google Scholar
• Elghazi, Y., A. Wagdy, S. Abdelwahab, and A. Hassan. 2014. Daylighting Driven Design: Optimizing Kaleidocycle Facade For Hot Arid Climate. The proceeding of Building Performance Analysis & SimBuild Virtual Conference, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany, https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3198.4408.
   Google Scholar
• Elzeyadi, I., B. Abboushi, H. Hadipour, and M. Rivera. 2016. “High-performance Facades: Measuring the Impacts of Dynamic Shading Prototypes on Indoor Environmental Quality Using Yearly Simulations and Field Tests.” PLEA 2016: 11–13.
   Google Scholar
• Gharipour, A., and A. W.-C. Liew. 2013. “Colon Cell Image Segmentation Based on Level Set and Kernel-Based Fuzzy Clustering.” In Intelligent Computing Theories and Technology, 120–129. Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-39482-9_14
   Google Scholar
• Gharipour, A., and A. W.-C. Liew. 2015. Level Set Based Segmentation of Cell Nucleus in Fluorescence Microscopy Images Using Correntropy-Based K-Means Clustering. 2015 International Conference on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications (DICTA), 1–5. Adelaide, SA, Australia.https://doi.org/10.1109/DICTA.2015.7371279.
   Google Scholar
• Grobman, Y. J., I. G. Capeluto, and G. Austern. 2017. “External Shading in Buildings: Comparative Analysis of Daylighting Performance in Static and Kinetic Operation Scenarios.” Architectural Science Review 60 (2): 126–136. doi:10.1080/00038628.2016.1266991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grobman, Y. J., G. Austern, R. Hatiel, and I. G. Capeluto. 2020. “Evaluating the Influence of Varied External Shading Elements on Internal Daylight Illuminances.” Buildings 10 (22): 22.
   Google Scholar
• Heidari Matin, N., and A. Eydgahi. 2019. “Factors Affecting the Design and Development of Responsive Facades: A Historical Evolution.” Intelligent Buildings International 11: 1–14. doi:10.1080/17508975.2018.1562414.
   Google Scholar
• Heidari Matin, N., and A. Eydgahi. 2020. “Technologies Used in Responsive Facade Systems: A Comparative Study.” Intelligent Buildings International 12 (4): 1–20. doi:10.1080/17508975.2019.1577213.
   Google Scholar
• Heidari Matin, N., A. Eydgahi, S. Shyu, and P. Matin. 2018. Evaluating Visual Comfort Metrics of Responsive Facade Systems as Educational Activities. The Proceeding of Annual Conference of American Society for Engineering Education, Utah, US. https://www.asee.org/public/conferences/106/papers/23705/view.
   Google Scholar
• Kirimtat, A., O. Krejcar, B. Ekici, and M. Fatih Tasgetiren. 2019. “Multi-objective Energy and Daylight Optimization of Amorphous Shading Devices in Buildings.” Solar Energy 185: 100–111. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2019.04.048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, D.-S., J.-H. Jo, S.-H. Koo, and B.-Y. Lee. 2015. “Development of Climate Indices Using Local Weather Data for Shading Design.” Sustainability 7 (2): 1884–1899. doi:10.3390/su7021884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, D.-S., S.-H. Koo, Y.-B. Seong, and J.-H. Jo. 2016. “Evaluating Thermal and Lighting Energy Performance of Shading Devices on Kinetic Façades.” Sustainability 8 (9): 883. doi:10.3390/su8090883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LEED V4 for Interior Design and Construction Checklist. 2015. U.S. Green Building Council, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Loonen, R., M. Rico-Martinez, F. Favoino, M. Brzezicki, C. Menezo, and G. La Ferla. 2015. Design for facade adaptability – Towards a unified and systematic characterization. The Proceeding of 10th Energy Forum – Advanced Building Skin, Bern, Switzerland, p. 1274–84.
   Google Scholar
• Loonen, Trčka, M., D. Cóstola, and J. L. M. Hensen. 2013. “Climate Adaptive Building Shells: State-of-the-art and Future Challenges.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 25: 483–493. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.04.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mardaljevic & Nabil. 2005. “Useful Daylight Illuminance: A new Paradigm for Assessing Daylight in Buildings.” Lighting Research and Technology 37 (1): 41–59.
   Google Scholar
• Matin, N., A. Eydgahi, and S. Shyu. 2017. Comparative Analysis of Technologies Used in Responsive Building Facades. Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference, Columbus, OH,https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2–28052.
   Google Scholar
• Nabil, A., and J. Mardaljevic. 2006. “Useful Daylight Illuminances: A Replacement for Daylight Factors.” Energy and Buildings - ENERG BLDG 38: 905–913. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.03.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NPPL. 2015. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Annual Site Environmental Report (p. 155).
   Google Scholar
• Park, Augenbroe, G., and T. Messadi. 2003. Daylighting optimization in smart facadesystems. Eighth International IBPSA Conference, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Parsaee, M., C. Demers, J. Lalonde, A. Potvin, M. Inanici, and M. Hebert. 2020. “Human-centric Lighting Performance of Shading Panels in Architecture: a Benchmarking Study with lab Scale Physical Models Under Real Skies.” Solar Energy 24: 354–368.
   Google Scholar
• Reinhart, Jakubiec, & Ibarra. 2013. “Definition of a Reference Office for Standardized Evaluations of Dynamic Facade and Lighting Technologies.” Proceedings of Building Simulation 5: 560–580.
   Google Scholar
• Reinhart & Weisman. 2012. “The Daylit Area: Correlating Architectural Student Assessments with Current and Emerging Daylight Availability Metric.” Build. Environ 50: 155–164.
   Google Scholar
• Roughgarden, T. 2019. Algorithms Illuminated: Greedy Algorithms and Dynamic Programming. New York, NY: Soundlikeyourself publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Shan, R. 2016. “Climate Responsive FacadeOptimization Strategy.” (PhD Dissertation). University of Michigan, MI. https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/133475
   Google Scholar
• Shan, R., and L. Junghans. 2017. ““Adaptive Radiation” Optimization for Climate Adaptive Building Facade Design Strategy.” Building Simulation 11: 1–11. doi:10.1007/s12273-017-0406-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharaidin, Kamil. 2012. “Integration of Digital Simulation Tools With Parametric Designs to Evaluate Kinetic Façades for Daylight Performance.” Proceeding of 30th annual eCAADe conference.
   Google Scholar
• Tabadkani, A., S. Banihashemi, and M. R. Hosseini. 2018. “Daylighting and Visual Comfort of Oriental sun Responsive Skins: A Parametric Analysis.” Building Simulation 11 (4): 663–676. doi:10.1007/s12273-018-0433-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabadkani, A., M. Valinejad Shoubi, F. Soflaei, and S. Banihashemi. 2019. “Integrated Parametric Design of Adaptive Facades for User’s Visual Comfort.” Automation in Construction 106: 102857. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagdy, A., F. Fathy, and S. Altomonte. 2016. “Evaluating the Daylighting Performance of Dynamic Façades by Using New Annual Climate-Based Metrics.” Proceedings of the 32nd international Conference on passive and Low Energy Architecture, PLEA 2016, Los Angeles, 941–947.
   Google Scholar
• Yi, H., M. Kim, Y. Kim, S. Kim, and K. Lee. 2019. “Rapid Simulation of Optimally Responsive Facade During Schematic Design Phases: use of a new Hybrid Metaheuristic Algorithm.” Sustainability 11 (9): 2681. doi:10.3390/su11092681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yun, G., K. C. Yoon, and K. S. Kim. 2014. “The Influence of Shading Control Strategies on the Visual Comfort and Energy Demand of Office Buildings.” Energy and Buildings 84: 70–85. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.07.040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar