Distinctions and blurred boundaries between qualitative approaches and public and patient involvement (PPI) in research

References

• Beresford, P. (2007). The role of service user research in generating knowledge-based health and social care: From conflict to contribution. Evidence & Policy, 3, 329–341. doi:10.1332/174426407781738074
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. (2016). Enlightened common sense: The philosophy of critical realism. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, T., Boote, J., Buckley, N., Vougioukalou, S., & Wright, M. (2017). Accessing participatory research impact and legacy: developing the evidence base for participatory approaches in health research. Educational Action Research, 25, 473–488. doi:10.1080/09650792.2017.1326964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, N., & Barron, D. (2016). Evaluation of public involvement in research: time for a major re-think? Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 21, 209–211. doi:10.1177/1355819615612510
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodyear-Smith, F., Jackson, C., & Greenhalgh, T. (2015). Co-design and implementation research: challenges and solutions for ethics committees. BMC Medical Ethics, 16, 1–5, doi:10.1186/s12910-015-0072-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, T., Hinton, L., Finlay, T., Macfarlane, A., Fahy, N., Clyde, B., & Chant, A. (2019). Frameworks for supporting patient and public involvement in research: systematic review and co-design pilot. Health Expectations, 22, 785–801. doi:10.1111/hex.12888
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hersh, D., Azul, D., Carroll, C., Lyons, R., Mc Menamin, R., & Skeat, J. (2022). New perspectives, theory, method, and practice: Qualitative research and innovation in speech-language pathology. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 1–11. doi:10.1080/17549507.2022.2029942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hersh, D., Israel, M., & Shiggins, C. (2021). The ethics of patient and public involvement across the research process: towards partnership with people with aphasia. Aphasiology, 1–27. doi:10.1080/02687038.2021.1896870
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• INVOLVE. (2012). What is public involvement in research? Retrieved February 10, 2022, from https://www.invo.org.uk/find-out-more/what-is-public-involvement-in-research-2/?print=print
   Google Scholar
• Irish Health Research Forum. (2015). Public and patient involvement (PPI) in research. Retrieved February 10, 2022 from http://media.wix.com/ugd/75eae6_4bcbe2242ac14cad898047df445dcb92.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Isaksen, J., Shiggins, C., Olsen, A., Coath, C., & Mc Menamin, R. (in press). Involvement of people with aphasia in research: A scoping review. Aphasiology.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, T., Pinnock, H., Liew, S., Horne, E., Ehrlich, E., Fulton, O., … De Simoni, A. (2020). Patient and public involvement in research: From tokenistic box ticking to valued team members. BMC Medicine, 18, 79. doi:10.1186/s12916-020-01544-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R.B., & Onwuegbuzie, A.J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33, 14–26. doi:10.3102/0013189X033007014
   Google Scholar
• Kagan, A. (1998). Supported conversation for adults with aphasia: Methods and resources for training conversation partners. Aphasiology, 12, 816–830. doi:10.1080/02687039808249575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liabo, K., Boddy, K., Burchmore, H., Cockcroft, E., & Britten, N. (2018). Clarifying the roles of patients in research. BMJ, 361, k1463. doi:10.1136/bmj.k1463
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Locock, L., & Boaz, A. (2019). Drawing straight lines along blurred boundaries: Qualitative research, patient and public involvement in medical research, co-production and co-design. Evidence & Policy, 15, 409–421. doi:10.1332/174426419X15552999451313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luck, A., & Rose, M. (2007). Interviewing people with aphasia: Insights into method adjustments from a pilot study. Aphasiology, 21, 208–224. doi:10.1080/02687030601065470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, R., & McAllister, L. (Eds.). (2019). Qualitative research in communication disorders: An introduction for students and clinicians. J & R Press.
   Google Scholar
• Madden, M., & Speed, E. (2017). Beware zombies and unicorns: Toward critical patient and public involvement in health research in a neoliberal context [conceptual analysis]. Frontiers in Sociology, 2, 1–7. doi:10.3389/fsoc.2017.00007
   Google Scholar
• Manning, M. (2020). How to support working-aged individuals to live well with post-stroke aphasia: A mixed methodologies study [Doctoral thesis, University of Limerick]. Limerick. http://hdl.handle.net/10344/9617
   Google Scholar
• Manning, M., Cuskelly, C., Russ, E., & Franklin, S. (2020a). Supporting people with post-stroke aphasia to live well: A cross-sectional survey of Speech & Language Therapists in Ireland. Health & Social Care in the Community, 28, 2105–2124. doi:10.1111/hsc.13021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, M., Mac Farlane, A., Hickey, A., Galvin, R., & Franklin, S. (2020b). The relevance of stroke care for living well with post-stroke aphasia: Qualitative interviews with working-aged adults. Disability and Rehabilitation, 1–13. doi:10.1080/09638288.2020.1863483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mc Menamin, R., Griffin, M., Grzybowska, B., & Pound, C. (2021). Working together: Experiences of people with aphasia as co-researchers in participatory health research studies. Aphasiology, 1–22. doi:10.1080/02687038.2021.1923948
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mc Menamin, R., Isaksen, I., & Shiggins, C. (2022). Public and Patient Involvement in qualitative health and social care research. In R. Lyons, L. McAllister, C. Carroll, D. Hersh, & J. Skeat (Eds.), Diving deep into qualitative data analysis in communication disorders research. J & R Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mc Menamin, R., & Pound, C. (2019). Participatory approaches in communication disorders research. In R. Lyons & L. McAllister (Eds.), Qualitative research in communication disorders: An introduction for students and clinicians (pp. 167–191). J & R Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mc Menamin, R., Tierney, E., & Mac Farlane, A. (2015a). Addressing the long-term impacts of aphasia: How far does the Conversation Partner Programme go? Aphasiology, 29, 889–913. doi:10.1080/02687038.2015.1004155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mc Menamin, R., Tierney, E., & Mac Farlane, A. (2015b). Who decides what criteria are important to consider in exploring the outcomes of conversation approaches? A participatory health research study. Aphasiology, 29, 914–938. doi:10.1080/02687038.2015.1006564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, A., Biggerstaff, D., Krishnan, N., & Lycett, D. (2017). Understanding the role of patient and public involvement in renal dietetic research. Patient Experience Journal, 4, 23–32. doi:10.35680/2372-0247.1155
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, S., Liabo, K., Stewart, R., & Rees, R. (2015). Public involvement in research: Making sense of the diversity. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 20, 45–51. doi:10.1177/1355819614551848
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearl, G. (2014). Engaging with people who have aphasia. A set of resources for stroke researchers. NHS National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)/Clinical Research Network Stroke. Retrieved October 30, 2020, from https://www.aphasiatrials.org/templates-for-accessible-information-sheets-and-consent-forms/
   Google Scholar
• Pope, C., & Mays, N. (1995). Qualitative Research: Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: An introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. BMJ, 311, 42–45. doi:10.1136/bmj.311.6996.42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pound, C. (2013). An exploration of the friendship experiences of working-age adults with aphasia [PhD]. Brunel University London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. (2008). Qualitative Research Guidelines Project: What is qualitative research? Retrieved February 10, 2022, from http://qualres.org/HomeWhat-3513.html
   Google Scholar
• Shiggins, C., Coe, D., Gilbert, L., Research Collaboration, A., & Mares, K. (2022). Development of an ‘aphasia-accessible participant in research experience survey’ through co-production. Aphasiology, 1–34. doi:10.1080/02687038.2021.1996532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie, N., Raymer, A., Armstrong, E., Holland, A., & Cherney, L.R. (2010). Communication partner training in aphasia: A systematic review. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 91, 1814–1837. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2010.08.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie, N., Raymer, A., & Cherney, L.R. (2016). Communication partner training in aphasia: An updated systematic review. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 97, 2202–2221. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2016.03.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toombs, S.K. (2001). Introduction: Phenomenology and medicine. In S. K. Toombs (Ed.), Handbook of phenomenology and medicine (pp. 1–26). Kluwer.
   Google Scholar