175
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The Efficacy of an Extracurricular Inquiry Programme on Grade 8 and 9 South African Low Quintile Learners’ Science Learning

ORCID Icon

References

  • Anderson, L.W., & Sosniak, L.A. (1994). Bloom’s taxonomy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • DBE (2011). Physical science curriculum and assessment policy statement. Pretoria: Department of Basic Education.
  • Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5–12. doi: 10.3102/0013189X023007005
  • Driver, R., Leach, J., & Millar, R. (1996). Young people’s images of science. London: McGraw–Hill Education.
  • Fish, D., Allie, S., Pelaez, N., & Anderson, T. (2017). A cross-cultural comparison of high school students’ responses to a science centre show on the physics of sound in South Africa. Public Understanding of Science, 26(7), 806–814. doi: 10.1177/0963662516642725
  • Guthrie, G. (2018). Classroom change in developing countries: From progressive cage to formalistic frame. London: Routledge.
  • Hattingh, A., Aldous, C., & Rogan, J. (2007). Some factors influencing the quality of practical work in science classrooms. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(1), 75–90. doi: 10.1080/10288457.2007.10740613
  • Heywood, J., & Heywood, S. (1992). The training of student-teachers in discovery methods of instruction and learning. Dublin: Dublin University.
  • Hoadley, U. (2018). Pedagogy in poverty: Lessons from twenty years of curriculum reform in South Africa. New York: Routledge.
  • Kirschner, P.A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R.E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
  • Kirschner, P.A., Sweller, J., Kirschner, F., & Zambrano, J. (2018). From cognitive load theory to collaborative cognitive load theory. International Journal of Computer-supported Collaborative Learning, 13(2), 213–233. doi: 10.1007/s11412-018-9277-y
  • Marshall, S.P. (2009). Re-imagining specialized STEM academies: Igniting and nurturing decidedly different minds, by design. Roeper Review, 32(1), 48–60. doi: 10.1080/02783190903386884
  • Mayer, R.E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Santa Barbara, CA: Oxford University Press.
  • Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L.A., De Jong, T., Van Riesen, S.A., Kamp, E.T., … Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
  • Plowright, D. (2011). Using mixed methods: Frameworks for an integrated methodology. London: SAGE Publications.
  • Pretorius, E.J., & Spaull, N. (2016). Exploring relationships between oral reading fluency and reading comprehension amongst English second language readers in South Africa. Reading and Writing, 29(7), 1449–1471. doi: 10.1007/s11145-016-9645-9
  • Ramnarain, U., & Hlatswayo, M. (2018). Teacher beliefs and attitudes about inquiry-based learning in a rural school district in South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 38(1), 51–61. doi: 10.15700/saje.v38n1a1431
  • Ramnarain, U., & Hobden, P. (2015). Shifting South African learners towards greater autonomy in scientific investigations. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47(1), 94–121. doi: 10.1080/00220272.2014.966153
  • Ramnarain, U., & Schuster, D. (2014). The pedagogical orientations of South African Physical Sciences teachers towards inquiry or direct instructional approaches. Research in Science Education, 44(4), 627–650. doi: 10.1007/s11165-013-9395-5
  • Reddy, V., Visser, M., Winnaar, L., Arends, F., Juan, A., Prinsloo, C., & Isdale, K. (2016). TIMSS 2015: Highlights of mathematics and science achievement of Grade 9 South African learners. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council.
  • Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
  • Schwartz, D.L., Varma, S., & Martin, L. (2008). Dynamic transfer and innovation. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 479–508). London: Routledge.
  • Schwartz, D.L., Lindgren, R., & Lewis, S. (2009). Constructivism in an age of non-constructivist assessments. In S.T.T.M. Duffy (Ed.), Constructivist Instruction: Success or Failure? (pp. 34–61). New York: Routledge.
  • Schweisfurth, M. (2011). Learner-centred education in developing country contexts: From solution to problem? International Journal of Educational Development, 31(5), 425–432. doi: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2011.03.005
  • Stott, A.E. (2017). The effectiveness of a conceptually focused out-of-class intervention on promoting learning of electricity by township learners. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(3), 304–315.
  • Stott, A.E. (2018). Are instructivist pedagogies more appropriate for learning the sciences in South African low-quintile schools than western literature suggests? Journal of Education, 71, 39–57.
  • Stott, A.E., & Beelders, T. (2019). The influence of science reading comprehension on South African township learners’ learning of science. South African Journal of Science, 115(1–2), 72–80.
  • Thaiposri, P., & Wannapiroon, P. (2015). Enhancing students’ critical thinking skills through teaching and learning by inquiry-based learning activities using social network and cloud computing. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 2137–2144. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.013
  • Tobias, S. (2009). An eclectic appraisal of the success or failure of constructivist instruction. In S. Tobias & T.M. Duffy (Eds.), Constructivist Instruction: Success or Failure? (pp. 335–350). New York: Routledge.
  • Treagust, D.F. (2007). General instructional methods and strategies. In S.K. Abel & N.G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 373–391). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Van der Berg, S., Spaull, N., Wills, G., Gustafsson, M., & Kotzé, J. (2016). Identifying binding constraints in education. Stellenbosch: Department of Economics, University of Stellenbosch.
  • Wise, A.F., & O’Neill, K. (2009). Beyond more versus less: A reframing of the debate on instructional guidance. In S. Tobias & T.M. Duffy (Eds.), Constructivist instruction: Success or failure? (pp. 82–105). New York: Routledge.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.