Intersemiotic Complementarity in Namibian Physical Science Teachers’ Classroom Practice

References

• Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Airey, J., & Linder, C. (2009). A disciplinary discourse perspective on university science learning: Achieving fluency in a critical constellation of modes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antia, B. E., & Kamai, R. A. (2016). Writing biology, assessing biology: The nature and effects of variation in terminology. Terminology, 22(2), 201–222. https://doi.org/10.1075/term.22.2.03ant
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axelsson, M., Danielsson, K., Jakobson, B., & Uddling, J. (2017). Multilingual students’ meaning making in science. European Science Education Research Association, ESERA, Dublin 2017, 21–25 August, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Best, R. M., Dockrell, J. E., & Braisby, N. (2006). Lexical acquisition in elementary science classes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 824–838. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3(3), 149–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01320076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, M. P. (2006). Visual representations in science education: The influence of prior knowledge and cognitive load theory on instructional design principles. Science Education, 90(6), 1073–1091. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Fontecha, A., O’Halloran, K. L., Tan, S., & Wignell, P. (2019). A multimodal approach to visual thinking: The scientific sketchnote. Visual Communication, 18(1), 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357218759808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredlund, T., Airey, J., & Linder, C. (2012). Exploring the role of physics representations: An illustrative example from students sharing knowledge about refraction. European Journal of Physics, 33(3), 657–666. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/33/3/657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredlund, T., Linder, C., Airey, J., & Linder, A. (2014). Unpacking physics representations: Towards an appreciation of disciplinary affordance. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 10((020129|20129)), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Frydman, J. (2011). A critical analysis of Namibia’s English-only language policy. Selected proceedings of the 40th Annual Conference on African Linguistics, 178–189, 9–11 April, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic. Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (2007 [1975]). Language as social semiotic: Towards a general Sociolinguistic theory. In J. J. Webster (Ed.), Language and Society (pp. 169–201). Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Hasan, M. (2016). Conceptualization of depth of vocabulary knowledge with academic reading comprehension. PASAA: Journal of Language Teaching and Learning in Thailand, 51, 235–268.
   Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C., & Kress, G. R. (Eds.). (2003). Multimodal literacy. Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, M. I. (2018). Individuating part-whole relations in the biological world. In Otávio Bueno, Ruey-Lin Chen, and Melinda Bonnie Fagan (Ed.), Individuation, Process, and Scientific Practices, 63. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaswa, J. M. (2015). The effect of visual learning aids on student’s academic performance in public secondary schools, a case of Magu District secondary schools [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The Open University of Tanzania.
   Google Scholar
• Kostić, N. A. (2017). The distributional asymmetries of English antonyms in language use. Brno Studies in English, 43(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.5817/BSE2017-1-1.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Ogborn, J., & Tsatsarelis, C. (2001). Multimodal teaching and learning: The rhetorics of the science classroom. Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., Ogborn, J., & Martins, I. (1998). A satellite view of language: Some lessons from science classrooms. Language Awareness, 7(2-3), 69–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658419808667102
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, F. V., & Tan, K. Y. S. (2017). Multimodal translational research: Teaching visual texts. In O. Seizov, & J. Wildfeuer (Eds.), New studies in multimodality: Conceptual and methodological elaborations (pp. 175–200). Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Marchetti, L., & Cullen, P. (2016). A multimodal approach in the classroom for creative learning and teaching. Psychological and Creative Approaches to Language Teaching, 5(1), 39–51.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3201_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2003). The promise of multimedia learning: Using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning and Instruction, 13(2003), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00016-6
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., Bove, W., Bryman, A., Mars, R., & Tapangco, L. (1996). When less is more: Meaningful learning from visual and verbal summaries of science textbook lessons. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(1), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.88.1.64
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosofsky, R. M., Sanders, C. A., & McDaniel, M. A. (2018). Tests of an exemplar-memory model of classification learning in a high-dimensional natural-science category domain. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(3), 328–353. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Halloran, K. L. (2011). Multimodal discourse analysis. In D. Hyland, & B. Paltridge (Eds.), Continuum companion to discourse analysis (pp. 120–137). Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• O’Toole, M. (1995). A systemic-functional semiotics of art. Advances in Discourse Processes, 50, 159–182.
   Google Scholar
• Paziraie, M. E. (2013). The effect of textual metafunction on the Iranian EFL learners’ writing performance. English Language Teaching, 6(2), 71–83.
   Google Scholar
• Royce, T. (1999). Visual-verbal intersemiotic complementarity in the Economist magazine [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Reading.
   Google Scholar
• Royce, T. (2007). Intersemiotic complementarity: A framework for multimodal discourse analysis. In T. Royce, & W. Boucher (Eds.), New directions in the analysis of multimodal discourse (pp. 63–109). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ryu, J., & Boggs, G. (2016). Teachers’ perceptions about teaching multimodal composition: The case study of Korean English teachers at secondary schools. English Language Teaching, 9(6), 52–60. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n6p52
   Google Scholar
• Tang, K. S., Delgado, C., & Moje, E. B. (2014). An integrative framework for the analysis of multiple and multimodal representations for meaning-making in science education. Science Education, 98(2), 305–326. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tippett, C. D. (2016). What recent research on diagrams suggests about learning with rather than learning from visual representations in science. International Journal of Science Education, 38(5), 725–746. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1158435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verner, V. N. (2019). Challenges affecting grade 12 learners’ academic examination performance in Namibia Senior Secondary Certificate Ordinary level biology in the //Kharas region, Namibia [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Namibia.
   Google Scholar
• Volkwyn, T. S., Airey, J., Gregorcic, B., & Heijkenskjöld, F. (2019). Transduction and science learning: Multimodality in the physics laboratory. Designs for Learning, 11(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.118
   Google Scholar
• Waldrip, B., Prain, V., & Carolan, J. (2006). Learning junior secondary science through multi-modal representations. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 11(1), 87–107. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000285
   Google Scholar
• Xie, H., Mayer, R. E., Wang, F., & Zhou, Z. (2019). Coordinating visual and auditory cueing in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(2), 235–255. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y. (2016). Multimodal teacher input and science learning in a middle school sheltered classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(1), 7–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar