References
- Barrett, M.A., & Bainton, D. (2016). Re-interpreting relevant learning: An evaluative framework for secondary education in a global language. Comparative Education, 52(3), 392–407. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2016.1185271
- Braden, S., Wassell, B.A., Scantlebury, K., & Grover, A. (2016). Supporting language learners in science classrooms: Insights from middle-school English language learner students. Language and Education, 30(5), 438–458. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2015.1134566
- Brock-Utne, B. & Desai, Z. (2003). Expressing oneself through writing – A comparative study of learners’ writing skills in Tanzania and South Africa. In B. Brock-Utne, Z. Desai, & M. Qorro (Eds.), language of instruction in tanzania and south africa—highlights from a project (pp. 11–31). E & D Limited. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/9789460912221003
- Bybee, R.W. (2002). Scientific inquiry, student learning, and the science curriculum: Learning science and the science of learning. NSTA Press.
- Crawford, B.A. (2014). From inquiry to scientific practices in the science classroom. In N. Lederman & S. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education, Vol. II (pp. 515–541). Routledge.
- David, O., & Venuste, N. (2021). Practice in teaching and learning of invertebrates: Evaluating the effectiveness of pedagogical language strategies in Tanzania secondary schools. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(2), em1940. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9697
- Dong, Y.R. (2002). Integrating language and content: How three biology teachers work with non-English-speaking students. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 5(1), 40–57. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050208667745
- Halliday, M.A.K. (1993). Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education, 5(2), 93–116. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0898-5898(93)90026-7
- Knoch, U. (2011). Rating scales for diagnostic assessment of writing: What should they look like and where should the criteria come from? Assessing Writing, 16(1), 81–96. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2011.02.03
- Llinares, A., & Pastrana, A. (2013). CLIL students’ communicative functions across activities and educational levels. Journal of Pragmatics, 59, 81–92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.05.011
- Ma, C., Xiao, R., Wei, Y. & Yang, H. (2011). An inquiry-based learning approach on an Educational Technology course. Proceeding of 2011 IEEE International Symposium on IT in Medicine and Education (ITME) (pp. 422–424).
- Mkimbili, S.T. (2019). Meaningful science learning by the use of an additional language: A Tanzanian perspective. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 23(3), 265–275. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2019.1654212
- Mkimbili, S.T., & Ødegaard, M. (2020). Inquiry-based science teaching in community secondary schools in Tanzania: Role played by the language of instruction. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 15, 1121–1142. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-020-09973-9
- Mkimbili, S.T., Tiplic, D., & Ødegaard, M. (2017). The role played by contextual challenges in practising inquiry-based science teaching in Tanzania secondary schools. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(2), 211–221. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2017.1333752
- Moate, J. (2010). The integrated nature of CLIL: A sociocultural perspective. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(3), 38–45.
- Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (2019). Education and training policy. Dar es Salaam: Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology.
- MoEVT (2010). Biology syllabus for secondary schools Form I–IV. Dar es Salaam: Tanzania Institute of Education.
- Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Leijen, Ä., & Sarapuu, S. (2012). Improving students’ inquiry skills through reflection and self-regulation scaffolds. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning, 9, 81–95.
- Ricketts, A. (2014). Preservice elementary teachers’ ideas about scientific practices. Science & Education, 23(10), 2119–2135. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s1191-014- 9709-7
- Semali, L.M., & Mehta, K. (2012). Science education in Tanzania: Challenges and policy responses. International Journal of Educational Research, 53, 225–239. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2012.03.012
- Snow, C.E. (2010). Scientific language and the challenge of reading for learning about science. Science, 328 (5977), 450–452. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1182597
- Thaiposri, P., & Wannapiroon, P. (2015). Enhancing students’ critical thinking skills through teaching and learning by inquiry-based learning activities using social network and cloud computing. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 2137–2144. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.013
- Vidal, K. (2003). Scientific listening: A source of vocabulary acquisition? Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 56–89. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.1.56
- Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
- Waltz, C.F., & Bausell, R.B. (1983). Nursing research: Design, Statistics, and Computer Analysis, 2nd ed. FA Davis.
- Webb, T., & Mkongo, S. (2013). Classroom discourse. In F. Vavrus & L. Bartlett (Eds.), Teaching in tension: International pedagogies, national policies and teachers’ practices in Tanzania (pp. 149–168). Sense.
- Wellington, J., & Osborne, J. (2001). Language and literacy in science education. Open University Press.