References
- Alfano, A. (2017). Epistemic virtues and vices in science and religion [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/3pIi8d3kigI
- Brookfield, S.D. (2015). The skillful teacher: On technique, trust, and responsiveness in the classroom. John Wiley & Sons.
- Brown, R. (2017). Using collective argumentation to engage students in a primary mathematics classroom. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 29(2), 183–199.
- Choo, C.W. (2016). The inquiring organization: How organizations acquire knowledge and seek information. Oxford University Press.
- Chuene, K. (2019). University of Limpopo Engendering students’ epistemic agency in a collaborative mathematics for educators’ class at a university in South Africa. https://taufellowships.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Kabelo-Chuene-project-report.pdf
- Damşa, C.I., Kirschner, P.A., Andriessen, J.E., Erkens, G., & Sins, P.H. (2010). Shared epistemic agency: An empirical study of an emergent construct. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(2), 143–186.
- Davis, B. & Simmt, E., 2003. Understanding learning systems: Mathematics education and complexity science. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(2), 137–167.
- Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 268–291.
- Elgin, C.Z. (2013). Epistemic agency. School Field, 11(2), 135–152.
- Engel, P. (2013). Is epistemic agency possible? Philosophical Issues, 23(1), 158–178.
- Eriksson, P., & Kovalainen, A. (2015). Ethnographic research. Qualitative methods in business research (2nd ed., pp. 149–163). Sage.
- Fitzgerald, M.H. (2000). Establishing cultural competency for mental health professionals. Anthropological approaches to psychological medicine (pp. 184–200). Jessica Kingsley.
- Fricker, M. (2003). Epistemic justice and a role for virtue in the politics of knowing. Metaphilosophy, 34(1–2), 154–173.
- Geeslin, W.E. (1977). Using writing about mathematics as a teaching technique. The Mathematics Teacher, 70(2), 112–115.
- González-Howard, M., & McNeill, K.L. (2020). Acting with epistemic agency: Characterizing student critique during argumentation discussions. Science Education, 104(6), 953–982.
- Heyd-Metzuyanim, E., & Schwarz, B.B. (2017). Conceptual change within dyadic interactions: The dance of conceptual and material agency. Instructional Science, 45(5), 645–677.
- Ingram, J., & Elliott, V. (2016). A critical analysis of the role of wait time in classroom interactions and the effects on student and teacher interactional behaviours. Cambridge Journal of Education, 46(1), 37–53.
- Kim, J.H. (2015). Understanding narrative inquiry: The crafting and analysis of stories as research. Sage.
- Lindström, J., & Karlsson, S. (2016). Tensions in the epistemic domain and claims of no-knowledge: A study of Swedish medical interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 106, 129–147.
- McGowen, M.A., & Tall, D.O. (2010). Metaphor or met-before? The effects of previous experience on practice and theory of learning mathematics. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 29(3), 169–179.
- Montmarquet, J.A. (1987). Epistemic virtue. Mind, 96(384), 482–497.
- Morgan, C. (2016). Studying the role of human agency in school mathematics. Research in Mathematics Education, 18(2), 120–141.
- Morris, M.W., Leung, K., Ames, D., & Lickel, B. (1999). Views from inside and outside: Integrating emic and etic insights about culture and justice judgment. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 781–796.
- Mueller, M., Yankelewitz, D., & Maher, C. (2012). A framework for analyzing the collaborative construction of arguments and its interplay with agency. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(3), 369–387.
- Muukkonen, H., Lakkala, M., & Hakkarainen, K. (2009). Technology-enhanced progressive inquiry in higher education. In M. Khosrow-Pour (Ed.), Encyclopedia of information science and technology I–V (2nd ed., pp. 3714–3720). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
- Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency and science. University of Chicago Press.
- Polkinghorne, D.E. (1995). Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 8(1), 5–23.
- Riggs, W.D. (2003). Balancing our epistemic goals. Noûs, 37(2), 342–352.
- Riling, M. (2018, January). Cognitive agency and computer-based tasks. In Proceedings of the 40th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. (Greenville, South Carolina, November 15–18).
- Rittberg, C.J., Tanswell, F.S., & Van Bendegem, J.P. (2020). Epistemic injustice in mathematics. Synthese, 197(9), 3875–3904.
- Rowe, M. B. (1972). Wait-Time and Rewards as Instructional Variables: Their Influence on Language, Logic, and Fate Control.
- Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1991). Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge building: A challenge for the design of new knowledge media. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1(1), 37–68.
- Sengupta-Irving, T. (2016). Doing things: Organizing for agency in mathematical learning. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 41, 210–218.
- Son, J.Y., Blake, A.B., Fries, L., & Stigler, J.W. (2021). Modeling first: Applying learning science to the teaching of introductory statistics. Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education, 29(1), 4–21.
- Stahl, R.J. (1994). Using’ think-time’ and’ wait-time’ skillfully in the classroom. ERIC Clearinghouse.
- Van Lier, L. (2008). Agency in the classroom. Sociocultural Theory and the Teaching of Second Languages, 163, 186.
- Van Lier, L., & Matsuo, N. (2000). Varieties of conversational experience: Looking for learning opportunities. Applied Language Learning, 11(2), 265–288.
- Wagner, D. (2007). Students’ critical awareness of voice and agency in mathematics classroom discourse. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 9(1), 31–50.
- Waring, H.Z. (2009). Moving out of IRF (Initiation–Response–Feedback): A single case analysis. Language Learning, 59(4), 796–824.
- Wright, P. (2021). Transforming mathematics classroom practice through participatory action research. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 24(2), 155–177.