Negotiating the Demands of Teaching Mathematical Literacy

REFERENCES

• AMESA (Association of Mathematics Educators of South Africa). 2003. AMESA Submission to the Department of Education on the National Curriculum Statement Grades 10–12 (Schools) and in Particular on the Mathematics and Mathematical Literacy Subject Statements. Diepriver: AMESA.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., and H. Bass. 2000. “Interweaving Content and Pedagogy in Teaching and Learning to Teach: Knowing and Using Mathematics.” In Multiple Perspectives on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics, edited by J. Boaler. Westport: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Bansilal, S. 2013. “Understanding the Contextual Resources Necessary for Engaging in Mathematical Literacy Assessment Tasks.” Journal of Education 58: 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Bansilal, S., D. Brijlall, and T. W. Mkhwanazi. 2014. “An Exploration of the Common Content Knowledge of High School Mathematics Teachers.” Perspectives in Education 32 (1): 34–50.
   Google Scholar
• Bansilal, S., T. W. Mkhwanazi, and P. Mahlabela. 2012. “Mathematical Literacy Teachers’ Engagement with Contextual Tasks Based on Personal Finance.” Perspectives in Education 31 (3): 98–109.
   Google Scholar
• Brijlall, D. 2014. “Exploring the Pedagogical Content Knowledge for Teaching Probability in Middle School: A South African Case Study.” International Journal of Educational Science 7 (3): 719–726. https://doi.org/10.1080/09751122.2014.11890234
   Google Scholar
• Brombacher, A. 2010. National Senior Certificate Mathematics and Mathematical Literacy: A Balance between Dreams and Realities. Report presented at the National Science and Technology Forum (NSTF), Proceedings of Workshop on Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Education, KwaZulu-Natal, April 10.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, B., and M. Schafer. 2006. “Teacher Education for Mathematical Literacy: A Modelling Approach.” Pythagoras 64 (1): 45–51. https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v0i64.98
   Google Scholar
• DBE (Department of Basic Education). 2011. Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement (CAPS). Mathematics Grades 10–12. Pretoria: DoBE.
   Google Scholar
• DoE (Department of Education). 2003. National Curriculum Statement, Grades 10–12 (General): Mathematical Literacy. Pretoria: DoE.
   Google Scholar
• Graven, M., and H. Venkat. 2007. “Emerging Pedagogic Agendas in the Teaching of Mathematical Literacy.” African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 11 (2): 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2007.10740622
   Google Scholar
• Kagan, D. M. 1992. “Professional Growth among Pre-Service and Beginning Teachers.” Review of Educational Research 62 (2): 129–169. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062002129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriek, J., and D. Grayson. 2009. “A Holistic Professional Development Model for South African Physical Science Teachers.” South African Journal of Education 29: 185–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzsimmons, G. E. 2008. “A Comparison of Mathematics, Numeracy, and Functional Mathematics: What Do They Mean for Adult Numeracy Practitioners?” Adult Learning 19 (3–4): 8–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/104515950801900302
   Google Scholar
• North, M. P. 2015. “The Basis of Legitimisation of Mathematical Literacy in South Africa.” Doctoral thesis, University of KwaZulu-Natal. https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v36i1.285
   Google Scholar
• North, M. P., and I. M. Christiansen. 2015. “Problematising Current Forms of Legitimised Participation in the Examination Papers for Mathematical Literacy.” Pythagoras 36 (1): #285. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v36i1.285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2010. Draft 2012 Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) Mathematics Framework. Copenhagen: PISA. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839950080103
   Google Scholar
• Polkinghorne, D. E. 1995. “Narrative Configuration in Qualitative Analysis.” In Life History as Narrative, edited by J. A. Hatch and R. Wisniewski, 5–23. London: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Sfard, A. 2007. “When the Rules of Discourse Change but Nobody Tells You: Making Sense of Mathematics Learning from a Commognitive Standpoint.” Journal for Learning Sciences 16 (4): 567–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400701525253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sfard, A. 2008. Thinking as Communication: Human Development, the Growth of Discourses and Mathematizing. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511499944
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. 1986. “Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching.” Educational Researcher 15 (2): 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
   Google Scholar
• Simon, M. A. 1995. “Reconstructing Mathematics Pedagogy from a Constructivist Perspective.” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 26 (2): 114–145. https://doi.org/10.2307/749205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatakrishnan, H. 2010. “Exploring the Nature and Coherence of Mathematical Work in South African Mathematical Literacy Classrooms.” Research in Mathematics Education 12 (1): 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794800903569865
   Google Scholar
• Wu, H. 2006. “Professional Development: The Hard Work of Learning Mathematics.” Presentation at the Fall Southeastern Section Meeting of the American Mathematical Society, Tennessee, October 16.
   Google Scholar
• Yeo, K. K. J. 2008. “Teaching Area and Perimeter: Mathematics-Pedagogical-Content-Knowledge-in- Action.” In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (MERGA), edited by M. Goos, R. Brown and K. Makar, 621–627. Adelaide: MERGA.
   Google Scholar