Effect of dietary cowpea (Vigna unguiculata [L] walp) and chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) seeds on growth performance, blood parameters and breast meat fatty acids in broiler chickens

References

• Abdelgani AA, Abdelatti KA, Elamin KM, Dafalla KY, Malik HEE, Dousa MB. 2013. Effects of dietary cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) seeds on the performance of broiler chicks. Wayamba J Anim Sci. 13(5):678–684.
   Google Scholar
• Abeysekara S, Chilibeck PD, Vatanparast H, Zello GA. 2012. A pulse-based diet is effective for reducing total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol in older adults. Br J Nutr. 108(S1):S103–S110.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Akanji AM, Fasina OE, Ogungbesan AM. 2016. Effect of raw and processed cowpea on growth and haematological profile of broiler chicken. Bang J Anim Sci. 45(1):62–68.
   Google Scholar
• AOCS. 2006. Urease activity (Method Ba 9–58). Official method and recommended practice. 5th ed. Urbana, IL, USA: AOCS.
   Google Scholar
• Anjos DF, Vazquez-Anon M, Dierenfeld ES, Parsons CM, Chimonyo M. 2016. Chemical composition, amino acid digestibility, and true metabolizable energy of cowpeas as affected by roasting and extrusion processing treatments using the cecectomized rooster assay. J Appl Poult Res. 25(1):85–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antova GA, Stoilova TD, Ivanova MM. 2014. Proximate and lipid composition of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) cultivated in Bulgaria. J Food Compos. Anal. 33(2):146–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashraduzzaman M,AS, Khatun MA, Banu S, Absar N. 2011. Vigna unguiculata walp seed oil exhibiting antidiabetic effects in alloxan induced diabetic rats. Mal. J Pharm Sci. 9:13–23.
   Google Scholar
• Aziza AE, Quezada N, Cherian G. 2010. Feeding Camelina sativa meal to meat-type chickens: Effect on production performance and tissue fatty acid composition. J Appl Poult Res. 19(2):157–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bampidis VA, Christodoulou V. 2011. Chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) in animal nutrition: a review. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 168(1–2):1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baptista A, Pinho O, Pinto E, Casal S, Mota C, Ferreira I. 2017. Characterization of protein and fat composition of seeds from common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) and bambara groundnuts (Vigna subterranea L. Verdc) from Mozambique. Food Measure. 11(2):442–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenes A, Viveros A, Centeno C, Arija I, Marzo F. 2008. Nutritional value of raw and extruded chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) for growing chickens. Span J Agric Res. 6(4):537–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christodoulou V, Bampidis VA, Hucko B, Iliadis C, Mudrik Z. 2006. Nutritional value of chickpeas in rations of broiler chickens. Arch Geflügelk. 70(3):112–118.
   Google Scholar
• Ciurescu G, Ropotă M, Toncea I, Hăbeanu M. 2016. Camelia (Camelina sativa L. Crantz variety) oil and seeds as n-3 fatty acids rich products in broiler diets and its effects on performance, meat fatty acid composition, immune tissue weights, and plasma metabolic profile. J Agr Sci Tech Iran. 18(2):315–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciurescu G, Toncea I, Ropotă M, Hăbeanu M. 2018. Seeds composition and their nutrients quality of some pea (Pisum sativum L.) and lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) cultivars. Romanian Agri Res. 35:101–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciurescu G, Vasilachi A, Grosu H. 2020. Efficacy of microbial phytase on growth performance, carcass traits, bone mineralization and blood biochemistry parameters in broiler turkeys fed raw chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L., cv. Burnas) diets. J Appl Poult Res. 29(1):171–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciurescu G, Vasilachi A, Ropotă M, Palade M, Dragomir C. 2017. Beneficial effects of increasing dietary levels of raw lentil seeds on meat fatty acid and plasma metabolic profile in broiler chickens. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 87(11):1385–1390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb-Vantress. 2018. Cobb 500 broiler performance & nutrition supplement. [accessed 2018 Dec]. http://www.cobbvantress.com.
   Google Scholar
• Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 of 28 June 2007 on organic production and labelling of organic products and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91.
   Google Scholar
• Drăghici R, Drăghici I, Croitoru M. 2016a. The study of some cultivars of cowpea under climate change in southern Oltenia. Sci Papers Ser A Agron. LIX:283–288.
   Google Scholar
• Drăghici R, Drăghici I, Diaconu A, Dima M. 2016b. Variability of genetic resources of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) studied in the sandy soil conditions from Romania. Ann Univ Craiova-Agri., Montanology, Cadastre Ser. XLVI:147–153.
   Google Scholar
• Embaye TN, Ameha N, Yusuf Y. 2018. Effect of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) grain on growth performance of Cobb 500 broiler chickens. Int J Livest Prod. 9(12):326–333.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. 2019. Accessed Feb. 2019 http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL.
   Google Scholar
• Garsen A, Dotas V, Anastasiadou M, Nikolakakis I, Mitsopoulos I, Dotas D. 2008. Performance and carcass characteristics of broilers as affected by the replacement of soybean meal with chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Proceedings of 1st Mediterranean Summit WPSA, Porto Carras, Chalkidiki, Greece; p. 908–912.
   Google Scholar
• Gonçalves A, Goufo P, Barros A, Domínguez-Perles R, Trindade H, Rosa EAS, Ferreira L, Rodrigues M. 2016. Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp), a renewed multipurpose crop for a more sustainable agri-food system: nutritional advantages and constraints. J Sci Food Agric. 96(9):2941–2951.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gumaa-Balaiel GN. 2014. Effect of dietary levels of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) seeds on broiler performance and some serum biochemical factors. Online J Anim Feed Res. 4:1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Hafez HM, Attia YA. 2020. Challenges to the poultry industry: current perspectives and strategic future after the COVID-19 outbreak. Front Vet Sci. 7:516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heiras-Palazuelos MJ, Ochoa-Lugo M, Gutierrez-Dorado R, Lopez-Valenzuela JA, Mora RS, Milan-Carrillo J, Garzon-Tiznado JA, Reyes-Morenoc C. 2013. Technological properties, antioxidant activity and total phenolic and flavonoid content of pigmented chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 64(1):69–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISAAA. 2017. Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops in 2017: Biotech Crop Adoption Surges as Economic Benefits Accumulate in 22 Years. ISAAA Brief No. 53. ISAAA: Ithaca, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Jaśkiewicz T, Sagan A, Puzio I. 2014. Effect of the Camelina sativa oil on the performance, essential fatty acid level in tissues and fat-soluble vitamins content in the livers of broiler chickens. Livest Sci. 165:74–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayathilake C, Visvanathan R, Deen A, Bangamuwage R, Jayawardana BC, Nammi S, Liyanage R. 2018. Cowpea: an overview on its nutritional facts and health benefits. J Sci Food Agric. 98(13):4793–4806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jukanti AK, Gaur PM, Gowda CLL, Chibbar RN. 2012. Nutritional quality and health benefits of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): a review. Br J Nutr. 108(S1):S11–S26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korakas E, Dimitriadis G, Raptis A, Lambadiari V. 2018. Dietary composition and cardiovascular risk: a mediator or a bystander? Nutrients. 10(12):1912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laudadio V, Ceci E, Tufarelli V. 2011. Productive traits and meat fatty acid profile of broiler chickens fed diets containing micronized fava beans (Vicia faba L: var. minor) as the main protein source. J Appl Poult Res. 20(1):12–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muzquiz M, Varela A, Burbano C, Cuadrado C, Guillamón E, Pedrosa MM. 2012. Bioactive compounds in legumes: pronutritive and antinutritive actions: implications for nutrition and health. Phytochem Rev. 11(2–3):227–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OJEU. 2009. Commission Regulation (EC) No. 152/2009 laying down the methods of sampling and analysis for the official control of feed. Official Journal of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Paszkiewicz W, Muszyński S, Kwiecień M, Zhyla M, Świątkiewicz S, Arczewska-Włosek A, Tomaszewska E. 2020. Effect of soybean meal substitution by raw chickpea seeds on thermal properties and fatty acid composition of subcutaneous fat tissue of broiler chickens. Animals. 10(3):533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shetty AA, Magadum S, Managanvi K. 2013. Vegetables as sources of antioxidants. J Food Nutr Disor. 2:1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sirri F, Castellini C, Roncarati A, Franchini A, Meluzzi A. 2010. Effect of feeding and genotype on the lipid profile of organic chicken meat. Eur J Lipid Sci Technol. 112(9):994–1002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres AM, Avila C, Gutierrez N, Palomino C, Moreno MT, Cubero J. 2010. Marker-assisted selection in faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Field Crops Res. 115(3):243–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trinidad TP, Mallillin AC, Loyola AS, Sagum RS, Encabo RR. 2010. The potential health benefits of legumes as a good source of dietary fibre. Br J Nutr. 103(4):569–574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tshovhote NJ, Nesamvuni AE, Raphulu T, Gous RM. 2003. The chemical composition, energy and amino acid digestibility of cowpeas used in poultry nutrition. South Afr J Anim Sci. 33:65–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valdebouze P, Bergeron E, Gaborit T, Delort-Laval J. 1980. Content and distribution of trypsin inhibitors and haemaglutinins in some legume seeds. Can J Plant Sci. 60(2):695–701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viveros A, Centeno C, Arija I, Brenes A. 2007. Cholesterol-lowering effects of dietary lupin (Lupinus albus var Multolupa) in chicken diets. Poult Sci. 86(12):2631–2638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WPSA. 1989. European tables of energy values for poultry feedstuffs. 3rd ed. Subcommittee Energy of the Working Group n°2, Nutrition, Wageningen, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Zia-Ul-Haq M, Ahmad S, Chiavaro E, Mehjabeen Ahmed S. 2010. Studies of oil from cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp) cultivars commonly grown in Pakistan. Pak J Bot. 42(2):1333–1341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar