Greenhouse Gas Emissions Generated by Tofu Production: A Case Study

References

• Eshel G, Martin PA. Geophysics and nutritional science: toward a novel, unified paradigm. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;89:1710S–1716S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garnett T. Where are the best opportunities for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the food system (including the food chain)? Food Policy. 2011;36(Suppl 1):S23–S32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, M.L. Parry, O.F. Canziani, J.P. Palutikof, P.J. van der Linden and C.E. Hanson, Eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 976 pp. Cambridge, UK: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Vermeulen J, John S, Ingram I. Climate change and food systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 2012;37:195–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Tirpak D, Burger N, et al. Policies, instruments and co-operative arrangements. In: Metz B, Davidson OR, Bosch PR, Dave R, Meyer LA, eds. Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Popp A, Lotze-Campen H, Bodirsky B. Food consumption, diet shifts and associated non-CO2 greenhouse gases from agricultural production. Glob Environ Change. 2010;20:451–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stehfest EBL, van Vuuren DP, den Elzen MGJ, Eickhout B, Kabat P. Climate benefits of changing diet. Clim Change. 2009;95:83–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajzelj B, Richards KS, Allwood JM, et al. Importance of food-demand management for climate mitigation. Nat Clim Chang. 2014;4:924–929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanco G, Eby M, Edmonds J, et al. Climate Change 2014 Synthesis Report. New York, NY: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Fifth Assessment. Approved Summary for Policymakers, 1 November 2014. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Foley JA, Ramankutty N, Brauman KA, et al. Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature. 2011;478:337–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciati R, Ruini L. Double pyramid: healthy food for people, sustainable food for the planet. In: Burlingame B, Dernini S, eds. Sustainable Diets and Biodiversity: Directions and Solutions for Policy, Research and Action. Vol 2013. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization; 2012:280–294.
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Medicine. Sustainable Diets: Food for Healthy People and a Healthy Planet: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• de Boer J, Schösler H, Aiking H. “Meatless days” or “less but better”? Exploring strategies to adapt Western meat consumption to health and sustainability challenges. Appetite. 2014;76:120–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller MC, Keoleian GA, Willett WC. Toward a life cycle-based, diet-level framework for food environmental impact and nutritional quality assessment: a critical review. Environ Sci Technol. 2013;47:12632–12647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garnett T. Food sustainability: problems, perspectives and solutions. Proc Nutr Soc. 2013;72:29–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blonk H, Kool A, Luske B, de Waart S. Environmental effects of protein-rich food products in The Netherlands: consequences of animal protein substitutes. 2008. Available at: http://www.blonkconsultants.nl/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/english-summary-protein-rich-products.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hamerschlag K. Meat Eaters Guide to Climate Change and Health. Washington, DC: Environmental Working Group; 2011. Available at: http://www.ewg.org/meateatersguide. Accessed July 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Berk Z. Technology of Production of Edible Flours and Protein Products From Soybeans. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 1992. FAO Agricultural Services Bulletin No. 97.
   Google Scholar
• SimaPro. SimaPro. 8th ed. Amersfoort, The Netherlands: Pre Product Ecology Consultants; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf M-A, Pant R, Chomkhamsri K, Sala S, Pennington D. The International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILDC) Handbook. Ispra, Italy: European Commission Joint Research Centre - Institute for Environment and Sustainability; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Schau E, Fet A. LCA studies of food products as background for environmental product declarations. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2008;13:255–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pant R, Bersani R, Pennington DW, Brandão M. The International Reference Life Cycle Data System Handbook: Analysis of Existing Environmental Impact Assessment Methodologies for Use in Life Cycle Assessment. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability. 1st ed. Ispra, Italy: European Commission Joint Research Centre; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Sandars DL, Audsley E, Canete C, Cumby TR, Scotford IM, Williams AG. Environmental benefits of livestock manure management practices and technology by life cycle assessment. Biosyst Eng. 2003;84:267–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller MC, Keoleian GA. Life cycle energy and greenhouse gas analysis of a large-scale vertically integrated organic dairy in the United States. Environ Sci Technol. 2011;45:1903–1910.
   Google Scholar
• Venkat K. Comparison of twelve organic and conventional farming systems: a life cycle greenhouse gas emissions perspective. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture. 2012;36:620–649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brander M, Tipper R, Hutchison C, Davis G. Technical Paper: Consequential and Attributional Approaches to LCA: A Guide to Policy Makers With Specific Reference to Greenhouse Gas LCA of Biofuels. Edinburgh, UK; 2008. Available at: http://ecometrica.com/white-papers/consequential-and-attributional-approaches-to-lca-a-guide-to-policy-makers-with-specific-reference-to-greenhouse-gas-lca-of-biofuels. Accessed January 20, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Frischknecht R, Jungbluth N, Athaus HJ, et al. Overview and Methodology. Dubendorf, Switzerland: Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories; 2007. Ecoinvent Report No. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Ciroth A, Muller S, Weidema B, Lesage P. Empirically based uncertainty factors for the pedigree matrix in ecoinvent. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2013;21(9):1338–1348.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Agriculture. National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference Release 27. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service; 2015. Available at: https://ndb.nal.usda.gov/ndb/foods.
   Google Scholar
• Li S, Zhu D, Li K, Yang Y, Lei Z, Zhang Z. Soybean curd residue: composition, utilization, and related limiting factors. ISRN Industrial Engineering. 2013;2013:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Kim S, Dale BE. Cumulative energy and global warming impact from the production of biomass for biobased products. J Ind Ecol. 2003;7(3–4):147–162.
   Google Scholar
• Ogle SM, DelGrosso SJ, Alder PR, Parton WJ. Soil nitrous oxide emissions with crop production for biofuel: implications for greenhouse gas mitigation. Paper presented at: Biofuels, Food and Feed Tradeoffs; January 29, 2008; Miami Beach, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Dalgaard R, Schmidt J, Halberg N, Christensen P, Thrane M, Pengue W. LCA of soybean meal. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2008;13:240–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam R, Reeder R. No-till and conservation agriculture in the United States: an example from the David Brandt farm, Carroll, Ohio. International Soil and Water Conservation Research. 2014;2:97–107.
   Google Scholar
• Baker JM, Griffis TJ. Examining strategies to improve the carbon balance of corn/soybean agriculture using eddy covariance and mass balance techniques. Agric For Meteorol. 2005;128:163–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drummond MA, Auch R. Land-Cover Change in the United States Great Plains. Available at: http://landcovertrends.usgs.gov/gp/regionalSummary.html. Accessed January 20, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Nijdam D, Rood T, Westhoek H. The price of protein: review of land use and carbon footprints from life cycle assessments of animal food products and their substitutes. Food Policy. 2012;37:760–770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi Z, Hu X, Yuan B, et al. Strong negative association between intake of tofu and anemia among Chinese adults in Jiangsu, China. J Am Diet Assoc. 2008;108:1146–1153.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar