An Experimental Evaluation of Guided Reading and Explicit Interventions for Primary-Grade Students At-Risk for Reading Difficulties

REFERENCES

• Al Otaiba, S., & Torgesen, J. (2007). Effects from intensive standardized kindergarten and first-grade interventions for the prevention of reading difficulties. In S.R. Jimerson, M.K. Burns, & A.M. VanDerHeyden (Eds.), Handbook of response to intervention (pp. 212–222). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Beavers, J. (2006). Developmental reading assessment K-3 (2nd ed.). Parsippany, NJ: Celebration Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cavanaugh, C.L., Kim, A.-H., Wanzek, J., & Vaughn, S. (2004). Kindergarten reading interventions for at-risk students: Twenty years of research. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 2, 9–21.
   Google Scholar
• Center for Academic and Reading Skills & Texas Institute for Measurement, Evaluation, and Statistics. (n.d.). Technical report: TPRI progress monitoring for beginning readers: 2006–2008 edition. Houston: University of Texas-Houston Health Science Center and University of Houston. Retrieved from Texas Primary Reading Inventory website: https://www.tpri.org/resources/documents/TPRI-PMBR%2006-08%20TECHNICAL%20REPORT.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chard, D.J., Vaughn, S., & Tyler, B. (2002). A synthesis of research on effective interventions for building reading fluency with elementary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 386–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cirino, P. T., Romain, M. A., Barth, A. E., Tolar, T. D., Fletcher, J. M., & Vaughn, S. (2013). Reading skill components and impairments in middle school struggling readers. Reading & Writing, 26, 1059–1086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clay, M.M. (2002). An observation survey of early literacy achievement . (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Cowley, J. (1998). Mrs. Wishy-Washy’ s tub. Bothell, WA: Wright Group.
   Google Scholar
• Denton, C.A., & Hocker, J.L. (2006). Responsive reading instruction: Flexible intervention for struggling readers in the early grades. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
   Google Scholar
• Dorn, L.J., & Soffos, C. (2009). Interventions that work: Guided reading plus group DVD. Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Dymock, S.J. (1998). A comparison study of the effects of text structure training, reading practice, and guided reading on reading comprehension. National Reading Conference Yearbook, 47, 90–102.
   Google Scholar
• Ehri, L.C., Nunes, S.R., Stahl, S.A., & Willows, D.M. (2001). Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel's meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71, 393–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbaum, B., Vaughn, S., Hughes, M.T., & Moody, S.W. (2000). How effective are one-to-one tutoring programs in reading for elementary students at risk for reading failure? A metaanalysis of the intervention research. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 605–619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, J.M., Stuebing, K.K., Barth, A.E., Miciak, J., Francis, D.J. & Denton, C.A. (2014). Agreement and coverage of indicators of response to intervention: A multi-method comparison and simulation. Topics in Language and Learning Disorders, 34, 74–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, M.P., & Opitz, M.F. (2008). A national survey of guided reading practices: What we can learn from primary teachers. Literacy Research and Instruction, 47, 309–331.
   Google Scholar
• Fountas, I.C., & Pinnell, G.S. (1996). Guided reading: Good first teaching for all children. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Fountas, I.C., & Pinnell, G.S. (1999). Matching books to readers: Using leveled books in guided reading K–3. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Fountas, I.C., & Pinnell, G.S. (2005). Guided reading: Essential elements and the skillful teacher. [DVD]. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Fountas, I.C., & Pinnell, G.S. (2012–13). Guided reading: The romance and the reality. Reading Teacher, 66, 268–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M.K., & Jenkins, J.R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 239–256.
   Google Scholar
• Gersten, R., Compton, D., Connor, C.M., Dimino, J., Santoro, L., Linan-Thompson, S., & Tilly, W.D. (2008). Assisting students struggling with reading: Response to intervention and multitier intervention for reading in the primary grades. A practice guide (NCEE 2009–4045). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/publications/practiceguides/
   Google Scholar
• Hall, K.M., Sabey, B.L. & McClellan, M. (2005). Expository text comprehension: Helping primary-grade teachers use expository texts to full advantage. Reading Psychology, 26, 211–234.
   Google Scholar
• Hasbrouck, J., & Tindall, G.A. (2006). Oral reading fluency norms: A valuable assessment tool for reading teachers. Reading Teacher, 59, 636–644. doi:10.1598/RT.59.7.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiebert, E.H. (2003). Quick reads. Parsippany, NJ: Modern Curriculum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Education Sciences. (2013). What Works Clearinghouse procedures and standards handbook (Version 3.0). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/documentsum.aspx?sid=19
   Google Scholar
• Kamps, D., Abbott, M., Greenwood, C., Arreaga-Mayer, C., Wills, H., Longstaff, J., … Walton, C. (2007). Use of evidence-based small-group reading instruction for English language learners in elementary grades: Secondary-tier intervention. Learning Disability Quarterly, 30, 153–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M.W., Puzio, K., Yun, C., Hebert, M.A., Steinka-Fry, K., Cole, M.W., … Busick, M.D. (2012). Translating the statistical representation of the effects of education interventions into more readily interpretable forms. (NCSER 2013-3000). Washington, DC: National Center for Special Education Research, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncser/pubs/20133000/
   Google Scholar
• MacGinitie, W., MacGinitie, R., Maria, K., Dreyer, L., & Hughes, K. (2000). Gates-MacGinitie Reading Tests–4. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
   Google Scholar
• Mathes, P.G., Denton, CA..A., Fletcher, J.M., Anthony, J.L., Francis, D.J., & Schatschneider, C. (2005). The effects of theoretically different instruction and student characteristics on the skills of struggling readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 148–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, S.E., & Delaney, H.E. (2003). Designing experiments and analyzing data: A model comparison perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• McGrew, K.S., & Woodcock, R.W. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III Technical Manual. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
   Google Scholar
• National Reading Panel (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Nayak, G., & Sylva, K. (2013). The effects of a guided reading intervention on reading comprehension: A study on young Chinese learners of English in Hong Kong. The Language Learning Journal, 41, 85–103.
   Google Scholar
• Savage, R.S., Abrami, P., Hipps, G., & Deault, L. (2009). A randomized controlled trial study of the ABRACADABRA Reading Intervention Program in Grade 1. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 590–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanahan, T., Callison, K., Carriere, C., Duke, N.K., Pearson, P.D., Schatschneider, C., & Torgesen, J. (2010). Improving reading comprehension in kindergarten through 3rd grade: A practice guide. (NCEE 2010–4038). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://whatworks.ed.gov/publications/practiceguides
   Google Scholar
• Stuebing, K.K., Barth, A.E., Cirino, P.T., Francis, D.J., & Fletcher, J.M. (2008). A response to recent reanalyses of the National Reading Panel Report: Effects of systematic phonics instruction are practically significant. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 123–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobin, K.G., & Calhoon, M.B. (2009). A comparison of two reading programs on the reading outcomes of first-grade students. Journal of Direct Instruction, 9, 35–46.
   Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J. K. (2000). Individual differences in response to early interventions in reading: The lingering problem of treatment resisters. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 55–64.
   Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J.K. (2004). Lessons learned from research on interventions for students who have difficulty learning to read. In P. McCardle & V. Chhabra (Eds.), The voice of evidence in reading research (pp. 355–382). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J. (2005). Recent discoveries on remedial interventions for children with dyslexia. In M.J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 521–549). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J., Wagner, R., & Rashotte, C. (1999). Test of Word Reading Efficiency. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Vadasy, P., & Sanders, E. (2007). Sound partners plus. Seattle: Washington Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Vadasy, P.F., Sanders, E.A., & Peyton, J.A. (2006). Paraeducator-supplemented instruction in structural analysis with text reading practice for second and third graders at risk for reading problems. Remedial and Special Education, 27, 365–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vadasy, P.F., Sanders, E.A., & Tudor, S. (2007). Effectiveness of paraeducator-supplemented individual instruction: Beyond basic decoding skills. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 508–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vadasy, P., Wayne, S., O’Connor, R., Jenkins, J., Pool, K., Firebaugh, M., & Peyton, J. (2005). Sound partners. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, R.K., Torgesen, J., Rashotte, C.A., & Pearson, N. (2010). The Test of Silent Reading Efficiency and Comprehension. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Wanzek, J., & Vaughn, S. (2007). Research-based implications from extensive early reading interventions. School Psychology Review, 36, 541–561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodcock, R.W., McGrew, K.S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock–Johnson III Tests of Achievement. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
   Google Scholar